Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K using XR 7
On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 at 20:29, Nick Hilliard wrote: > there are several reconfig / deconfig operations that can't be handled > on XR using a single commit, e.g. changing ISIS NET address, some > netflow stuff, etc. Deapplying and removing QoS policy in a single commit :). Opening tickets about these tactically feels frustrating when the vendor doesn't understand there is a strategic problem under the hood causing these. Some other vendors who simply cannot produce config without having models first don't have these commit time problems or they are orders of magnitude rarer events. Cisco keeps being confused about what does 'model driven' mean, the moment you talk about coverage of models and being model driven, you're confused what model driven means. Cisco doesn't even have real config infra, if QoS policy doesn't commit, that is QoS people problem, if tunnel config doesn't commit, that's tunnel team problem and so-forth. Instead of them consuming some internal config API, and having all commit problems be a config team problem. -- ++ytti ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K using XR 7
William McCall wrote on 30/07/2021 17:54: CSCvx80028, but it is a very specific order of operations thing when doing configuration. there are several reconfig / deconfig operations that can't be handled on XR using a single commit, e.g. changing ISIS NET address, some netflow stuff, etc. Nick ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K using XR 7
CSCvx80028, but it is a very specific order of operations thing when doing configuration. On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 9:52 AM Erik Sundberg wrote: > > > We're running the following right now. > ASR9906's > A99-RSP-SE > A9K-MOD200-SE with A9K-MPA-20X1GE and A9K-MPA-8X10GE > A9K-24X10GE-1G-SE > > > William, do you have have a bug id for the VPWS bug? We are doing a bunch of > ethernet services. > > > > Glad to hear that so far that XR 7 is working as expected and nothing major. > > Thanks > > Erik > > > -Original Message- > From: William McCall > Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 9:46 PM > To: Erik Sundberg > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K using XR 7 > > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 7:55 PM Erik Sundberg wrote: > > > > Just wondering if anyone out there has and moved there ASR9K's to XR > > 7. We run a Service Provider Network (Internet, MPLS, Ethernet > > Services). We are going to be doing our own testing but would like to > > also see what challenges or issues others faced going to XR 7 > > > > When talking with TAC I have been told different things, use 6.6.3, 6.7.3, > > or 7.1.3. > > > > The current Extended Maintenance release is XR 7.1.3, with 7.3.x set to go > > Extended Maintenance release around Q3/Q4 from what I can tell. > > > > Thanks > > > > Erik > > Done some 7.1.3. > > -Mind the possibility that you need golden FPD upgrades (previous release we > were on claimed it did it, but 7.1.3 actually fixed it.. > oops). > -Also, depending on how you handle VPWS configs, there may be a little funny > behavior, already SMU'ed. > -If you've done Golden ISO in the past, you may run into a space problem on > admin plane. > > Overall, we're seeing nothing interesting so far on Tomahawk + RSP880/RP2. > > -- > William McCall > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or > previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential information > that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a > person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of > the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY > PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the > sender immediately by replying to this e-mail. You must destroy the original > transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. > Thank you. -- William McCall ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K using XR 7
We're running the following right now. ASR9906's A99-RSP-SE A9K-MOD200-SE with A9K-MPA-20X1GE and A9K-MPA-8X10GE A9K-24X10GE-1G-SE William, do you have have a bug id for the VPWS bug? We are doing a bunch of ethernet services. Glad to hear that so far that XR 7 is working as expected and nothing major. Thanks Erik -Original Message- From: William McCall Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 9:46 PM To: Erik Sundberg Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K using XR 7 On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 7:55 PM Erik Sundberg wrote: > > Just wondering if anyone out there has and moved there ASR9K's to XR > 7. We run a Service Provider Network (Internet, MPLS, Ethernet > Services). We are going to be doing our own testing but would like to > also see what challenges or issues others faced going to XR 7 > > When talking with TAC I have been told different things, use 6.6.3, 6.7.3, or > 7.1.3. > > The current Extended Maintenance release is XR 7.1.3, with 7.3.x set to go > Extended Maintenance release around Q3/Q4 from what I can tell. > > Thanks > > Erik Done some 7.1.3. -Mind the possibility that you need golden FPD upgrades (previous release we were on claimed it did it, but 7.1.3 actually fixed it.. oops). -Also, depending on how you handle VPWS configs, there may be a little funny behavior, already SMU'ed. -If you've done Golden ISO in the past, you may run into a space problem on admin plane. Overall, we're seeing nothing interesting so far on Tomahawk + RSP880/RP2. -- William McCall CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail. You must destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
