Re: [cisco-voip] CER Configuration - Guides?

[Matt Taber (mtaber) via cisco-voip]

This guide is a bit more streamlined, with configuration screenshots taken from 
an example deployment:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/unified-communications/emergency-responder/211453-Cisco-Emergency-Responder-Integration-wi.html


-Matt

On Feb 19, 2020, at 12:53 PM, Matthew Loraditch 
 wrote:

Any good guides or blogs that go through this in a more real world way than the 
documentation?

I haven’t found anything super helpful yet.

Matthew Loraditch​
Sr. Network Engineer
p: 443.541.1518
w: www.heliontechnologies.com|  
e: mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com




___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Help need about Cisco IP Phone 7931

[Matt Taber (mtaber)]

Hi Leonard,

The 7931 IP Phone Administration Guide provides a good overview of initial 
configuration steps:

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/7931g/6_1/english/administration/guide/7931admin/7931set.html#wp1188195


Regards,

Matt

On Apr 2, 2016, at 12:22 PM, PATSON & CO TRADING COMPANY SRLS 
mailto:i...@patsonandco.com>> wrote:

Hi,
I have an Cisco IP Phone 7931. I want to configure it but I don’t know where to 
start. Can someone help me please?
Many thanks





   LEONARD PATU
   Sales Manager

   PATRADECOM SRLS
   P.IVA : IT 03492361203



   Viale Masini 12/14



   40126 Bologna (BO) Italy



   Tel. +390510910450



   @: i...@patradecom.com



   www.techgostore.it



    
 
 



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Lead Second

[Matt Taber (mtaber)]

Document released today on cisco.com regarding UC 
Applications impacted by the June 30th Leap Second:

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-callmanager/119036-technote-vos-00.html


-Matt

On Jun 10, 2015, at 1:44 PM, Wes Sisk (wsisk)  wrote:

Good call out Andrew.

adding a quote so that this might register a little more…

"When the leap second update occurs it is possible for the kernel to hang or 
halt.” Kernel offline means all services/applications/processes offline. This 
is a little important.

-w


On Jun 8, 2015, at 8:53 PM, Andrew Grech 
mailto:agrec...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Guys,

As an advisory please check here for the up and coming leap second. Some UC 
versions are affected


http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/leap-second.html#~ProductInformation
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live

[Matt Taber (mtaber)]

I will be at the Technical Solutions Clinic for Collaboration this week.


Regards,

Matthew Taber
Customer Support Engineer
Unified Communications Infrastructure
+1-919-574-4938, 9am - 5pm EDT (GMT -4)

On May 19, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Matthew Loraditch wrote:

I have dinner plans around 7, but will certainly head over to the tac area at 
the reception.



Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA, CCDA

1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093

voice. 410.252.8830
fax.  410.252.9284

Twitter  |  
Facebook  | 
Website  |  Email 
Support


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Eric 
Pedersen
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 3:53 PM
To: Stephen Welsh
Cc: cisco-voip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live


I'm up for getting together. It would be great to have a cisco-voip gathering.



Stephen Welsh mailto:stephen.we...@unifiedfx.com>> 
wrote:



Cisco TAC area of WoS sounds good to me

Stephen

Sent from my iPad

On 19 May 2014, at 14:32, "Anthony Holloway" 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I'd like to meetup, but tonight is the CSC VIP dinner at 8:30pm.  I'll probably 
be in the TAC area of WoS prior to that.  I'll keep watching the list for 
updates.  Thanks for getting something going Dennis.

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Heim, Dennis 
mailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com>> wrote:
For those at live, anyone up for a get together tonight?

Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814

PS Engineering:  Innovate & Ignite.



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged

subject matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact

the sender and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication,

e-mail communications may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized

parties. If you do not wish us to communicate with you by e-mail, please

notify us at your earliest convenience. In the absence of such

notification, your consent is assumed. Should you choose to allow us to

communicate by e-mail, we will not take any additional security measures

(such as encryption) unless specifically requested.



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Run on All Active Unified CM Nodes in 8.5 and higher

[Matt Taber (mtaber)]

Hi Jason,

Prior to selection of the Run on All Active Nodes checkbox after upgrade, it 
sounds like a potential inter-node communication existed with the primary node 
on which the RL/GW is associated.

The Run on All Active Nodes feature was introduced in CM 8.5 and later to allow 
use of the route local rule, which is described below:

For route lists, the route local rule operates as follows:

For outbound calls that use route lists (and associated route groups and 
trunks), when a call from a registered phone or inbound trunk arrives at the 
node with the route list instance, Cisco Unified CM checks to see if an 
instance of the selected outbound trunk exists on the same node as the route 
list. If so, Cisco Unified CM will use this node to establish the outbound 
trunk call.

If both the route list and the trunk have Run on all Active Unified CM Nodes 
enabled, outbound call distribution will be determined by the node on which the 
inbound call arrives. When the selected outbound trunk uses Cisco Unified CM 
Groups instead of running on all nodes, Cisco Unified CM will apply the route 
local rule if an instance of the selected outbound trunk exists on the same 
node on which the inbound call arrived. If an instance of the trunk does not 
exist on this node, then Cisco Unified CM will forward the call (within the 
cluster) to a node where the trunk is active.

If the route list does not have Run on all Active Unified CM Nodes enabled, an 
instance of the route list will be active on one node within the cluster (the 
primary node of the trunk's Cisco Unified CM Group) and the route local rule 
will be applied on this node.

Ref: 
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/session_mgmt/deploy/8_5_1/trunks.html#wpxref55318


Regards,

Matt

On Apr 16, 2014, at 12:59 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) wrote:

Topic: Run on All Active Unified CM Nodes in 8.5 and higher

So prior to 8.5 was the default to Run on All Active Unified CM Nodes?

I upgraded a working customer from CallManager 7.0 to 9.1.2. They have 3 subs.  
After the upgrade they couldn’t make calls out a MGCP gateway.  We put a check 
in the Route List for Run on All Active Unified CM Nodes and the problem is 
fixed. They have 30+ Route lists for 30+ sites.  Each site has single PRI with 
MGCP.  Small spoke offices.

The have a single RL with a single RG pointed to a single MGCP gateway.

The upgrade has none of the Route Lists with Run on All Active Unified CM 
Nodes.  I can’t think of a reason in this scenario (note we have no SIP) not to 
put the checkmark in the Route Lists for Run on All Active Unified CM Nodes.

SRND Run on all active nodes
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/session_mgmt/deploy/8_5_1/overview.html




___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] is there a way to remove a file from Cisco ELM v9.0(2)SU1?

[Matt Taber (mtaber)]

At this time the procedure provided by Brian is the only method in which to 
remove an existing license file association under ELM.

The following enhancement defect has been opened with regard to the ability to 
manually remove the license file itself under the ELM instance:

https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCud93951


Regards,

Matt

On Apr 16, 2014, at 12:57 PM, Brian Meade wrote:

I've never seen them use a "revoke" file.

What I would do is run that command to put it back in demo mode and have 
licensing give a single license file with all of your current licenses.

Brian


On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi 
mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote:

So there's no way to load the "revoke" file the licensing team sends?

I really don't like the idea of a license file hanging around. :(

Lelio

Sent from my iPhone

On 2014-04-16, at 1:42 PM, Brian Meade 
mailto:bmead...@vt.edu>> wrote:

This is the only way right now- 
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice-unified-communications/unified-communications-licensing/116289-problem-cucm-00.html




On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi 
mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote:

So the licensing team cut the license file incorrectly. Is there a way to 
remove the file? Or is it going to require TAC remote assistance?

Just wondering.

Lelio


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
le...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM 9.1 SIP Normalization Rules

[Matt Taber (mtaber)]

Hi Matt,

Cisco Developer Network (CDN) is available to support the design of LUA scripts 
utilized for SIP Normalization:
https://developer.cisco.com/site/devnet/support/

Information pertaining to SIP Transparency and Normalization scripting can be 
found in the following:
https://developer.cisco.com/site/collaboration/call-control/uc-manager-sip/overview/


-Matt

On Mar 14, 2014, at 11:29 AM, Brian Meade wrote:

Matt,

Cisco TAC doesn't support SIP Normalization Scripts.  Developer support has to 
be used for things like this.

Brian


On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Matt Slaga (AM) 
mailto:matt.sl...@dimensiondata.com>> wrote:
It’s the request line (INVITE sip:firstname.lastn...@domain.com:5060 SIP/2.0


We attempted to open a TAC case on this issue, and I’ve never seen Cisco toss a 
hot potato that fast in my 15 years of dealing with them.  It’s like I clicked 
‘send’ and got a reply back from an engineer saying ‘not supported’.  That’s 
the first I’ve seen a viable option with the CUCM interface rejected as not 
supported.




From: Bernhard Albler 
[mailto:bernhard.alb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 10:06 AM

To: Matt Slaga (AM)
Cc: 'Cisco-Voip-Puck' 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCM 9.1 SIP Normalization Rules



Hi matt,
which line are you trying to change? The To 
Field(TO:bla...@blabla.com:5060 or the 
request Line (INVITE...)

thanks
bernhard

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Matt Slaga (AM) 
mailto:matt.sl...@dimensiondata.com>> wrote:
I’m attempting to apply a SIP Normalization rule to make a port adjustment on 
SIP calls between UCM and Lync 2013.

In the header, UCM sends the port number as 5060.  Lync has problems digesting 
this when referring the call to another pool and wants to see the header at 
5061.

The script we are attempting to use is below.  It has been applied to the 
various SIP trunks between UCM and Lync.

When reviewing traces, the port is not being adjusted.  Either the LUA script 
is wrong below, or for some reason it is not being applied.

Any thoughts?


M = {}
function M.outbound_INVITE(msg)
local method, ruri, ver = msg:getRequestLine()
local uri = string.gsub(ruri, "5060", "5061")
msg:setRequestUri(uri)
end
return M








Matt Slaga
Dimension Data
Tel:+1-571-203-4132
matt.sl...@dimensiondata.com


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



--
Bernhard Albler, +4369917207384
--
"Was Nachwelt! Wie komm' ich dazu was für die Nachwelt zu tun? Was hat denn die 
Nachwelt für mich getan?"
--Carl Friedrich Zelter


itevomcid

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CER 10 - possible to use ELM?

[Matt Taber (mtaber)]

Hi Matthew/Erick,

Support for CER 10.0 license management is introduced in the 10.0 PLM version.  
You may upgrade your existing ELM instance to PLM, however a License re-hosting 
would be required if migrating from co-res to standalone PLM deployment, using 
the output of PLM License Request and submission to Licensing to convert 
existing licenses purchased.

PLM 10.0 User Guide - Generate License Request
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/plm/10_0_1/CPLM_BK_U7066CD8_00_user-guide-rel-10-0-1_chapter_0100.html#CUCM_RF_NEF612C0_00

PLM 10.0 Release Notes:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/plm/CUCM_BK_P73D8919_00_plm_rn_1001_chapter_00.html#CUCM_TP_I3862C31_00

CER 10.0 Licensing:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cer/10_0_1/english/release/notes/CER0_BK_CAB0B702_00_cisco-emergency-responder-10-0-release_chapter_00.html#CER0_TP_L59912C5_00


Regards,

Matthew Taber
Customer Support Engineer
Unified Communications Infrastructure
+1-919-574-4938, 9am - 5pm EST (GMT -5)

On Feb 3, 2014, at 12:44 PM, Matthew Loraditch wrote:

I know there is a license definition file for 10x CUCM and UCXN but I don’t 
believe it adds CER. For migration I think you just would rehost the ELM to the 
PLM. I don’t believe it’s possible to restore a co-res ELM to standalone.


Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093

direct voice. 443.541.1518
fax.  410.252.9284

Twitter  |  
Facebook  | 
Website  |  Email 
Support
Support Phone. 410.252.8830


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Erick 
Wellnitz
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 9:40 AM
To: cisco-voip
Subject: [cisco-voip] CER 10 - possible to use ELM?

Okay, I'm probably just overlooking something somewhere.  Does anyone know if 
there is an ELM license definition available for CER 10 or will I need to 
install Prime License Manager 10 instance.

If I need to install a PLM 10 instance, how would I migrate from a co-res ELM 
to a standalone PLM?
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip