Re: [cisco-voip] COBRAS import PIN issue

2014-03-04 Thread Salisbury, Charles
Affected probably 20%  of users overall - wasn't a universal issue which is why 
we didn't catch it immediately with our testing.

From: Bill Talley [mailto:btal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 9:42 AM
To: Salisbury, Charles
Cc: Justin Steinberg; Cisco VOIP
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] COBRAS import PIN issue

Some users having not changed their PINS affected all users on the system?

Sent from an Apple iOS device with very tiny touchscreen input keys.  Please 
excude my typtos.

On Mar 4, 2014, at 8:18 AM, Salisbury, Charles 
charles.salisb...@gentex.commailto:charles.salisb...@gentex.com wrote:
I just did an upgrade from 7.1.5 to 9.1(2) and had this exact same issue - TAC 
traced it to be users that had not changed their PIN for a while.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Justin Steinberg
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 11:13 PM
To: Bill Talley
Cc: Cisco VOIP
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] COBRAS import PIN issue


I ran into this issue once and tracked it down to the time when the user had 
last changed/set their pin.  In my situation only about 20% of the users were 
affected. The other 80% were fine.

I tracked the issue down by running a user data dump, and all the users that 
had reported the problem had the last pin changed time of much older than 
everyone else.  In my case, the authentication rules on this system did not 
expire the pins, so some users had the same pins for years.

Instead of rolling back, I opted to run a bulk pin reset to the default for 
these users and then sent a mass email to all of them telling them that their 
PIN had been reset.

If you don't expire your pins this might be your problem.  While I didn't try 
this, you could go into the current 7 system and set the password policy to 
force users to change their pin on the next login and let everyone update their 
pin before you run the upgrade again.

I believe the aggravating factor is that the users in question last changed 
their pin on an older version of connection that used a different encryption 
type, that is not supported by v9.
On Mar 3, 2014 8:57 PM, Bill Talley 
btal...@gmail.commailto:btal...@gmail.com wrote:
I interpreted the issue as being from or to version 7.0 as it also
suggests upgrading to 7.1.3 prior (IIRC) to using COBRAS.

Sent from an Apple iOS device with very tiny touchscreen input keys.
Please excude my typtos.

 On Mar 3, 2014, at 5:48 PM, Ed Leatherman 
 ealeather...@gmail.commailto:ealeather...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello!

 This weekend I exported some voice mail accounts from Connection 7.0.2 and 
 imported them into 9.1(2) using COBRAS tool.

 When I did this, the users were not able to sign into their mailbox, as if 
 PIN was changed.

 Retracing my steps, I did have this in the COBRAS log during the import:
 [Thread 001], [14/03/02 08:51:34], Updating subscriber phone PIN from 
 Connection backup
 [Thread 001], [14/03/02 08:51:34], (warning) unable to find mapping for 
 MDBObjectId=051ee60c-4e21-42f6-bea4-9f845e6e96c8, ObjectType=CredentialPolicy 
 in GetNewObjectId on DirectoryBackupDatabaseFunctions.cs

 Unfortunately I had did not have a whole lot of time to troubleshoot on live 
 9.1 server - weather emergency dictated that I swing them back the 7.0 
 version asap so that users could update various greetings and info prompts. 
 Right now i'm working with the 9.1 VM in a isolated network.

 My hypothesis is that the old system had PIN set to not expire, and the new 
 system has PIN set to expire in 120 days - and this somehow caused the PIN to 
 not get updated somehow. I can't see any other difference related to 
 credential policy. Anyone know if this is the case or why PINs might not have 
 carried over, or if I'm barking up the wrong tree?

 I had read that there was some issues importing PINs into version 7.0, but 
 exporting from 7.0 TO a version 7.1.3+ was not cited as a problem.

 Thanks!


 --
 Ed Leatherman




THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENTS SENT FROM 
GENTEX CORPORATION IS GENTEX CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE 
PERSONAL USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, distribution, or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, 
and delete this e-mail message and any attachments from your computer.


___
 cisco-voip mailing list
 cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] COBRAS import PIN issue

2014-03-04 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
Thanks Ed. 

Because we ran into a problem with passwords during our migration from v4 to 
v7, we had to force people to change their password . 

My current version is 7.1(3)ES11, but my inactive version shows 7.1(2)ES3 - 
this is the version I upgraded to from Unity v4. 

I suspect that since the majority of people have changed their password within 
a v7.1 system, my upgrade should be fine. I'll probably post a followup and see 
what Jeff says. 

Lelio 



--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure 
Computing and Communications Services (CCS) 
University of Guelph 

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 
le...@uoguelph.ca 
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs 
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building 
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 

- Original Message -

From: Ed Leatherman ealeather...@gmail.com 
To: Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca 
Cc: Jason Aarons (AM) jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com, Cisco VOIP 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net 
Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 11:21:57 AM 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] COBRAS import PIN issue 


I got a pretty good reply from Jeff on my thread: 
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/4181654 








On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi  le...@uoguelph.ca  wrote: 




Jason, 

Can you share the forum thread link? I'd like to post a follow up question to 
Jeff. 


Lelio 



--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure 
Computing and Communications Services (CCS) 
University of Guelph 

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 
le...@uoguelph.ca 
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs 
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building 
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 



From: Jason Aarons (AM)  jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com  
To: Charles Salisbury  charles.salisb...@gentex.com , Justin Steinberg  
jsteinb...@gmail.com , Bill Talley  btal...@gmail.com  
Cc: Cisco VOIP  cisco-voip@puck.nether.net  
Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 9:59:45 AM 


Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] COBRAS import PIN issue 



From the Cobras developer; 

Yeah… if you don’t change your PINs for years and port them multiple times 
without changing them you will have problems… Unity and early versions of 
Connection and then later versions of Connection all used different hashes or 
PWs and PINs… nothing any client can do about that – 

Maybe a separate “everything you ever wanted to know about PINs and passwords” 
section could pull all that into a single section might help… 




From: cisco-voip [mailto: cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net ] On Behalf Of 
Salisbury, Charles 
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 9:18 AM 
To: Justin Steinberg; Bill Talley 
Cc: Cisco VOIP 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] COBRAS import PIN issue 


I just did an upgrade from 7.1.5 to 9.1(2) and had this exact same issue – TAC 
traced it to be users that had not changed their PIN for a while. 

From: cisco-voip [ mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net ] On Behalf Of 
Justin Steinberg 
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 11:13 PM 
To: Bill Talley 
Cc: Cisco VOIP 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] COBRAS import PIN issue 

I ran into this issue once and tracked it down to the time when the user had 
last changed/set their pin. In my situation only about 20% of the users were 
affected. The other 80% were fine. 
I tracked the issue down by running a user data dump, and all the users that 
had reported the problem had the last pin changed time of much older than 
everyone else. In my case, the authentication rules on this system did not 
expire the pins, so some users had the same pins for years. 
Instead of rolling back, I opted to run a bulk pin reset to the default for 
these users and then sent a mass email to all of them telling them that their 
PIN had been reset. 
If you don't expire your pins this might be your problem. While I didn't try 
this, you could go into the current 7 system and set the password policy to 
force users to change their pin on the next login and let everyone update their 
pin before you run the upgrade again. 
I believe the aggravating factor is that the users in question last changed 
their pin on an older version of connection that used a different encryption 
type, that is not supported by v9. 

On Mar 3, 2014 8:57 PM, Bill Talley  btal...@gmail.com  wrote: 
I interpreted the issue as being from or to version 7.0 as it also 
suggests upgrading to 7.1.3 prior (IIRC) to using COBRAS. 

Sent from an Apple iOS device with very tiny touchscreen input keys. 
Please excude my typtos. 

 On Mar 3, 2014, at 5:48 PM, Ed Leatherman  ealeather...@gmail.com  wrote: 
 
 Hello! 
 
 This weekend I exported some voice mail accounts from Connection 7.0.2 and 
 imported them into 9.1(2) using COBRAS tool. 
 
 When I did this, the users were not able to sign into their mailbox, as if 
 PIN was changed. 
 
 Retracing my steps, I did have this in the COBRAS log during the import: 
 [Thread 001], [14/03/02 08:51:34], Updating subscriber phone PIN from 
 Connection backup 
 [Thread 001], [14/03/02 08:51:34], (warning) unable to find mapping for 
 

Re: [cisco-voip] Directory URI in LDAP sync

2014-03-04 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi

Just following up on this Erick... 

After upgrading from v7 to v9, the Directory URI field is blank as you suggest. 
I thought I could simply add another host in the existing relationship, but 
that does not work. It looks like I have to create a new directory 
relationship. 

Is it dangerous to create two directory relationships to the same active 
directory source? 

Lelio 



--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure 
Computing and Communications Services (CCS) 
University of Guelph 

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 
le...@uoguelph.ca 
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs 
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building 
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 

- Original Message -

From: Erick B. erick...@gmail.com 
To: Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca 
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net 
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 2:46:57 PM 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Directory URI in LDAP sync 


After upgrade from 8.x to 9.x, the field is not mapped to LDAP attribute (is 
blank). You need to add new LDAP directory entry to get that field mapped or go 
under Call Routing - Directory Number and Directory URI and set each DN and 
Directory URI setting there. 


The SIP URI is used for telepresence mainly so people call you at 
use...@domainname.com from a video device. 


Still learning this... 



On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi  le...@uoguelph.ca  wrote: 


Can anyone comment/elaborate on what the Directory URI is used for in the LDAP 
sync setup screen in v9? It's set to msRTCSIP-primaryuseraddress by default. 
Unfortunately it's not modifiable after the relationship is setup and I'm not 
sure what to set it to. 

I'll also have to see what value it takes during an upgrade 


http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/9_0_1/ccmcfg/CUCM_BK_CDF59AFB_00_admin-guide_chapter_01100.html#CUCM_RF_LE051F5C_00
 


Sent from my iPhone 
___ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 




___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] DTMF from CUEAC

2014-03-04 Thread Jason Aarons (AM)
If doing something in the Software I’m  guessing it uses JTAPI to send the 
DTMF, and you need to enable the JTAPI traces.  Have you tried using the phone 
TUI  mid-call?

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Erick 
Wellnitz
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 2:16 PM
To: cisco-voip
Subject: [cisco-voip] DTMF from CUEAC


Maybe I'm missing something but for the life of me I can't get mid call DTMF to 
work on CUEAC 9.1.1.10

Tried holding down the control key but no luck.


itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] DTMF from CUEAC

2014-03-04 Thread Erick Wellnitz
Works as expected from the phone.  Does it use JTAPI?  It has the TSP
installed.


On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) 
jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com wrote:

 If doing something in the Software I'm  guessing it uses JTAPI to send the
 DTMF, and you need to enable the JTAPI traces.  Have you tried using the
 phone TUI  mid-call?



 *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
 Of *Erick Wellnitz
 *Sent:* Tuesday, March 04, 2014 2:16 PM
 *To:* cisco-voip
 *Subject:* [cisco-voip] DTMF from CUEAC





 Maybe I'm missing something but for the life of me I can't get mid call
 DTMF to work on CUEAC 9.1.1.10



 Tried holding down the control key but no luck.



 itevomcid

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] DTMF from CUEAC

2014-03-04 Thread Erick Wellnitz
Excellent.  Thanks fpor the great information.


On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Jamie Gale -X (jamgale - ARC SOLUTIONS
INTERNATIONAL LTD at Cisco) jamg...@cisco.com wrote:

  It used TSP on the server.

  This is actually a bug in the CUEAC client, if you raise a TAC case and
 reference the bug ID CSCuj33939, they should be able to get you the fix.

 Kind Regards

 Jamie Gale
 Professional Services Engineer
 Arc Solutions, onsite at Cisco
 jamg...@cisco.com


  On Mar 4, 2014, at 3:43 PM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com
  wrote:

 Works as expected from the phone.  Does it use JTAPI?  It has the TSP
 installed.


 On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) 
 jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com wrote:

  If doing something in the Software I'm  guessing it uses JTAPI to send
 the DTMF, and you need to enable the JTAPI traces.  Have you tried using
 the phone TUI  mid-call?



 *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On
 Behalf Of *Erick Wellnitz
 *Sent:* Tuesday, March 04, 2014 2:16 PM
 *To:* cisco-voip
 *Subject:* [cisco-voip] DTMF from CUEAC





 Maybe I'm missing something but for the life of me I can't get mid call
 DTMF to work on CUEAC 9.1.1.10



 Tried holding down the control key but no luck.



 itevomcid


  ___
 cisco-voip mailing list
 cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


[cisco-voip] Setting up ICM Sprawler 8.x

2014-03-04 Thread Ryan Burtch
I have a couple questions on the ICM Sprawler setup.

1. Does SQL need to be installed on the Sprawler?
2. Can AD/DNS be installed on the Sprawler?




Sincerely,

Ryan Burtch
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip