Re: [c-nsp] Central services VPNs

2012-01-23 Thread Livio Zanol Puppim
Can't this be done using routing policies?

Just a guess...

2011/12/18 MKS rekordmeis...@gmail.com

 So I have a MPLS vpn question for the masterminds on this list;)

 I have two central services VRFs, A and B and I need route leaking
 (same import/export) between them to optimize traffic flow. The reason
 I need two VRFs is that I have to specifiy a different default gw for
 each VRF.
 But the problem is that this setup eats up tcam space in the 6500 we
 use, and doesn't scale then adding the third or forth VRF, then the
 vrfs contain 10k routes.

 Can this be done in a scaleale way (tcam) but still be able to
 optimize traffic flow and support different default GWs

 Regards
 MKS
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/




-- 
[]'s

LĂ­vio Zanol Puppim
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] Central services VPNs

2011-12-18 Thread MKS
So I have a MPLS vpn question for the masterminds on this list;)

I have two central services VRFs, A and B and I need route leaking
(same import/export) between them to optimize traffic flow. The reason
I need two VRFs is that I have to specifiy a different default gw for
each VRF.
But the problem is that this setup eats up tcam space in the 6500 we
use, and doesn't scale then adding the third or forth VRF, then the
vrfs contain 10k routes.

Can this be done in a scaleale way (tcam) but still be able to
optimize traffic flow and support different default GWs

Regards
MKS
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/