Re: suppress-map with summary-only?? [7:55599]
Cisco Nuts, I don't believe you need to use the option keyword "suppress-map" to achieve your objective. Unless of course you're trying to find another what of achieving the same goal, for which you would still have no need for the "summary-only" keyword. Nonetheless, it would seem that keyword "summary-only" should work with the command as they perform the same function in generating a aggregate address, but by also suppressing the more specific routes. HTH Nigel P.S. Let us know what your testing proves. - Original Message - From: "Cisco Nuts" To: Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 9:27 PM Subject: suppress-map with summary-only?? [7:55599] > Hello, > > Does the suppress-map work along with the summary-only keyword? > > I would only like to see the summary 13.0.0.0/8 but I keep seeing the rest > of the networks. > > Here is the config: > > R7-FR(config)#aggregate-address 13.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 suppress-map CHECK > summary-only > > route-map CHECK permit 10 > match ip address 21 > > access-list 21 permit 13.4.0.0 0.0.255.255 > access-list 21 deny any > > This works as it should.denies netw 13.4.0.0/16 and permits the rest, > 13.1.0.0/24, 13.2.1.0/24, 13.3.0.0/16 and 13.0.0.0 BUT I would only like to > see the aggregate 13.0.0.0/8 > > Am I even asking the right thing here? :-) > Just checking. > > Thank you. > > Sincerely. > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55617&t=55599 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: suppress-map with summary-only?? [7:55599]
I think the aggregate address has to be in your routing table first. Someone please correct me if i'm wrong, as I'm trying to get it right from memory. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello, > > Does the suppress-map work along with the summary-only keyword? > > I would only like to see the summary 13.0.0.0/8 but I keep seeing the rest > of the networks. > > Here is the config: > > R7-FR(config)#aggregate-address 13.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 suppress-map CHECK > summary-only > > route-map CHECK permit 10 > match ip address 21 > > access-list 21 permit 13.4.0.0 0.0.255.255 > access-list 21 deny any > > This works as it should.denies netw 13.4.0.0/16 and permits the rest, > 13.1.0.0/24, 13.2.1.0/24, 13.3.0.0/16 and 13.0.0.0 BUT I would only like to > see the aggregate 13.0.0.0/8 > > Am I even asking the right thing here? :-) > Just checking. > > Thank you. > > Sincerely. > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55600&t=55599 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
suppress-map with summary-only?? [7:55599]
Hello, Does the suppress-map work along with the summary-only keyword? I would only like to see the summary 13.0.0.0/8 but I keep seeing the rest of the networks. Here is the config: R7-FR(config)#aggregate-address 13.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 suppress-map CHECK summary-only route-map CHECK permit 10 match ip address 21 access-list 21 permit 13.4.0.0 0.0.255.255 access-list 21 deny any This works as it should.denies netw 13.4.0.0/16 and permits the rest, 13.1.0.0/24, 13.2.1.0/24, 13.3.0.0/16 and 13.0.0.0 BUT I would only like to see the aggregate 13.0.0.0/8 Am I even asking the right thing here? :-) Just checking. Thank you. Sincerely. _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55599&t=55599 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
