Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
What they *could* easily do is support the 7600 chassis in the Catalyst 6500 software 15.0 SY. That I think they might, and there's kind of a poetic justice in it if they do, because everything would then be back to square one. Maybe, just because of that, they won't: It would look like they made a mistake when they split the two products. == I believe Cisco is back to square one. Went down the 2T path with our account team only to find that the EVC model is not supported with EoMPLS or VPLS. I wouldn't go so far as to say it is a mistake but from a customer's perspective, the confusion does make my head hurt. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/15.0SY/release _notes.html#wp2560852 New Hardware Features in Release 15.0(1)SY1 [snip] .Cisco 7609-S chassis (CISCO7609-S) Cheers, Jay McMaster, Consultant Advanced IP Solutions Inc. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
The Sup2T works on the 7600 platform with compatible line cards. The ES+ is reported to be planned for compatibility with Sup2T. No word yet if it is a part swap or line card swap. Mack -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 6:04 AM To: 'Rinse Kloek' Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x > Does any of you already heard about the successor of the RSP720 for > the 7600 ? I don't think it would make a lot of sense, and I don't think we'll ever see one. If they rebrand the Sup2T as RSP2T, they would have close to no supported line cards (only 67xx without DFCs) and, specifically, all of the high-functionality line cards (ES+) wouldn't be supported. Yes, they could support 68xx and 69xx and spin new ES cards (ES++), but that would be fairly expensive. And for what purpose? If you have a 7600 and you need to replace everything but the chassis and PSUs to upgrade to higher speeds, does it make sense to do so, when there's already the ASR 9000 available? A much better router at presumably approx. the same production cost as a 7600 full of ES+. In my opinion, no. What they *could* easily do is support the 7600 chassis in the Catalyst 6500 software 15.0 SY. That I think they might, and there's kind of a poetic justice in it if they do, because everything would then be back to square one. Maybe, just because of that, they won't: It would look like they made a mistake when they split the two products ;-) (Hi Gert!) -A ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
The Sup-2T will work in the 7600 or the 6500 with SY code. Mack -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rinse Kloek Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2012 12:33 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x On 1-7-2012 19:47, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 06:42:07PM +0200, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote: >> Yep, Asbjorn has it right. 15.0SY is the current line, and 12.2SX is >> going out. The roadmap for 15.0SY, and where things converge is still >> lurking somewhere in the dark. The 6500 architecture session on the >> recent Cisco Live covered this in some detail. > Thanks for the pointer. Reading up on recent innovations now... > > gert Anybody a link to this document ? Does any of you already heard about the successor of the RSP720 for the 7600 ? I heard some rumours that the SUP2T (named RSP-2T) will be released for the 7600 platform also. Rinse ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
15.xSY is the re-merge of SX and SRD trains (ie. Runs on 6500 and 7600). Mack -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2012 3:01 AM To: Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists Cc: 'Gert Doering'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x Hi, On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:40:58PM +0200, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote: > On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:10:26PM +0200, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote: > >> Numer of trains is limited, development is more focused, and the > >> code reuse is progressing. > > > 12.2SX next, please :-) > > That's 15.0 SY Well, I was asking for SX-for-6500 (SXI, SXJ), not whatever else might be using an IOS called 12.2SX. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
> Does any of you already heard about the successor of the RSP720 > for the 7600 ? I don't think it would make a lot of sense, and I don't think we'll ever see one. If they rebrand the Sup2T as RSP2T, they would have close to no supported line cards (only 67xx without DFCs) and, specifically, all of the high-functionality line cards (ES+) wouldn't be supported. Yes, they could support 68xx and 69xx and spin new ES cards (ES++), but that would be fairly expensive. And for what purpose? If you have a 7600 and you need to replace everything but the chassis and PSUs to upgrade to higher speeds, does it make sense to do so, when there's already the ASR 9000 available? A much better router at presumably approx. the same production cost as a 7600 full of ES+. In my opinion, no. What they *could* easily do is support the 7600 chassis in the Catalyst 6500 software 15.0 SY. That I think they might, and there's kind of a poetic justice in it if they do, because everything would then be back to square one. Maybe, just because of that, they won't: It would look like they made a mistake when they split the two products ;-) (Hi Gert!) -A ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
Just back catching up to this thread > Well, thanks for clarifying. The VSS720-10G-3C is not yet EOX (at least as far as I have noticed) so maybe there is still hope... We are in the same boat Gert. We recently purchased a few 3C SUP's as a hardware refresh and found out that 15.0SY will not be supported (at least at the moment, probably never based on what I've been told). I have some 2T's on order and will start testing as soon as they arrive, so at the moment, we've stopped ordering 3C's as part of the refresh. We currently have ~400 6500's that are all 3B's . so we're probably going to hold off on the refresh untill I can get further clarification from our SE about the matter. I think I have this slide from the ones I saved presented at Live this year that Lukasz is referring to, but I don't think I'm allowed to post them to a public list being that they are Cisco confidential and part of NDA if i'm not mistaken. If someone from Cisco wants to correct me on this, i'd be happy to post it for others to have if I can find it. Regards, Max ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
On 1-7-2012 19:47, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 06:42:07PM +0200, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote: Yep, Asbjorn has it right. 15.0SY is the current line, and 12.2SX is going out. The roadmap for 15.0SY, and where things converge is still lurking somewhere in the dark. The 6500 architecture session on the recent Cisco Live covered this in some detail. Thanks for the pointer. Reading up on recent innovations now... gert Anybody a link to this document ? Does any of you already heard about the successor of the RSP720 for the 7600 ? I heard some rumours that the SUP2T (named RSP-2T) will be released for the 7600 platform also. Rinse ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
Hi, On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 06:42:07PM +0200, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote: > Yep, Asbjorn has it right. 15.0SY is the current line, and 12.2SX is > going out. The roadmap for 15.0SY, and where things converge is still > lurking somewhere in the dark. The 6500 architecture session on the > recent Cisco Live covered this in some detail. Thanks for the pointer. Reading up on recent innovations now... gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de pgpecNNuHqZzV.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
Hi, On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:25:20PM +0200, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote: > > Well, I was asking for SX-for-6500 (SXI, SXJ), not whatever else > > might be using an IOS called 12.2SX. > > 15.0 SY *is* for the 6500. Oh, Sup2T. The 3rd product line for 6500/7600 hardware, effectively, given its line card requirements... > Now, wether it'll also be there for the Sup32 or '720 (both of which > are End-of-X) is another story, and maybe the jury is still out on > that. But, again, 15.0 SY *is* the 15.0 train for the 6500 family. > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps11845/ > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/15.0SY/release_notes.html Well, thanks for clarifying. The VSS720-10G-3C is not yet EOX (at least as far as I have noticed) so maybe there is still hope... gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de pgpljhHlGotcx.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
On 7/1/12 3:25 PM, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote: On Sun, 1 Jul 2012 11:00:40 +0200, you wrote: Numer of trains is limited, development is more focused, and the code reuse is progressing. 12.2SX next, please :-) That's 15.0 SY Well, I was asking for SX-for-6500 (SXI, SXJ), not whatever else might be using an IOS called 12.2SX. 15.0 SY *is* for the 6500. Yep, Asbjorn has it right. 15.0SY is the current line, and 12.2SX is going out. The roadmap for 15.0SY, and where things converge is still lurking somewhere in the dark. The 6500 architecture session on the recent Cisco Live covered this in some detail. -- "There's no sense in being precise when | Łukasz Bromirski you don't know what you're talking | jid:lbromir...@jabber.org about." John von Neumann |http://lukasz.bromirski.net ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
On Sun, 1 Jul 2012 11:00:40 +0200, you wrote: Numer of trains is limited, development is more focused, and the code reuse is progressing. >>> 12.2SX next, please :-) >> That's 15.0 SY > Well, I was asking for SX-for-6500 (SXI, SXJ), not whatever else > might be using an IOS called 12.2SX. 15.0 SY *is* for the 6500. Now, wether it'll also be there for the Sup32 or '720 (both of which are End-of-X) is another story, and maybe the jury is still out on that. But, again, 15.0 SY *is* the 15.0 train for the 6500 family. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps11845/ http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/15.0SY/release_notes.html -A ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
Hi, On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:40:58PM +0200, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote: > On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:10:26PM +0200, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote: > >> Numer of trains is limited, development is more focused, and the code > >> reuse is progressing. > > > 12.2SX next, please :-) > > That's 15.0 SY Well, I was asking for SX-for-6500 (SXI, SXJ), not whatever else might be using an IOS called 12.2SX. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de pgpr6AkHjzZPR.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:10:26PM +0200, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote: >> Numer of trains is limited, development is more focused, and the code >> reuse is progressing. > 12.2SX next, please :-) That's 15.0 SY -A ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
Hi, On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:10:26PM +0200, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote: > Numer of trains is limited, development is more focused, and the > code reuse is progressing. These are very good news. 12.2SX next, please :-) gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de pgpYySaxixnGe.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
On 6/30/12 11:41 AM, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 01:31:41AM +0200, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote: 15.1S is the same train, save for hardware-dependent features. That's good news. What I heard was more like "15.1S is just a relabeled 12.2SRE and has not much relationship to 15.0/15.1". That's more complicated. 12.2SR code went into the common train that became 15.xS. Some features: OTOH since 15.1M is still missing features that 12.2SX/12.2SR have, it would be interesting to see where those features went regarding 15.1S (like: IPv6 HSRP with global unicast address)... ...are still being synchronized to this tree. That was about the same time when IOS-XE was split, and many different changes did happen in Cisco. I could fill a whole slot on the PLNOG/EURONOG/SWINOG/NANOG just touching the very basics of what's there and what's not currently, but the progress you see on the receiving end should be already visible. Numer of trains is limited, development is more focused, and the code reuse is progressing. -- "There's no sense in being precise when | Łukasz Bromirski you don't know what you're talking | jid:lbromir...@jabber.org about." John von Neumann |http://lukasz.bromirski.net ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
On 6/30/12 8:48 AM, Doug McIntyre wrote: I think the main point was that 12.2 came out, then 12.4 came out, 12.4T,etc. and then 12.2S came out. Yep, as 12.2S is build using 12.0S as base, and just syncing up changes/progress made in the newer trees. Which is different than on the switches, which stuck in 12.1 for the longest time, and it is current in the switches to be 12.2, until of course everything was "synced" back into 15.x again. Yes, and that again was made as a number of changes went into effect, including launch of couple of new platforms. Some of which are based on IOS-XE. -- "There's no sense in being precise when | Łukasz Bromirski you don't know what you're talking | jid:lbromir...@jabber.org about." John von Neumann |http://lukasz.bromirski.net ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
Hi, On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 01:31:41AM +0200, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote: > 15.1S is the same train, save for hardware-dependent features. That's good news. What I heard was more like "15.1S is just a relabeled 12.2SRE and has not much relationship to 15.0/15.1". OTOH since 15.1M is still missing features that 12.2SX/12.2SR have, it would be interesting to see where those features went regarding 15.1S (like: IPv6 HSRP with global unicast address)... gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de pgpetglWMIogE.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 01:55:32AM +0200, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote: > On 6/30/12 1:24 AM, N. Max Pierson wrote: > > I think that for simplification purposes, Cisco has somewhat taken the > > confusion out of what the 'latest' train would be for any device running > > run IOS. Now it's simply 15.x/insert variable for hardware here/. I think > > they went real awry with the 7200 having 12.4(M/T) and 12.2(SRx) which > > really confused folks in regards to feature set. Not necessary IMHO. > > M/T were "enterprise" feature sets, where anything with 'S' meant > Service Provider. For the CPU-driven platforms and 7600 it is still > the case. I think the main point was that 12.2 came out, then 12.4 came out, 12.4T,etc. and then 12.2S came out. Which is different than on the switches, which stuck in 12.1 for the longest time, and it is current in the switches to be 12.2, until of course everything was "synced" back into 15.x again. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
On 6/30/12 1:24 AM, N. Max Pierson wrote: I think that for simplification purposes, Cisco has somewhat taken the confusion out of what the 'latest' train would be for any device running run IOS. Now it's simply 15.x/insert variable for hardware here/. I think they went real awry with the 7200 having 12.4(M/T) and 12.2(SRx) which really confused folks in regards to feature set. Not necessary IMHO. M/T were "enterprise" feature sets, where anything with 'S' meant Service Provider. For the CPU-driven platforms and 7600 it is still the case. I've never really understood the 7600 either in regards to the hardware part (I'm a router, I'm a switch ... Pat from SNL anyone :) It's a router, with switch LCs unless you're equipped with ES/ES+/SIP linecards. Starting from Sup2T it's router even with traditional LCs, as VLAN interfaces were coupled with the logical interface ID, and that effectively provided VLAN independence per-port. Hopefully we'll be retiring this pair of 7600's soon in exchange for 7k's. "All I want for Christmas is multi-chassis CRS-3" :D -- "There's no sense in being precise when | Łukasz Bromirski you don't know what you're talking | jid:lbromir...@jabber.org about." John von Neumann |http://lukasz.bromirski.net ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
On 6/29/12 10:09 AM, Gert Doering wrote: Always keep in mind that this is 15.1*S*, not 15.1 - completely different IOS train. Yes. (Though I'm wondering how 15.1S-for-7600 and 15.1S-for-others relate... IOS trains, feature distribution and hardware support is more cloudy than ever) 15.1S is the same train, save for hardware-dependent features. -- "There's no sense in being precise when | Łukasz Bromirski you don't know what you're talking | jid:lbromir...@jabber.org about." John von Neumann |http://lukasz.bromirski.net ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
> Always keep in mind that this is 15.1*S*, not 15.1 - completely different IOS train. Understood Gert. I think that for simplification purposes, Cisco has somewhat taken the confusion out of what the 'latest' train would be for any device running run IOS. Now it's simply 15.x/insert variable for hardware here/. I think they went real awry with the 7200 having 12.4(M/T) and 12.2(SRx) which really confused folks in regards to feature set. Not necessary IMHO. I've never really understood the 7600 either in regards to the hardware part (I'm a router, I'm a switch ... Pat from SNL anyone :) However, I can say that we like how the Nexus 7k has played out so far. A bug here or there aside, I'm glad to see that there are no ACE/IPS/WLC/VMWare server in my switch/ modules being made for the platform. (At least at the moment) Hopefully we'll be retiring this pair of 7600's soon in exchange for 7k's. Regards, Max ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
Hi, On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 04:04:44PM -0500, N. Max Pierson wrote: > Thanks for all on/off list replies. It seems that 15.1 is what we'll go > with based on the feedback. Always keep in mind that this is 15.1*S*, not 15.1 - completely different IOS train. (Though I'm wondering how 15.1S-for-7600 and 15.1S-for-others relate... IOS trains, feature distribution and hardware support is more cloudy than ever) gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de pgpIDhnLcOH0j.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
Thanks for all on/off list replies. It seems that 15.1 is what we'll go with based on the feedback. Regards, Max ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
You should use 15.1(3)S as it has extended support. We run it on a number of devices with no issues so far. -- sam > 15.1s should be fine. > > Sent from my HTC One X > > - Reply message - > From: "Xu Hu" > To: "N. Max Pierson" > Cc: "Cisco Mailing list" > Subject: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x > Date: Wed, Jun 27, 2012 21:01 > > > > Actually we will use 15.1s for the feature support of OSPFv3 between PE & > CE next month. > If you don't need any new special features, maybe SRE5 is a better choose, > you know the 15.1s released in the March, should be some unknown bugs. > > HTH > Xu Hu > > On 28 Jun, 2012, at 6:48, "N. Max Pierson" wrote: > >> Hi List, >> >> Anyone out there running 7600 with 15.x code train in production?? We >> have >> a pair of 7609's in one of our data centers acting as a WAN aggregation >> block and seem to have hit a bug that's affecting some BGP functionality >> and would like to upgrade IOS. We're currently running SRC1 which is a >> little dated and would like to see about going to 15.x, but wanted to >> ping >> a few people on the list to see if there were any issues known with >> making >> this big of a jump in code or if there were any horror stories running >> 15.x >> on this platform. 15.1 is what we were looking at, but not opposed to >> 15.2 >> if there's no real concerns. >> >> Features list: >> BGP (acting as RR's) >> EIGRP >> WCCP >> Netflow >> Minimal QoS >> >> Nothing exotic, but this particular bug (which we have not gotten >> anything >> back from TAC yet) is a PITA and I know that the response is probably >> going >> to be an upgrade. >> >> Regards, >> Max >> ___ >> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
15.1s should be fine. Sent from my HTC One™ X - Reply message - From: "Xu Hu" To: "N. Max Pierson" Cc: "Cisco Mailing list" Subject: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x Date: Wed, Jun 27, 2012 21:01 Actually we will use 15.1s for the feature support of OSPFv3 between PE & CE next month. If you don't need any new special features, maybe SRE5 is a better choose, you know the 15.1s released in the March, should be some unknown bugs. HTH Xu Hu On 28 Jun, 2012, at 6:48, "N. Max Pierson" wrote: > Hi List, > > Anyone out there running 7600 with 15.x code train in production?? We have > a pair of 7609's in one of our data centers acting as a WAN aggregation > block and seem to have hit a bug that's affecting some BGP functionality > and would like to upgrade IOS. We're currently running SRC1 which is a > little dated and would like to see about going to 15.x, but wanted to ping > a few people on the list to see if there were any issues known with making > this big of a jump in code or if there were any horror stories running 15.x > on this platform. 15.1 is what we were looking at, but not opposed to 15.2 > if there's no real concerns. > > Features list: > BGP (acting as RR's) > EIGRP > WCCP > Netflow > Minimal QoS > > Nothing exotic, but this particular bug (which we have not gotten anything > back from TAC yet) is a PITA and I know that the response is probably going > to be an upgrade. > > Regards, > Max > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
Actually we will use 15.1s for the feature support of OSPFv3 between PE & CE next month. If you don't need any new special features, maybe SRE5 is a better choose, you know the 15.1s released in the March, should be some unknown bugs. HTH Xu Hu On 28 Jun, 2012, at 6:48, "N. Max Pierson" wrote: > Hi List, > > Anyone out there running 7600 with 15.x code train in production?? We have > a pair of 7609's in one of our data centers acting as a WAN aggregation > block and seem to have hit a bug that's affecting some BGP functionality > and would like to upgrade IOS. We're currently running SRC1 which is a > little dated and would like to see about going to 15.x, but wanted to ping > a few people on the list to see if there were any issues known with making > this big of a jump in code or if there were any horror stories running 15.x > on this platform. 15.1 is what we were looking at, but not opposed to 15.2 > if there's no real concerns. > > Features list: > BGP (acting as RR's) > EIGRP > WCCP > Netflow > Minimal QoS > > Nothing exotic, but this particular bug (which we have not gotten anything > back from TAC yet) is a PITA and I know that the response is probably going > to be an upgrade. > > Regards, > Max > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x
Hi List, Anyone out there running 7600 with 15.x code train in production?? We have a pair of 7609's in one of our data centers acting as a WAN aggregation block and seem to have hit a bug that's affecting some BGP functionality and would like to upgrade IOS. We're currently running SRC1 which is a little dated and would like to see about going to 15.x, but wanted to ping a few people on the list to see if there were any issues known with making this big of a jump in code or if there were any horror stories running 15.x on this platform. 15.1 is what we were looking at, but not opposed to 15.2 if there's no real concerns. Features list: BGP (acting as RR's) EIGRP WCCP Netflow Minimal QoS Nothing exotic, but this particular bug (which we have not gotten anything back from TAC yet) is a PITA and I know that the response is probably going to be an upgrade. Regards, Max ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
