speed/duplex negotiation between pix & 2610 router

2001-01-23 Thread Frank Kim

Hi guys,
Has anyone experienced speed or duplex negotiation between a pix 506
ethernet interface and a cisco 2610's ethernet interface using a
cross-over cable between the two?  Should I uplink those two into a switch
and let the switch worry about the negotiation?  I'm currently
experiencing 'interface up, line down' on the pix's ethernet0(i think it's
intel NIC); this happens almost every 24 hours.  Perhaps bad cross-over
cable?  Any input will be appreciated.


-Frank


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: speed/duplex negotiation between pix & 2610 router

2001-01-23 Thread McCallum, Robert

As a rule of thumb Frank, turn off all and everything that is auto sensing
or auto anything.  The best way to do anything is to manually get it right.
There is a document on the cisco website, at the moment I do not have access
to it, which describes the reasons for the errors and auto sensing
nightmares.

You will fins when you manually set the cards then most if not all of your
errors will disappear.

Enjoy!

-Original Message-
From: Frank Kim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 January 2001 16:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: speed/duplex negotiation between pix & 2610 router


Hi guys,
Has anyone experienced speed or duplex negotiation between a pix 506
ethernet interface and a cisco 2610's ethernet interface using a
cross-over cable between the two?  Should I uplink those two into a switch
and let the switch worry about the negotiation?  I'm currently
experiencing 'interface up, line down' on the pix's ethernet0(i think it's
intel NIC); this happens almost every 24 hours.  Perhaps bad cross-over
cable?  Any input will be appreciated.


-Frank


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: speed/duplex negotiation between pix & 2610 router

2001-01-23 Thread John Neiberger

IIRC, the 2610 can only do 10MB, half duplex, and the PIX is a fastethernet
interface.  If you have the PIX set for autonegotiate, slap yourself on the
wrist (and refer to last week's thread on autonoegotiation) and then
hard-set the speed and duplex to 10/half.  You could always do a show
interface on the PIX to see what settings it thought it should use.

Once you have those set reliably, if you still experience problems I would
replace the crossover cable.  There is no need to waste a switch or hub in
the this situation unless you feel like trying it for troubleshooting
purposes.

HTH,
John

>  Hi guys,
>  Has anyone experienced speed or duplex negotiation between a pix 506
>  ethernet interface and a cisco 2610's ethernet interface using a
>  cross-over cable between the two?  Should I uplink those two into a
switch
>  and let the switch worry about the negotiation?  I'm currently
>  experiencing 'interface up, line down' on the pix's ethernet0(i think
it's
>  intel NIC); this happens almost every 24 hours.  Perhaps bad cross-over
>  cable?  Any input will be appreciated.
>  
>  
>  -Frank
>  
>  
>  _
>  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]





___
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: speed/duplex negotiation between pix & 2610 router

2001-01-23 Thread John Neiberger

Hmm... okay, if that pix is only 10baseT, then I don't see how there could
be a speed or duplex mismatch.  Both sides can only do 10MB/half.  I would
replace the cable at this point.  I had a similar situation once, except the
line bounces were more frequent, and it turned out to be a bad crossover
cable.

Good luck!

>  Hi John,
>  Actually the pix 506 is a 10mbps interface(10baset).  Thanks for the
>  advice.  I'll give it a shot.
>  
>  -Frank
>  
>  On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, John Neiberger wrote:
>  
>  > IIRC, the 2610 can only do 10MB, half duplex, and the PIX is a
fastethernet
>  > interface.  If you have the PIX set for autonegotiate, slap yourself on
the
>  > wrist (and refer to last week's thread on autonoegotiation) and then
>  > hard-set the speed and duplex to 10/half.  You could always do a show
>  > interface on the PIX to see what settings it thought it should use.
>  > 
>  > Once you have those set reliably, if you still experience problems I
would
>  > replace the crossover cable.  There is no need to waste a switch or hub
in
>  > the this situation unless you feel like trying it for troubleshooting
>  > purposes.
>  > 
>  > HTH,
>  > John
>  > 
>  > >  Hi guys,
>  > >  Has anyone experienced speed or duplex negotiation between a pix 506
>  > >  ethernet interface and a cisco 2610's ethernet interface using a
>  > >  cross-over cable between the two?  Should I uplink those two into a
>  > switch
>  > >  and let the switch worry about the negotiation?  I'm currently
>  > >  experiencing 'interface up, line down' on the pix's ethernet0(i
think
>  > it's
>  > >  intel NIC); this happens almost every 24 hours.  Perhaps bad
cross-over
>  > >  cable?  Any input will be appreciated.
>  > >  
>  > >  
>  > >  -Frank
>  > >  
>  > >  
>  > >  _
>  > >  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>  > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>  > >  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > 
>  > 
>  > 
>  > 
>  > 
>  > ___
>  > Send a cool gift with your E-Card
>  > http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
>  > 
>  > 
>





___
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]