Re: [c-nsp] 5s or 10s periodic IOS tasks

2011-06-11 Thread Rubens Kuhl 
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Pete Lumbis  wrote:
> Not sure on the timers but generally testing CEF/PXF switched issues
> (through the box) with process switched traffic (to the box) isn't
> always a valid check. I'd suggest pinging something directly connected
> to the 7300 so the traffic is CEF switched through the 7300 when
> testing.

The multicast traffic was going thru the box with similar loss patterns.

> If you are seeing packet loss to the box my guess would be interface
> issues or CPU issues. Do you see any drops on the interface or
> controllers?

After noticing a high amount of flushes, disabling spd (selective
packet discard) seemed to solve the packet drops, but a few more
business days will confirm if it was simply that. Frequency of Hello
OSPF packets (10s) was the master clock of the packet drops.

Rubens
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus N7K-M132XP-12 powerup

2011-06-11 Thread Tim Stevenson 

Hi Renelson,

My first suspicion would be that these are in fact N7K-M132XP-12L 
cards (note the trailing "L"). The "L" version of this card is only 
supported from 5.1, I'd recommend 5.1(3).


Otherwise, I'd open a TAC case, as support for the non-L version is 
there from day 1.


Hope that helps,
Tim

At 01:39 PM 6/11/2011, Renelson Panosky pronounced:


I am working on a N7K with two of the above cards.  they're showing power
down and everytime i tried to power them back up i got the following
errors.

switch(config)# 2011 Jun 12 01:22:36 switch %$ VDC-1 %$
%PLATFORM-2-PFM_MODULE_POWER_ON: Manual power-on of Module 7  from Command
Line Interface
2011 Jun 12 01:22:39 switch %$ VDC-1 %$
%PLATFORM-2-MOD_PWRIDPROM_SW_CARD_ID_UNKNOWN: Module 7 failed to power up.
(Unknown card. Could not get software-card-id)

I am running Software version 5.0 (2a) and i moved one the card in slot 7
and still getting the same error.


 sho mod
Mod  Ports  Module-Type  Model  Status
---  -   -- 
10  Unknown Module  powered-dn
248 10/100/1000 Mbps Ethernet Module N7K-M148GT-11  ok
348 10/100/1000 Mbps Ethernet Module N7K-M148GT-11  ok
50  Supervisor module-1X N7K-SUP1   active *
60  Supervisor module-1X N7K-SUP1   ha-standby
70  Unknown Module  powered-dn
Mod  Power-Status  Reason
---    ---
1powered-dn Unknown card (Could not get software-card-id)
7powered-dn Unknown card (Could not get software-card-id)
Mod  Sw  Hw
---  --  --
25.0(2a) 1.7
35.0(2a) 1.7
55.0(2a) 1.8
65.0(2a) 1.8

Mod  MAC-Address(es) Serial-Num
---  --  --
250-3d-e5-b3-35-5c to 50-3d-e5-b3-35-90  JAF1502BDGH
350-3d-e5-b9-81-a0 to 50-3d-e5-b9-81-d4  JAF1502BDGF
510-8c-cf-1d-e5-d0 to 10-8c-cf-1d-e5-d8  JAF1453BKBK
68c-b6-4f-e8-ee-60 to 8c-b6-4f-e8-ee-68  JAF1453BKCF
Mod  Online Diag Status
---  --
2Pass
3Pass
5Pass
6Pass
Xbar Ports  Module-Type  Model  Status
---  -   -- 
10  Fabric Module 1  N7K-C7010-FAB-1ok
20  Fabric Module 1  N7K-C7010-FAB-1ok
30  Fabric Module 1  N7K-C7010-FAB-1ok
Xbar Sw  Hw
---  --  --
1NA  1.1
2NA  1.1
3NA  1.1

Xbar MAC-Address(es) Serial-Num
---  --  --
1NA  JAF1453BPHE
2NA  JAF1453BPHH
3NA  JAF1453BPAP
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at 
http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/





Tim Stevenson, tstev...@cisco.com
Routing & Switching CCIE #5561
Distinguished Technical Marketing Engineer, Cisco Nexus 7000
Cisco - http://www.cisco.com
IP Phone: 408-526-6759

The contents of this message may be *Cisco Confidential*
and are intended for the specified recipients only.


___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] Nexus N7K-M132XP-12 powerup

2011-06-11 Thread Renelson Panosky 
I am working on a N7K with two of the above cards.  they're showing power
down and everytime i tried to power them back up i got the following
errors.

switch(config)# 2011 Jun 12 01:22:36 switch %$ VDC-1 %$
%PLATFORM-2-PFM_MODULE_POWER_ON: Manual power-on of Module 7  from Command
Line Interface
2011 Jun 12 01:22:39 switch %$ VDC-1 %$
%PLATFORM-2-MOD_PWRIDPROM_SW_CARD_ID_UNKNOWN: Module 7 failed to power up.
(Unknown card. Could not get software-card-id)

I am running Software version 5.0 (2a) and i moved one the card in slot 7
and still getting the same error.


 sho mod
Mod  Ports  Module-Type  Model  Status
---  -   -- 
10  Unknown Module  powered-dn
248 10/100/1000 Mbps Ethernet Module N7K-M148GT-11  ok
348 10/100/1000 Mbps Ethernet Module N7K-M148GT-11  ok
50  Supervisor module-1X N7K-SUP1   active *
60  Supervisor module-1X N7K-SUP1   ha-standby
70  Unknown Module  powered-dn
Mod  Power-Status  Reason
---    ---
1powered-dn Unknown card (Could not get software-card-id)
7powered-dn Unknown card (Could not get software-card-id)
Mod  Sw  Hw
---  --  --
25.0(2a) 1.7
35.0(2a) 1.7
55.0(2a) 1.8
65.0(2a) 1.8

Mod  MAC-Address(es) Serial-Num
---  --  --
250-3d-e5-b3-35-5c to 50-3d-e5-b3-35-90  JAF1502BDGH
350-3d-e5-b9-81-a0 to 50-3d-e5-b9-81-d4  JAF1502BDGF
510-8c-cf-1d-e5-d0 to 10-8c-cf-1d-e5-d8  JAF1453BKBK
68c-b6-4f-e8-ee-60 to 8c-b6-4f-e8-ee-68  JAF1453BKCF
Mod  Online Diag Status
---  --
2Pass
3Pass
5Pass
6Pass
Xbar Ports  Module-Type  Model  Status
---  -   -- 
10  Fabric Module 1  N7K-C7010-FAB-1ok
20  Fabric Module 1  N7K-C7010-FAB-1ok
30  Fabric Module 1  N7K-C7010-FAB-1ok
Xbar Sw  Hw
---  --  --
1NA  1.1
2NA  1.1
3NA  1.1

Xbar MAC-Address(es) Serial-Num
---  --  --
1NA  JAF1453BPHE
2NA  JAF1453BPHH
3NA  JAF1453BPAP
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Link/Line Testing

2011-06-11 Thread Jeff Kell 
On 6/11/2011 3:07 PM, James Bensley wrote:
> OK, so now lets say you have a 24 x 100Mb port switch at the access
> layer and you have an EtherChannel over ports 23 + 24 to give 200 Mbps
> up to the distribution layer, how can you test that each end device is
> capable of pushing the 200Mbs over the EtherChannel?

To begin with, you can't just throw 200Mbps at the problem, as a
"port-channel" of 2(x) bandwidth doesn't mean you get 2(x) throughput,
your maximum speed for any ONE connection is going to be 1(x) if you are
talking about any of the Catalyst line of switches.  You would have to
push data that is particularly crafted for your switch load-balance
algorithm.

At layer-3, on a router, you can play with per-packet load balancing on
multiple equal cost paths (an old T1 bonding game), but as the speeds
increase you are likely to cause more layer-3 issues on the endpoints
with out-of-order packets, not to mention the load on the routers.

Or you can do flows over multiple equal cost paths with EIGRP and get
some traffic-load-based load balancing per flow.

But generically calling any aggregation of N*X links as providing N*X
bandwidth is best left to the marketing department :)

Jeff
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Link/Line Testing

2011-06-11 Thread jkrejci 
Not sure I understand. You want to test >100mbps throughput on a switch 
etherchannel without any devices to actually generate and/or receive traffic?

Iperf is fast, easy, and runs on both win and non-win systems very nicely. This 
would be a poor test for real life traffic but will test raw bytes per second 
with ease.


Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-Original Message-
From: James Bensley 
Sender: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:07:05 
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Link/Line Testing

Hi all,

Sorry for the delay in my response and thank you for your suggestions,
some interesting points have been made.

OK, so now lets say you have a 24 x 100Mb port switch at the access
layer and you have an EtherChannel over ports 23 + 24 to give 200 Mbps
up to the distribution layer, how can you test that each end device is
capable of pushing the 200Mbs over the EtherChannel?

Yes I could wait for a busy period and see if the port channel
bandwidth exceeds 200Mbps but thats no good if there is a problem and
the EtherChannel is configured incorrectly or the switches can't
perform and you start to drop traffic/queue it up or whatever.

Without getting another laptop and running some traffic generating
software on them both; I can't see any other way. Suggestions anyone?

-- 
James.
http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/
There are 10 kinds of people in the world; Those who understand
Vigesimal, and J others...?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Link/Line Testing

2011-06-11 Thread James Bensley 
Hi all,

Sorry for the delay in my response and thank you for your suggestions,
some interesting points have been made.

OK, so now lets say you have a 24 x 100Mb port switch at the access
layer and you have an EtherChannel over ports 23 + 24 to give 200 Mbps
up to the distribution layer, how can you test that each end device is
capable of pushing the 200Mbs over the EtherChannel?

Yes I could wait for a busy period and see if the port channel
bandwidth exceeds 200Mbps but thats no good if there is a problem and
the EtherChannel is configured incorrectly or the switches can't
perform and you start to drop traffic/queue it up or whatever.

Without getting another laptop and running some traffic generating
software on them both; I can't see any other way. Suggestions anyone?

-- 
James.
http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/
There are 10 kinds of people in the world; Those who understand
Vigesimal, and J others...?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] 5s or 10s periodic IOS tasks

2011-06-11 Thread Pete Lumbis 
Not sure on the timers but generally testing CEF/PXF switched issues
(through the box) with process switched traffic (to the box) isn't
always a valid check. I'd suggest pinging something directly connected
to the 7300 so the traffic is CEF switched through the 7300 when
testing.

If you are seeing packet loss to the box my guess would be interface
issues or CPU issues. Do you see any drops on the interface or
controllers?

-Pete

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Rubens Kuhl  wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm helping a friend diagnose some strange packet loss issues, and it
> seems that every 5s (for multicast traffic going thru a 7300 router)
> or every 10s (for ICMP traffic targeted at the same router) one or
> more packets get lost.
>
> I'm thinking what cyclic tasks could impact performance in such a
> predictable way; SPF recalcs default to 10s, so it could not explain a
> 5s interval but could contribute to the 10s issue... any ideas ?
>
>
> Rubens
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Input Queue

2011-06-11 Thread Pete Lumbis 
The input queue is the queue between the interface and the CPU, only
process switched traffic hits this queue. Drops in the input queue are
almost always due to a busy CPU.

If you happen to have packets in the queue (the first number is
greater than 0) you can run "show buffers input interface 
dump" and decode the packets.

Also check out this troubleshooting doc
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps133/products_tech_note09186a0080094791.shtml

-Pete

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Mohammad Khalil  wrote:
>
> hi all
>
> i have etherchannel consisting of 5 G interfaces
> the port-channel is assigned to VLAN 10 (SVI created)
> i cleared the counters on the interface yesterday and today
> Input queue: 0/75/962/962 (size/max/drops/flushes)
> what is the issue ?
>
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7606-S

2011-06-11 Thread Mohammad Khalil 

Thanks a lot Bruce , because i tried the SRD6 and SRE5 and i faced some 
difficulties

> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7606-S
> From: br...@sidlinger.com
> Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 10:48:57 -0500
> CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> To: eng_m...@hotmail.com
> 
> 12.2(33)SRE3 has been good on my 7609-S RSP720 routers. I'm running the 
> Advanced IP Services (crypto) flavor on 37 of them with no issues.
> 
> -Bruce
> 
> 
> On Jun 10, 2011, at 3:06 PM, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
> 
> > 
> > what is the stable version to use on Cisco 7606-S ?
> > 
> > Cisco IOS Software, c7600s72033_rp Software 
> > (c7600s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICES-M), Version 12.2(33)SRD6, RELEASE SOFTWARE 
> > (fc3)
> > Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
> > Copyright (c) 1986-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
> > Compiled Sun 19-Dec-10 15:46 by prod_rel_team
> > 
> > ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(17r)S4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
> > BOOTLDR:
> > Cisco IOS Software, c7600s72033_rp Software 
> > (c7600s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICES-M), Version 12.2(33)SRD6, RELEASE SOFTWARE
> > (fc3)
> > 
> > CR1.KJ-Building uptime is 1 week, 3 days, 16 hours, 20 minutes
> > Uptime for this control processor is 1 week, 3 days, 16 hours, 21 minutes
> > System returned to ROM by reload (SP by reload)
> > System restarted at 00:29:41 EET Tue May 31 2011
> > System image file is 
> > "sup-bootdisk:c7600s72033-advipservices-mz.122-33.SRD6.bin"
> > Last reload type: Normal Reload
> > 
> > cisco CISCO7606-S (R7000) processor (revision 1.0) with 983008K/65536K 
> > bytes of memory.
> > Processor board ID FOX1213GJYZ
> > SR71000 CPU at 600Mhz, Implementation 0x504, Rev 1.2, 512KB L2 Cache
> > Last reset from s/w reset
> > 1 SIP-400 controller (5 GigabitEthernet).
> > 18 Virtual Ethernet interfaces
> > 71 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
> > 1917K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
> > 8192K bytes of packet buffer memory.
> > 
> > 65536K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 512K).
> > Configuration register is 0x2102
> > 
> > Thanks
> >   
> > ___
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
  
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7606-S

2011-06-11 Thread Bruce D. Sidlinger 
12.2(33)SRE3 has been good on my 7609-S RSP720 routers. I'm running the 
Advanced IP Services (crypto) flavor on 37 of them with no issues.

-Bruce


On Jun 10, 2011, at 3:06 PM, Mohammad Khalil wrote:

> 
> what is the stable version to use on Cisco 7606-S ?
> 
> Cisco IOS Software, c7600s72033_rp Software (c7600s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICES-M), 
> Version 12.2(33)SRD6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
> Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
> Copyright (c) 1986-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
> Compiled Sun 19-Dec-10 15:46 by prod_rel_team
> 
> ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(17r)S4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
> BOOTLDR:
> Cisco IOS Software, c7600s72033_rp Software 
> (c7600s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICES-M), Version 12.2(33)SRD6, RELEASE SOFTWARE
> (fc3)
> 
> CR1.KJ-Building uptime is 1 week, 3 days, 16 hours, 20 minutes
> Uptime for this control processor is 1 week, 3 days, 16 hours, 21 minutes
> System returned to ROM by reload (SP by reload)
> System restarted at 00:29:41 EET Tue May 31 2011
> System image file is 
> "sup-bootdisk:c7600s72033-advipservices-mz.122-33.SRD6.bin"
> Last reload type: Normal Reload
> 
> cisco CISCO7606-S (R7000) processor (revision 1.0) with 983008K/65536K bytes 
> of memory.
> Processor board ID FOX1213GJYZ
> SR71000 CPU at 600Mhz, Implementation 0x504, Rev 1.2, 512KB L2 Cache
> Last reset from s/w reset
> 1 SIP-400 controller (5 GigabitEthernet).
> 18 Virtual Ethernet interfaces
> 71 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
> 1917K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
> 8192K bytes of packet buffer memory.
> 
> 65536K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 512K).
> Configuration register is 0x2102
> 
> Thanks
> 
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7606-S

2011-06-11 Thread Mohammad Khalil 

Thanks

Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 10:49:07 +0200
From: g...@greenie.muc.de
To: d...@rrbone.net
CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7606-S

Hi,
 
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 01:12:26AM +0200, Dominik Bay wrote:
> > what is the stable version to use on Cisco 7606-S ?
> 
> You should measure the visible moon tonight at 0239, divide by 7.78 and check 
> if it the number fits the people died in the spanish civil war.
> Do a case shift on the first three numbers, add the fourth number and you've 
> probably the most stable version calculated.
 
I think you forgot to add the right letter for the holy patron of routing
for the appropriate regional calendar.
 
"IOS for 7600 must have lots of letters!!!"
 
gert
 
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
   //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/  
  
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7606-S

2011-06-11 Thread Gert Doering 
Hi,

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 01:12:26AM +0200, Dominik Bay wrote:
> > what is the stable version to use on Cisco 7606-S ?
> 
> You should measure the visible moon tonight at 0239, divide by 7.78 and check 
> if it the number fits the people died in the spanish civil war.
> Do a case shift on the first three numbers, add the fourth number and you've 
> probably the most stable version calculated.

I think you forgot to add the right letter for the holy patron of routing
for the appropriate regional calendar.

"IOS for 7600 must have lots of letters!!!"

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
   //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de


pgpQqS4zGgs9v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/