Re: [cisco-voip] RedSky SIP Trunk

[Raffi Rodrigo]

alguem te,sala cisco webex

Em qua., 1 de abr. de 2020 às 23:04, Anthony Holloway <
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> escreveu:

> Oh, good to hear!
>
> Yeah NAT and SIP doesn't work without an ALGwellsort of.  You
> could apply a Lua script to the SIP trunk to modify OUTBOUND INVITEs,
> effectively doing your own SIP inspection, but then it would apply to all
> CUCMs, and you'd need it to apply to only that one.  Which you should be
> able to do, but would require some reconfiguration of your SIP trunks, call
> routing and callmanager groups.
>
> Post back if you find a solution, or if you're still looking for help.
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 1:29 PM Matthew Loraditch <
> mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com> wrote:
>
>> Nope it is actually as simple as they said. Basic sip trunk out of CUCM.
>> No special profiles, or anything.  Am having problems as one of my CUCMs
>> goes through an ISR to get to RedSky vs an ASA. ISR NAT is being funky but
>> dealing with that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Matthew Loraditch​
>> Sr. Network Engineer
>> p: *443.541.1518* <443.541.1518>
>> w: *www.heliontechnologies.com*   |
>> e: *mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com*
>> 
>> [image: Helion Technologies] 
>> [image: Facebook] 
>> [image: Twitter] 
>> [image: LinkedIn] 
>>
>> *From:* Anthony Holloway 
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 1, 2020 2:27 PM
>> *To:* Matthew Loraditch 
>> *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] RedSky SIP Trunk
>>
>>
>>
>> [EXTERNAL]
>>
>>
>>
>> So...are you still without a functional SIP trunk then Matt?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:08 AM Matthew Loraditch <
>> mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com> wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone done this? Surprisingly they don’t provide a bunch of guidance
>> here. I’m so used to carriers and other vendors being very very specific
>> about how to setup their trunks.
>>
>>
>>
>> I was planning on doing them directly in CUCM as that seemed simpler, but
>> would appreciate any input.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Matthew Loraditch**​*
>>
>> *Sr. Network Engineer*
>>
>> p: *443.541.1518* <443.541.1518>
>>
>> w: *www.heliontechnologies.com* 
>>
>>  |
>>
>> e: *mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com*
>> 
>>
>> [image: Helion Technologies] 
>>
>> [image: Facebook] 
>>
>> [image: Twitter] 
>>
>> [image: LinkedIn] 
>>
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Can MRA work with old UCM configured with IP addresses?

[Dana Tong]

I’ve reconfigured it all to use FQDN and re-configured my nodes. And I’m logged 
in okay now and MRA is working.

Cheers
Dana


From: NateCCIE 
Sent: Thursday, 2 April 2020 12:45 PM
To: Dana Tong 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Can MRA work with old UCM configured with IP 
addresses?

I know I have done one MRA with IPs, back when MRA was new. You still need the 
Cisco Uds srv record to be there and that record needs to be resolvable my the 
C.

That old system isn’t using MRA right now, so I don’t know if it’s changed in 
newer versions of expressway.
Sent from my iPhone


On Apr 1, 2020, at 8:13 PM, Dana Tong 
mailto:dana.t...@yellit.com.au>> wrote:

Hi all,

I have a customer who was installed some 9 years ago and the hosts were all 
configured with IP address instead of FQDN. They’re up on UCM 10.5(2) now and I 
have spun up Expressway X12.5.7.
The UC Traversal zone is up and running. The Expressway’s have certificates 
installed.
However I am hitting issues with getting the edge config and signing in. I get 
the usual “cannot communicate with server” when I try to login with Jabber.

I’ve tried changing some things such as configuring the UCM, IM&P, Unity 
servers in Expressway-C by IP or FQDN and have had some varying results on the 
Collaboration Solution Analyser. Sometimes its downloads the user UDS 
configuration and sometimes it doesn’t.

Is MRA do-able with the UCM using IP address? Or am I going to have to bite the 
bullet and reconfigure all the devices to use FQDN for their clustering? Or is 
there some kind of easy fix?

Cheers
Dana

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Can MRA work with old UCM configured with IP addresses?

[Schlotterer, Tommy]

Check to make sure the Expressway-C has a reverse DNS record for the 
Expressway-E’s IP address.

Also, upload your Logs to here: https://cway.cisco.com/csa/

CSA usually has good advice for MRA issues.

Thanks

Tommy

Tommy Schlotterer|  Engineer

Presidio
 |  presidio.com

20 N Saint Clair 3rd Floor, Toledo, OH 43604
D: 419.214.1415|  C: 
419.706.0259|  
tschlotte...@presidio.com



[https://www2.presidio.com/signatures/Presidio_Blue_FutureBuilt_200px.png]




From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Dana Tong
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 6:26 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Can MRA work with old UCM configured with IP addresses?

EXTERNAL EMAIL




Hi all,

I have a customer who was installed some 9 years ago and the hosts were all 
configured with IP address instead of FQDN. They’re up on UCM 10.5(2) now and I 
have spun up Expressway X12.5.7.
The UC Traversal zone is up and running. The Expressway’s have certificates 
installed.
However I am hitting issues with getting the edge config and signing in. I get 
the usual “cannot communicate with server” when I try to login with Jabber.

I’ve tried changing some things such as configuring the UCM, IM&P, Unity 
servers in Expressway-C by IP or FQDN and have had some varying results on the 
Collaboration Solution Analyser. Sometimes its downloads the user UDS 
configuration and sometimes it doesn’t.

Is MRA do-able with the UCM using IP address? Or am I going to have to bite the 
bullet and reconfigure all the devices to use FQDN for their clustering? Or is 
there some kind of easy fix?

Cheers
Dana



This message w/attachments (message) is intended solely for the use of the 
intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, 
confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please 
notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy all copies and 
attachments. Please be advised that any review or dissemination of, or the 
taking of any action in reliance on, the information contained in or attached 
to this message is prohibited.
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Can MRA work with old UCM configured with IP addresses?

[NateCCIE]

I know I have done one MRA with IPs, back when MRA was new. You still need the 
Cisco Uds srv record to be there and that record needs to be resolvable my the 
C.

That old system isn’t using MRA right now, so I don’t know if it’s changed in 
newer versions of expressway. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 1, 2020, at 8:13 PM, Dana Tong  wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I have a customer who was installed some 9 years ago and the hosts were all 
> configured with IP address instead of FQDN. They’re up on UCM 10.5(2) now and 
> I have spun up Expressway X12.5.7.
> The UC Traversal zone is up and running. The Expressway’s have certificates 
> installed.
> However I am hitting issues with getting the edge config and signing in. I 
> get the usual “cannot communicate with server” when I try to login with 
> Jabber.
>  
> I’ve tried changing some things such as configuring the UCM, IM&P, Unity 
> servers in Expressway-C by IP or FQDN and have had some varying results on 
> the Collaboration Solution Analyser. Sometimes its downloads the user UDS 
> configuration and sometimes it doesn’t.
>  
> Is MRA do-able with the UCM using IP address? Or am I going to have to bite 
> the bullet and reconfigure all the devices to use FQDN for their clustering? 
> Or is there some kind of easy fix?
>  
> Cheers
> Dana
>  
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Can MRA work with old UCM configured with IP addresses?

[Charles Goldsmith]

never tried, but I wouldn't be surprised if FQDN is required.  Are your
hosts discovered in the expressway core and showing as TCP Active?  I'm
also assuming you have TLS verify mode off?

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 9:13 PM Dana Tong  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
> I have a customer who was installed some 9 years ago and the hosts were
> all configured with IP address instead of FQDN. They’re up on UCM 10.5(2)
> now and I have spun up Expressway X12.5.7.
>
> The UC Traversal zone is up and running. The Expressway’s have
> certificates installed.
>
> However I am hitting issues with getting the edge config and signing in. I
> get the usual “cannot communicate with server” when I try to login with
> Jabber.
>
>
>
> I’ve tried changing some things such as configuring the UCM, IM&P, Unity
> servers in Expressway-C by IP or FQDN and have had some varying results on
> the Collaboration Solution Analyser. Sometimes its downloads the user UDS
> configuration and sometimes it doesn’t.
>
>
>
> Is MRA do-able with the UCM using IP address? Or am I going to have to
> bite the bullet and reconfigure all the devices to use FQDN for their
> clustering? Or is there some kind of easy fix?
>
>
>
> Cheers
> Dana
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] jabber searching only user in AD but not local cucm database

[Pawlowski, Adam]

Hi,

Jabber is going to connect directly to an LDAP source unless you use UDS.

You'll have to create records in AD to match those sources, or go through the 
fun of UDS (avatar hosting, make sure records from your source are right).

You can alternatively supply some other sort of custom lookup tab, contacts, 
etc, but that is not really sustainable.

Best,

Adam Pawlowski
SUNY Buffalo



From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of naresh 
rathore
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 8:22 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] jabber searching only user in AD but not local cucm 
database

hi,


I have the requirement to search both users configured in AD and its working 
fine. I have some local users on cucm as well, i am not able to search them, on 
CUCM i have same field populated as AD user, specially mailid.

any suggestions

System version: 12.5.1.11900-146.
Jabber version: 12.8.0
Regards

Naray
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Can MRA work with old UCM configured with IP addresses?

[Dana Tong]

Hi all,

I have a customer who was installed some 9 years ago and the hosts were all 
configured with IP address instead of FQDN. They're up on UCM 10.5(2) now and I 
have spun up Expressway X12.5.7.
The UC Traversal zone is up and running. The Expressway's have certificates 
installed.
However I am hitting issues with getting the edge config and signing in. I get 
the usual "cannot communicate with server" when I try to login with Jabber.

I've tried changing some things such as configuring the UCM, IM&P, Unity 
servers in Expressway-C by IP or FQDN and have had some varying results on the 
Collaboration Solution Analyser. Sometimes its downloads the user UDS 
configuration and sometimes it doesn't.

Is MRA do-able with the UCM using IP address? Or am I going to have to bite the 
bullet and reconfigure all the devices to use FQDN for their clustering? Or is 
there some kind of easy fix?

Cheers
Dana

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] RedSky SIP Trunk

[Anthony Holloway]

Oh, good to hear!

Yeah NAT and SIP doesn't work without an ALGwellsort of.  You could
apply a Lua script to the SIP trunk to modify OUTBOUND INVITEs,
effectively doing your own SIP inspection, but then it would apply to all
CUCMs, and you'd need it to apply to only that one.  Which you should be
able to do, but would require some reconfiguration of your SIP trunks, call
routing and callmanager groups.

Post back if you find a solution, or if you're still looking for help.

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 1:29 PM Matthew Loraditch <
mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com> wrote:

> Nope it is actually as simple as they said. Basic sip trunk out of CUCM.
> No special profiles, or anything.  Am having problems as one of my CUCMs
> goes through an ISR to get to RedSky vs an ASA. ISR NAT is being funky but
> dealing with that.
>
>
>
> Matthew Loraditch​
> Sr. Network Engineer
> p: *443.541.1518* <443.541.1518>
> w: *www.heliontechnologies.com*   |
> e: *mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com* 
> [image: Helion Technologies] 
> [image: Facebook] 
> [image: Twitter] 
> [image: LinkedIn] 
>
> *From:* Anthony Holloway 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 1, 2020 2:27 PM
> *To:* Matthew Loraditch 
> *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] RedSky SIP Trunk
>
>
>
> [EXTERNAL]
>
>
>
> So...are you still without a functional SIP trunk then Matt?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:08 AM Matthew Loraditch <
> mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com> wrote:
>
> Has anyone done this? Surprisingly they don’t provide a bunch of guidance
> here. I’m so used to carriers and other vendors being very very specific
> about how to setup their trunks.
>
>
>
> I was planning on doing them directly in CUCM as that seemed simpler, but
> would appreciate any input.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Matthew Loraditch**​*
>
> *Sr. Network Engineer*
>
> p: *443.541.1518* <443.541.1518>
>
> w: *www.heliontechnologies.com* 
>
>  |
>
> e: *mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com* 
>
> [image: Helion Technologies] 
>
> [image: Facebook] 
>
> [image: Twitter] 
>
> [image: LinkedIn] 
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] jabber searching only user in AD but not local cucm database

[naresh rathore]

hi,


I have the requirement to search both users configured in AD and its working 
fine. I have some local users on cucm as well, i am not able to search them, on 
CUCM i have same field populated as AD user, specially mailid.

any suggestions

System version: 12.5.1.11900-146.
Jabber version: 12.8.0
Regards

Naray
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] RedSky SIP Trunk

[Matthew Loraditch]

Nope it is actually as simple as they said. Basic sip trunk out of CUCM. No 
special profiles, or anything.  Am having problems as one of my CUCMs goes 
through an ISR to get to RedSky vs an ASA. ISR NAT is being funky but dealing 
with that.


Matthew Loraditch
Sr. Network Engineer
p: 443.541.1518
w: www.heliontechnologies.com | e: mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com
From: Anthony Holloway 
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 2:27 PM
To: Matthew Loraditch 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] RedSky SIP Trunk

[EXTERNAL]

So...are you still without a functional SIP trunk then Matt?

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:08 AM Matthew Loraditch 
mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com>> 
wrote:
Has anyone done this? Surprisingly they don’t provide a bunch of guidance here. 
I’m so used to carriers and other vendors being very very specific about how to 
setup their trunks.

I was planning on doing them directly in CUCM as that seemed simpler, but would 
appreciate any input.



Matthew Loraditch​
Sr. Network Engineer
p: 443.541.1518
w: www.heliontechnologies.com
 |
e: mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com
[Helion Technologies]
[Facebook]
[Twitter]
[LinkedIn]
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] RedSky SIP Trunk

[Anthony Holloway]

So...are you still without a functional SIP trunk then Matt?

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:08 AM Matthew Loraditch <
mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com> wrote:

> Has anyone done this? Surprisingly they don’t provide a bunch of guidance
> here. I’m so used to carriers and other vendors being very very specific
> about how to setup their trunks.
>
>
>
> I was planning on doing them directly in CUCM as that seemed simpler, but
> would appreciate any input.
>
>
>
>
>
> Matthew Loraditch​
> Sr. Network Engineer
> p: *443.541.1518* <443.541.1518>
> w: *www.heliontechnologies.com*   |
> e: *mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com* 
> [image: Helion Technologies] 
> [image: Facebook] 
> [image: Twitter] 
> [image: LinkedIn] 
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip