Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.6.2 cluster problem
Run show network cluster to make sure both nodes are authenticated/connected. Then run utils dbreplication stop on pub and sub, run utils dbreplication dropadmindb on pub and sub, then run utils dbreplication reset all from the publisher once everything else has completed. You can run file list activelog cm/trace/dbl detail date on the publisher to watch the files. You should see the CDR defines happen immediately. You can use file tail activelog cm/trace/dbl/filename to watch the files in real-time. Your CDR define file should show the result of 64 if it was successful. Then just wait 5 minutes (or however long your repltimeout is set to) and you should see the broadcast go out from the publisher. Then just sit back and wait/monitor the broadcast via tail if you want. No harm in resetting replication during the day. Just never ever use the clusterreset command and you'll be fine. Brian On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Martin Schmuker m...@bilobit.com wrote: All, I have problems with a CUCM cluster at one customer. He is running 8.6.2.2-2. Cluster was running fine in the past. Some months ago second machine lost power (UPS problems) and since this time sometimes we have problems that cluster is reporting as not working. After a reboot of both machines they are running fine. Today publisher was stuck on 100% CPU and all phones were in “registering” state. But subscriber did not register any phones. After rebooting both machines again everything is fine, but I’m not happy with this situation. Can you see in the following output if cluster is running fine? When I issue utils dbreplication runtimestate on *publisher (=cucm01)* I get: admin:utils dbreplication runtimestate DB and Replication Services: ALL RUNNING Cluster Replication State: Replication status command started at: 2015-02-16-14-32 Replication status command COMPLETED 541 tables checked out of 541 No Errors or Mismatches found. Use 'file view activelog cm/trace/dbl/sdi/ReplicationStatus.2015_02_16_14_32_48.out' to see the details DB Version: ccm8_6_2_2_2 Number of replicated tables: 541 Cluster Detailed View from PUB (2 Servers): PINGREPLICATION REPL. DBver REPL. REPLICATION SETUP SERVER-NAME IP ADDRESS (msec) RPC?STATUS QUEUE TABLES LOOP? (RTMT) details --- -- --- - --- - - s-lx-cucm01 192.168.1.100.082 Yes Connected 0 match Yes (2) PUB Setup Completed cucm02 192.168.1.110.244 Yes Connected 0 match N/A (0) Setup Requested *On Subscriber (=cucm02):* admin:utils dbreplication runtimestate DB and Replication Services: ALL RUNNING Cluster Replication State: Only available on the PUB DB Version: ccm8_6_2_2_2 Number of replicated tables: 541 Cluster Detailed View from SUB (2 Servers): PINGREPLICATION REPL. DBver REPL. REPLICATION SETUP SERVER-NAME IP ADDRESS (msec) RPC?STATUS QUEUE TABLES LOOP? (RTMT) --- -- --- - --- - - s-lx-cucm01 192.168.1.100.212 Yes Connected 0 match No (2) cucm02 192.168.1.110.055 Yes Connected 0 match No (0) Output of *utils dbreplication status on pub*: admin:file view activelog cm/trace/dbl/sdi/ReplicationStatus.2015_02_16_14_32_48.out SERVER ID STATESTATUS QUEUE CONNECTION CHANGED --- g_cucm02_ccm8_6_2_2_23 Active Connected 0 Feb 16 14:30:50 g_s_lx_cucm01_ccm8_6_2_2_22 Active Local 0 - No Errors or Mismatches found. Replication status is good on all available servers. utils dbreplication status output To determine if replication is suspect, look for the following: (1) Number of rows in a table do not match on all nodes. (2) Non-zero values occur in any of the other output columns for a table Sync target server is not defined for the replicate ccmdbtemplate_s_lx_cucm01_ccm8_6_2_2_2_1_118_typedberrors Feb 16 2015 14:32:53 -- Table scan for ccmdbtemplate_s_lx_cucm01_ccm8_6_2_2_2_1_118_typedberrors end - And on sub: admin:file view activelog cm/trace/dbl/sdi/ReplicationStatus.2015_02_16_14_34_37.out SERVER ID STATESTATUS QUEUE CONNECTION CHANGED --- g_cucm02_ccm8_6_2_2_23 Active Local 0 g_s_lx_cucm01_ccm8_6_2_2_22 Active Connected 0 Feb 16 14:30:49
[cisco-voip] Unity connection - Voicemail playback
I have a Unity 10.5 HA setup and the subscriber is at our COLO. Currently the link between the two is being saturated so voicemail playback is very choppy. The question is, how do i force the publisher to handle those requests so that voicemail playback is handled inside this location and not at the colo? Thanks Jose ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Unity connection - Voicemail playback
You have to route calls to that node. Right now, either you SCCP ports, or SIP trunk are pointing to the Sub. You have to change the priority of the trunk or the ports so it uses the Sub first. +Chris TME - Unity Connection and MediaSense From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jose Colon II Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 1:44 PM To: Cisco VOIP Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity connection - Voicemail playback I have a Unity 10.5 HA setup and the subscriber is at our COLO. Currently the link between the two is being saturated so voicemail playback is very choppy. The question is, how do i force the publisher to handle those requests so that voicemail playback is handled inside this location and not at the colo? Thanks Jose ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[cisco-voip] CUCM Need a suitcase migration method similar to COBRAS
Install CSR 1000v inside firewall for NTP server Install a Win7 Jump box as jump box is too locked down (not a administrator) and needs a virtual nic to be able to move between production and isolated Install new VM with 7.0.1.11000-2 Upgrade to 7.0.2.23900-1 Upgrade to 7.1.3.31900-1 to match for DRS restore (had to rebuild due to CSCtl74037https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCtl74037 ) DRS Restore production 7.1.3.31900-1 to new VM Upgrade to 10.0.1.1-19 ( follow guide, lots of critical steps, install cop files etc) http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/upgrade/10_0_1/CUCM_BK_U4214F9D_00_upgrade-guide-cucm-100/CUCM_BK_U4214F9D_00_upgrade-guide-cucm-100_chapter_010.html Upgrade to 10.5.1.1-7 to match for DRS backup Install new VM with 10.5.1.1-7 for DRS Restore to fix Unaligned Partitions See how much fun this is to upgrade from 7.1.3 to 10.5 ? ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Unity connection - Voicemail playback
Ryan, When did CUC start to allow more than two nodes in a cluster? Jose, You can go into the unity connection serviceability and click stop taking calls Then there are no configuration changes to deal with, just turn it back on when the link is stable. -Nate From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Huff Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 12:09 PM To: Chris Ward chrward; jcolon...@gmail.com; Cisco VOIP Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity connection - Voicemail playback Jose, If SIP integrated, easy fix, just point the trunk at the pub (and then reset the trunk in CUCM). If SCCP integrated, you have a few different options and the best option depends on how you're setup and if this is a perm. change or just temporary? If this is just temporary and assuming you have the max amount of ports per CUC node, In CUCM I would go to the line group of the SCCP ports and drop out the ports that are registered to the CUC subscriber node. Once your link is no longer saturated, add the ports back to the line group. There are some other design strategies that you can look at to help mitigate this in the future. For example, you could add an additional CUC Subscriber node in the same DC as the publisher (so you end up with a subscriber in both data centers). This would allow you to have additional ports in the same DC as the publisher. Thanks, Ryan _ From: chrw...@cisco.com mailto:chrw...@cisco.com To: jcolon...@gmail.com mailto:jcolon...@gmail.com ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:52:43 + Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity connection - Voicemail playback You have to route calls to that node. Right now, either you SCCP ports, or SIP trunk are pointing to the Sub. You have to change the priority of the trunk or the ports so it uses the Sub first. +Chris TME - Unity Connection and MediaSense From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jose Colon II Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 1:44 PM To: Cisco VOIP Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity connection - Voicemail playback I have a Unity 10.5 HA setup and the subscriber is at our COLO. Currently the link between the two is being saturated so voicemail playback is very choppy. The question is, how do i force the publisher to handle those requests so that voicemail playback is handled inside this location and not at the colo? Thanks Jose ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Unity connection - Voicemail playback
Jose, If SIP integrated, easy fix, just point the trunk at the pub (and then reset the trunk in CUCM). If SCCP integrated, you have a few different options and the best option depends on how you're setup and if this is a perm. change or just temporary? If this is just temporary and assuming you have the max amount of ports per CUC node, In CUCM I would go to the line group of the SCCP ports and drop out the ports that are registered to the CUC subscriber node. Once your link is no longer saturated, add the ports back to the line group. There are some other design strategies that you can look at to help mitigate this in the future. For example, you could add an additional CUC Subscriber node in the same DC as the publisher (so you end up with a subscriber in both data centers). This would allow you to have additional ports in the same DC as the publisher. Thanks, Ryan From: chrw...@cisco.com To: jcolon...@gmail.com; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:52:43 + Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity connection - Voicemail playback You have to route calls to that node. Right now, either you SCCP ports, or SIP trunk are pointing to the Sub. You have to change the priority of the trunk or the ports so it uses the Sub first. +Chris TME - Unity Connection and MediaSense From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jose Colon II Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 1:44 PM To: Cisco VOIP Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity connection - Voicemail playback I have a Unity 10.5 HA setup and the subscriber is at our COLO. Currently the link between the two is being saturated so voicemail playback is very choppy. The question is, how do i force the publisher to handle those requests so that voicemail playback is handled inside this location and not at the colo? Thanks Jose ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[cisco-voip] Issues with UCCX Sample Callback Script in ScriptRepository
We've taken the callback scripts from the UCCX Script Repository sample pack and included it as part of a larger application. I've been seeing issues with the script failing the callback process reporting '%MIVR-LIB_EVENT-5-TOO_LONG_IN_QUEUE' which appears to be a value of 5000 s. In the comments in the sample scripts, it references the use of separate call control groups for the main application and the callback application. Anyone have any ideas why this would be the case? It doesn't give any reasons in the script or included documentation. Our current setup is using a single call control group (separate triggers). I'm looking into changing this to separate CCG's but interested to know if anyone could id why separate ones are required. Any thoughts on the above appreciated. Nathan ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Issues with UCCX Sample Callback Script in ScriptRepository
Hi Nathan, Could you grab the MIVR logs for this? Regards, Abhiram Kramadhati Technical Solutions Manager, CBABU CCIE Voice # 40065 From: Nathan Reeves nathan.a.ree...@gmail.commailto:nathan.a.ree...@gmail.com Date: Tuesday, 17 February 2015 4:44 pm To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] Issues with UCCX Sample Callback Script in ScriptRepository We've taken the callback scripts from the UCCX Script Repository sample pack and included it as part of a larger application. I've been seeing issues with the script failing the callback process reporting '%MIVR-LIB_EVENT-5-TOO_LONG_IN_QUEUE' which appears to be a value of 5000 s. In the comments in the sample scripts, it references the use of separate call control groups for the main application and the callback application. Anyone have any ideas why this would be the case? It doesn't give any reasons in the script or included documentation. Our current setup is using a single call control group (separate triggers). I'm looking into changing this to separate CCG's but interested to know if anyone could id why separate ones are required. Any thoughts on the above appreciated. Nathan ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.6.2 cluster problem
Are these VMs or physical servers ? Did you look on server console to see if there were any errors ? Like read only file system and a bunch of java output? Sometimes if a server fs goes read only when you'll see that sort of issue on server console , or when first connecting with ssh session. A reboot would clear the read only fs issue if that was issue , the reboot would also halt on boot up if there are serious file system issues. Also, from my experiences the early 8.6.2 versions are troublesome. 8.6.2 SU3 and higher are better so you should look at patching to latest 8.6.2 SU when you get time. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 16, 2015, at 9:33 AM, Brian Meade bmead...@vt.edu wrote: Run show network cluster to make sure both nodes are authenticated/connected. Then run utils dbreplication stop on pub and sub, run utils dbreplication dropadmindb on pub and sub, then run utils dbreplication reset all from the publisher once everything else has completed. You can run file list activelog cm/trace/dbl detail date on the publisher to watch the files. You should see the CDR defines happen immediately. You can use file tail activelog cm/trace/dbl/filename to watch the files in real-time. Your CDR define file should show the result of 64 if it was successful. Then just wait 5 minutes (or however long your repltimeout is set to) and you should see the broadcast go out from the publisher. Then just sit back and wait/monitor the broadcast via tail if you want. No harm in resetting replication during the day. Just never ever use the clusterreset command and you'll be fine. Brian On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Martin Schmuker m...@bilobit.com wrote: All, I have problems with a CUCM cluster at one customer. He is running 8.6.2.2-2. Cluster was running fine in the past. Some months ago second machine lost power (UPS problems) and since this time sometimes we have problems that cluster is reporting as not working. After a reboot of both machines they are running fine. Today publisher was stuck on 100% CPU and all phones were in “registering” state. But subscriber did not register any phones. After rebooting both machines again everything is fine, but I’m not happy with this situation. Can you see in the following output if cluster is running fine? When I issue utils dbreplication runtimestate on publisher (=cucm01) I get: admin:utils dbreplication runtimestate DB and Replication Services: ALL RUNNING Cluster Replication State: Replication status command started at: 2015-02-16-14-32 Replication status command COMPLETED 541 tables checked out of 541 No Errors or Mismatches found. Use 'file view activelog cm/trace/dbl/sdi/ReplicationStatus.2015_02_16_14_32_48.out' to see the details DB Version: ccm8_6_2_2_2 Number of replicated tables: 541 Cluster Detailed View from PUB (2 Servers): PINGREPLICATION REPL. DBver REPL. REPLICATION SETUP SERVER-NAME IP ADDRESS (msec) RPC?STATUS QUEUE TABLES LOOP? (RTMT) details --- -- --- - --- - - s-lx-cucm01 192.168.1.100.082 Yes Connected 0 match Yes (2) PUB Setup Completed cucm02 192.168.1.110.244 Yes Connected 0 match N/A (0) Setup Requested On Subscriber (=cucm02): admin:utils dbreplication runtimestate DB and Replication Services: ALL RUNNING Cluster Replication State: Only available on the PUB DB Version: ccm8_6_2_2_2 Number of replicated tables: 541 Cluster Detailed View from SUB (2 Servers): PINGREPLICATION REPL. DBver REPL. REPLICATION SETUP SERVER-NAME IP ADDRESS (msec) RPC?STATUS QUEUE TABLES LOOP? (RTMT) --- -- --- - --- - - s-lx-cucm01 192.168.1.100.212 Yes Connected 0 match No (2) cucm02 192.168.1.110.055 Yes Connected 0 match No (0) Output of utils dbreplication status on pub: admin:file view activelog cm/trace/dbl/sdi/ReplicationStatus.2015_02_16_14_32_48.out SERVER ID STATESTATUS QUEUE CONNECTION CHANGED --- g_cucm02_ccm8_6_2_2_2 3 Active Connected 0 Feb 16 14:30:50 g_s_lx_cucm01_ccm8_6_2_2_22 Active Local 0 - No Errors or Mismatches found. Replication status is good on all available servers. utils
[cisco-voip] CUCM 8.6.2 cluster problem
All, I have problems with a CUCM cluster at one customer. He is running 8.6.2.2-2. Cluster was running fine in the past. Some months ago second machine lost power (UPS problems) and since this time sometimes we have problems that cluster is reporting as not working. After a reboot of both machines they are running fine. Today publisher was stuck on 100% CPU and all phones were in registering state. But subscriber did not register any phones. After rebooting both machines again everything is fine, but I'm not happy with this situation. Can you see in the following output if cluster is running fine? When I issue utils dbreplication runtimestate on publisher (=cucm01) I get: admin:utils dbreplication runtimestate DB and Replication Services: ALL RUNNING Cluster Replication State: Replication status command started at: 2015-02-16-14-32 Replication status command COMPLETED 541 tables checked out of 541 No Errors or Mismatches found. Use 'file view activelog cm/trace/dbl/sdi/ReplicationStatus.2015_02_16_14_32_48.out' to see the details DB Version: ccm8_6_2_2_2 Number of replicated tables: 541 Cluster Detailed View from PUB (2 Servers): PINGREPLICATION REPL. DBver REPL. REPLICATION SETUP SERVER-NAME IP ADDRESS (msec) RPC?STATUS QUEUE TABLES LOOP? (RTMT) details --- -- --- - --- - - s-lx-cucm01 192.168.1.100.082 Yes Connected 0 match Yes (2) PUB Setup Completed cucm02 192.168.1.110.244 Yes Connected 0 match N/A (0) Setup Requested On Subscriber (=cucm02): admin:utils dbreplication runtimestate DB and Replication Services: ALL RUNNING Cluster Replication State: Only available on the PUB DB Version: ccm8_6_2_2_2 Number of replicated tables: 541 Cluster Detailed View from SUB (2 Servers): PINGREPLICATION REPL. DBver REPL. REPLICATION SETUP SERVER-NAME IP ADDRESS (msec) RPC?STATUS QUEUE TABLES LOOP? (RTMT) --- -- --- - --- - - s-lx-cucm01 192.168.1.100.212 Yes Connected 0 match No (2) cucm02 192.168.1.110.055 Yes Connected 0 match No (0) Output of utils dbreplication status on pub: admin:file view activelog cm/trace/dbl/sdi/ReplicationStatus.2015_02_16_14_32_48.out SERVER ID STATESTATUS QUEUE CONNECTION CHANGED --- g_cucm02_ccm8_6_2_2_23 Active Connected 0 Feb 16 14:30:50 g_s_lx_cucm01_ccm8_6_2_2_22 Active Local 0 - No Errors or Mismatches found. Replication status is good on all available servers. utils dbreplication status output To determine if replication is suspect, look for the following: (1) Number of rows in a table do not match on all nodes. (2) Non-zero values occur in any of the other output columns for a table Sync target server is not defined for the replicate ccmdbtemplate_s_lx_cucm01_ccm8_6_2_2_2_1_118_typedberrors Feb 16 2015 14:32:53 -- Table scan for ccmdbtemplate_s_lx_cucm01_ccm8_6_2_2_2_1_118_typedberrors end - And on sub: admin:file view activelog cm/trace/dbl/sdi/ReplicationStatus.2015_02_16_14_34_37.out SERVER ID STATESTATUS QUEUE CONNECTION CHANGED --- g_cucm02_ccm8_6_2_2_23 Active Local 0 g_s_lx_cucm01_ccm8_6_2_2_22 Active Connected 0 Feb 16 14:30:49 - No Errors or Mismatches found. Replication status is good on all available servers. utils dbreplication status output To determine if replication is suspect, look for the following: (1) Number of rows in a table do not match on all nodes. (2) Non-zero values occur in any of the other output columns for a table Sync target server is not defined for the replicate ccmdbtemplate_s_lx_cucm01_ccm8_6_2_2_2_1_118_typedberrors Feb 16 2015 14:34:43 -- Table scan for ccmdbtemplate_s_lx_cucm01_ccm8_6_2_2_2_1_118_typedberrors end - show perf query class Number of Replicates Created and State of Replication on publisher shows: ==query class : - Perf class (Number of Replicates Created and State of Replication) has instances and values: ReplicateCount - Number of Replicates Created = 541 ReplicateCount - Replicate_State= 2 So a replicate state of 2 means everything ok, correct? What can I do? Is it safe to run dbreplication reset all? Thanks for your ideas,
Re: [cisco-voip] unity connection full mailboxes - notifying callers
Just to follow up on this, after some testing with 10.5. When a mailbox is over quota the user will get an email. There is a Quota Notification Mail task under Tools - Task Management to adjust the schedule of the quota email. You can also customize the quota email text, under Message Storage - Mailbox Quotas, the Quota Alert Text section. On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Erick Bergquist erick...@gmail.com wrote: Good. So is this SMTP notification automatic in 10.x for over quota? I have a 10.5.2 system and not seeing it under notification device options or under mailbox. On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Haas, Neal nh...@co.fresno.ca.us wrote: We ended up increasing the quota size, with 6000 users we only use 20% of storage. Also making the aging policy faster. No one retrieves deleted voicemail. We did SMTP, but once we did single inbox we turned SMTP off. 80% of our users use Single Inbox and love it! Neal Haas -Original Message- From: Erick Bergquist [mailto:erick...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 8:39 AM To: Chris Ward (chrward) Cc: Haas, Neal; Justin Steinberg; Cisco VOIP Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] unity connection full mailboxes - notifying callers Thanks for the additional info. Guess there are couple options then on 9.1 -- increase quota, set outside caller messages to be impacted by quota, set message aging policy to delete messages in inbox or saved messages after x days. I guess we could also disable single inbox and do SMTP notifdication onlly w/accept and relay to smtp address. On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Chris Ward (chrward) chrw...@cisco.com wrote: Neal, Welcome to the future! I think this was a feature we added in 10.0 as Single Inbox drove people away from dialing into their voicemail box and therefore no one knew when their account was full and so they would just see the consequences of a full inbox with no warnings or alerts. The SMTP alerts were added to remedy this. +Chris TME - MediaSense and Unity Connection -Original Message- From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Haas, Neal Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 10:07 AM To: 'Erick Bergquist'; Justin Steinberg Cc: Cisco VOIP Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] unity connection full mailboxes - notifying callers We upgraded to 10.5.1.1-7 on unity conn, and all of a sudden end users were complaining that they were getting emails saying that there email box was full. (but I check all of the time I don’t know why I would get this email..last checked 60 days ago) So for the time being I would say that notification is working. We didn’t change ANY settings, just a regular upgrade. Neal Haas -Original Message- From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Erick Bergquist Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 11:31 PM To: Justin Steinberg Cc: Cisco VOIP Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] unity connection full mailboxes - notifying callers Has there been any update or better way to handle this in 9.1 since the last discussion in this thread? Running into this issue on CUC 9.1.1 with a client. Users never check messages via TUI and aren't getting notified of their mailbox being over quota due to external messages still being allowed to be left. They noticed a problem when they deleted messages in outlook and they weren't being deleted but showing as saved messages or outlook deleting the message then it showing back up in their inbox because unity wasn't putting it in deleted items folder. I can see issue with SMTP notification like others have mentioned, as that is done via another method and if they aren't using a SMTP SmartHost at all it requires another messaging interface to be configured and setup. Some places are getting strict about basic SMTP relays as well. How does that work with Office365 for instance? Erick On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com wrote: The 10.0 feature will help with single inbox users, but I really wish there was a better way. Something like provide the option to modify the behavior of the message aging rules with a new option that ages the message out of unity connection, breaks the ews link to exchange, and leaves the WAV file in the users mailbox as a normal email. I also support some law firms and they have no quota in exchange and are frustrated with what they perceive as an artificial limit imposed by unity. This is especially bad for migrations from unity to connection. While we are on the topic, on my wish list is more collaboration between the unity team and jabber group. It would be nice if the jabber voicemail tab could show the quota status. Forward voicemails in jabber. Dispatch messages in jabber. On Dec 3, 2013 2:34 PM, Chris Ward (chrward) chrw...@cisco.com wrote: Well, the SMTP notification can be used outside of Single Inbox too
Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Need a suitcase migration method similar to COBRAS
If you used PCD, it would have only taken twice the amount of time! On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com wrote: Install CSR 1000v inside firewall for NTP server Install a Win7 Jump box as jump box is too locked down (not a administrator) and needs a virtual nic to be able to move between production and isolated Install new VM with 7.0.1.11000-2 Upgrade to 7.0.2.23900-1 Upgrade to 7.1.3.31900-1 to match for DRS restore (had to rebuild due to CSCtl74037 https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCtl74037 ) DRS Restore production 7.1.3.31900-1 to new VM Upgrade to 10.0.1.1-19 ( follow guide, lots of critical steps, install cop files etc) http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/upgrade/10_0_1/CUCM_BK_U4214F9D_00_upgrade-guide-cucm-100/CUCM_BK_U4214F9D_00_upgrade-guide-cucm-100_chapter_010.html Upgrade to 10.5.1.1-7 to match for DRS backup Install new VM with 10.5.1.1—7 for DRS Restore to fix Unaligned Partitions See how much fun this is to upgrade from 7.1.3 to 10.5 ? ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
