Re: [cisco-voip] Strange routing behavior cucm 10.5 and int'l pattern

2015-02-13 Thread Anthony Holloway
Andrew,

It's an special indication from the user to the phone system that they have
finished dialing the digits.  Otherwise, the T.302 timer will have to
expire before the call will be routed.

An analogy would be like saying "over" on a walkie talkie.

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Andrew Grech  wrote:

> Why do we include a # for international?
> On 14/02/2015 8:06 AM, "Brian Meade"  wrote:
>
>> If your route pattern is 9.011!#, users have to dial the # at the end to
>> match and your discard should be pre-dot trailing hash.  Usually you'll
>> have 2 RPs for international (9.011! and 9.011!#).
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Ryan Huff  wrote:
>>
>>> Try this one on;
>>>
>>> Was working fine ...
>>>
>>> Standard Int'l route pattern 9.011!# Discard set to PreDot (again, this
>>> was working ... no issue on gateway ... etc)
>>>
>>> So today it stops working, just rings busy. I debug the ISDN and it
>>> shows called party as the last 7 digits. I go over to DNA and use an int'l
>>> pattern with the css I was using and it blocks pattern for unallocation.
>>>
>>> I create a new test partition with a new 9.011!# pattern in it and a new
>>> css with only the new partition in it. I go back over to DNA and try the
>>> int'l pattern with the new test css and it blocks for unallocated.
>>>
>>> Now I scratch my head, so I take off the octothorpe on the pattern
>>> (9.011!) and BOOM, DNA routes and everything is happy. I move to production
>>> and it works just fine without the octothorpe.
>>>
>>> What does this sound like? Do you think I may have competing patterns
>>> somewhere in the dial plan?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ryan
>>>
>>> ___
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] Strange routing behavior cucm 10.5 and int'l pattern

2015-02-13 Thread Ryan Huff
Andrew,

Since international numbers are varying lengths, the # is used to signal the 
end of the number string.

You can also just wait for the interdigit timeout to expire and then routing 
occurs.

Usually as Brian mentioned, both are supported because it usually comes down to 
a user preference.

Thanks,

Ryan Huff___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] Strange routing behavior cucm 10.5 and int'l pattern

2015-02-13 Thread Ryan Huff
Brian,

I suppose I wasn't clear on that. The octothorpe was dialed at the end of the 
international pattern in production and with DNA.

Only when I removed the octothorpe from the pattern did routing occur.

Thanks,

Ryan Huff___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] Strange routing behavior cucm 10.5 and int'l pattern

2015-02-13 Thread Anthony Holloway
Brian,

I agree with you on the trailing hash requirement.  DNA will not make a
match for you unless you typed the hash at the end.

[image: Inline image 1]

[image: Inline image 2]

Also, the PreDot/Trailing # is only needed for Translation Patterns.  Route
Patterns strip the trailing hash automatically.  Though, it doesn't hurt to
use the predot/trailing # on Route Patterns, it will still work.

On Fri Feb 13 2015 at 4:06:51 PM Brian Meade  wrote:

> If your route pattern is 9.011!#, users have to dial the # at the end to
> match and your discard should be pre-dot trailing hash.  Usually you'll
> have 2 RPs for international (9.011! and 9.011!#).
>
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Ryan Huff  wrote:
>
>> Try this one on;
>>
>> Was working fine ...
>>
>> Standard Int'l route pattern 9.011!# Discard set to PreDot (again, this
>> was working ... no issue on gateway ... etc)
>>
>> So today it stops working, just rings busy. I debug the ISDN and it shows
>> called party as the last 7 digits. I go over to DNA and use an int'l
>> pattern with the css I was using and it blocks pattern for unallocation.
>>
>> I create a new test partition with a new 9.011!# pattern in it and a new
>> css with only the new partition in it. I go back over to DNA and try the
>> int'l pattern with the new test css and it blocks for unallocated.
>>
>> Now I scratch my head, so I take off the octothorpe on the pattern
>> (9.011!) and BOOM, DNA routes and everything is happy. I move to production
>> and it works just fine without the octothorpe.
>>
>> What does this sound like? Do you think I may have competing patterns
>> somewhere in the dial plan?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ryan
>>
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] Strange routing behavior cucm 10.5 and int'l pattern

2015-02-13 Thread Andrew Grech
Why do we include a # for international?
On 14/02/2015 8:06 AM, "Brian Meade"  wrote:

> If your route pattern is 9.011!#, users have to dial the # at the end to
> match and your discard should be pre-dot trailing hash.  Usually you'll
> have 2 RPs for international (9.011! and 9.011!#).
>
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Ryan Huff  wrote:
>
>> Try this one on;
>>
>> Was working fine ...
>>
>> Standard Int'l route pattern 9.011!# Discard set to PreDot (again, this
>> was working ... no issue on gateway ... etc)
>>
>> So today it stops working, just rings busy. I debug the ISDN and it shows
>> called party as the last 7 digits. I go over to DNA and use an int'l
>> pattern with the css I was using and it blocks pattern for unallocation.
>>
>> I create a new test partition with a new 9.011!# pattern in it and a new
>> css with only the new partition in it. I go back over to DNA and try the
>> int'l pattern with the new test css and it blocks for unallocated.
>>
>> Now I scratch my head, so I take off the octothorpe on the pattern
>> (9.011!) and BOOM, DNA routes and everything is happy. I move to production
>> and it works just fine without the octothorpe.
>>
>> What does this sound like? Do you think I may have competing patterns
>> somewhere in the dial plan?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ryan
>>
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] Strange routing behavior cucm 10.5 and int'l pattern

2015-02-13 Thread Nick Thompson
Use 9.011![0-9#] and pre-dot trailing pound if you want a single route pattern.

On Feb 13, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Brian Meade 
mailto:bmead...@vt.edu>> wrote:

If your route pattern is 9.011!#, users have to dial the # at the end to match 
and your discard should be pre-dot trailing hash.  Usually you'll have 2 RPs 
for international (9.011! and 9.011!#).

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Ryan Huff 
mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote:
Try this one on;

Was working fine ...

Standard Int'l route pattern 9.011!# Discard set to PreDot (again, this was 
working ... no issue on gateway ... etc)

So today it stops working, just rings busy. I debug the ISDN and it shows 
called party as the last 7 digits. I go over to DNA and use an int'l pattern 
with the css I was using and it blocks pattern for unallocation.

I create a new test partition with a new 9.011!# pattern in it and a new css 
with only the new partition in it. I go back over to DNA and try the int'l 
pattern with the new test css and it blocks for unallocated.

Now I scratch my head, so I take off the octothorpe on the pattern (9.011!) and 
BOOM, DNA routes and everything is happy. I move to production and it works 
just fine without the octothorpe.

What does this sound like? Do you think I may have competing patterns somewhere 
in the dial plan?

Thanks,

Ryan

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] Strange routing behavior cucm 10.5 and int'l pattern

2015-02-13 Thread Jason Aarons (AM)
Use 9.011![0-9#]

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brian 
Meade
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 4:57 PM
To: Ryan Huff
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Strange routing behavior cucm 10.5 and int'l pattern


If your route pattern is 9.011!#, users have to dial the # at the end to match 
and your discard should be pre-dot trailing hash.  Usually you'll have 2 RPs 
for international (9.011! and 9.011!#).

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Ryan Huff 
mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote:
Try this one on;

Was working fine ...

Standard Int'l route pattern 9.011!# Discard set to PreDot (again, this was 
working ... no issue on gateway ... etc)

So today it stops working, just rings busy. I debug the ISDN and it shows 
called party as the last 7 digits. I go over to DNA and use an int'l pattern 
with the css I was using and it blocks pattern for unallocation.

I create a new test partition with a new 9.011!# pattern in it and a new css 
with only the new partition in it. I go back over to DNA and try the int'l 
pattern with the new test css and it blocks for unallocated.

Now I scratch my head, so I take off the octothorpe on the pattern (9.011!) and 
BOOM, DNA routes and everything is happy. I move to production and it works 
just fine without the octothorpe.

What does this sound like? Do you think I may have competing patterns somewhere 
in the dial plan?

Thanks,

Ryan

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] Strange routing behavior cucm 10.5 and int'l pattern

2015-02-13 Thread Brian Meade
If your route pattern is 9.011!#, users have to dial the # at the end to
match and your discard should be pre-dot trailing hash.  Usually you'll
have 2 RPs for international (9.011! and 9.011!#).

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Ryan Huff  wrote:

> Try this one on;
>
> Was working fine ...
>
> Standard Int'l route pattern 9.011!# Discard set to PreDot (again, this
> was working ... no issue on gateway ... etc)
>
> So today it stops working, just rings busy. I debug the ISDN and it shows
> called party as the last 7 digits. I go over to DNA and use an int'l
> pattern with the css I was using and it blocks pattern for unallocation.
>
> I create a new test partition with a new 9.011!# pattern in it and a new
> css with only the new partition in it. I go back over to DNA and try the
> int'l pattern with the new test css and it blocks for unallocated.
>
> Now I scratch my head, so I take off the octothorpe on the pattern
> (9.011!) and BOOM, DNA routes and everything is happy. I move to production
> and it works just fine without the octothorpe.
>
> What does this sound like? Do you think I may have competing patterns
> somewhere in the dial plan?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ryan
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


[cisco-voip] Strange routing behavior cucm 10.5 and int'l pattern

2015-02-13 Thread Ryan Huff
Try this one on;

Was working fine ...

Standard Int'l route pattern 9.011!# Discard set to PreDot (again, this was 
working ... no issue on gateway ... etc)

So today it stops working, just rings busy. I debug the ISDN and it shows 
called party as the last 7 digits. I go over to DNA and use an int'l pattern 
with the css I was using and it blocks pattern for unallocation.

I create a new test partition with a new 9.011!# pattern in it and a new css 
with only the new partition in it. I go back over to DNA and try the int'l 
pattern with the new test css and it blocks for unallocated.

Now I scratch my head, so I take off the octothorpe on the pattern (9.011!) and 
BOOM, DNA routes and everything is happy. I move to production and it works 
just fine without the octothorpe.

What does this sound like? Do you think I may have competing patterns somewhere 
in the dial plan?

Thanks,

Ryan
  ___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip