Re: [c-nsp] Latest Nexus 5k NX-OS?
Thanks Simon Thomason Network Engineer 2649 Logan Road Eight Mile Plains, QLD, 4113 PO Box 4 Springwood, QLD 4127 T +61 7 3361 2359 F +61 7 3841 1048 E simon.thoma...@racq.com.au<mailto:simon.thoma...@racq.com.au> W racq.com <http://www.racq.com.au>[cid:image001.jpg@01CC2B42.71ED1320]<http://www.racq.com.au/><http://www.racq.com.au> <http://www.racq.com.au/decadeofaction>[cid:image002.jpg@01CC2B42.71ED1320]<http://www.racq.com.au/decadeofaction><http://www.racq.com.au/decadeofaction> Like us on [cid:image003.gif@01CC2B42.71ED1320] <http://www.facebook.com/racqofficial> Follow us on [cid:image004.gif@01CC2B42.71ED1320] <http://www.twitter.com/racqofficial> From: Ramesh Karki [mailto:rameshka...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 15 June 2011 9:37 AM To: Thomason, Simon Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Latest Nexus 5k NX-OS? It is better to stay with existing version until 5.03(n2) get released. 5.0.3.N1.1c has a bug (CSCtn94753) which cause the slot# to appear automatically in config and can't delete them easily. Thanks -R On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Thomason, Simon mailto:simon.thoma...@racq.com.au>> wrote: Hey All, Was just wondering if anyone has started to use n5000-uk9.5.0.3.N1.1c.bin NX-OS? I have been advised this will fix a few issues with our monitoring solution Statseeker (nexus does not send correct snmp info to statseeker). Currently running on n5000-uk9.5.0.2.N2.1.bin so there are really no major features in the newer version to really drive home the point of an upgrade. Just wanted to hear from anyone running on the cutting edge and if they have had any issues with it. Hot foot it to RACQ MotorFest at Eagle Farm Racecourse on 17 July and swoon over Queensland's largest display of collectable vehicles. Visit www.racq.com/motorfest<http://www.racq.com/motorfest> Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au<mailto:unsubscr...@racq.com.au> or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Hot foot it to RACQ MotorFest at Eagle Farm Racecourse on 17 July and swoon over Queensland's largest display of collectable vehicles. Visit www.racq.com/motorfest Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. <><><><>___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco AnyConnect VPN Client
Where are you getting this information from? As of 8.4 they redid the licensing for anyconnect and also added ikev2 ipsec to the anyconnect suite unless I missed something. If you can get pics [cid:image001.png@01CC9AD5.10537C00] -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll Sent: Friday, 4 November 2011 7:20 AM To: Manu Chao Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco AnyConnect VPN Client NO. Anyconnect is a ssl vpn only. and licensed. Scott On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Manu Chao wrote: > I haven't found how to configure IPSec with Cisco AnyConnect VPN Client. > > Is it possible? > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Show Your RACQ Card & Save during November and save 20% at Repco. For more info visit: www.racq.com/repco Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. <>___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Local printer will not print when connected to Cisco VPN client or checkpoint..Please help
Sorry I am pretty certain I total miss read this one. Split tunnelling will only work if you specify what is and is not interesting traffic for the VPN and local network. Depending on what client you are using you can enable local lan access in anyconnect (not certain if there is an option for this in the old Cisco VPN). -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Quinn Kuzmich Sent: Wednesday, 28 March 2012 12:04 PM To: Renelson Panosky Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Local printer will not print when connected to Cisco VPN client or checkpoint..Please help Enable split tunneling on the VPN or plug the printer into a local USB port. Q On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Renelson Panosky wrote: > I have a user who work from home and he has a home network printer which > connected to his wireless router throuh a LAN port. Whenever he is VPN > into the office he is not able to print from his home network printer. > but if he disconnect from the VPN then he can print. I already make sure > split tunnelling is enabled on the VPN server and Local LAN access is > enabled on his machines. However he can print if he connects his wireless > printer directly to his PC or Laptop he is just can't print wirelessly. > Any idea how i can get him to be able to print wirelessly while VPN into > the office. > > Things i've already checked: > > 1) he can ping his printer IP address > 2) While connected to the VPN he can see his home printer > > Any help will greatly appreciated... > > Renelson > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ RACQ gets more than 9 out of 10 cars going again – quick smart. That’s Australia’s highest success rate! Be part of Queensland’s largest club. Visit racq.com/roadsiderescue Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Local printer will not print when connected to Cisco VPN client or checkpoint..Please help
Does the printer have a default gateway as in able to see outside its own subnet? Can you ping/tracroute to it? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Quinn Kuzmich Sent: Wednesday, 28 March 2012 12:04 PM To: Renelson Panosky Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Local printer will not print when connected to Cisco VPN client or checkpoint..Please help Enable split tunneling on the VPN or plug the printer into a local USB port. Q On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Renelson Panosky wrote: > I have a user who work from home and he has a home network printer which > connected to his wireless router throuh a LAN port. Whenever he is VPN > into the office he is not able to print from his home network printer. > but if he disconnect from the VPN then he can print. I already make sure > split tunnelling is enabled on the VPN server and Local LAN access is > enabled on his machines. However he can print if he connects his wireless > printer directly to his PC or Laptop he is just can't print wirelessly. > Any idea how i can get him to be able to print wirelessly while VPN into > the office. > > Things i've already checked: > > 1) he can ping his printer IP address > 2) While connected to the VPN he can see his home printer > > Any help will greatly appreciated... > > Renelson > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ RACQ gets more than 9 out of 10 cars going again – quick smart. That’s Australia’s highest success rate! Be part of Queensland’s largest club. Visit racq.com/roadsiderescue Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 2960S IOS
Always a good idea to read the field notice and current / fixed bugs in your new IOS. There might be a bug but it might not be relevant to your situation. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of John Elliot Sent: Wednesday, 21 March 2012 3:43 PM To: jiri.procha...@superhosting.cz; cisco-nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 2960S IOS > > John, > > > we're using 15.0.1-SE2 (and 15.0.1-SE1) on aproximately 20 2960S's for a > while and we have no problem so far. > Thanks to all who responded - have upgraded to 15.0(1)SE2...fingers crossed we encounter no issues :) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ RACQ gets more than 9 out of 10 cars going again – quick smart. That’s Australia’s highest success rate! Be part of Queensland’s largest club. Visit racq.com/roadsiderescue Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 2960S IOS
Not certain if anyone is looking into smart install or vstack but when you go to 15 train you get a few nicer features which is one of the reasons we have gone into the 15 train where we can. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Thomason, Simon Sent: Wednesday, 21 March 2012 9:16 AM To: 'John Elliot'; cisco-nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 2960S IOS Hi John, I just upgrade our branch fleet of 2960s' to 15.0.1-SE2 if that helps. Cheers, Simon. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of John Elliot Sent: Wednesday, 21 March 2012 9:13 AM To: cisco-nsp Subject: [c-nsp] 2960S IOS Hi Guys, Have a pair of new 2960S's that are running 12.2(55)SE3 - Just after a recommendation on whether to upgrade to 12.2.58-SE2 or go to 15.0.1-SE2 ? Cheers. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ RACQ gets more than 9 out of 10 cars going again – quick smart. That’s Australia’s highest success rate! Be part of Queensland’s largest club. Visit racq.com/roadsiderescue Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ RACQ gets more than 9 out of 10 cars going again – quick smart. That’s Australia’s highest success rate! Be part of Queensland’s largest club. Visit racq.com/roadsiderescue Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 2960S IOS
Hi John, I just upgrade our branch fleet of 2960s' to 15.0.1-SE2 if that helps. Cheers, Simon. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of John Elliot Sent: Wednesday, 21 March 2012 9:13 AM To: cisco-nsp Subject: [c-nsp] 2960S IOS Hi Guys, Have a pair of new 2960S's that are running 12.2(55)SE3 - Just after a recommendation on whether to upgrade to 12.2.58-SE2 or go to 15.0.1-SE2 ? Cheers. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ RACQ gets more than 9 out of 10 cars going again – quick smart. That’s Australia’s highest success rate! Be part of Queensland’s largest club. Visit racq.com/roadsiderescue Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASA and ipads
Software client but I was thinking if the client could send information about itself (dot1x) part then this might work. Sorry if I have miss understood dot1x but thought that the same kind of functionality could be use such as for wireless with the vpn client. Just trying to find out what can be done right now. -Original Message- From: Christopher J. Pilkington [mailto:c...@0x1.net] Sent: Monday, 30 January 2012 3:16 PM To: Thomason, Simon Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASA and ipads On Jan 29, 2012, at 22:28, "Thomason, Simon" wrote: > Just did a quick search to see if the ASA would support Dot1x and does not > look like they do as this might have been a different option. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding your topology here... are these laptops entering your network with a software VPN client, or do you have a router at their site terminating the VPN tunnel? If the former, I don't see how 802.1x fits. -cjp Renew your membership online, simply visit http://www.racq.com.au/my_racq/make_a_payment today. Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASA and ipads
That would be a policy question not a technical one :) -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dobbins, Roland Sent: Monday, 30 January 2012 1:48 PM To: Cisco NSP Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASA and ipads On Jan 30, 2012, at 9:54 AM, Thomason, Simon wrote: > have the ASA aware that the device connecting is an IPAD and heavily restrict > its access. Why does being an iPad make a device somehow undesirable and deserving of heavy restrictions? It can be argued that the iPad is at least superficially more secure than general-purpose computers. If I were to differentiate access policies between iPads and general-purpose computers (which I can't imagine having a need to do), I'd be inclined to give the iPads *more* privileges than the general-purpose computers, not less. --- Roland Dobbins // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> The basis of optimism is sheer terror. -- Oscar Wilde ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Renew your membership online, simply visit http://www.racq.com.au/my_racq/make_a_payment today. Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Cisco ASA and ipads
I am looking at allowing IPADS to from a VPN with our ASA to provide limited access. I would like to ideally have the IPAD connect with a cert and username password but have the ASA aware that the device connecting is an IPAD and heavily restrict its access. I really need the ASA to be aware what these device are to prevent users importing a laptop certain and gaining full access to the network over their IPAD. I am pretty certain you can get this functionality with premium but just want to check you can and it works well. Has anyone look into this at all? Just did a quick search to see if the ASA would support Dot1x and does not look like they do as this might have been a different option. Cheers, Simon T Renew your membership online, simply visit http://www.racq.com.au/my_racq/make_a_payment today. Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus and HP Flexfabric
Do you know what the limit to vlans on flexfabric is? As we seem to be running into an issues with Vlan limits right now and depending on which person/website I ask depends on the limit. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists Sent: Friday, 16 December 2011 10:42 AM To: 'Pablo Espinosa' Cc: 'cisco-nsp' Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus and HP Flexfabric We have customers running the Nexus B22HP (Cisco/HP FEX) and it works pretty well. Flex-Whatever sucks. Bowling balls through straws. It's a switch, but not a switch. It doesn't do QoS. (Flex-NIC bandwidth-limitations work only in one direction). It doesn't do multi-hop FCoE (no FCoE out of the rack), and thus requires more FC ports = more expensive, it is limited in number of VLANs. Management sucks. Server admins configure networking. >From my experience I'd say 1st prio: B22HP -> N5500 (limited market exposure, but cool tech) 2nd prio: Pass-Through -> N2232 -> N5500 ... 5th prio: CBS-3120X -> N5500 ... 8th prio: barbed wired ... Cth prio: VC FlexFabric -> N5500 ... Fth prio: VC Flex-10 -> N5500 Seriously. -A -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Pablo Espinosa Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 11:10 PM To: cisco-nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus and HP Flexfabric Actually, I mis-spoke on the HP Flexfabric question. I've been asked to consider the HP Flexfabric product OR the integrated Cisco Nexus 2K within an HP Blade serverIf anyone has deployed either solution, I would love some feedback thanks p- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Stuck for gift ideas? Check out racq.com/shop where you are sure to find something for everyone. Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 5k with HP flex Fabric
Tried all of these things kind of lost on this one. Waiting to hear back from HP. -Original Message- From: Håvard Staub Nyhus [mailto:hny...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2011 11:16 PM To: Thomason, Simon Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 5k with HP flex Fabric > Has anyone run into issues with adding new vlans to a VPC for HP blades? I > have just provisioned a new network to pump down to my HP blades but have run > into issues on the HP farm. HP Flexfabric certainly feels like a black hole in the data center network infrastructure. Are you sure the vlan is correctly provisioned on the HP blades? It is certainly easy enough to misconfigure the flexfabric with regards to failover. What kind of channel protocol are you running? LACP? what does "show port-channel summary" say? Is everything connected properly? Try turning on LLDP on your Nexus and verify your connections... -- Håvard Staub Nyhus Network Consultant +47 41 88 00 99 Stuck for gift ideas? Check out racq.com/shop where you are sure to find something for everyone. Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Cisco 5k with HP flex Fabric
Hi All, Has anyone run into issues with adding new vlans to a VPC for HP blades? I have just provisioned a new network to pump down to my HP blades but have run into issues on the HP farm. Currently have 12 chassis spread over 2 sites with 2 new networks (1 per site) not working at all at one site and only 1 of the 6 chassis working with the new network. At both sites I have allocated a new port with just this new network on it and brought up a server fine on the new network. At our DR site I have had the server team reboot both flexfabric one at a time and still does not work. I have even gone to the length of having the new VLAN taken off and put back on the flex fabric. Just wanted to see if anyone else had run into an issues like this. Server team currently have a job opened with HP but wanted to see if anyone could help here. Below is some code for the VPC but the only real difference is that the working one has a few less vlans. ---code EMP31D11NEXUS# sh vlan id 328 VLAN Name StatusPorts - --- 328 MS_Exchange_10.53.128.0/24 activePo1, Po2, Po3, Po37, Po38, Po39 Po40, Po50, Po51, Po52, Po53 Po55, Po56, Po64, Po65 Remote SPAN VLAN Disabled Primary Secondary Type Ports --- - --- --- !Working VPC interface port-channel40 description Blade Chassis EMPR1C6CH1 VConnect 2 switchport mode trunk vpc 40 switchport trunk allowed vlan 314,321-323,328,360,362,617 spanning-tree port type edge trunk speed 1 ! example of a a VPC that is not working. EMP31D11NEXUS# sh run int po50 !Command: show running-config interface port-channel50 !Time: Tue Dec 13 14:15:00 2011 version 5.0(2)N2(1) interface port-channel50 description L EMPR1C1CH1-VC1 switchport mode trunk vpc 50 switchport trunk allowed vlan 310-311,314-315,321-323,328,360,362,610-615,617 spanning-tree port type edge trunk speed 1 ---code Stuck for gift ideas? Check out racq.com/shop where you are sure to find something for everyone. Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Cisco Branch router needs a reboot after updating MOH
Hey All, Just to clear up levels of knowledge before I begin I only do the data side of the network but I am now chasing up a problem for our Voice team as each time they update the Music on hold on our branch routes they need to reboot the router to get the MOH to work properly. I for the life of me can believe that you have to reboot a router to get MOH working so I am asking the if there something they are missing with this updates. I did a bit of basic looking around and could not find out anything with my limited knowledge of this area. Any help our guidance would be appreciated. Also know I could lodge a job on this one but thought it must be something simple missing. Models 1800 2800 2900 affected. issue Issue - Once we upload the new MOH file, if we don't reboot the gateway then phones doesn't play the complete hold message and just keep repeating 2-3 seconds of whole file. We tried it on all RACQ branches and each gateway had the same issue. issue Config ! call-manager-fallback moh SampleAudioSource.ulaw.wav multicast moh 239.1.1.9 port 16384 route 10.54.21.1 10.54.20.1 ! Config log CRN11R01#sh ver Cisco IOS Software, C2900 Software (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.0(1)M1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport Copyright (c) 1986-2009 by Cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Wed 02-Dec-09 15:23 by prod_rel_team ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 15.0(1r)M1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) CRN11R01 uptime is 19 hours, 10 minutes System returned to ROM by reload at 18:26:47 EST Mon Dec 5 2011 System restarted at 18:28:05 EST Mon Dec 5 2011 System image file is "flash0:c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.150-1.M1.bin" Last reload reason: Reload Command This product contains cryptographic features and is subject to United States and local country laws governing import, export, transfer and use. Delivery of Cisco cryptographic products does not imply third-party authority to import, export, distribute or use encryption. Importers, exporters, distributors and users are responsible for compliance with U.S. and local country laws. By using this product you agree to comply with applicable laws and regulations. If you are unable to comply with U.S. and local laws, return this product immediately. A summary of U.S. laws governing Cisco cryptographic products may be found at: http://www.cisco.com/wwl/export/crypto/tool/stqrg.html If you require further assistance please contact us by sending email to exp...@cisco.com. Cisco CISCO2911/K9 (revision 1.0) with 479232K/45056K bytes of memory. Processor board ID # 3 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces 21 Serial interfaces 1 Channelized E1/PRI port 2 Voice FXS interfaces DRAM configuration is 64 bits wide with parity enabled. 255K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 254464K bytes of ATA System CompactFlash 0 (Read/Write) License Info: License UDI: - Device# PID SN - *0CISCO2911/K9 # Technology Package License Information for Module:'c2900' TechnologyTechnology-package Technology-package Current Type Next reboot - ipbaseipbasek9 Permanent ipbasek9 security None None None ucuck9 Permanent uck9 data None None None Configuration register is 0x2102 Directory of flash0:/ 1 -rw-62558836 Feb 11 2010 15:43:34 +10:00 c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.150-1.M1.bin 2 -rw-2903 Feb 11 2010 15:50:40 +10:00 cpconfig-29xx.cfg 3 -rw- 2915328 Feb 11 2010 15:50:54 +10:00 cpexpress.tar 4 -rw-1038 Feb 11 2010 15:51:04 +10:00 home.shtml 5 -rw- 115712 Feb 11 2010 15:51:12 +10:00 home.tar 6 -rw- 1697952 Feb 11 2010 15:51:24 +10:00 securedesktop-ios-3.1.1.45-k9.pkg 7 -rw- 415956 Feb 11 2010 15:51:36 +10:00 sslclient-win-1.1.4.176.pkg 8 -rw- 600 Mar 8 2010 12:46:20 +10:00 vlan.dat 9 -rw- 2795232 Dec 5 2011 18:26:24 +10:00 SampleAudioSource.ulaw.wav 10 -rw- 18294 Jan 18 2011 12:23:56 +10:00 CRN11R01-18012011.CONF 260153344 bytes total (189607936 bytes free) log Simon Thomason Stuck for gift ideas? Check out racq.com/shop where you are sure to find something for everyone. Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please de
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco AnyConnect VPN Client
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps6032/ps6094/ps6120/data_sheet_c78-527494.html VPN Protocol Choice SSL (TLS and DTLS), and IPsec/IKEv2 New in AnyConnect 3.0 * AnyConnect now provides a choice of VPN protocols, allowing administrators to use whichever protocol best fits their business needs * Tunneling support includes SSL (TLS and DTLS) and next-generation IPsec (IKEv2) * DTLS provides an optimized connection for latency-sensitive traffic, such as VoIP traffic or TCP-based application access * TLS (HTTP over TLS/SSL) ensures availability of network connectivity through locked-down environments, including those using web proxy servers * IPsec/IKEv2 provides an optimized connection for latency-sensitive traffic when security policies require use of IPsec -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Manu Chao Sent: Friday, 4 November 2011 2:24 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco AnyConnect VPN Client I haven't found how to configure IPSec with Cisco AnyConnect VPN Client. Is it possible? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Show Your RACQ Card & Save during November and save 20% at Repco. For more info visit: www.racq.com/repco Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Changing VLANs
You could use EEM and tcl scripts to do this. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mohammad Khalil Sent: Thursday, 3 November 2011 4:15 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Changing VLANs Hi all , i have a layer 2 switch , i want to connect a PC to a port and number of DHCP servers to other ports i want to the PC to communicate with each server every 5 minutes for example PC is connected to F0/1 and Server 1 is connected to F0/2 , after 5 minutes i want the port the PC connecting to to change its VLAN in order to communicate with Server 2 which is connected to port F0/3 (which is on different VLAN) Thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Show Your RACQ Card & Save during November and save 20% at Repco. For more info visit: www.racq.com/repco Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] "Strange" Cisco ASA5520 errors - Connection limit exceeded
Sh activation-key ASA# sh activation-key Licensed features for this platform: Maximum Physical Interfaces : Unlimited perpetual Maximum VLANs : 150perpetual Inside Hosts : Unlimited perpetual Failover : Active/Active perpetual VPN-DES : Enabledperpetual VPN-3DES-AES : Enabledperpetual Security Contexts : 2 perpetual GTP/GPRS : Disabled perpetual AnyConnect Premium Peers : 2 perpetual <<< what does this one say? AnyConnect Essentials : Disabled perpetual Other VPN Peers : 750perpetual Total VPN Peers : 750perpetual Shared License: Disabled perpetual AnyConnect for Mobile : Disabled perpetual AnyConnect for Cisco VPN Phone: Disabled perpetual Advanced Endpoint Assessment : Disabled perpetual UC Phone Proxy Sessions : 2 perpetual Total UC Proxy Sessions : 2 perpetual Botnet Traffic Filter : Disabled perpetual Intercompany Media Engine : Disabled perpetual -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Peter Adkins Sent: Friday, 28 October 2011 3:13 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] "Strange" Cisco ASA5520 errors - Connection limit exceeded Hi all, The scenario is that we have two 5520s for this environment configured for fail-over, these devices currently terminate a whopping 2x L2L IPSec VPNs and a handful of SSL VPN sessions. This morning we encountered a strange issue which was originally believed to be due to ACLs not permitting traffic; effectively, if I were to log in to one of the configured SSL VPNs I was unable to connect to any services configured to be permitted through the VPN filter. As a last ditch effort to work out what was wrong I permitted ANY IP traffic through to the required network, however, this still didn't fix the issue. As an example of what we were seeing, when attempts to telnet into TCP port 1433 were failing, the following was found in the logs: ... %ASA-3-201011: Connection limit exceeded -35/5000 for input packet from X.X.X.X/65374 to Y.Y.Y.Y/1433 on interface outside %ASA-3-201011: Connection limit exceeded -35/5000 for input packet from X.X.X.X/65374 to Y.Y.Y.Y/1433 on interface outside %ASA-3-201011: Connection limit exceeded -35/5000 for input packet from X.X.X.X/65374 to Y.Y.Y.Y/1433 on interface outside %ASA-3-201011: Connection limit exceeded -35/5000 for input packet from X.X.X.X/65375 to Y.Y.Y.Y/1433 on interface outside %ASA-3-201011: Connection limit exceeded -35/5000 for input packet from X.X.X.X/65375 to Y.Y.Y.Y/1433 on interface outside %ASA-3-201011: Connection limit exceeded -35/5000 for input packet from X.X.X.X/65375 to Y.Y.Y.Y/1433 on interface outside ... The Cisco website indicates that these sorts of messages would be presented if the configured connection limits were, well, exceeded. However, I am slightly perplexed as to the current count staying at -35 for all reported messages -- as there was a large number of them. ... Interface outside: Service-policy: CONNS Class-map: CONNS Set connection policy: conn-max 5000 embryonic-conn-max 30 current embryonic conns 0, current conns -35, drop 5622 Set connection timeout policy: embryonic 0:40:00 half-closed 0:20:00 idle 2:00:00 DCD: enabled, retry-interval 0:00:15, max-retries 5 DCD: client-probe 530, server-probe 0, conn-expiration 106 ... I could understand if we were reaching a session limit, however, with only two clients connected and a max of 5000 I don't believe this to be the case. Also, as mentioned, the current session index being 'stuck' at -35 concerns me slightly. In the end, we had failed over to the redundant node which did not exhibit this issue. However, as soon as we failed back the problem came straight back. The only way to resolve the issue was a reload. I'm trying to work out whether anyone has encountered this issue before on an ASA55x0 running 8.2(4). Mainly to determine whether this was something strange, or me just being daft. As much as I'd like to log a TAC case for this one, this particular device does not have a valid support contract. However, for my sanity I'd like to establish whether this is / was a potential code issue, or a problem with the device itself. Regards, Peter Adkins ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Members sav
[c-nsp] Anyconnect 3.0 client as a service.
Hello all, I just wanted to know if you could start the anyconnect 3.0 client on a windows xp machine as service or system process so normal users can not ctrl + alt + del and kill the process. Cheers, Simon T Members save 1%* p.a. on car loan rates with no ongoing fees. Apply today at http://www.racq.com.au/promotions/racq_car_loans Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] redundant Cat3560 trunk links
Etherchannel? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of zaidoon h Sent: Sunday, 9 October 2011 9:52 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] redundant Cat3560 trunk links How to connect redundant Cat3560 with trunk links to 7606 (ios 12.2 sr ) ? how to terminate l3 sub interfaces ? Dose 802.1Q Tunneling Works ? any advise please. Zaid ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Members save 1%* p.a. on car loan rates with no ongoing fees. Apply today at http://www.racq.com.au/promotions/racq_car_loans Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] WAAS Mobile client and IE7
Hey All, Bit of a long shot but is anyone running WAAS mobile client and having issues with IE7. I have had reports and now able to replicate issues where IE7 will open and crash the WAAS mobile client. Currently have a tac case open but just wanted to see if anyone has run into an issues like this and whether there is a quick fix (other than stop using IE7). WAAS mobile version 3.5.2 Cheers, Simon T. Save money and avoid queues – pre-purchase discounted Ekka tickets at your local RACQ store. Visit: racq.com/entertainment Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus 2248TP interface down/inactive
More information is required! What interfaces are you working on? What makes you think it is a spanning-tree issue? Logs debugs? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Renelson Panosky Sent: Friday, 22 July 2011 10:28 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus 2248TP interface down/inactive I am working in this interface 2248TP some of the interface are showing down/inactive. My svi on the core are up/up. I think it maybe a spanning-tree issue but I am not sure. can anyone help ? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Save money and avoid queues – pre-purchase discounted Ekka tickets at your local RACQ store. Visit: racq.com/entertainment Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Nexus 2k - host ports
Hey All, Just doing a little research at the moment for some design work and I found out that you can not plug a switch into a nexus2k as all ports are host ports. I am certain a least a few people on here have had a look into this and was just wondering if there is some kind of work around? I have also been trying to find out if on the road map for the nexus platform there is something in the works to support this at a later date. Reason for plugging a switch into the Nexus2k's would be to allow the ilo ports which only operate at 100M to be plugged into a cheaper switch rather than burning up a 10/100/1000 extender per rack with a 10gig extender. ---reference--- Host interfaces are for host or server connectivity only; host interfaces cannot connect to another network. These interfaces are always enabled as edge ports; as they come up, these ports immediately transition to the forwarding state. Host interfaces are always enabled with BPDU Guard. If a BPDU is received, the port is immediately placed in an error-disabled state which keeps the link down. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus2000/sw/configuration/guide/rel_4_0_1a/FEX-features.html Host interfaces are for host or server connectivity only; host interfaces cannot connect to another network. These interfaces are always enabled as edge ports; as they come up, these ports immediately transition to the forwarding state. Host interfaces are always enabled with BPDU Guard. If a BPDU is received, the port is immediately placed in an error-disabled state which keeps the link down. ---reference--- Hot foot it to RACQ MotorFest at Eagle Farm Racecourse on 17 July and swoon over Queensland’s largest display of collectable vehicles. Visit www.racq.com/motorfest Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Latest Nexus 5k NX-OS?
I just saw this email going over the release notes now. I did not see that CSCtn94753 was fixed but only skimming over right now. Flex links looks pretty interesting along with Orphan port shutdown. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of John Gill Sent: Thursday, 16 June 2011 12:39 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Latest Nexus 5k NX-OS? FYI 5.0(3)N2(1) is out now John Gill cisco On 6/14/11 7:37 PM, Ramesh Karki wrote: > It is better to stay with existing version until 5.03(n2) get released. > > 5.0.3.N1.1c has a bug (CSCtn94753) which cause the slot# to appear > automatically in config and can't delete them easily. > > Thanks >-R > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Thomason, Simon> wrote: > >> Hey All, >> >> Was just wondering if anyone has started to use n5000-uk9.5.0.3.N1.1c.bin >> NX-OS? >> >> I have been advised this will fix a few issues with our monitoring solution >> Statseeker (nexus does not send correct snmp info to statseeker). >> >> Currently running on n5000-uk9.5.0.2.N2.1.bin so there are really no major >> features in the newer version to really drive home the point of an upgrade. >> >> Just wanted to hear from anyone running on the cutting edge and if they >> have had any issues with it. >> >> Hot foot it to RACQ MotorFest at Eagle Farm Racecourse on 17 July and swoon >> over Queensland’s largest display of collectable vehicles. Visit >> www.racq.com/motorfest >> >> Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this >> email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that >> this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive >> any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail >> unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. >> >> ___ >> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Hot foot it to RACQ MotorFest at Eagle Farm Racecourse on 17 July and swoon over Queensland’s largest display of collectable vehicles. Visit www.racq.com/motorfest Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Latest Nexus 5k NX-OS?
Hey All, Was just wondering if anyone has started to use n5000-uk9.5.0.3.N1.1c.bin NX-OS? I have been advised this will fix a few issues with our monitoring solution Statseeker (nexus does not send correct snmp info to statseeker). Currently running on n5000-uk9.5.0.2.N2.1.bin so there are really no major features in the newer version to really drive home the point of an upgrade. Just wanted to hear from anyone running on the cutting edge and if they have had any issues with it. Hot foot it to RACQ MotorFest at Eagle Farm Racecourse on 17 July and swoon over Queensland’s largest display of collectable vehicles. Visit www.racq.com/motorfest Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Wireless 802.1x authentication failures
Are all the clients and server in sync with time? Just out of interest. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Edward Iong Sent: Tuesday, 14 June 2011 4:53 PM To: engel.lab...@gmail.com Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Wireless 802.1x authentication failures Hi there, I have checked the cert is not expired > CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > From: engel.lab...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Wireless 802.1x authentication failures > Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:22:14 +0900 > To: edward_io...@hotmail.com > > You may want to eliminate several issues contributing to this problem. One > thing to check is the expiration date of the certificate issued for MS ISA. > > HTH > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2011/06/14, at 15:13, Edward Iong wrote: > > > > > Dear All, > > > > We are using windows certificates for authenticate domain computers to > > connect wireless network. > > > > In previous, it is working. Everyone can access wireless network. But now > > no one can get access, we found in the MS ISA event Log, it has a warning > > message as below > > > > > > Event Type: Warning > > Event Source: IAS > > Event Category: None > > Event ID: 2 > > Date: 6/14/2011 > > Time: 1:16:37 PM > > User: N/A > > Computer: EDC-HKNT135 > > Description: > > User host/BDNB00011.bd.ABC.com was denied access. > > Fully-Qualified-User-Name = ABC\BDNB00011$ > > NAS-IP-Address = 10.XXX.XXX.51 > > NAS-Identifier = BDWLC1 > > Called-Station-Identifier = :xxx > > Calling-Station-Identifier = > > Client-Friendly-Name = BDWLC1 > > Client-IP-Address = 10.XXX.XXX.51 > > NAS-Port-Type = Wireless - IEEE 802.11 > > NAS-Port = 1 > > Proxy-Policy-Name = Use Windows authentication for all users > > Authentication-Provider = Windows > > Authentication-Server = > > Policy-Name = > > Authentication-Type = EAP > > EAP-Type = > > Reason-Code = 48 > > Reason = The connection attempt did not match any remote access policy. > > For more information, see Help and Support Center at > > http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. > > Data: > > : 00 00 00 00 > > > > Could anyone have any clues? or any suggestion for me to find out the issue > > come from? > > > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > > > > > Edward > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Hot foot it to RACQ MotorFest at Eagle Farm Racecourse on 17 July and swoon over Queensland’s largest display of collectable vehicles. Visit www.racq.com/motorfest Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] CIsco 5548P with 2248TP
Configuration would be a good starting point? I am assuming you have checked all the basic things; Plugged in and powered on? Cabled correctly (Multi or single mode cables)? Interface show fex or optic? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Renelson Panosky Sent: Friday, 3 June 2011 4:52 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] CIsco 5548P with 2248TP Have anybody here is running Cisco Nexus 5548P with 2248TP. I configured everything but i still can't see the Cisco Nexus 2248TP. Can anyone help me with this ? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Like us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/racqofficial Follow us on Twitter at http://twitter.com/RACQOfficial Hot foot it to RACQ MotorFest at Eagle Farm Racecourse on 17 July and swoon over Queensland’s largest display of collectable vehicles. Visit www.racq.com/motorfest Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] problems with 6500 and syncing sup config.
Hey Ken, Lodged a job to tac just in case as this is a core device but I did get a few off list emails which pointed me in the right direction. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matlock, Kenneth L Sent: Thursday, 2 June 2011 12:15 AM To: Phil Mayers; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] problems with 6500 and syncing sup config. Also be VERY careful about this if you're running Modular code. Modular code actively reads/writes to the flash filesystem periodically, and not sure if it touches the NVRAM during normal operation. Ken Matlock Network Analyst Exempla Healthcare (303) 467-4671 matlo...@exempla.org -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 1:28 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] problems with 6500 and syncing sup config. On 06/01/2011 02:33 AM, Thomason, Simon wrote: > Been getting the following error when doing a write me on a 6500. > > Jun 1 11:16:35.721 EST: %SYS-SPSTBY-4-CONFIG_NV_NEED_OVERRUN: Non > config data present at the end of nvram needs to be overwritten to > fit the configuration into nvram Jun 1 11:16:37.437 EST: Sounds like the nvram: on the standby sup is full and/or corrupted. Try: dir nvram: dir slavenvram: ...and see if anything obvious presents itself. It's possible you'll need to: erase nvram: erase slavenvram: wr mem ...but I'd be cautious about doing that. I'm not sure what else it might kill (e.g. SNMP ifindex persistence, SSH keys, etc.) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ *** Exempla Confidentiality Notice *** The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any other dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. *** Exempla Confidentiality Notice *** ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Hot foot it to RACQ MotorFest at Eagle Farm Racecourse on 17 July and swoon over Queensland’s largest display of collectable vehicles. Visit www.racq.com/motorfest Like us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/racqofficial Follow us on Twitter at http://twitter.com/RACQOfficial Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] problems with 6500 and syncing sup config.
Been getting the following error when doing a write me on a 6500. Jun 1 11:16:35.721 EST: %SYS-SPSTBY-4-CONFIG_NV_NEED_OVERRUN: Non config data present at the end of nvram needs to be overwritten to fit the configuration into nvram Jun 1 11:16:37.437 EST: %PFINIT-SP-1-CONFIG_SYNC_FAIL: Sync'ing the private configuration to the standby Router FAILED, the file may be already locked by a command like: show config. Had a look around and could not find out a solution for how to fix this issues as I have killed everyone's session to the 6500 but still get this error. I am not certain what process show startup would be in the show process and have not as yet been able to find information as to which process this would be. Anyone seen this before or know of a solution? Cheer, Simon. Hot foot it to RACQ MotorFest at Eagle Farm Racecourse on 17 July and swoon over Queensland’s largest display of collectable vehicles. Visit www.racq.com/motorfest Like us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/racqofficial Follow us on Twitter at http://twitter.com/RACQOfficial Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Nexus 5k NX-OS upgrade issues VPC access port.
Hey All, Just wanted to check something off with the subject matter experts. Last night did an upgrade on my pair of nexus 5k from 5.0.2N1.1 to 5.0.2.N2.1 and ran into and issues where after one device was rebooted one of my VPC failed until the second Nexus one was upgrade. I am pretty certain the issue was that that VPC was not running as a edge port which caused STP to be inconsistent and causing a type 1 global on the VPC taking it down. So the question is, if I change this port-channel to type edge will this fix the issues as I would like to do another pair Friday night. Log *** Compatibility check result during upgrade process *** SPT12D11NEXUS# install all kickstart bootflash:n5000-uk9-kickstart.5.0.2.N2.1.bin system bootflash:n5000-uk9.5.0.2.N2.1.bin Verifying image bootflash:/n5000-uk9-kickstart.5.0.2.N2.1.bin for boot variable "kickstart". [] 100% -- SUCCESS Verifying image bootflash:/n5000-uk9.5.0.2.N2.1.bin for boot variable "system". [] 100% -- SUCCESS Verifying image type. [] 100% -- SUCCESS Extracting "system" version from image bootflash:/n5000-uk9.5.0.2.N2.1.bin. [] 100% -- SUCCESS Extracting "kickstart" version from image bootflash:/n5000-uk9-kickstart.5.0.2.N2.1.bin. [] 100% -- SUCCESS Extracting "bios" version from image bootflash:/n5000-uk9.5.0.2.N2.1.bin. [] 100% -- SUCCESS Performing module support checks. [] 100% -- SUCCESS Notifying services about system upgrade. [] 100% -- SUCCESS Compatibility check is done: Module bootable Impact Install-type Reason -- -- -- 1 yes disruptive reset STP ISSU preupgrade check failed - Upgrade needs to be disruptive! Images will be upgraded according to following table: Module Image Running-Version New-Version Upg-Required -- -- -- -- 1 system 5.0(2)N1(1) 5.0(2)N2(1) yes 1 kickstart 5.0(2)N1(1) 5.0(2)N2(1) yes 1biosv1.3.0(09/08/09)v1.3.0(09/08/09)no 1 power-seqv1.2v1.2no Additional info for this installation: -- Port: port-channel14 in VLAN0312 is Designated. Topology change could occur during ISSU. Upgrade needs to be disruptive!!! Switch will be reloaded for disruptive upgrade. Do you want to continue with the installation (y/n)? *** Error logs on Nexus No.1 *** SPT12D11NEXUS# sh log | in port-channel14 2011 Apr 12 23:25:04.570 SPT12D11NEXUS %ETH_PORT_CHANNEL-5-CREATED: port-channel14 created 2011 Apr 12 23:25:12.154 SPT12D11NEXUS %ETHPORT-5-IF_DOWN_PORT_CHANNEL_MEMBERS_DOWN: Interface port-channel14 is down (No operational members) 2011 Apr 12 23:25:16.597 SPT12D11NEXUS %ETHPORT-5-SPEED: Interface port-channel14, operational speed changed to 1 Gbps 2011 Apr 12 23:25:16.598 SPT12D11NEXUS %ETHPORT-5-IF_DUPLEX: Interface port-channel14, operational duplex mode changed to Full 2011 Apr 12 23:25:16.598 SPT12D11NEXUS %ETHPORT-5-IF_RX_FLOW_CONTROL: Interface port-channel14, operational Receive Flow Control state changed to off 2011 Apr 12 23:25:16.598 SPT12D11NEXUS %ETHPORT-5-IF_TX_FLOW_CONTROL: Interface port-channel14, operational Transmit Flow Control state changed to off 2011 Apr 12 23:25:21.622 SPT12D11NEXUS %ETHPORT-5-SPEED: Interface port-channel14, operational speed changed to 1 Gbps 2011 Apr 12 23:25:21.623 SPT12D11NEXUS %ETHPORT-5-IF_DUPLEX: Interface port-channel14, operational duplex mode changed to Full 2011 Apr 12 23:25:21.623 SPT12D11NEXUS %ETHPORT-5-IF_RX_FLOW_CONTROL: Interface port-channel14, operational Receive Flow Control state changed to off 2011 Apr 12 23:25:21.623 SPT12D11NEXUS %ETHPORT-5-IF_TX_FLOW_CONTROL: Interface port-channel14, operational Transmit Flow Control state changed to off 2011 Apr 12 23:25:53.352 SPT12D11NEXUS %ETHPORT-5-IF_DOWN_INITIALIZING: Interface port-channel14 is down (Initializing) 2011 Apr 12 23:25:53.373 SPT12D11NEXUS %ETHPORT-5-IF_DOWN_PORT_CHANNEL_MEMBERS_DOWN: Interface port-channel14 is down (No operational members) 2011 Apr 12 23:25:57.159 SPT12D11NEXUS %ETHPORT-5-SPEED: Interface port-channel14, operational speed changed to 1 Gbps 2011 Apr 12 23:25:57.160 SPT12D11NEXUS %ETHPORT-5-IF_DUPLEX: Interface port-channel14, operational duplex mode changed to Full 2011 Apr 12 23:25:57.160 SPT12D11NEXUS %ETHPORT-5-IF_RX_FLOW_CONTROL: Interface port-channel14, operational Receive Flow Control state changed to off 2011 Apr 12 23:25:57.160 SPT12D11NEXUS %ETHPORT-5-IF_TX_FLOW_CONTROL: Interface port-channel14, operational Transmit Flow Control state change
Re: [c-nsp] N5K with Generic Copper sfp
Hey Chris, Port is set to 1G but have not tried the command just yet. Not certain I am going as this is a production device and really do not want to have an event happen. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Evans Sent: Tuesday, 22 March 2011 11:17 AM To: tvarri...@comcast.net Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] N5K with Generic Copper sfp The command still works. You also need to configure speed 1000 under the port. On Mar 21, 2011 9:03 PM, "Tony Varriale" wrote: > On 3/21/2011 6:22 PM, Thomason, Simon wrote: >> Hey All, >> >> Was just wondering if anyone has had much luck using generic copper sfp in a nexus 5020? I have run into an issue with a generic SFP will not bring the port up on my 5k but a Cisco one work first time. >> >> I do know that Cisco will say to use a Cisco sfp but there is a rather big price difference between generic and cisco :( >> >> >> log--- >> EMP31D12NEXUS# sh interface ethernet 1/16 transceiver >> Ethernet1/16 >> sfp is present >> name is OEM >> type is 10Gbase-(unknown) >> part number is GLC-T-CRB >> revision is A1 >> serial number is TT1209160022 >> nominal bitrate is 1200 MBits/sec >> Link length supported for copper is 100 m(s) >> cisco id is -- >> cisco extended id number is 4 >> ! >> Eth1/16 TBA - 10.53.109.x/ down 314 full 1000 1/10g >> >> >> >> EMP31D12NEXUS# sh interface ethernet 1/16 transceiver >> Ethernet1/16 >> sfp is present >> name is CISCO-AVAGO >> type is 10Gbase-(unknown) >> part number is ABCU-5710RZ-CS4 >> revision is >> serial number is AGM1327260K >> nominal bitrate is 1300 MBits/sec >> Link length supported for copper is 100 m(s) >> cisco id is -- >> cisco extended id number is 4 >> ! >> Eth1/16 TBA - 10.53.109.x/ up 314 full 1000 1/10g >> log--- >> >> ---config--- >> interface Ethernet1/16 >> description TBA - 10.53.109.x/24 >> switchport access vlan 314 >> speed 1000 >> storm-control broadcast level 0.50 >> udld aggressive >> channel-group 18 mode active >> ---config--- >> >> $50 off vehicle inspections >> An RACQ vehicle inspection is great for new car buyers, or to check for any faults before your warranty expires. Members get $50 off the retail price. For more info visit http://www.racq.com.au/motoring/cars/car_advice/vehicle_inspections >> >> Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. >> >> >> ___ >> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> > The unsupported-transceiver used to work but it's been a long while. I > suspect it's turned off now. > > tv > > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ $50 off vehicle inspections An RACQ vehicle inspection is great for new car buyers, or to check for any faults before your warranty expires. Members get $50 off the retail price. For more info visit http://www.racq.com.au/motoring/cars/car_advice/vehicle_inspections Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] N5K with Generic Copper sfp
Hey All, Was just wondering if anyone has had much luck using generic copper sfp in a nexus 5020? I have run into an issue with a generic SFP will not bring the port up on my 5k but a Cisco one work first time. I do know that Cisco will say to use a Cisco sfp but there is a rather big price difference between generic and cisco :( log--- EMP31D12NEXUS# sh interface ethernet 1/16 transceiver Ethernet1/16 sfp is present name is OEM type is 10Gbase-(unknown) part number is GLC-T-CRB revision is A1 serial number is TT1209160022 nominal bitrate is 1200 MBits/sec Link length supported for copper is 100 m(s) cisco id is -- cisco extended id number is 4 ! Eth1/16TBA - 10.53.109.x/ down 314 full10001/10g EMP31D12NEXUS# sh interface ethernet 1/16 transceiver Ethernet1/16 sfp is present name is CISCO-AVAGO type is 10Gbase-(unknown) part number is ABCU-5710RZ-CS4 revision is serial number is AGM1327260K nominal bitrate is 1300 MBits/sec Link length supported for copper is 100 m(s) cisco id is -- cisco extended id number is 4 ! Eth1/16TBA - 10.53.109.x/ up 314 full10001/10g log--- ---config--- interface Ethernet1/16 description TBA - 10.53.109.x/24 switchport access vlan 314 speed 1000 storm-control broadcast level 0.50 udld aggressive channel-group 18 mode active ---config--- $50 off vehicle inspections An RACQ vehicle inspection is great for new car buyers, or to check for any faults before your warranty expires. Members get $50 off the retail price. For more info visit http://www.racq.com.au/motoring/cars/car_advice/vehicle_inspections Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Ping test with DF bit and MTU / IP MTU value
Hey Muhammad, If you set the MTU size to 1520 and set the DF (do not fragment bit) then it will tell all device to never fragment the packets... So if a single hope in the chain can not support the max size of the packet you are sending it will drop the packet. Sorry not certain if I missed something here but that seems like a simple enough question and answer?!?! Cheers, Simon -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Muhammad Atif Jauhar Sent: Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:21 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Ping test with DF bit and MTU / IP MTU value Hi, I have very basic question related to MTU / IP MTU value and ping test with DF bit *Scenario: * I have one router connected to HUB router with Link leasing from SP ** 1. On spoke side, we have GigaEthernet Interface with MTU value set to 1520 2. On HUB side, that link is terminated on layer-2 switch and from there to router sub-interface with IP MTU value set to 1520. 3. Configurations on both router * a. SPOKE Side* * *interface GigabitEthernet0/1 mtu 1520 bandwidth 1 ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.252 ip ospf network point-to-point ip ospf cost 1000 ip ospf hello-interval 1 ip ospf dead-interval 3 ip ospf mtu-ignore duplex auto speed auto mpls ip *b. HUB Side* * interface GigabitEthernet0/1.100 bandwidth 1 encapsulation dot1Q 100 ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.252 ip mtu 1520 ip ospf network point-to-point ip ospf cost 1000 ip ospf hello-interval 1 ip ospf dead-interval 3 ip ospf mtu-ignore mpls ip * *Issue:* I am testing the link and face issue. 1. while performing ping test without df bit, I am able to ping with size upto 18024 2. while performing ping test with df bit, I am able to ping with size 1520 3. while performing ping test with df bit, I am able to ping with size more than 1520 *Kindly let me know, why I am not able to ping with DF bit with size more than 1520 (MTU value). How can I troubleshoot the issue. * * * *Any comment please* -- Regards, Muhammad Atif Jauhar (+60-10-2155076) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Buy your loved one the gift of peace of mind with an RACQ gift membership. Join the Club today at www.racq.com/membership, 13 1905, 24 hours every day or in store Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] How to limit bandwidth on CISCO switch interfaces
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk545/technologies_tech_note09186a00800a3a25.shtml <<< should cover you off. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of JA Colmenares Sent: Thursday, 6 January 2011 2:54 PM To: Cisco NSP Forum Subject: [c-nsp] How to limit bandwidth on CISCO switch interfaces I need to limit bandwidth on the trunk ports of two connected switches(2960 to 3750). It is currently transmitting at 100 mbps and I want to limit it to 50 mbps How can this be done? can anyone provide any steps or resources to get this done. Thanks Juan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Buy your loved one the gift of peace of mind with an RACQ gift membership. Join the Club today at www.racq.com/membership, 13 1905, 24 hours every day or in store Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Layer Two tunneling question (advice needed)
Do you have MPLS between your 6500 already as what you are talking about doing is a xconnect or EoMPLS which would rely on you already having an MPLS network? A xconnect would provide you with layer2 between sites and they are easy to setup as long as you already have the MPLS network in place. You might want to also have a look at OTV on the nexus 7k if you want layer2 site to site. Cheers, Simon T -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of John Neiberger Sent: Tuesday, 4 January 2011 10:23 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Layer Two tunneling question (advice needed) I've never had to configure any sort of layer two tunneling, so I'm not really familiar with my options. I'm pretty sure there are many here who have done this, so I thought I'd ask. What we need to do is fairly simple. Here's a basic map: DeviceA -- [6500] ---(fiber run to different site) [6500] --- DeviceB At the moment, the devices on each end are connected to layer three interfaces, not switchports, and the link between the 6500s is routed. We've run into a legacy issue and the solution is to put DeviceA and DeviceB on the same vlan. However, we do not want to change the routing between the 6500s. We really, *really* want to leave the routing in place. Switching to an all layer-two design causes some other headaches for us that you don't see because of my simplified diagram. So, I think some sort of layer two tunneling is in order. What are our options if we want to make DeviceA and DeviceB think they're local to each other and in the same LAN? I've heard of L2TP and of various MPLS techniques that might solve this, but I've just never needed to use them and really know nothing about how they're configured or if they're even legitimate options. Any thoughts? Many thanks! John ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Buy your loved one the gift of peace of mind with an RACQ gift membership. Join the Club today at www.racq.com/membership, 13 1905, 24 hours every day or in store Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email as its use is prohibited. RACQ does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses or defects. If you do not wish to receive any further commercial electronic messages from RACQ please e-mail unsubscr...@racq.com.au or contact RACQ on 13 19 05. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
