Re: [c-nsp] Cisco CSR 1000V License ?
On 1/12/14, 16:02 , Olivier CALVANO wrote: Hi anyone have the price list of Cisco CSR 1000v router for VMWare ? We can buy online this license ? You can buy those through Cisco partners only -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] ASR-9001 IOS-XR, no image
On 6/25/12 17:23 , Vinny Abello wrote: Hello, I recently just received a few ASR-9001 routers and was surprised to find they did not come with the required IOS-XR 4.2.1 image at all and are effectively paperweights. As far as I've determined, it seems like there might have been an error in the ordering process which omitted this. At any rate, I'm trying to get Smartnet activated on these (which was also omitted but should have been ordered) which will take some time as it has to go through my company's bid desk. In the meantime, is there any department within Cisco to whom I can speak to help resolve this just so I can get these to boot? After repeated emails and calls, I'm just told they cannot provide an image without an active service contract which I completely understand... but I'm not trying to upgrade it. I'm just trying to use it and there is only one version of IOS-XR that even runs on this. Am I just SOL until I get Smartnet in place or is there some way to remedy this through a different channel than I've tri! ed alrea dy? Additionally, I see there is no ASR-9001 even listed on CCO for downloads. I assume it's the same image that the 9006 and 9010 take as those look the same. Hi Vinny, If I were you I'd try to contact my Account Manager on Cisco to solve this problem. Other way is to open TAC case and provide them scan of invoice as a proof you bought the routers. But AM might be faster and more reliable way. Regards, Peter -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] EARL L2 ASIC Search Engine has failed
On 5/29/12 16:03 , Jason Lixfeld wrote: I've had TAC chewing on this error for the past month. Seems that the DFC in slot 2 and slot 3 are reporting the error. TAC's first inclination was bad hardware, so it was RMA'd, however the error showed up again a few days ago. A reboot cleared it and I haven't seen it since, but it's still alarming that brand new hardware would show exactly the same error, of which I have never seen before in my life. Anyone seen this in the wild? Software issue perhaps? Hello Jason, Have you replaced only DFC or whole line card including DFC? Have you tried this card in different chassis or different slots in same chassis? Have you tried rebooting or reinserting just one line card instead of rebooting whole chassis? Because we're talking about adjacent slots it may be possible it's chassis problem just error messages are misleading. Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 2960s output drops
On 4/4/12 18:35 , Nikolay Shopik wrote: Hi, So we just replaced some aging c3524XL with 2960S and suddenly start seeing output drops on one of port facing client, while 3524 never had output drops to this client. Traffic levels pretty much low like 1-2mbit with 200-300pps levels. I believe this is because uplink now 1Gbit, but previously it was just 100mbit and client port also 100mbit. But just wanna confirm with you guys should I ignore these drops or do something about. What kind of drops are those? Can you provide us show interface output? Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 2960s output drops
On 4/4/12 20:54 , Nikolay Shopik wrote: Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 2197 It seems that you might have traffic peaks on this interface. It happens when traffic received from 1000BaseTx interface are being sent over interface configured as 100BaseTx and traffic volume exceeds configured speed which might happen during bursts. Output queue is then overwhelmed and drops occurs. Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Adding a SUP720-3BXL standby SUP question
On 4/4/12 22:14 , Lee Starnes wrote: Hi, I have a question about the 6509 and the SUP720-3BXL standby sup. If a chassis only has 1 SUP installed and you install a second one, will that disrupt the currently installed and working SUP? I ask this because we have our standby SUPs and I would like to install them, but I know they don't have the same version of IOS running. I don't want to blow away the config or cause the chassis to go down when installing these. Does anyone have any experience with this? Hi, Normally when you insert second sup as a standby (same type, hardware configuration including PFC and memory) it should synchronize itself to active one including IOS and configuration (except configuration registers) and reload as standby. But I normally recommend my customers to manually load proper IOS to supervisor on spare chassis and insert prepared one into production chassis. Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR 9010 and CRS-1 understanding
On 3/21/12 14:11 , Nick Hilliard wrote: 2. Are RSP slots combo slots (can they be used to host I/O cards)? Not that I'm aware of. They are not, can be used only for RSPs. Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 10Gigabit Ethernet with Sup6L-E
On 1/25/12 20:39 , Alex D. wrote: Hi list, i have a problem with some a WS-C4506-E chassis. The systems doesn't boot when 1 or both 10G ports are equiped with a X2 transceiver. All status LEDs remain dark. When i power-on the supervisor engine without transceivers, system boots successful. After reinserting a transceiver, system dies without any console output. If i use TwinGig converters, system works without problems. Are there any restictions, when using Sup6L-E with 10G ports ? Hi Alex, Might be some hardware problem with either supervisor (more likely) or X2 transceivers itself (less likely). Have you tried inserting different X2 transceivers or using same one in different chassis? Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] ASR as BGP Route Server
On 1/23/12 18:45 , Michael Lambert wrote: Hi All, I was wondering if anyone could comment on experiences (production or otherwise) with BGP route server functionality on the ASR1000 series/IOS-XE. Can you offer any comparisons (stability, configuration, table sizes, etc) between it and the open-source implementations (quagga, BIRD, OpenBGPD)? Hi Michael, ASR1000 is good choice when you plan to deploy RR in your networks. High performance is one of key factors when you looking for right platform. It's also scalable and provides flexible CoPP mechanisms, hardware and software redundancy. Not to mention good price to performance ratio especially if you are planning to deploy ASR1001 which performance can be upgraded using license while your network is growing. Table size depends on how much DRAM you put in it. Check datasheets for details about how many prefixes you can store. All other solutions are just software running on Linux or Unix systems so they are dependent on hardware platform performance and stability. Not really good option imo. Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] interconnect with adsl
On 1/20/12 13:30 , K bharathan wrote: hi any clues on the cheapest way of interconnecting branches and hq with adsl! which cisco equipment can be ideal fo this thanks Depends on speed of DSL line, additional features like VPN etc. 88x and 89x DSL bundles should be enough for branches in most scenarios and some ISR G2 in HQ. Regards -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] interconnect with adsl
On 1/20/12 13:30 , K bharathan wrote: hi any clues on the cheapest way of interconnecting branches and hq with adsl! which cisco equipment can be ideal fo this thanks Depends on speed of DSL line, additional features like VPN etc. 88x and 89x DSL bundles should be enough for branches in most scenarios and some ISR G2 in HQ. Regards -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k A9K-8T-L LC crash and reload
On 6/16/11 14:25 , Wyatt Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote: Hi All We are having an issue with a ring of 3 ASR9010 and one 7606 Sup7203BXL with 6704-DFC3BLX. Hi, Because problem occurs on multiple chassis I would guess hardware problems are unlikely. Have you performed software upgrade after you got them from factory? If yes did you perform upgrade of FPD too? Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] SFP module on 2921 ISR router
On 6/6/11 18:35 , K bharathan wrote: hi i'm trying to use a 1000base SFP module in cisco 2921 ISR ; on the router SFP appears to be assigned to G0/1; but when i put a SFP-LX-SM module nothing happens; no lights no connectivity and int is not coming up; is there any configuration required to make fibre port identified the following are given as certifed in a cisco doc GLC-LH-SM= 1000Base-LX/LH 9/125 1310 Single 10 km GLC-ZX-SM= 1000Base-ZX 9/125 1550 Single 100 km CWDM-SFP-1470= 1000Base-CWDM 50 1470 Single 100 km currently i'm using a converter (by TRANSITION Networks) (the SFP module in this converter shows long range 20km) which SFP module i can use? It's combo port afair, so try setting media-type sfp on interface so it will use SFP port instead of built-in RJ-45. Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 and HWIC-1GE-SFP
On 5/2/11 19:24 , Chris Knipe wrote: Given the low throughput on these WICs (Active/Passive failover), would I be able to install two of them into the 2811, or do I need to look at an alternative router? Look for an alternative router like next generation of ISR's routers. 4 HWICs slots is maximum for ISRs. Cisco 3925 have 4 EHWIC slots and two bult-in GigabitEthernet combo port, so you'll need only buy SFP, not whole HWIC-1GE-SPF. Therefor you have 4 slots free for ADSL and 2T interfaces. Performance is also higher than 2811 but also the price. If you don't need to have all HWIC's in one chassis look at 2921 which have one combo port or 2911. Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus 5010 Help
On 4/29/11 15:19 , Renelson Panosky wrote: Does Anybody here familiar with Cisco Nexus 5010 ? I am trying to configure one along with two Nexus 2248. How do i set a management IP address on this device ? Nexus 2248 extenders have no logic and all configuration is done on Nexus 5010. You see extenders as ports in configuration. You set out-of-band management on mgmt0 interface. Regards -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus 5010 Help
On 4/29/11 15:19 , Renelson Panosky wrote: Does Anybody here familiar with Cisco Nexus 5010 ? I am trying to configure one along with two Nexus 2248. How do i set a management IP address on this device ? Nexus 2248 extenders have no logic and all configuration is done on Nexus 5010. You see extenders as ports in configuration. You set out-of-band management on mgmt0 interface. Regards -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus 5010 Help
On 4/29/11 15:19 , Renelson Panosky wrote: Does Anybody here familiar with Cisco Nexus 5010 ? I am trying to configure one along with two Nexus 2248. How do i set a management IP address on this device ? Nexus 2248 extenders have no logic and all configuration is done on Nexus 5010. You see extenders as ports in configuration. You set out-of-band management on mgmt0 interface. Regards -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus 5010 Help
On 4/29/11 15:19 , Renelson Panosky wrote: Does Anybody here familiar with Cisco Nexus 5010 ? I am trying to configure one along with two Nexus 2248. How do i set a management IP address on this device ? Nexus 2248 extenders have no logic and all configuration is done on Nexus 5010. You see extenders as ports in configuration. You set out-of-band management on mgmt0 interface. Regards -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Searching for cheap IPv6 NAT-PT Cisco-device
On 2/25/11 2:17 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote: Hello, I would like to connect IPv4-only devices like printers to an IPv6-only Network and I thought about doing this with NAT-PT on a cisco-device. To play around with NAT-PT and do some tests I need a cheap device. According to the cisco document Implementing NAT-PT for IPv6 (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipv6/configuration/guide/ip6-nat_trnsln_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html) I need IOS 12.4(2)T if I want to use all the available features. What is the cheapest cisco-device with at least two or better four fast ethernet ports running IOS 12.4(2)T to evaluate, if configuring NAT-PT is a solution for my problem ? greetings and thanks for help, Hello Andreas, In general performance of NAT64 is not really high. I remember on Cisco 2801 ~4Mbit was all I could get. I used one of the latest 12.4T release, 12.4(24)T as far as I remember. The smaller reasonable device to play with would be Cisco 1841 but it's also available on 870 and 880 platform. Of course for the production network I'd check how much traffic it's going to handle (and not only in number of TCP sessions that have to be translated but throughput itself, because NAT64 is process switched since 12.4(20)T, until that it was fast switched). Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Rate Limiting on Cisco ASR1006
On 2/7/11 5:16 PM, Righa Shake wrote: How do you do rate limiting on cisco ASR1006? Am looking for the command but cant find it at interface level You can use policers Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Broadband Right-To-Use Feature Lic for ASR1000 Series (FLASR1-BB-RTU)
On 2/1/11 2:33 PM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: Hi Piotr, Interesting feedback on this one. IIRC, I thought reading somewhere on Cisco's BEAUTIFUL website that this license could only be activated for an ASR1006 or higher. This is why they propose a bundle called Cisco ASR1000 Series Broadband Bundle with that model. Once again - you don't activate any of those license. You have to buy them if you want to use this feature, but you can always configure broadband aggregation. It's just piece of paper you have to have to be lagal. Same is with all features on ASR1K. The broadband bundle exists also for ASR1002. If you are right (and I don't doubt), this means that the whole series of ASR1K could be used to terminate any kind of sessions (such as LNS) without even purchasing the license. Correct ? Yes. Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] VRF aware syslog and snmps on IOS and IOS-XR
On 2/2/11 7:15 AM, Jason Lixfeld wrote: Sorry for the noise. Further testing suggests that I should also ask about vrf aware tacacs+ authentication. Hi Jason, afair SNMP is VRF-aware, haven't heard of exception with traps, tacacs+ and syslog are not yet. Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] VRF aware syslog and snmps on IOS and IOS-XR
On 2/2/11 7:55 AM, Ryan West wrote: On 2/2/11 7:15 AM, Jason Lixfeld wrote: Sorry for the noise. Further testing suggests that I should also ask about vrf aware tacacs+ authentication. Hi Jason, afair SNMP is VRF-aware, haven't heard of exception with traps, tacacs+ and syslog are not yet. TACACS+ is VRF-aware, at least in the ISR line. I was talking about IOS XR only Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Broadband Right-To-Use Feature Lic for ASR1000 Series (FLASR1-BB-RTU)
On 1/31/11 9:56 PM, Andrew K. wrote: Does anyone have any experience purchasing this license for an ASR1002? The Cisco site does not offer much information about it, the only real information is followed : hxxp://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps9343/data_sheet_c78-447652.html I am looking to find out how to input this license into the router and what version of IOS is needed. Hi Andrew, FLASR1-BB-RTU is just right-to-use license that enables broadband features. It must be purchased in conjunction with a Broadband Number-Of-Sessions license like FLASR1-BB-4K which allows maximum number of 4000 user sessions. But on ASR1K you don't enable licenses like on ISR G2 to make some features available. You buy licenses and Cisco trusts you, that you bought licenses for features you are using and number of sessions you are terminating. Also trying to find out what the effect be on PPPoE/VPDN sessions currently terminated without this license (if any). None :) Regards, Peter -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Broadband Right-To-Use Feature Lic for ASR1000 Series (FLASR1-BB-RTU)
On 1/31/11 9:56 PM, Andrew K. wrote: Does anyone have any experience purchasing this license for an ASR1002? The Cisco site does not offer much information about it, the only real information is followed : hxxp://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps9343/data_sheet_c78-447652.html I am looking to find out how to input this license into the router and what version of IOS is needed. Hi Andrew, FLASR1-BB-RTU is just right-to-use license that enables broadband features. It must be purchased in conjunction with a Broadband Number-Of-Sessions license like FLASR1-BB-4K which allows maximum number of 4000 user sessions. But on ASR1K you don't enable licenses like on ISR G2 to make some features available. You buy licenses and Cisco trusts you, that you bought licenses for features you are using and number of sessions you are terminating. Also trying to find out what the effect be on PPPoE/VPDN sessions currently terminated without this license (if any). None :) Regards, Peter -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] %SIBYTE-CFC10-3-CORRECTABLE_ECC_ERR (6500 switch)
On 1/23/11 12:49 PM, Farooq Razzaque wrote: Hi All I am getting the following errors on 6500 %SIBYTE-CFC10-3-CORRECTABLE_ECC_ERR: A correctable ECC error has occurred, A_BUS_L2_ERRORS: 0x0, A_BUS_MEMIO_ERRORS: 0xFF, A_SCD_BUS_ERR_STATUS: 0xC0DC3000 Attached is the outputs of show environment command. Apparently all the environment are normal . Hi Farooq, I don't see show environment output from you but if you say everything is ok (temperature, voltage ect.) then it may be hardware problem. What card do you have in slot 10? Does card reload itself or you see any other logs from this card? It seems like CFC and/or it's memory might went broken (parity errors?). Regards, Peter -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te0/2: Rx power low warning; Operating value: -12.5 dBm, Threshold value -9.9 dBm
On 1/24/11 8:41 AM, Farooq Razzaque wrote: Hi All I am receiving the following errors on aggregation switch (WS-C3560E-12SD-E) which is connected with Core switch (Cat. 6513) %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te0/2: Rx power low warning; Operating value: -12.5 dBm, Threshold value -9.9 dBm Check show interface Ten0/2 trans detail but it looks like a problem with either fiber patch cord or optical module - receiving power on C3560 is lower than threshold. Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] asr1000 netflow export
On 1/20/11 3:20 PM, marc williams wrote: Can you export netflow via the vrf Mgmt-intf? I'm getting flows failed due to lack of export packet. No you can't. OOB Mgmt interface cannot be used as a NetFlow export source interface. Peter, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] While we're at it: SPAs in ASRs
On 1/19/11 11:04 AM, Elmar K. Bins wrote: Me again, this seems to be Cisco crazyness day. I have acquired SPA-2X1GE-V2 to go along with my ASR1002, and it now looks like the SPA does not work inside that box (the card is found but the interfaces keep bouncing). Has anyone heard of compatibility problems there? I know that ASRs are not listed on the SPA's page on www.cisco.com; I put that down to Cisco as usual not updating their info. I found the SPA listed somewhere connected to ASRs (don't remember the place, this has been a while ago). If anyone has experience, please share. Hello, This SPA is supported in ASR1002 since the beginning afair. Check if other SPA (same type or different) is working properly on this slot, if this SPA will work in other chassis and SFP's if you are using them if they are not broken. It may be hardware problem. Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 3G cisco cpe in Slovenia
On 1/5/11 6:42 PM, zack wrote: Hello I'm working on a networ design which requires Integrated 3G Wireless WAN CPE in Slovenia (Europe). The CPE model should be: CISCO881G-G-K9 Cisco 881 Fast Ethernet Security Router supporting HSPA/UMTS/EDGE/GPRS - Global SKU with 2 modems option: PCEX-3G-HSPA-R6 PCEX-3G-HSPA-G Which is the correct modem option that can support Slovenina 3G SIM CARD? Hi Marco, You should go with PCEX-3G-HSPA-G which is recommended for Europe and is working on 900MHz band for WCDMA where -R6 is not. Those cards also differs in antenna connectors if you want to use external antennas. Peter, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
