Re: [c-nsp] Console connections
--- Begin Message --- > On Jan 31, 2019, at 5:27 PM, Hunter Fuller wrote: > > We are trying a somewhat-radical new strategy. For our newest rack, we > bought a Raspberry Pi Model 3B. It has four USB ports, and into each port > we plugged a dual-headed USB to RS232 adapter, for a total of 8 ports. > > So far, so good. The main benefits are ease of use (our team can use the > same tools they use on their laptops) and cost (100-150 USD total for the > setup I just mentioned). > > The gotchas are that it only has one inbuilt Ethernet port and it does not > have built-in support for redundant power. But we are using this only for > emergencies, and we access the site once every few months anyway, so we > were willing to make that concession. For software on that sort of setup, this is really great: https://www.conserver.com/ For a neater solution, these folks have all kinds of neat USB -> many serial port options: http://usbserial.com/ Can’t say enough things about ConServer. The logging is awesome, multi-user is super-handy. It beats all of the software I’ve seen in proprietary terminal server hardware. I bet you could also pick up something like Xylogics Annex III super cheap on Ebay too (if you don’t mind telnet instead of ssh!). Charles > > -- > Hunter Fuller > Network Engineer > VBH Annex B-5 > +1 256 824 5331 > > Office of Information Technology > The University of Alabama in Huntsville > Systems and Infrastructure > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 4:03 PM R. Benjamin Kessler > wrote: > >> We've deployed async HWICs/NIMs in Cisco routers for customers in hundreds >> of locations. >> Many/most were also pared with 4G cards provide an out-of-band connection >> back to a centralized data center. >> >> R. Benjamin Kessler >> PRESIDENT / CHIEF NETWORK GEEK >> ZENETRA CORPORATION >> CCIE # 8762 | CISSP | PCNSE >> P: (260)-271-4330 | M: (260)-437-5774 >> >> -Original Message- >> From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Robert >> Raszuk >> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 5:00 PM >> To: Nick Cutting >> Cc: Cisco NSPs >> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Console connections >> >> Hi Nick, >> >> Indeed I was looking also at opengear but got a bit scared with limited >> software based pinout switching capabilities ... Some models can switch >> between X1 and X2 but is this enough ? Today we use avocent which claims to >> be soft selectable between RS485, RS422 and RS232 pinouts. >> >> >> https://opengear.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/216371943-Which-adapter-will-I-use-to-connect-to-various-types-of-equipment- >> >> In my case in those 10 racks are complete wild zoo of various eval >> equipment and just trying to avoid as much as possible per vendor console >> adapters going forward. >> >> Many thx, >> R. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:55 PM Nick Cutting wrote: >> >>> We use lots of opengear. >>> Expensive - but awesome >>> >>> I did just roll out a cisco 4431 with 3 octal cables for a client >>> though, but opengear has way more features and supports 2 people at >>> once on the lines etc >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of >>> Robert Raszuk >>> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 4:28 PM >>> To: Cisco NSPs >>> Subject: [c-nsp] Console connections >>> >>> This message originates from outside of your organisation. >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> What would you all recommend these days for min 8-12 port rack mounted >>> terminal servers to talk to various vendor's router and switches >>> console ports ? >>> >>> For years I used cisco 2511 but now it is history .. so what's the >>> best cisco or not cisco successor for it ? >>> >>> It would be awesome if it would also have few KVM switch ports for >>> video to get them over IP, but this is just "nice to have" - >>> primary I need to get 10 async terminal servers. >>> >>> Any proven in action hints ? >>> >>> Many thx, >>> Robert. >>> ___ >>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >>> >>> >> ___ >> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> ___ >> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ --- End Message --- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4k Performance and Boost Licensing
Hi Rick, the license is activated the same way, as performance license on 4451x, so you don't need to go though 1G>2G>4G: platform hardware throughput level 100/200/boost Note, however, that you'll need at least IOS XE 16.07.01, otherwise boost option will not show up. Regards/S pozdravom, Miro Sturmankin -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Adam Greene Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 3:12 PM To: 'Cisco NSPs' Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4k Performance and Boost Licensing Rick, My impression from reading the documentation has been that the Boost license can be activated independently of the Performance license. Maybe someone who's actually implemented it can confirm! ;) Thanks, Adam -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Richard Clayton Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 7:12 AM To: Cisco NSPs Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco 4k Performance and Boost Licensing Hi Guys Quick question regarding the above. Can I activate a boost license independent of a performance license or do I need to activate the performance license and then the boost license? I was hoping I could just activate the boost license on a 4451 to give me 4Gb, rather than activate the performance license first. So 1GB > 4GB rather than 1GB > 2Gb > 4Gb. Thanks Rick ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Console connections
We are trying a somewhat-radical new strategy. For our newest rack, we bought a Raspberry Pi Model 3B. It has four USB ports, and into each port we plugged a dual-headed USB to RS232 adapter, for a total of 8 ports. So far, so good. The main benefits are ease of use (our team can use the same tools they use on their laptops) and cost (100-150 USD total for the setup I just mentioned). The gotchas are that it only has one inbuilt Ethernet port and it does not have built-in support for redundant power. But we are using this only for emergencies, and we access the site once every few months anyway, so we were willing to make that concession. -- Hunter Fuller Network Engineer VBH Annex B-5 +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Systems and Infrastructure On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 4:03 PM R. Benjamin Kessler wrote: > We've deployed async HWICs/NIMs in Cisco routers for customers in hundreds > of locations. > Many/most were also pared with 4G cards provide an out-of-band connection > back to a centralized data center. > > R. Benjamin Kessler > PRESIDENT / CHIEF NETWORK GEEK > ZENETRA CORPORATION > CCIE # 8762 | CISSP | PCNSE > P: (260)-271-4330 | M: (260)-437-5774 > > -Original Message- > From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Robert > Raszuk > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 5:00 PM > To: Nick Cutting > Cc: Cisco NSPs > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Console connections > > Hi Nick, > > Indeed I was looking also at opengear but got a bit scared with limited > software based pinout switching capabilities ... Some models can switch > between X1 and X2 but is this enough ? Today we use avocent which claims to > be soft selectable between RS485, RS422 and RS232 pinouts. > > > https://opengear.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/216371943-Which-adapter-will-I-use-to-connect-to-various-types-of-equipment- > > In my case in those 10 racks are complete wild zoo of various eval > equipment and just trying to avoid as much as possible per vendor console > adapters going forward. > > Many thx, > R. > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:55 PM Nick Cutting wrote: > > > We use lots of opengear. > > Expensive - but awesome > > > > I did just roll out a cisco 4431 with 3 octal cables for a client > > though, but opengear has way more features and supports 2 people at > > once on the lines etc > > > > -Original Message- > > From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of > > Robert Raszuk > > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 4:28 PM > > To: Cisco NSPs > > Subject: [c-nsp] Console connections > > > > This message originates from outside of your organisation. > > > > Hello, > > > > What would you all recommend these days for min 8-12 port rack mounted > > terminal servers to talk to various vendor's router and switches > > console ports ? > > > > For years I used cisco 2511 but now it is history .. so what's the > > best cisco or not cisco successor for it ? > > > > It would be awesome if it would also have few KVM switch ports for > > video to get them over IP, but this is just "nice to have" - > > primary I need to get 10 async terminal servers. > > > > Any proven in action hints ? > > > > Many thx, > > Robert. > > ___ > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Console connections
We've deployed async HWICs/NIMs in Cisco routers for customers in hundreds of locations. Many/most were also pared with 4G cards provide an out-of-band connection back to a centralized data center. R. Benjamin Kessler PRESIDENT / CHIEF NETWORK GEEK ZENETRA CORPORATION CCIE # 8762 | CISSP | PCNSE P: (260)-271-4330 | M: (260)-437-5774 -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 5:00 PM To: Nick Cutting Cc: Cisco NSPs Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Console connections Hi Nick, Indeed I was looking also at opengear but got a bit scared with limited software based pinout switching capabilities ... Some models can switch between X1 and X2 but is this enough ? Today we use avocent which claims to be soft selectable between RS485, RS422 and RS232 pinouts. https://opengear.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/216371943-Which-adapter-will-I-use-to-connect-to-various-types-of-equipment- In my case in those 10 racks are complete wild zoo of various eval equipment and just trying to avoid as much as possible per vendor console adapters going forward. Many thx, R. On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:55 PM Nick Cutting wrote: > We use lots of opengear. > Expensive - but awesome > > I did just roll out a cisco 4431 with 3 octal cables for a client > though, but opengear has way more features and supports 2 people at > once on the lines etc > > -Original Message- > From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of > Robert Raszuk > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 4:28 PM > To: Cisco NSPs > Subject: [c-nsp] Console connections > > This message originates from outside of your organisation. > > Hello, > > What would you all recommend these days for min 8-12 port rack mounted > terminal servers to talk to various vendor's router and switches > console ports ? > > For years I used cisco 2511 but now it is history .. so what's the > best cisco or not cisco successor for it ? > > It would be awesome if it would also have few KVM switch ports for > video to get them over IP, but this is just "nice to have" - > primary I need to get 10 async terminal servers. > > Any proven in action hints ? > > Many thx, > Robert. > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Console connections
Hi Nick, Indeed I was looking also at opengear but got a bit scared with limited software based pinout switching capabilities ... Some models can switch between X1 and X2 but is this enough ? Today we use avocent which claims to be soft selectable between RS485, RS422 and RS232 pinouts. https://opengear.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/216371943-Which-adapter-will-I-use-to-connect-to-various-types-of-equipment- In my case in those 10 racks are complete wild zoo of various eval equipment and just trying to avoid as much as possible per vendor console adapters going forward. Many thx, R. On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:55 PM Nick Cutting wrote: > We use lots of opengear. > Expensive - but awesome > > I did just roll out a cisco 4431 with 3 octal cables for a client though, > but opengear has way more features and supports 2 people at once on the > lines etc > > -Original Message- > From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Robert > Raszuk > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 4:28 PM > To: Cisco NSPs > Subject: [c-nsp] Console connections > > This message originates from outside of your organisation. > > Hello, > > What would you all recommend these days for min 8-12 port rack mounted > terminal servers to talk to various vendor's router and switches console > ports ? > > For years I used cisco 2511 but now it is history .. so what's the best > cisco or not cisco successor for it ? > > It would be awesome if it would also have few KVM switch ports for > video to get them over IP, but this is just "nice to have" - primary > I need to get 10 async terminal servers. > > Any proven in action hints ? > > Many thx, > Robert. > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Console connections
We use lots of opengear. Expensive - but awesome I did just roll out a cisco 4431 with 3 octal cables for a client though, but opengear has way more features and supports 2 people at once on the lines etc -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 4:28 PM To: Cisco NSPs Subject: [c-nsp] Console connections This message originates from outside of your organisation. Hello, What would you all recommend these days for min 8-12 port rack mounted terminal servers to talk to various vendor's router and switches console ports ? For years I used cisco 2511 but now it is history .. so what's the best cisco or not cisco successor for it ? It would be awesome if it would also have few KVM switch ports for video to get them over IP, but this is just "nice to have" - primary I need to get 10 async terminal servers. Any proven in action hints ? Many thx, Robert. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Console connections
Hi Robert. Check Aten or Moxa Best regards, Vladimir Buyalskiy 01.02.2019 0:27, Robert Raszuk пишет: Hello, What would you all recommend these days for min 8-12 port rack mounted terminal servers to talk to various vendor's router and switches console ports ? For years I used cisco 2511 but now it is history .. so what's the best cisco or not cisco successor for it ? It would be awesome if it would also have few KVM switch ports for video to get them over IP, but this is just "nice to have" - primary I need to get 10 async terminal servers. Any proven in action hints ? Many thx, Robert. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Console connections
Hello, What would you all recommend these days for min 8-12 port rack mounted terminal servers to talk to various vendor's router and switches console ports ? For years I used cisco 2511 but now it is history .. so what's the best cisco or not cisco successor for it ? It would be awesome if it would also have few KVM switch ports for video to get them over IP, but this is just "nice to have" - primary I need to get 10 async terminal servers. Any proven in action hints ? Many thx, Robert. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4k Performance and Boost Licensing
> On 30 Jan 2019, at 15:11, Adam Greene wrote: > > Rick, > > My impression from reading the documentation has been that the Boost license > can be activated independently of the Performance license. > > Maybe someone who's actually implemented it can confirm! ;) Yes, “boost" is all you need if you need performance *only*. Take note however all cores are used so no-no for the VMs or any other apps on top of ISR. — ./ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
