Re: [c-nsp] off-topic NMS Suggestion
The best NMS solutions are open source. (My opinion... :-) You can get paid support if that is the issue, from installation to on-going configuration support. You should investigate what support teams are using to monitor large networks. Papa John's for example monitors 3400 locations requiring only one person on duty Open source NMS... You will save a ton of money as well... |--- | Dan Lacey daniel_p_la...@yahoo.com | PGP Key: 0xFE94668F @ http://pgp.mit.edu or http://keyserver.pgp.com | PGP Key fingerprint: 8A97 2996 266D A21C 0277 54EF 40D5 2B80 FE94 668F |--- On 5/17/11 7:38 PM, omar parihuana wrote: > Hi List, > > Please could you suggest me a NMS for WAN/LAN? the WAN is a MPLS/VPN (300 > remote offices) and the Switching is a campus LAN (aprox 1000 Network > Devices) and three remote buildings (aprox Network 200 devices in each > building). Before I tried Cisco Works but I faced some issues; HP Openview > was difficult also. We need a easy web interface for monitoring and > reporting (unfortunately no open source solutions are accepted). > > Thank you for your suggestions. > > Rgds. > ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cellular Modem on Aux
Try "3g ethernet Modem" in google. You could plug this into your network to access all your equipment. (security concerns aside...) |--- | Dan Lacey daniel_p_la...@yahoo.com | PGP Key: 0xFE94668F @ http://pgp.mit.edu or http://keyserver.pgp.com | PGP Key fingerprint: 8A97 2996 266D A21C 0277 54EF 40D5 2B80 FE94 668F |--- On 10/22/10 2:40 PM, Peder wrote: > Is anybody using cellular modems (ATT, Verizon, Sprint) on aux ports of > routers for backdoor access if the main T1 (or whatever connection it is) > goes down? I still see ATT and other managed service vendors using regular > US Robotics modems and analog lines and I would think cellular would be a > better way to go. If there is a cable cut, there is a good chance the > analog line will go down too. My home security system uses a cellular modem > so it is clearly inexpensive enough, so I would think it would be possible > for backdoor router access too (I don't mean failover for connectivity, just > remote access to the router itself). I know Cisco makes 3G cards, but I > want something outside the router as I want to be able to get access if the > router croaks too. I've googled around and didn't really find anything. > > Peder > > > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] q-in-q mtu
Isn't 1490 the "magic" MTU for PPPoE? |--- | Dan Lacey daniel_p_la...@yahoo.com | PGP Key: 0xFE94668F @ http://pgp.mit.edu or http://keyserver.pgp.com | PGP Key fingerprint: 8A97 2996 266D A21C 0277 54EF 40D5 2B80 FE94 668F |--- On 10/21/10 11:15 AM, Antonio Querubin wrote: > On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, David Freedman wrote: > >> Problem is the DEC chip found on PA-FE-TX , it has a hard limit of 1530 > > It's actually the built-in FastEthernet port instead of a port adapter: > > #show controllers fastEthernet 0/0 > Interface FastEthernet0/0 > Hardware is DEC21140A > >> PDU (i.e on the wire, with headers), IOS prevented you changing the mtu >> on the interface (which is usually the SDU, i.e without the ethernet >> frame overhead) because it was so close to the edge, but with advent of >> "tag-switching mtu" you were allowed to "bleed" into this space, >> in later releases they abandoned tag-switching mtu in favour of just >> letting the user configure the mtu directly up to the 1530 limit (but >> woe betide you if you configured it 1530 as this is the assumed SDU and >> hence had a PDU >1530!) > > This IOS is either too old or too crippled. It doesn't have > 'tag-switching mtu' and the max configurable mtu is 1500. So I'm > still wondering why (according to the carrier doing the testing): > > - Setting our sub-interface IPv4 mtu to 1490 works but 1492 does not > > - IPv6 isn't affected > > Antonio Querubin > 808-545-5282 x3003 > e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy
Hi all, I have a 7206 with two fastethernet port adapters. I would like to have both of these run to the 6506 switch. I need a scenario that would allow one of the links to work if the other goes down. This is for redundancy and not for bandwidth issues. I was wondering if it is possible (or desirable) to make them a Multilink bundle? Any other suggestions? Thanks, Dan Lacey ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] 7206 12.2(18) Maximum # of MLPPP T1s on PA-MC-T3
Hi all, cisco 7206VXR (NPE300) processor (revision B) with 229376K/65536K bytes of memory. R7000 CPU at 262Mhz, Implementation 39, Rev 1.0, 256KB L2 Cache 6 slot VXR midplane, Version 2.0 I found that the PA-MC-T3 card will handle 12 T1 links in one MLPPP group and still use HW. After 12, the 7206 will go into SW mode for the MLPPP bundle. How many T1s can I use, albeit in SW mode, can I bundle together? I know I can bundle across PA-MC-T3, again in SW mode, but how many total T1s can I bundle across two PA-MC-T3 cards? How about where I will run into performance issues? Thanks in advance! Dan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] 7206 misreporting ifSpeed via SNMP on ATM fiber interface
Hi all, I am trying to monitor a Cisco router (7206) using OpenNMS and SNMP. It is running: 7200 Software (C7200-IS-M), Version 12.2(19b), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3) There is an ATM fiber interface on this router. The sub-interfaces report the correct speed via the SNMP agent. The following interfaces report ifSpeed as 0, even tho the admin has told me that the speed is set by command line for every interface. The interfaces are named: ATM3/0-atm layer ATM3/0-aal5 layer Can anybody shed a little light on what we may be doing wrong? Is this an IOS problem/constraint or user error? Thanks in advance! Dan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Serial-server with modem.
I use Applied Innovations AIScouts for this because there have been plenty on the used market for under $1000. These can be modem'ed into, telnet to serial port, etc. and can monitor any contact closure (wet/dry etc.) and report status via SNMP. MKS wrote: > Hello List > > I'm looking for a device to do out-of-band management via PSTN/ISDN to the > cisco boxes in our pops. > > I'm looking for e.g. a serial-server with 2-4 serial (RS-232) ports and an > integrated modem. (well the integrated modem is optional but preferred) > Something similar to this > http://www.digi.com/products/serialservers/portservertsmmei.jsp > > Do someone have any experience with this product or know of any > similar(cheaper)? > > What are you using for out-of-band management? > > Regards > MKS > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] ONS 15454 SNMP traps
Dear experts, I cannot get the ONS to send alarm/events as SNMP traps. I have been able to verify that the box CAN send SNMP traps to the NOC server by performing and SNMP get with the wrong community string. I see the "SNMPv2-MIB::snmp Authentication Failure Trap", but that is all I have been able to "see". I can walk the whole MIB tree as well. Is there some other settings I am missing? Thanks in advance, Dan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
