Re: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade from v7 to v9?

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

Sorry, that should read vg202xm/vg204xm. 

Sent from my iPhone

On 2014-03-06, at 7:13 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi  wrote:

> As far as I can tell, the 187 are SIP only. It is SIP on my v7 cluster. 
> 
> Have you considered vg202+/vg204+?
> 
> They're basically a small density vg224 and can support all the protocols. A 
> bit more pricey than an ATA though. 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On 2014-03-06, at 12:43 PM, "Madziarczyk, Jonathan"  
> wrote:
> 
>> So long as the ATA goes to a real analog phone and not some other device 
>> (fax/elevator/etc).  When you jump to 9.x the 187s can only do SIP (I think 
>> 7x and 8x support sccp as well) and all hell breaks loose.  From what I can 
>> tell you lose CPC disconnect and Power-denial.  That’s been my nightmare for 
>> the last 3 months.
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca] 
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 6:12 PM
>> To: Madziarczyk, Jonathan
>> Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after 
>> upgrade from v7 to v9?
>>  
>> We have one ATA. The one that is SIP. 187 I think. 
>>  
>> Have experienced problems with ATAs?
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On 2014-03-05, at 3:31 PM, "Madziarczyk, Jonathan"  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Yes, I believe the aligned partitions issue is VMware specific.
>>  
>> I don’t know what Cisco has to say about it, but I always feel better 
>> knowing the install was direct from a fresh 9 install rather than a 7->9 
>> upgrade.  Since the DRS backup and restore from an upgraded 9x onto a fresh 
>> 9x is acceptable in the Jump Upgrade in VMware I don’t see a problem with it 
>> on the physical side.
>>  
>> On a side note, are you using any ATAs?
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
>> Lelio Fulgenzi
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 12:44 PM
>> To: Dennis Heim
>> Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after 
>> upgrade from v7 to v9?
>>  
>> Thanks Dennis. I  believe that 'aligned partitions' are a VM issue only? I 
>> am currently on MCS (HP equiv) servers.
>> 
>> Lelio
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---
>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
>> Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
>> University of Guelph
>> 
>> 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
>> le...@uoguelph.ca
>> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
>> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
>> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>>  
>> From: "Dennis Heim" 
>> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" , "cisco-voip voyp list" 
>> 
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 1:37:24 PM
>> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after 
>> upgradefrom v7 to v9?
>> 
>> Aligned partitions.
>>  
>> Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration)
>> World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814
>>  
>> PS Engineering:  Innovate & Ignite.
>>  
>>  
>> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
>> Lelio Fulgenzi
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 10:56 AM
>> To: cisco-voip voyp list
>> Subject: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade 
>> from v7 to v9?
>>  
>> 
>> I have an opportunity (maybe, if time permits) to rebuild an off-line 
>> cluster after I upgrade it from v7 to v9.
>> 
>> The question is, is there any advantage to building a cluster from scratch 
>> and restore from DRS, so that it is built from v9 installation media rather 
>> than from a v7 upgrade?
>> 
>> I recall seeing a number of bugs in the past that said something to the 
>> effect of "...if installation was an upgrade, disk space, etc. etc"
>> 
>> Can anything thing of any advantages of doing this? This will help us test 
>> our disaster recovery process as well.
>> 
>> Lelio
>> 
>> ---
>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
>> Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
>> University of Guelph
>> 
>> 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
>> le...@uoguelph.ca
>> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
>> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
>> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>>  
>>  
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade from v7 to v9?

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

As far as I can tell, the 187 are SIP only. It is SIP on my v7 cluster. 

Have you considered vg202+/vg204+?

They're basically a small density vg224 and can support all the protocols. A 
bit more pricey than an ATA though. 

Sent from my iPhone

On 2014-03-06, at 12:43 PM, "Madziarczyk, Jonathan"  
wrote:

> So long as the ATA goes to a real analog phone and not some other device 
> (fax/elevator/etc).  When you jump to 9.x the 187s can only do SIP (I think 
> 7x and 8x support sccp as well) and all hell breaks loose.  From what I can 
> tell you lose CPC disconnect and Power-denial.  That’s been my nightmare for 
> the last 3 months.
>  
>  
>  
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 6:12 PM
> To: Madziarczyk, Jonathan
> Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade 
> from v7 to v9?
>  
> We have one ATA. The one that is SIP. 187 I think. 
>  
> Have experienced problems with ATAs?
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On 2014-03-05, at 3:31 PM, "Madziarczyk, Jonathan"  
> wrote:
> 
> Yes, I believe the aligned partitions issue is VMware specific.
>  
> I don’t know what Cisco has to say about it, but I always feel better knowing 
> the install was direct from a fresh 9 install rather than a 7->9 upgrade.  
> Since the DRS backup and restore from an upgraded 9x onto a fresh 9x is 
> acceptable in the Jump Upgrade in VMware I don’t see a problem with it on the 
> physical side.
>  
> On a side note, are you using any ATAs?
>  
>  
>  
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
> Lelio Fulgenzi
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 12:44 PM
> To: Dennis Heim
> Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade 
> from v7 to v9?
>  
> Thanks Dennis. I  believe that 'aligned partitions' are a VM issue only? I am 
> currently on MCS (HP equiv) servers.
> 
> Lelio
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
> Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
> University of Guelph
> 
> 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
> le...@uoguelph.ca
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>  
> From: "Dennis Heim" 
> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" , "cisco-voip voyp list" 
> 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 1:37:24 PM
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade 
>from v7 to v9?
> 
> Aligned partitions.
>  
> Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration)
> World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814
>  
> PS Engineering:  Innovate & Ignite.
>  
>  
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
> Lelio Fulgenzi
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 10:56 AM
> To: cisco-voip voyp list
> Subject: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade 
> from v7 to v9?
>  
> 
> I have an opportunity (maybe, if time permits) to rebuild an off-line cluster 
> after I upgrade it from v7 to v9.
> 
> The question is, is there any advantage to building a cluster from scratch 
> and restore from DRS, so that it is built from v9 installation media rather 
> than from a v7 upgrade?
> 
> I recall seeing a number of bugs in the past that said something to the 
> effect of "...if installation was an upgrade, disk space, etc. etc"
> 
> Can anything thing of any advantages of doing this? This will help us test 
> our disaster recovery process as well.
> 
> Lelio
> 
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
> Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
> University of Guelph
> 
> 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
> le...@uoguelph.ca
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>  
>  
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] 7->9 jump upgrade cutover

[Ed Leatherman]

Thanks Matt,
This is about 800 endpoints but only about 150 actual IP Phones, the rest
are VG224 ports with relatively recent IOS, and I'm planning on visiting
those individually anyway for the SCCP/CCM version. Only 1 campus.
Older-ish (2800) MGCP gateways though so I will plan for a reload on those
if necessary.


On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Matthew Loraditch <
mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com> wrote:

>  This is how I’ve done it. Install sizes range from  ~50 users/1 site to
> ~1100users/15 sites. Most things seem to switch immediately and everything
> in 5-10 minutes. Got to watch if you have older gateways some of them are
> persnickety and require a reboot
>
> YMMV
>
>
>
> Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
>
> 1965 Greenspring Drive
> Timonium, MD 21093
>
> direct voice. 443.541.1518
> fax.  410.252.9284
>
> Twitter   |  
> Facebook
> | Website   |  Email 
> Support
>
> Support Phone. 410.252.8830
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Ed Leatherman
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 06, 2014 3:48 PM
> *To:* Cisco VOIP
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] 7->9 jump upgrade cutover
>
>
>
> Hello!
>
>
>
> Anyone have experience with flash cutting a cluster? Jump upgrade guide
> just says disconnect old cluster and connect upgraded cluster - is there a
> more graceful way to do this with phone registrations? Should I shut down
> CM service on the old cluster first or will the phones/new cluster sort out
> all its tcp sessions cleanly if I just swap network connectivity?
>
>
>
> I've got matching firmware on both clusters and the database appears to be
> in good working order on the new cluster, just want to minimize any
> surprises.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> --
> Ed Leatherman
>



-- 
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] 7->9 jump upgrade cutover

[Matthew Loraditch]

This is how I’ve done it. Install sizes range from  ~50 users/1 site to 
~1100users/15 sites. Most things seem to switch immediately and everything in 
5-10 minutes. Got to watch if you have older gateways some of them are 
persnickety and require a reboot
YMMV

Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093

direct voice. 443.541.1518
fax.  410.252.9284

Twitter  |  
Facebook  | 
Website  |  Email 
Support
Support Phone. 410.252.8830


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ed 
Leatherman
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 3:48 PM
To: Cisco VOIP
Subject: [cisco-voip] 7->9 jump upgrade cutover

Hello!

Anyone have experience with flash cutting a cluster? Jump upgrade guide just 
says disconnect old cluster and connect upgraded cluster - is there a more 
graceful way to do this with phone registrations? Should I shut down CM service 
on the old cluster first or will the phones/new cluster sort out all its tcp 
sessions cleanly if I just swap network connectivity?

I've got matching firmware on both clusters and the database appears to be in 
good working order on the new cluster, just want to minimize any surprises.

Thanks!

Ed

--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] 7->9 jump upgrade cutover

[Ed Leatherman]

Hello!

Anyone have experience with flash cutting a cluster? Jump upgrade guide
just says disconnect old cluster and connect upgraded cluster - is there a
more graceful way to do this with phone registrations? Should I shut down
CM service on the old cluster first or will the phones/new cluster sort out
all its tcp sessions cleanly if I just swap network connectivity?

I've got matching firmware on both clusters and the database appears to be
in good working order on the new cluster, just want to minimize any
surprises.

Thanks!

Ed

-- 
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Disabling most of mailboxes

[Isamar Maia]

Hi folks,

What is the best ways to disable most of mailboxes on Unity, leaving
just some of them unchanged ? Removing the users on Unity admin GUI ?


-- 
Isamar Maia
Cel. VIVO SSA:  (55) 71-9940-2012
Cel. TIM   SSA:  (55) 71-9289-5128
Cel. Claro SSA:  (55) 71-9146-8575
Fixo:  (55) 71-4062-8688
Skype ID: isamar.maia
"A vida é muito curta para ser pequena" (Benjamin Disraeli)

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco UCCX System Prompt Multi Language Issues

[Grace Maximuangu]

Anthony et All,

So while doing the reactive debug the system is still using en_US as the 
language for the system generated prompts. Even though the set contact info 
step should have pointed it to play in Spanish

TAC Suggestion :

Use a SubFlow which points to the system generated prompts to use as es_MX so 
that the customers who want English as their preferred language do not get 
interrupted.

Has anyone tried this method?
:-:gm

Grace Maximuangu
Voice Solutions Engineer
Black Box Network Services
Cell: 213.268.6342
grace.maximua...@blackbox.com
www.blackbox.com

[cid:image002.jpg@01CF392D.C32F1CF0]

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Anthony Holloway
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:56 PM
To: Cisco VoIP Group
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco UCCX System Prompt Multi Language Issues

This is more than likely a defect, in that the names of some files are mixed 
case, and unfortunately don't play, leaving you hearing English.

See this thread: https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3620875 for more 
details.

I've had recent talks about this with Cisco and it seems like we'll have to 
wait until UCCX 10.x to see the naming convention fully fixed.

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Anthony Holloway 
mailto:avhollo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
This is more than likely a defect, in that the names of some files are mixed 
case, and unfortunately don't play, leaving you hearing English.

See this thread: https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3620875 for more 
details.

I've had recent talks about this with Cisco and it seems like we'll have to 
wait until UCCX 10.x to see the naming convention fully fixed.

Anthony Holloway

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Grace Maximuangu 
mailto:grace.maximua...@blackbox.com>> wrote:

I have a Bilingual script running Spanish and English languages, the system is 
required to play Current date and Pricing and although the system was initially 
installed for EN_US, the customer wanted to add a second language option - 
ES_MX language.



We modified the script, by adding the Menu option and Set Contact Info step for 
Spanish branch.



All good, BUT Problem is after caller selects the menu option for Spanish, 
script plays spanish language until it gets to the System Prompt that is 
supposed to play back the Date of Today and Price for Today. It switches from 
Spanish to English, then goes back to Spanish and continues to play in Spanish.



TAC recommended a reboot of the CCX engine, because they thought that the 
system is not refreshing the script when it comes to that particular code.

Unfortunately that did not fix the issue.



I also looked at these two links below:

https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2080962



https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-13933



Is this a system limitation, has anyone ran into this issue before, what was 
the fix?


:-:gm

Grace Maximuangu
Voice Solutions Engineer
Black Box Network Services
Cell: 213.268.6342
grace.maximua...@blackbox.com
www.blackbox.com

[cid:image003.jpg@01CF392D.C32F1CF0]



This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended 
for the sole use of the individual to whom they are addressed. Black Box 
Corporation reserves the right to scan all e-mail traffic for restricted 
content and to monitor all e-mail in general. If you are not the intended 
recipient or you have received this email in error, any use, dissemination or 
forwarding of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this email.


<><>___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Setting up ICM Sprawler 8.x

[Stephen Welsh]

I plan to setup a Sprawler at some point too, the following looks like a useful 
guide:

https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-1374

I states the AD/DNS can be on the same box, however the post is a few years 
old, is this something that changes with a particular release?

It would be great if there was an updated version of the above guide as I know 
there are usually a ton of caveats and “special settings” that need to be taken 
into consideration.

Cheers

Stephen

On 5 Mar 2014, at 19:12, Beck, Christopher 
mailto:cb...@usg.com>> wrote:

Pavan is right.   You will need SQL because the router/logger processes are on 
the server.  If you install the AW/HDS service on a different host, that will 
require SQL as well.  You will need separate server(s) for the AD/DNS.  It 
isn’t supported as a function installed on the IPCC servers.


It doesn’t matter if you have a sprawler or a multi-server production setup, 
these rules apply.

Hope it helps,
Chris

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan 
Burtch
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 12:41 PM
To: Pavan K
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Setting up ICM Sprawler 8.x

This is for a Sprawler.  Do you have any experience setting one of these up?




Sincerely,

Ryan Burtch

On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Pavan K 
mailto:pav.c...@gmail.com>> wrote:

AD /DNS is usually on a separate box
You need SQL anywhere on the logger / aw/HDS/dds boxes. So yes you will need 
SQL.

On Mar 5, 2014 1:03 AM, "Ryan Burtch" 
mailto:rburt...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I have a couple questions on the ICM Sprawler setup.

1. Does SQL need to be installed on the Sprawler?
2. Can AD/DNS be installed on the Sprawler?




Sincerely,

Ryan Burtch

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Confidentiality Notice: This email is intended for the sole use of the intended
 recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary or privileged 
information.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, review,
 dissemination, copying or action taken based on this message or its 
attachments,
 if any, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact 
the
 sender by reply email and destroy or delete all copies of the original message
 and any attachments. Thank you.


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Setting up ICM Sprawler 8.x

[Ryan Burtch]

Thanks Chris. I knew about having AD/DNS in a production env, just never
setup a Sprawler before.  Thanks for the clarification.  Planning on
setting this thing up in AWS, so i'll basically have a hosted 'UCCE' Lab.
Appreciate the help.




Sincerely,

Ryan Burtch


On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Beck, Christopher  wrote:

> Pavan is right.   You will need SQL because the router/logger processes
> are on the server.  If you install the AW/HDS service on a different host,
> that will require SQL as well.  You will need separate server(s) for the
> AD/DNS.  It isn't supported as a function installed on the IPCC servers.
>
>
>
>
>
> It doesn't matter if you have a sprawler or a multi-server production
> setup, these rules apply.
>
>
>
> Hope it helps,
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Ryan Burtch
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 05, 2014 12:41 PM
> *To:* Pavan K
> *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Setting up ICM Sprawler 8.x
>
>
>
> This is for a Sprawler.  Do you have any experience setting one of these
> up?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Ryan Burtch
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Pavan K  wrote:
>
> AD /DNS is usually on a separate box
> You need SQL anywhere on the logger / aw/HDS/dds boxes. So yes you will
> need SQL.
>
> On Mar 5, 2014 1:03 AM, "Ryan Burtch"  wrote:
>
> I have a couple questions on the ICM Sprawler setup.
>
>
>
> 1. Does SQL need to be installed on the Sprawler?
>
> 2. Can AD/DNS be installed on the Sprawler?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Ryan Burtch
>
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This email is intended for the sole use of the 
> intended
>  recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary or privileged 
> information.
>  If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, review,
>  dissemination, copying or action taken based on this message or its 
> attachments,
>  if any, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact 
> the
>  sender by reply email and destroy or delete all copies of the original 
> message
>  and any attachments. Thank you.
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade from v7 to v9?

[Madziarczyk, Jonathan]

So long as the ATA goes to a real analog phone and not some other device 
(fax/elevator/etc).  When you jump to 9.x the 187s can only do SIP (I think 7x 
and 8x support sccp as well) and all hell breaks loose.  From what I can tell 
you lose CPC disconnect and Power-denial.  That’s been my nightmare for the 
last 3 months.

 

 

 

From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 6:12 PM
To: Madziarczyk, Jonathan
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade 
from v7 to v9?

 

We have one ATA. The one that is SIP. 187 I think. 

 

Have experienced problems with ATAs?


Sent from my iPhone


On 2014-03-05, at 3:31 PM, "Madziarczyk, Jonathan"  
wrote:

Yes, I believe the aligned partitions issue is VMware specific.

 

I don’t know what Cisco has to say about it, but I always feel better 
knowing the install was direct from a fresh 9 install rather than a 7->9 
upgrade.  Since the DRS backup and restore from an upgraded 9x onto a fresh 9x 
is acceptable in the Jump Upgrade in VMware I don’t see a problem with it on 
the physical side.

 

On a side note, are you using any ATAs?

 

 

 

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf 
Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 12:44 PM
To: Dennis Heim
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after 
upgrade from v7 to v9?

 

Thanks Dennis. I  believe that 'aligned partitions' are a VM issue 
only? I am currently on MCS (HP equiv) servers.

Lelio




---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
le...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1

 





From: "Dennis Heim" 
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" , "cisco-voip voyp list" 

Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 1:37:24 PM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after 
upgradefrom v7 to v9?

Aligned partitions.

 

Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration)

World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814

 

PS Engineering:  Innovate & Ignite.

 

 

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf 
Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 10:56 AM
To: cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after 
upgrade from v7 to v9?

 


I have an opportunity (maybe, if time permits) to rebuild an off-line 
cluster after I upgrade it from v7 to v9.

The question is, is there any advantage to building a cluster from 
scratch and restore from DRS, so that it is built from v9 installation media 
rather than from a v7 upgrade?

I recall seeing a number of bugs in the past that said something to the 
effect of "...if installation was an upgrade, disk space, etc. etc"

Can anything thing of any advantages of doing this? This will help us 
test our disaster recovery process as well.

Lelio

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
le...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1

 

 

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] How to change CUEAC 9.1.1.0 IP address??

[Jason Aarons (AM)]

Customer wants to change the IP address of CUEAC 9.1.1.  Same hostname.

Google finds an Arc forum post that says it can be done, then has a link to a 
doc that doesn't detail what to do.

CUEAC 9.1.1 with SQL Server Express


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10 Phones

[Daniel Pagan]

You can use the following tool to view IP phone compatibility with a selected 
version of CUCM:
http://tools.cisco.com/ITDIT/vtgsca/VTGServlet

The required firmware is listed beside each supported phone model.

Hope this helps.

- Daniel

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Leslie Meade
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 11:29 PM
To: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10 Phones

I know that the 1st gen phones are end of life, but they should still connect 
to a callmanager 10 environment ?
I have a client that wants to upgrade the system, but at this time not willing 
to upgrade the handsets.
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10 Phones

[Jason Aarons (AM)]

Do they have any VIP12 and VIP30s?

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Matthew Collins
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 3:49 AM
To: James Buchanan; Leslie Meade
Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10 Phones


Hi Leslie,

Below is a screen shot from the insert 79XX phone page from 10.0.(1)

[cid:image001.jpg@01CF390B.84FEAC60]

Regards

Matthew

ǀ BLOCK ǀ
Cisco Global EMEAR Partner of the Year 2013

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of James 
Buchanan
Sent: 06 March 2014 04:45
To: Leslie Meade
Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10 Phones

The SRND specifies the 7900 series phones are still considered collaboration 
endpoints but doesn't indicate which models are allowed.

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Leslie Meade 
mailto:leslie.me...@lvs1.com>> wrote:
I know that the 1st gen phones are end of life, but they should still connect 
to a callmanager 10 environment ?
I have a client that wants to upgrade the system, but at this time not willing 
to upgrade the handsets.

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



itevomcid
<>___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10 Phones

[Matthew Collins]

Hi Leslie,

Below is a screen shot from the insert 79XX phone page from 10.0.(1)

[cid:image001.jpg@01CF3918.E5FFD220]

Regards

Matthew

ǀ BLOCK ǀ
Cisco Global EMEAR Partner of the Year 2013

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of James 
Buchanan
Sent: 06 March 2014 04:45
To: Leslie Meade
Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10 Phones

The SRND specifies the 7900 series phones are still considered collaboration 
endpoints but doesn't indicate which models are allowed.

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Leslie Meade 
mailto:leslie.me...@lvs1.com>> wrote:
I know that the 1st gen phones are end of life, but they should still connect 
to a callmanager 10 environment ?
I have a client that wants to upgrade the system, but at this time not willing 
to upgrade the handsets.

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

<>___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip