Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-21 Thread Pawlowski, Adam
There is a getUniversalDeviceTemplate and addUniversalDeviceTemplate call you 
can use so you should be able to pull the record, manipulate the values, and 
put it back, with respect to how you’d do that with anything else via AXL.

I may try and play with this a bit myself later to see if it’s possible, or at 
least quickly “Report” on the UDTs and their settings for consistency, since 
the weird expanding interface isn’t great.



From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Tucci, Ben 
via cisco-voip
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 12:37 PM
To: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 

Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

I was able to do a simplified version of that on a smaller table – we had to 
build an app internally for this due to 
CSCuz76525<https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuz76525> (which has 
happened a few times to us). The AXL side requires that you send it all of the 
devices to add which isn’t ideal if we have many users trying to make changes. 
So we just call this insert from a separate web app for our admin users.

It’s a mix of data sources so it’s possible the syntax error is something in 
the quotes used or something else. I’m leaving the IDs in but they would need 
to be made specific.

insert into applicationuserdevicemap (pkid, fkdevice, fkapplicationuser, 
tkuserassociation) select newid(), pkid, 
'b11187e9-ba5d-aeeb-5afa-1950b50f99e9', 1 from device where name = 
'SEP204C9E6C71A0'

Those IDs are also from a lab environment we set up, and I would be very 
careful with these changes as you can insert a record ccmadmin can’t display 
and cause quite a panic. This was run on 10.5.2.


From: cisco-voip 
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
On Behalf Of Anthony Holloway
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 12:05 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Disclaimer:  Please test in a lab thoroughly before playing cowboy/girl and 
just modifying the database willy-nilly.

I was able to pull the SQL insert from CCMAdmin tomcat logs when adding a new 
template from the GUI, and then use the syntax to insert my own records at the 
CLI.  However, using the below structure to copy an existing record fails, with 
a syntax error, which is a real shame.

admin:run sql insert into device (pkid, name, col1, col2, colN...) select 
newid(), concat(name, " - copy"), col1, col2, colN... where name = 'the name 
you want to copy'

Where col1, col2, and colN are the required columns needed to properly insert a 
new record (again, taken from CCMAdmin traces upon inserting a new template via 
the GUI).

The idea is to insert a new record, specifying all of the proper column names 
(e.g., pkid, name, fkdevicepool, etc.), while dynamically generating a new 
PKID, and appending " - copy" to the name of the record I want to copy.

According to some documentation, that command syntax should work in Informix.  
I tried a few other variations, but I can't figure it out.  Can anyone else 
figure it out?  Could be a useful construct for copying just about anything in 
the DB.

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 10:16 AM Pawlowski, Adam 
mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>> wrote:
They are in the database and you can pull them up as a phone if you nav to edit 
them with their record’s pkid as the key. I haven’t tried inserting one there 
but it’s in there.

I bet it would work as well as any of that does otherwise.




From: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2020 1:58 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>; Pawlowski, 
Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing


Ok, so I’m finding a few more issues with these templates. I have a case open 
for more details. But, I’m likely going to have to live with them.

But what I don’t like? What I really don’t like?

There’s no way to copy universal templates. ARGH.

There’s not even a way to export them and then import them.

Why?!?!




From: cisco-voip 
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 8:56 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Sort of like how all the icons/graphics for ccmuser pages are brok

Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-21 Thread Anthony Holloway
Oh jeez, and now I think I spotted my syntax error: I forgot to mention the
table name in the select statement.  Grrr.

I'll give it a shot a little later, but this syntax should work then:

admin:run sql insert into device (pkid, name, col1, col2, colN...) select
newid(), concat(name, " - copy"), col1, col2, colN... from device where
name = 'the name you want to copy'

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 11:37 AM Tucci, Ben via cisco-voip <
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> wrote:

> I was able to do a simplified version of that on a smaller table – we had
> to build an app internally for this due to CSCuz76525
> <https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuz76525> (which has
> happened a few times to us). The AXL side requires that you send it all of
> the devices to add which isn’t ideal if we have many users trying to make
> changes. So we just call this insert from a separate web app for our admin
> users.
>
>
>
> It’s a mix of data sources so it’s possible the syntax error is something
> in the quotes used or something else. I’m leaving the IDs in but they would
> need to be made specific.
>
>
>
> insert into applicationuserdevicemap (pkid, fkdevice, fkapplicationuser,
> tkuserassociation) select newid(), pkid,
> 'b11187e9-ba5d-aeeb-5afa-1950b50f99e9', 1 from device where name =
> 'SEP204C9E6C71A0'
>
>
>
> Those IDs are also from a lab environment we set up, and I would be very
> careful with these changes as you can insert a record ccmadmin can’t
> display and cause quite a panic. This was run on 10.5.2.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip  *On Behalf Of *Anthony
> Holloway
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 21, 2020 12:05 PM
> *To:* Pawlowski, Adam 
> *Cc:* voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) <
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users
> without a physical phone - licensing
>
>
>
> Disclaimer:  Please test in a lab thoroughly before playing cowboy/girl
> and just modifying the database willy-nilly.
>
>
>
> I was able to pull the SQL insert from CCMAdmin tomcat logs when adding a
> new template from the GUI, and then use the syntax to insert my own records
> at the CLI.  However, using the below structure to copy an existing record
> fails, with a syntax error, which is a real shame.
>
>
>
> admin:run sql insert into device (pkid, name, col1, col2, colN...) select
> newid(), concat(name, " - copy"), col1, col2, colN... where name = 'the
> name you want to copy'
>
>
>
> Where col1, col2, and colN are the required columns needed to properly
> insert a new record (again, taken from CCMAdmin traces upon inserting a new
> template via the GUI).
>
>
>
> The idea is to insert a new record, specifying all of the proper column
> names (e.g., pkid, name, fkdevicepool, etc.), while dynamically generating
> a new PKID, and appending " - copy" to the name of the record I want to
> copy.
>
>
>
> According to some documentation, that command syntax should work in
> Informix.  I tried a few other variations, but I can't figure it out.  Can
> anyone else figure it out?  Could be a useful construct for copying just
> about anything in the DB.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 10:16 AM Pawlowski, Adam 
> wrote:
>
> They are in the database and you can pull them up as a phone if you nav to
> edit them with their record’s pkid as the key. I haven’t tried inserting
> one there but it’s in there.
>
>
>
> I bet it would work as well as any of that does otherwise.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Lelio Fulgenzi 
> *Sent:* Monday, January 20, 2020 1:58 PM
> *To:* Lelio Fulgenzi ; Pawlowski, Adam <
> aj...@buffalo.edu>
> *Cc:* voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) <
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> *Subject:* RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users
> without a physical phone - licensing
>
>
>
>
>
> Ok, so I’m finding a few more issues with these templates. I have a case
> open for more details. But, I’m likely going to have to live with them.
>
>
>
> But what I don’t like? What I really don’t like?
>
>
>
> There’s no way to copy universal templates. ARGH.
>
>
>
> There’s not even a way to export them and then import them.
>
>
>
> Why?!?!
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip  *On Behalf Of *Lelio
> Fulgenzi
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 15, 2020 8:56 PM
> *To:* Pawlowski, Adam 
> *Cc:* voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) <
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users
> without a 

Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-21 Thread Tucci, Ben via cisco-voip
I was able to do a simplified version of that on a smaller table – we had to 
build an app internally for this due to 
CSCuz76525<https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuz76525> (which has 
happened a few times to us). The AXL side requires that you send it all of the 
devices to add which isn’t ideal if we have many users trying to make changes. 
So we just call this insert from a separate web app for our admin users.

It’s a mix of data sources so it’s possible the syntax error is something in 
the quotes used or something else. I’m leaving the IDs in but they would need 
to be made specific.

insert into applicationuserdevicemap (pkid, fkdevice, fkapplicationuser, 
tkuserassociation) select newid(), pkid, 
'b11187e9-ba5d-aeeb-5afa-1950b50f99e9', 1 from device where name = 
'SEP204C9E6C71A0'

Those IDs are also from a lab environment we set up, and I would be very 
careful with these changes as you can insert a record ccmadmin can’t display 
and cause quite a panic. This was run on 10.5.2.


From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Anthony 
Holloway
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 12:05 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam 
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 

Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Disclaimer:  Please test in a lab thoroughly before playing cowboy/girl and 
just modifying the database willy-nilly.

I was able to pull the SQL insert from CCMAdmin tomcat logs when adding a new 
template from the GUI, and then use the syntax to insert my own records at the 
CLI.  However, using the below structure to copy an existing record fails, with 
a syntax error, which is a real shame.

admin:run sql insert into device (pkid, name, col1, col2, colN...) select 
newid(), concat(name, " - copy"), col1, col2, colN... where name = 'the name 
you want to copy'

Where col1, col2, and colN are the required columns needed to properly insert a 
new record (again, taken from CCMAdmin traces upon inserting a new template via 
the GUI).

The idea is to insert a new record, specifying all of the proper column names 
(e.g., pkid, name, fkdevicepool, etc.), while dynamically generating a new 
PKID, and appending " - copy" to the name of the record I want to copy.

According to some documentation, that command syntax should work in Informix.  
I tried a few other variations, but I can't figure it out.  Can anyone else 
figure it out?  Could be a useful construct for copying just about anything in 
the DB.

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 10:16 AM Pawlowski, Adam 
mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>> wrote:
They are in the database and you can pull them up as a phone if you nav to edit 
them with their record’s pkid as the key. I haven’t tried inserting one there 
but it’s in there.

I bet it would work as well as any of that does otherwise.




From: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2020 1:58 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>; Pawlowski, 
Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing


Ok, so I’m finding a few more issues with these templates. I have a case open 
for more details. But, I’m likely going to have to live with them.

But what I don’t like? What I really don’t like?

There’s no way to copy universal templates. ARGH.

There’s not even a way to export them and then import them.

Why?!?!




From: cisco-voip 
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 8:56 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Sort of like how all the icons/graphics for ccmuser pages are broken for new 
phone types added with devpacks. Logs show nothing but errors. Opened up case, 
told it’s cosmetic.


-sent from mobile device-

Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | 
le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.uoguelph.ca_ccs=DwMFaQ=RyOedRvjc7OSsfc0bTI76Q=7N3S3VwV170meOMF2t3MxSPtfF4yZYjo-cGnk0FWjNE=aE1BH_PfX_QvNfpIqkJgT9XA7ThL-gMIMprmfS1LkO8=2KdznV740jNktbyeKcJbYV4T4Yb4pF_G56rNFdAJ3hY=>
 | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook


On Jan 15, 2020, at 3:33 PM, Pawlowski, Adam 
mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>> wrote:
The UI broke at some point and none of the proper localizati

Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-21 Thread Anthony Holloway
Disclaimer:  Please test in a lab thoroughly before playing cowboy/girl and
just modifying the database willy-nilly.

I was able to pull the SQL insert from CCMAdmin tomcat logs when adding a
new template from the GUI, and then use the syntax to insert my own records
at the CLI.  However, using the below structure to copy an existing record
fails, with a syntax error, which is a real shame.

admin:run sql insert into device (pkid, name, col1, col2, colN...) select
newid(), concat(name, " - copy"), col1, col2, colN... where name = 'the
name you want to copy'

Where col1, col2, and colN are the required columns needed to properly
insert a new record (again, taken from CCMAdmin traces upon inserting a new
template via the GUI).

The idea is to insert a new record, specifying all of the proper column
names (e.g., pkid, name, fkdevicepool, etc.), while dynamically generating
a new PKID, and appending " - copy" to the name of the record I want to
copy.

According to some documentation, that command syntax should work in
Informix.  I tried a few other variations, but I can't figure it out.  Can
anyone else figure it out?  Could be a useful construct for copying just
about anything in the DB.

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 10:16 AM Pawlowski, Adam  wrote:

> They are in the database and you can pull them up as a phone if you nav to
> edit them with their record’s pkid as the key. I haven’t tried inserting
> one there but it’s in there.
>
>
>
> I bet it would work as well as any of that does otherwise.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Lelio Fulgenzi 
> *Sent:* Monday, January 20, 2020 1:58 PM
> *To:* Lelio Fulgenzi ; Pawlowski, Adam <
> aj...@buffalo.edu>
> *Cc:* voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) <
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> *Subject:* RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users
> without a physical phone - licensing
>
>
>
>
>
> Ok, so I’m finding a few more issues with these templates. I have a case
> open for more details. But, I’m likely going to have to live with them.
>
>
>
> But what I don’t like? What I really don’t like?
>
>
>
> There’s no way to copy universal templates. ARGH.
>
>
>
> There’s not even a way to export them and then import them.
>
>
>
> Why?!?!
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip  *On Behalf Of *Lelio
> Fulgenzi
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 15, 2020 8:56 PM
> *To:* Pawlowski, Adam 
> *Cc:* voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) <
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users
> without a physical phone - licensing
>
>
>
> Sort of like how all the icons/graphics for ccmuser pages are broken for
> new phone types added with devpacks. Logs show nothing but errors. Opened
> up case, told it’s cosmetic.
>
>
>
>
>
> *-sent from mobile device-*
>
>
>
> *Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.* | Senior Analyst
>
> Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
>
> Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON |
> N1G 2W1
>
> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 <519-824-4120;56354> | le...@uoguelph.ca
>
>
>
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
>
> On Jan 15, 2020, at 3:33 PM, Pawlowski, Adam  wrote:
>
> The UI broke at some point and none of the proper localization fills in,
> so I guess get used to error.add .
>
>
>
> It seems to use AXL or something similar in the background, and you can
> debug what the error is from the application log in RTMT, though half the
> time it’s a code and not useful.
>
>
>
> Duplicate items will break it, as will things that are not valid for
> insert but are part of your universal templates, such as #DEPT# and someone
> has a department name with & in it.
>
>
>
> As for the custom templates, they’re one of those once-a-year things I
> clean up with the database by assigning the phonetemplate record to the
> type, and then removing any of the phone templates that aren’t associated
> with anything.
>
>
>
> I used to say they don’t hurt anything but if you invest in MigrationFX,
> it will leverage the phone button template as a selector to help you choose
> the correct migration. Unless you want it to clone SEPasdfghjkl-Invididual
> Template-8841-MFX all over, you’ll want these to be consistent.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Lelio Fulgenzi 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 15, 2020 3:28 PM
> *To:* Pawlowski, Adam ; Anthony Holloway <
> avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.n

Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-21 Thread Pawlowski, Adam
They are in the database and you can pull them up as a phone if you nav to edit 
them with their record’s pkid as the key. I haven’t tried inserting one there 
but it’s in there.

I bet it would work as well as any of that does otherwise.




From: Lelio Fulgenzi 
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2020 1:58 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; Pawlowski, Adam 
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 

Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing


Ok, so I’m finding a few more issues with these templates. I have a case open 
for more details. But, I’m likely going to have to live with them.

But what I don’t like? What I really don’t like?

There’s no way to copy universal templates. ARGH.

There’s not even a way to export them and then import them.

Why?!?!




From: cisco-voip 
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 8:56 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Sort of like how all the icons/graphics for ccmuser pages are broken for new 
phone types added with devpacks. Logs show nothing but errors. Opened up case, 
told it’s cosmetic.


-sent from mobile device-

Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 
2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | 
le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

On Jan 15, 2020, at 3:33 PM, Pawlowski, Adam 
mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>> wrote:
The UI broke at some point and none of the proper localization fills in, so I 
guess get used to error.add .

It seems to use AXL or something similar in the background, and you can debug 
what the error is from the application log in RTMT, though half the time it’s a 
code and not useful.

Duplicate items will break it, as will things that are not valid for insert but 
are part of your universal templates, such as #DEPT# and someone has a 
department name with & in it.

As for the custom templates, they’re one of those once-a-year things I clean up 
with the database by assigning the phonetemplate record to the type, and then 
removing any of the phone templates that aren’t associated with anything.

I used to say they don’t hurt anything but if you invest in MigrationFX, it 
will leverage the phone button template as a selector to help you choose the 
correct migration. Unless you want it to clone SEPasdfghjkl-Invididual 
Template-8841-MFX all over, you’ll want these to be consistent.


From: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 3:28 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>; Anthony 
Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing


If you really want to hear where it falls short, check this out:


  *   Create jabber phone with tool.
  *   It creates phone with custom phone button template.
  *   I don’t like it, so I change it to our standard.
  *   I want to test things again, so I delete phone and try to create again.
  *   It doesn’t work. It fails with the most descriptive error ever: 
“Error.add”
  *   TAC couldn’t figure it out.

Turns out, if you delete a phone with a custom phone button template, it will 
delete the template (if not in use elsewhere?). But because I changed the 
template to our standard template, the custom template remained.

When I tried to create the phone again using the tool, it tried to recreate the 
custom template, but because it already existed, it failed. ERROR.ADD

Ugh. UI 101….. better error messages!


From: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 3:03 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>; Anthony 
Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Yes, it’s “almost” there, but falls short on those things you note.

But, it is at least consistent in what it does or doesn’t do, so you know what 
you have to fix or clean up.



From: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Sent: Wednesday, J

Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-20 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi

Ok, so I’m finding a few more issues with these templates. I have a case open 
for more details. But, I’m likely going to have to live with them.

But what I don’t like? What I really don’t like?

There’s no way to copy universal templates. ARGH.

There’s not even a way to export them and then import them.

Why?!?!




From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Lelio 
Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 8:56 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam 
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 

Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Sort of like how all the icons/graphics for ccmuser pages are broken for new 
phone types added with devpacks. Logs show nothing but errors. Opened up case, 
told it’s cosmetic.


-sent from mobile device-


Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 
2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | 
le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

On Jan 15, 2020, at 3:33 PM, Pawlowski, Adam 
mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>> wrote:
The UI broke at some point and none of the proper localization fills in, so I 
guess get used to error.add .

It seems to use AXL or something similar in the background, and you can debug 
what the error is from the application log in RTMT, though half the time it’s a 
code and not useful.

Duplicate items will break it, as will things that are not valid for insert but 
are part of your universal templates, such as #DEPT# and someone has a 
department name with & in it.

As for the custom templates, they’re one of those once-a-year things I clean up 
with the database by assigning the phonetemplate record to the type, and then 
removing any of the phone templates that aren’t associated with anything.

I used to say they don’t hurt anything but if you invest in MigrationFX, it 
will leverage the phone button template as a selector to help you choose the 
correct migration. Unless you want it to clone SEPasdfghjkl-Invididual 
Template-8841-MFX all over, you’ll want these to be consistent.


From: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 3:28 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>; Anthony 
Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing


If you really want to hear where it falls short, check this out:


  *   Create jabber phone with tool.
  *   It creates phone with custom phone button template.
  *   I don’t like it, so I change it to our standard.
  *   I want to test things again, so I delete phone and try to create again.
  *   It doesn’t work. It fails with the most descriptive error ever: 
“Error.add”
  *   TAC couldn’t figure it out.

Turns out, if you delete a phone with a custom phone button template, it will 
delete the template (if not in use elsewhere?). But because I changed the 
template to our standard template, the custom template remained.

When I tried to create the phone again using the tool, it tried to recreate the 
custom template, but because it already existed, it failed. ERROR.ADD

Ugh. UI 101….. better error messages!


From: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 3:03 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>; Anthony 
Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Yes, it’s “almost” there, but falls short on those things you note.

But, it is at least consistent in what it does or doesn’t do, so you know what 
you have to fix or clean up.



From: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 3:00 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>; Anthony 
Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Ok. I’ll have to keep that in mind.

I found a few “oddities” as I mentioned.


  *   No way to specify phone button templates. It creates a custom one for 
each user.
  *   It enables mobility by default which allows people to set up remote 
destinations for the jabber. We want to a

Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-15 Thread Pawlowski, Adam
The UI broke at some point and none of the proper localization fills in, so I 
guess get used to error.add .

It seems to use AXL or something similar in the background, and you can debug 
what the error is from the application log in RTMT, though half the time it’s a 
code and not useful.

Duplicate items will break it, as will things that are not valid for insert but 
are part of your universal templates, such as #DEPT# and someone has a 
department name with & in it.

As for the custom templates, they’re one of those once-a-year things I clean up 
with the database by assigning the phonetemplate record to the type, and then 
removing any of the phone templates that aren’t associated with anything.

I used to say they don’t hurt anything but if you invest in MigrationFX, it 
will leverage the phone button template as a selector to help you choose the 
correct migration. Unless you want it to clone SEPasdfghjkl-Invididual 
Template-8841-MFX all over, you’ll want these to be consistent.


From: Lelio Fulgenzi 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 3:28 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam ; Anthony Holloway 

Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 

Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing


If you really want to hear where it falls short, check this out:


  *   Create jabber phone with tool.
  *   It creates phone with custom phone button template.
  *   I don’t like it, so I change it to our standard.
  *   I want to test things again, so I delete phone and try to create again.
  *   It doesn’t work. It fails with the most descriptive error ever: 
“Error.add”
  *   TAC couldn’t figure it out.

Turns out, if you delete a phone with a custom phone button template, it will 
delete the template (if not in use elsewhere?). But because I changed the 
template to our standard template, the custom template remained.

When I tried to create the phone again using the tool, it tried to recreate the 
custom template, but because it already existed, it failed. ERROR.ADD

Ugh. UI 101….. better error messages!


From: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 3:03 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>; Anthony 
Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Yes, it’s “almost” there, but falls short on those things you note.

But, it is at least consistent in what it does or doesn’t do, so you know what 
you have to fix or clean up.



From: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 3:00 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>; Anthony 
Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Ok. I’ll have to keep that in mind.

I found a few “oddities” as I mentioned.


  *   No way to specify phone button templates. It creates a custom one for 
each user.
  *   It enables mobility by default which allows people to set up remote 
destinations for the jabber. We want to avoid that at launch so we will have to 
disable manually after the fact.
  *   It doesn’t populate the ASCII display fields.
  *   It doesn’t allow for the sip security profile and uses the universal 
template. Something we’ll have to change after.

They went so far with this tool, but missed out on a few things. I wish I had 
know about it sooner.

Lelio


From: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 2:54 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>; Anthony 
Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Yes this works, just with the caveat about common phone profiles not working 
(again, at least for me, 11.5) though that’s not quick add’s fault.

Also, in my experience click the buttons, pressing enter has undesirable 
effects. I have been able to press “enter” when adding a new device and have 
had it double – insert which I didn’t think was possible.



From: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 2:42 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>; Anthony 
Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:c

Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-15 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi

If you really want to hear where it falls short, check this out:


  *   Create jabber phone with tool.
  *   It creates phone with custom phone button template.
  *   I don’t like it, so I change it to our standard.
  *   I want to test things again, so I delete phone and try to create again.
  *   It doesn’t work. It fails with the most descriptive error ever: 
“Error.add”
  *   TAC couldn’t figure it out.

Turns out, if you delete a phone with a custom phone button template, it will 
delete the template (if not in use elsewhere?). But because I changed the 
template to our standard template, the custom template remained.

When I tried to create the phone again using the tool, it tried to recreate the 
custom template, but because it already existed, it failed. ERROR.ADD

Ugh. UI 101….. better error messages!


From: Pawlowski, Adam 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 3:03 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; Anthony Holloway 

Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 

Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Yes, it’s “almost” there, but falls short on those things you note.

But, it is at least consistent in what it does or doesn’t do, so you know what 
you have to fix or clean up.



From: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 3:00 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>; Anthony 
Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Ok. I’ll have to keep that in mind.

I found a few “oddities” as I mentioned.


  *   No way to specify phone button templates. It creates a custom one for 
each user.
  *   It enables mobility by default which allows people to set up remote 
destinations for the jabber. We want to avoid that at launch so we will have to 
disable manually after the fact.
  *   It doesn’t populate the ASCII display fields.
  *   It doesn’t allow for the sip security profile and uses the universal 
template. Something we’ll have to change after.

They went so far with this tool, but missed out on a few things. I wish I had 
know about it sooner.

Lelio


From: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 2:54 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>; Anthony 
Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Yes this works, just with the caveat about common phone profiles not working 
(again, at least for me, 11.5) though that’s not quick add’s fault.

Also, in my experience click the buttons, pressing enter has undesirable 
effects. I have been able to press “enter” when adding a new device and have 
had it double – insert which I didn’t think was possible.



From: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 2:42 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>; Anthony 
Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Sorry. I’m mixing scenarios.

I think I have the process of adding Jabber devices for users with an existing 
phone down pat. With some oddities that we’ll have to address.

I’m concerned with creating Jabber devices for users without an existing phone 
-or- DN.

That being said, I believe I have that figured out, but will need to test it 
out.


  *   Go to quick user/phone add
  *   Select user (that has already been imported)
  *   Go to extension section
  *   Add a new extension using the appropriate Line template
  *   Click save (likely)
  *   Go to manage devices and add the appropriate device

We’ll have to see how that works out.

Lelio



From: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 10:50 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>; Anthony 
Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

I’m still a bit confused, unless you mean that with the quick add you’ve 
already set extensions for the user so that the templates will work, as you’ve 
already provisioned a phone?

We are sort of in the same boat. T

Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-15 Thread Pawlowski, Adam
Yes, it’s “almost” there, but falls short on those things you note.

But, it is at least consistent in what it does or doesn’t do, so you know what 
you have to fix or clean up.



From: Lelio Fulgenzi 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 3:00 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam ; Anthony Holloway 

Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 

Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Ok. I’ll have to keep that in mind.

I found a few “oddities” as I mentioned.


  *   No way to specify phone button templates. It creates a custom one for 
each user.
  *   It enables mobility by default which allows people to set up remote 
destinations for the jabber. We want to avoid that at launch so we will have to 
disable manually after the fact.
  *   It doesn’t populate the ASCII display fields.
  *   It doesn’t allow for the sip security profile and uses the universal 
template. Something we’ll have to change after.

They went so far with this tool, but missed out on a few things. I wish I had 
know about it sooner.

Lelio


From: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 2:54 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>; Anthony 
Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Yes this works, just with the caveat about common phone profiles not working 
(again, at least for me, 11.5) though that’s not quick add’s fault.

Also, in my experience click the buttons, pressing enter has undesirable 
effects. I have been able to press “enter” when adding a new device and have 
had it double – insert which I didn’t think was possible.



From: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 2:42 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>; Anthony 
Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Sorry. I’m mixing scenarios.

I think I have the process of adding Jabber devices for users with an existing 
phone down pat. With some oddities that we’ll have to address.

I’m concerned with creating Jabber devices for users without an existing phone 
-or- DN.

That being said, I believe I have that figured out, but will need to test it 
out.


  *   Go to quick user/phone add
  *   Select user (that has already been imported)
  *   Go to extension section
  *   Add a new extension using the appropriate Line template
  *   Click save (likely)
  *   Go to manage devices and add the appropriate device

We’ll have to see how that works out.

Lelio



From: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 10:50 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>; Anthony 
Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

I’m still a bit confused, unless you mean that with the quick add you’ve 
already set extensions for the user so that the templates will work, as you’ve 
already provisioned a phone?

We are sort of in the same boat. The sync will provision based on a mask if 
your LDAP data contains good numbers. You can also tell it to start assigning 
numbers from a pool on the same screen.  I have multiple exchanges I issue 
numbers from based on customer/location so this doesn’t do me any good 
pool-wise, and we don’t control the LDAP data so anything goes there.

You can configure the DN first, yes, as long as it is the primary extension it 
will appear in the quick add tool. I haven’t quite figured out where it stores 
the rest of the DNs you can add there or their order but the primary extension 
sure appears there.

I’m not sure if Prime Provisioning can assist with this task since it has some 
more capabilities, if it works for your installation.

From: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 10:33 AM
To: Anthony Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>; voyp list, 
cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Yeah – I was looking at that. I’m not sure we can take that approach because we 
have so

Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-15 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
Ok. I’ll have to keep that in mind.

I found a few “oddities” as I mentioned.


  *   No way to specify phone button templates. It creates a custom one for 
each user.
  *   It enables mobility by default which allows people to set up remote 
destinations for the jabber. We want to avoid that at launch so we will have to 
disable manually after the fact.
  *   It doesn’t populate the ASCII display fields.
  *   It doesn’t allow for the sip security profile and uses the universal 
template. Something we’ll have to change after.

They went so far with this tool, but missed out on a few things. I wish I had 
know about it sooner.

Lelio


From: Pawlowski, Adam 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 2:54 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; Anthony Holloway 

Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 

Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Yes this works, just with the caveat about common phone profiles not working 
(again, at least for me, 11.5) though that’s not quick add’s fault.

Also, in my experience click the buttons, pressing enter has undesirable 
effects. I have been able to press “enter” when adding a new device and have 
had it double – insert which I didn’t think was possible.



From: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 2:42 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>; Anthony 
Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Sorry. I’m mixing scenarios.

I think I have the process of adding Jabber devices for users with an existing 
phone down pat. With some oddities that we’ll have to address.

I’m concerned with creating Jabber devices for users without an existing phone 
-or- DN.

That being said, I believe I have that figured out, but will need to test it 
out.


  *   Go to quick user/phone add
  *   Select user (that has already been imported)
  *   Go to extension section
  *   Add a new extension using the appropriate Line template
  *   Click save (likely)
  *   Go to manage devices and add the appropriate device

We’ll have to see how that works out.

Lelio



From: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 10:50 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>; Anthony 
Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

I’m still a bit confused, unless you mean that with the quick add you’ve 
already set extensions for the user so that the templates will work, as you’ve 
already provisioned a phone?

We are sort of in the same boat. The sync will provision based on a mask if 
your LDAP data contains good numbers. You can also tell it to start assigning 
numbers from a pool on the same screen.  I have multiple exchanges I issue 
numbers from based on customer/location so this doesn’t do me any good 
pool-wise, and we don’t control the LDAP data so anything goes there.

You can configure the DN first, yes, as long as it is the primary extension it 
will appear in the quick add tool. I haven’t quite figured out where it stores 
the rest of the DNs you can add there or their order but the primary extension 
sure appears there.

I’m not sure if Prime Provisioning can assist with this task since it has some 
more capabilities, if it works for your installation.

From: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 10:33 AM
To: Anthony Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>; voyp list, 
cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Yeah – I was looking at that. I’m not sure we can take that approach because we 
have so many already imported. And extensions are assigned by us, not the AD 
team. It’s weird.

I will look through.

Question: Is there a “pool” that CCM will grab an extension from to assign 
magically?

From: Anthony Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 10:28 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Cc: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>; voyp list, 
cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone

Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-15 Thread Pawlowski, Adam
Yes this works, just with the caveat about common phone profiles not working 
(again, at least for me, 11.5) though that’s not quick add’s fault.

Also, in my experience click the buttons, pressing enter has undesirable 
effects. I have been able to press “enter” when adding a new device and have 
had it double – insert which I didn’t think was possible.



From: Lelio Fulgenzi 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 2:42 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam ; Anthony Holloway 

Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 

Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Sorry. I’m mixing scenarios.

I think I have the process of adding Jabber devices for users with an existing 
phone down pat. With some oddities that we’ll have to address.

I’m concerned with creating Jabber devices for users without an existing phone 
-or- DN.

That being said, I believe I have that figured out, but will need to test it 
out.


  *   Go to quick user/phone add
  *   Select user (that has already been imported)
  *   Go to extension section
  *   Add a new extension using the appropriate Line template
  *   Click save (likely)
  *   Go to manage devices and add the appropriate device

We’ll have to see how that works out.

Lelio



From: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 10:50 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>; Anthony 
Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

I’m still a bit confused, unless you mean that with the quick add you’ve 
already set extensions for the user so that the templates will work, as you’ve 
already provisioned a phone?

We are sort of in the same boat. The sync will provision based on a mask if 
your LDAP data contains good numbers. You can also tell it to start assigning 
numbers from a pool on the same screen.  I have multiple exchanges I issue 
numbers from based on customer/location so this doesn’t do me any good 
pool-wise, and we don’t control the LDAP data so anything goes there.

You can configure the DN first, yes, as long as it is the primary extension it 
will appear in the quick add tool. I haven’t quite figured out where it stores 
the rest of the DNs you can add there or their order but the primary extension 
sure appears there.

I’m not sure if Prime Provisioning can assist with this task since it has some 
more capabilities, if it works for your installation.

From: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 10:33 AM
To: Anthony Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>; voyp list, 
cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Yeah – I was looking at that. I’m not sure we can take that approach because we 
have so many already imported. And extensions are assigned by us, not the AD 
team. It’s weird.

I will look through.

Question: Is there a “pool” that CCM will grab an extension from to assign 
magically?

From: Anthony Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 10:28 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Cc: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>; voyp list, 
cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

The way I use self-provisioning, is to allow CUCM to create the lines for me at 
user synchronization time.

System > LDAP > Dir > Enterprise Users* > Feature Group Template > Common 
Features* > User Profile > Common User* > Universal Line Template > Common 
Line* > All kinds of template settings
System > LDAP > Dir > Enterprise Users* > Apply Mask to synced telephone 
numbers to create a new line for inserted users > Checked
System > LDAP > Dir > Enterprise Users* > Apply Mask to synced telephone 
numbers to create a new line for inserted users  > Mask > **

*These are just the names of my objects, your names might be different.
**That's 12 Xs to accommodate a NANP +E164 number from LDAP

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 9:54 PM Lelio Fulgenzi 
mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote:

I guess I’m missing the piece of how is an extension assigned then?

With an existing phone, the extension is assigned automatically.

I was gonna do some testing, but any pointers would help.

I mean, can I create 

Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-15 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
Sorry. I’m mixing scenarios.

I think I have the process of adding Jabber devices for users with an existing 
phone down pat. With some oddities that we’ll have to address.

I’m concerned with creating Jabber devices for users without an existing phone 
-or- DN.

That being said, I believe I have that figured out, but will need to test it 
out.


  *   Go to quick user/phone add
  *   Select user (that has already been imported)
  *   Go to extension section
  *   Add a new extension using the appropriate Line template
  *   Click save (likely)
  *   Go to manage devices and add the appropriate device

We’ll have to see how that works out.

Lelio



From: Pawlowski, Adam 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 10:50 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; Anthony Holloway 

Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 

Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

I’m still a bit confused, unless you mean that with the quick add you’ve 
already set extensions for the user so that the templates will work, as you’ve 
already provisioned a phone?

We are sort of in the same boat. The sync will provision based on a mask if 
your LDAP data contains good numbers. You can also tell it to start assigning 
numbers from a pool on the same screen.  I have multiple exchanges I issue 
numbers from based on customer/location so this doesn’t do me any good 
pool-wise, and we don’t control the LDAP data so anything goes there.

You can configure the DN first, yes, as long as it is the primary extension it 
will appear in the quick add tool. I haven’t quite figured out where it stores 
the rest of the DNs you can add there or their order but the primary extension 
sure appears there.

I’m not sure if Prime Provisioning can assist with this task since it has some 
more capabilities, if it works for your installation.

From: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 10:33 AM
To: Anthony Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>; voyp list, 
cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Yeah – I was looking at that. I’m not sure we can take that approach because we 
have so many already imported. And extensions are assigned by us, not the AD 
team. It’s weird.

I will look through.

Question: Is there a “pool” that CCM will grab an extension from to assign 
magically?

From: Anthony Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 10:28 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Cc: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>; voyp list, 
cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

The way I use self-provisioning, is to allow CUCM to create the lines for me at 
user synchronization time.

System > LDAP > Dir > Enterprise Users* > Feature Group Template > Common 
Features* > User Profile > Common User* > Universal Line Template > Common 
Line* > All kinds of template settings
System > LDAP > Dir > Enterprise Users* > Apply Mask to synced telephone 
numbers to create a new line for inserted users > Checked
System > LDAP > Dir > Enterprise Users* > Apply Mask to synced telephone 
numbers to create a new line for inserted users  > Mask > **

*These are just the names of my objects, your names might be different.
**That's 12 Xs to accommodate a NANP +E164 number from LDAP

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 9:54 PM Lelio Fulgenzi 
mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote:

I guess I’m missing the piece of how is an extension assigned then?

With an existing phone, the extension is assigned automatically.

I was gonna do some testing, but any pointers would help.

I mean, can I create the DN first? And configure DN with userID?

I’m still getting used to this process.
-sent from mobile device-

Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | 
le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook



On Jan 14, 2020, at 8:35 AM, Pawlowski, Adam 
mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>> wrote:
The quick user/phone add should work as generically for Jabber devices as 
anything else. Just that I’ve found that the common phone profile will not 
populate the correct “Cisco Support Field” for mobile and I have to go into 
those and key in the configuration fi

Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-15 Thread Pawlowski, Adam
I’m still a bit confused, unless you mean that with the quick add you’ve 
already set extensions for the user so that the templates will work, as you’ve 
already provisioned a phone?

We are sort of in the same boat. The sync will provision based on a mask if 
your LDAP data contains good numbers. You can also tell it to start assigning 
numbers from a pool on the same screen.  I have multiple exchanges I issue 
numbers from based on customer/location so this doesn’t do me any good 
pool-wise, and we don’t control the LDAP data so anything goes there.

You can configure the DN first, yes, as long as it is the primary extension it 
will appear in the quick add tool. I haven’t quite figured out where it stores 
the rest of the DNs you can add there or their order but the primary extension 
sure appears there.

I’m not sure if Prime Provisioning can assist with this task since it has some 
more capabilities, if it works for your installation.

From: Lelio Fulgenzi 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 10:33 AM
To: Anthony Holloway 
Cc: Pawlowski, Adam ; voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

Yeah – I was looking at that. I’m not sure we can take that approach because we 
have so many already imported. And extensions are assigned by us, not the AD 
team. It’s weird.

I will look through.

Question: Is there a “pool” that CCM will grab an extension from to assign 
magically?

From: Anthony Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 10:28 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Cc: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>; voyp list, 
cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

The way I use self-provisioning, is to allow CUCM to create the lines for me at 
user synchronization time.

System > LDAP > Dir > Enterprise Users* > Feature Group Template > Common 
Features* > User Profile > Common User* > Universal Line Template > Common 
Line* > All kinds of template settings
System > LDAP > Dir > Enterprise Users* > Apply Mask to synced telephone 
numbers to create a new line for inserted users > Checked
System > LDAP > Dir > Enterprise Users* > Apply Mask to synced telephone 
numbers to create a new line for inserted users  > Mask > **

*These are just the names of my objects, your names might be different.
**That's 12 Xs to accommodate a NANP +E164 number from LDAP

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 9:54 PM Lelio Fulgenzi 
mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote:

I guess I’m missing the piece of how is an extension assigned then?

With an existing phone, the extension is assigned automatically.

I was gonna do some testing, but any pointers would help.

I mean, can I create the DN first? And configure DN with userID?

I’m still getting used to this process.
-sent from mobile device-

Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | 
le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook



On Jan 14, 2020, at 8:35 AM, Pawlowski, Adam 
mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>> wrote:
The quick user/phone add should work as generically for Jabber devices as 
anything else. Just that I’ve found that the common phone profile will not 
populate the correct “Cisco Support Field” for mobile and I have to go into 
those and key in the configuration file that customer should have.

It ended up being easier to insert via AXL to avoid having to fool with that.

Adam

From: cisco-voip 
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 1:13 PM
To: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical 
phone - licensing


I’m trying to setup an easy to replicate (troubleshoot/reconcile) system in 
place for our Jabber deployment.

We’ve decided to assign each Jabber device type to each user so there’s no 
end-user support issues when they want to use it on another device and/or move 
from one device type to another.

If I’m not mistaken, in this case, and, in any case where a primary phone is 
not set, more licenses are used then would need to be. The issue at hand here, 
is what happens when we deploy Jabber without a physical phone?

I’m already finding that the quick/add feature really only works when a phone 
is configured (although 

Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-15 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
Yeah – I was looking at that. I’m not sure we can take that approach because we 
have so many already imported. And extensions are assigned by us, not the AD 
team. It’s weird.

I will look through.

Question: Is there a “pool” that CCM will grab an extension from to assign 
magically?

From: Anthony Holloway 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 10:28 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi 
Cc: Pawlowski, Adam ; voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

The way I use self-provisioning, is to allow CUCM to create the lines for me at 
user synchronization time.

System > LDAP > Dir > Enterprise Users* > Feature Group Template > Common 
Features* > User Profile > Common User* > Universal Line Template > Common 
Line* > All kinds of template settings
System > LDAP > Dir > Enterprise Users* > Apply Mask to synced telephone 
numbers to create a new line for inserted users > Checked
System > LDAP > Dir > Enterprise Users* > Apply Mask to synced telephone 
numbers to create a new line for inserted users  > Mask > **

*These are just the names of my objects, your names might be different.
**That's 12 Xs to accommodate a NANP +E164 number from LDAP

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 9:54 PM Lelio Fulgenzi 
mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote:

I guess I’m missing the piece of how is an extension assigned then?

With an existing phone, the extension is assigned automatically.

I was gonna do some testing, but any pointers would help.

I mean, can I create the DN first? And configure DN with userID?

I’m still getting used to this process.
-sent from mobile device-

Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | 
le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook


On Jan 14, 2020, at 8:35 AM, Pawlowski, Adam 
mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>> wrote:
The quick user/phone add should work as generically for Jabber devices as 
anything else. Just that I’ve found that the common phone profile will not 
populate the correct “Cisco Support Field” for mobile and I have to go into 
those and key in the configuration file that customer should have.

It ended up being easier to insert via AXL to avoid having to fool with that.

Adam

From: cisco-voip 
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 1:13 PM
To: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical 
phone - licensing


I’m trying to setup an easy to replicate (troubleshoot/reconcile) system in 
place for our Jabber deployment.

We’ve decided to assign each Jabber device type to each user so there’s no 
end-user support issues when they want to use it on another device and/or move 
from one device type to another.

If I’m not mistaken, in this case, and, in any case where a primary phone is 
not set, more licenses are used then would need to be. The issue at hand here, 
is what happens when we deploy Jabber without a physical phone?

I’m already finding that the quick/add feature really only works when a phone 
is configured (although I have to work through that). So, I’m wondering, is it 
worthwhile to configure a “dummy” phone for Jabber users and set the primary 
phone for all Jabber clients to this dummy phone? Or should I ask them to pick 
the CSF jabber device as the primary phone for example?

What have others done?

Lelio

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-15 Thread Anthony Holloway
The way I use self-provisioning, is to allow CUCM to create the lines for
me at user synchronization time.

System > LDAP > Dir > Enterprise Users* > Feature Group Template > Common
Features* > User Profile > Common User* > Universal Line Template > Common
Line* > All kinds of template settings
System > LDAP > Dir > Enterprise Users* > Apply Mask to synced telephone
numbers to create a new line for inserted users > Checked
System > LDAP > Dir > Enterprise Users* > Apply Mask to synced telephone
numbers to create a new line for inserted users  > Mask > **

*These are just the names of my objects, your names might be different.
**That's 12 Xs to accommodate a NANP +E164 number from LDAP

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 9:54 PM Lelio Fulgenzi  wrote:

>
> I guess I’m missing the piece of how is an extension assigned then?
>
> With an existing phone, the extension is assigned automatically.
>
> I was gonna do some testing, but any pointers would help.
>
> I mean, can I create the DN first? And configure DN with userID?
>
> I’m still getting used to this process.
>
> *-sent from mobile device-*
>
>
> *Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.* | Senior Analyst
>
> Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
>
> Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON |
> N1G 2W1
>
> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 <519-824-4120;56354> | le...@uoguelph.ca
>
>
>
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
> On Jan 14, 2020, at 8:35 AM, Pawlowski, Adam  wrote:
>
> The quick user/phone add should work as generically for Jabber devices as
> anything else. Just that I’ve found that the common phone profile will not
> populate the correct “Cisco Support Field” for mobile and I have to go into
> those and key in the configuration file that customer should have.
>
>
>
> It ended up being easier to insert via AXL to avoid having to fool with
> that.
>
>
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip  *On Behalf Of *Lelio
> Fulgenzi
> *Sent:* Monday, January 13, 2020 1:13 PM
> *To:* voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) <
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a
> physical phone - licensing
>
>
>
>
>
> I’m trying to setup an easy to replicate (troubleshoot/reconcile) system
> in place for our Jabber deployment.
>
>
>
> We’ve decided to assign each Jabber device type to each user so there’s no
> end-user support issues when they want to use it on another device and/or
> move from one device type to another.
>
>
>
> If I’m not mistaken, in this case, and, in any case where a primary phone
> is not set, more licenses are used then would need to be. The issue at hand
> here, is what happens when we deploy Jabber without a physical phone?
>
>
>
> I’m already finding that the quick/add feature really only works when a
> phone is configured (although I have to work through that). So, I’m
> wondering, is it worthwhile to configure a “dummy” phone for Jabber users
> and set the primary phone for all Jabber clients to this dummy phone? Or
> should I ask them to pick the CSF jabber device as the primary phone for
> example?
>
>
>
> What have others done?
>
>
>
> Lelio
>
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-15 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
This is very helpful. Thanks. I was worried I’d have to worry about this, but 
for now, it looks like I don’t have to.

Awesome sauce!


From: Anthony Holloway 
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 5:02 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi 
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 

Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

You mentioned Primary Phone, so I thought I understood you, but I guess not.

"If I'm not mistaken, in this case, and, in any case where a primary phone is 
not set, more licenses are used then would need to be."

The primary phone field does not play a role in licensing anymore.  It's simply 
the owner user id set on the phone.

As for the workings of UCL:

1 device (regardless of user association) = 1 enhanced*
2 devices with 1 user = 1 enhanced plus
3 - 10 devices all with 1 owner user id = 1 cuwl
11+ devices all with 1 owner user id = 1+ cuwl (e.g., 34 devices + 1 user = 4 
cuwl)

*unless you purchased a cheap phone, then it might be basic or essential

Don't forget the borrowing that happens, so technically, a single device with 
no user could consume a cuwl license.

E.g., Anthony with no physical phone but does have: CSF + BOT + TAB + TCT will 
consume 1 cuwl license, with no primary phone set, just the owner user id on 
all 4 devices.

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:13 PM Lelio Fulgenzi 
mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote:
Yes, no DLUs, but there’s still licenses. So, what I was afraid of was that 
instead of one CUWL license, it would use 4 separate enhanced licenses. But, 
I’m guessing because it’s all one userID, it uses the license based on the 
number of devices.

So, if I have 4 Jabber devices to one userID, it uses CUWL, but if it uses 2 
jabber devices, it uses enhanced?



From: Anthony Holloway 
mailto:avholloway%2bcisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 2:39 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

We have *not* had DLUs since...

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:38 PM Anthony Holloway 
mailto:avholloway%2bcisco-v...@gmail.com>> 
wrote:
I might be saying something completely crazy here, but the Primary Phone field 
does nothing for you ever since CUCM 9x User Connect Licenses (UCL).

Here's what the help says for that field:

Choose the physical phone that will be associated with the application, such as 
IP communicator or Cisco Unified Personal Communicator. When you choose a 
primary phone, the application consumes fewer device license units and is 
considered an "adjunct" license (to the primary phone).

We have had DLUs since 8x, so, unless you're on version 8.x, you can ignore 
this field.

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:29 PM Lelio Fulgenzi 
mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote:

I'm trying to setup an easy to replicate (troubleshoot/reconcile) system in 
place for our Jabber deployment.

We've decided to assign each Jabber device type to each user so there's no 
end-user support issues when they want to use it on another device and/or move 
from one device type to another.

If I'm not mistaken, in this case, and, in any case where a primary phone is 
not set, more licenses are used then would need to be. The issue at hand here, 
is what happens when we deploy Jabber without a physical phone?

I'm already finding that the quick/add feature really only works when a phone 
is configured (although I have to work through that). So, I'm wondering, is it 
worthwhile to configure a "dummy" phone for Jabber users and set the primary 
phone for all Jabber clients to this dummy phone? Or should I ask them to pick 
the CSF jabber device as the primary phone for example?

What have others done?

Lelio

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-14 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi

I guess I’m missing the piece of how is an extension assigned then?

With an existing phone, the extension is assigned automatically.

I was gonna do some testing, but any pointers would help.

I mean, can I create the DN first? And configure DN with userID?

I’m still getting used to this process.

-sent from mobile device-

Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 
2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | 
le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

On Jan 14, 2020, at 8:35 AM, Pawlowski, Adam 
mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>> wrote:

The quick user/phone add should work as generically for Jabber devices as 
anything else. Just that I’ve found that the common phone profile will not 
populate the correct “Cisco Support Field” for mobile and I have to go into 
those and key in the configuration file that customer should have.

It ended up being easier to insert via AXL to avoid having to fool with that.

Adam

From: cisco-voip 
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 1:13 PM
To: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical 
phone - licensing


I’m trying to setup an easy to replicate (troubleshoot/reconcile) system in 
place for our Jabber deployment.

We’ve decided to assign each Jabber device type to each user so there’s no 
end-user support issues when they want to use it on another device and/or move 
from one device type to another.

If I’m not mistaken, in this case, and, in any case where a primary phone is 
not set, more licenses are used then would need to be. The issue at hand here, 
is what happens when we deploy Jabber without a physical phone?

I’m already finding that the quick/add feature really only works when a phone 
is configured (although I have to work through that). So, I’m wondering, is it 
worthwhile to configure a “dummy” phone for Jabber users and set the primary 
phone for all Jabber clients to this dummy phone? Or should I ask them to pick 
the CSF jabber device as the primary phone for example?

What have others done?

Lelio

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-14 Thread Pawlowski, Adam
The quick user/phone add should work as generically for Jabber devices as 
anything else. Just that I've found that the common phone profile will not 
populate the correct "Cisco Support Field" for mobile and I have to go into 
those and key in the configuration file that customer should have.

It ended up being easier to insert via AXL to avoid having to fool with that.

Adam

From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Lelio 
Fulgenzi
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 1:13 PM
To: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 

Subject: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical 
phone - licensing


I'm trying to setup an easy to replicate (troubleshoot/reconcile) system in 
place for our Jabber deployment.

We've decided to assign each Jabber device type to each user so there's no 
end-user support issues when they want to use it on another device and/or move 
from one device type to another.

If I'm not mistaken, in this case, and, in any case where a primary phone is 
not set, more licenses are used then would need to be. The issue at hand here, 
is what happens when we deploy Jabber without a physical phone?

I'm already finding that the quick/add feature really only works when a phone 
is configured (although I have to work through that). So, I'm wondering, is it 
worthwhile to configure a "dummy" phone for Jabber users and set the primary 
phone for all Jabber clients to this dummy phone? Or should I ask them to pick 
the CSF jabber device as the primary phone for example?

What have others done?

Lelio

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-13 Thread Anthony Holloway
You mentioned Primary Phone, so I thought I understood you, but I guess not.

*"If I'm not mistaken, in this case, and, in any case where a primary phone
is not set, more licenses are used then would need to be."*

The primary phone field does not play a role in licensing anymore.  It's
simply the owner user id set on the phone.

As for the workings of UCL:

1 device (regardless of user association) = 1 enhanced*
2 devices with 1 user = 1 enhanced plus
3 - 10 devices all with 1 owner user id = 1 cuwl
11+ devices all with 1 owner user id = 1+ cuwl (e.g., 34 devices + 1 user =
4 cuwl)

*unless you purchased a cheap phone, then it might be basic or essential

Don't forget the borrowing that happens, so technically, a single device
with no user could consume a cuwl license.

E.g., Anthony with no physical phone but does have: CSF + BOT + TAB + TCT
will consume 1 cuwl license, with no primary phone set, just the owner user
id on all 4 devices.

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:13 PM Lelio Fulgenzi  wrote:

> Yes, no DLUs, but there’s still licenses. So, what I was afraid of was
> that instead of one CUWL license, it would use 4 separate enhanced
> licenses. But, I’m guessing because it’s all one userID, it uses the
> license based on the number of devices.
>
>
>
> So, if I have 4 Jabber devices to one userID, it uses CUWL, but if it uses
> 2 jabber devices, it uses enhanced?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Anthony Holloway 
> *Sent:* Monday, January 13, 2020 2:39 PM
> *To:* Lelio Fulgenzi 
> *Cc:* voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) <
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users
> without a physical phone - licensing
>
>
>
> We have *not* had DLUs since...
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:38 PM Anthony Holloway <
> avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I might be saying something completely crazy here, but the Primary Phone
> field does nothing for you ever since CUCM 9x User Connect Licenses (UCL).
>
>
>
> Here's what the help says for that field:
>
>
>
> *Choose the physical phone that will be associated with the application,
> such as IP communicator or Cisco Unified Personal Communicator. When you
> choose a primary phone, the application consumes fewer device license units
> and is considered an "adjunct" license (to the primary phone).*
>
>
>
> We have had DLUs since 8x, so, unless you're on version 8.x, you can
> ignore this field.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:29 PM Lelio Fulgenzi  wrote:
>
>
> I'm trying to setup an easy to replicate (troubleshoot/reconcile) system
> in place for our Jabber deployment.
>
> We've decided to assign each Jabber device type to each user so there's no
> end-user support issues when they want to use it on another device and/or
> move from one device type to another.
>
> If I'm not mistaken, in this case, and, in any case where a primary phone
> is not set, more licenses are used then would need to be. The issue at hand
> here, is what happens when we deploy Jabber without a physical phone?
>
> I'm already finding that the quick/add feature really only works when a
> phone is configured (although I have to work through that). So, I'm
> wondering, is it worthwhile to configure a "dummy" phone for Jabber users
> and set the primary phone for all Jabber clients to this dummy phone? Or
> should I ask them to pick the CSF jabber device as the primary phone for
> example?
>
> What have others done?
>
> Lelio
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-13 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
Yes, no DLUs, but there’s still licenses. So, what I was afraid of was that 
instead of one CUWL license, it would use 4 separate enhanced licenses. But, 
I’m guessing because it’s all one userID, it uses the license based on the 
number of devices.

So, if I have 4 Jabber devices to one userID, it uses CUWL, but if it uses 2 
jabber devices, it uses enhanced?



From: Anthony Holloway 
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 2:39 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi 
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 

Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a 
physical phone - licensing

We have *not* had DLUs since...

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:38 PM Anthony Holloway 
mailto:avholloway%2bcisco-v...@gmail.com>> 
wrote:
I might be saying something completely crazy here, but the Primary Phone field 
does nothing for you ever since CUCM 9x User Connect Licenses (UCL).

Here's what the help says for that field:

Choose the physical phone that will be associated with the application, such as 
IP communicator or Cisco Unified Personal Communicator. When you choose a 
primary phone, the application consumes fewer device license units and is 
considered an "adjunct" license (to the primary phone).

We have had DLUs since 8x, so, unless you're on version 8.x, you can ignore 
this field.

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:29 PM Lelio Fulgenzi 
mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote:

I'm trying to setup an easy to replicate (troubleshoot/reconcile) system in 
place for our Jabber deployment.

We've decided to assign each Jabber device type to each user so there's no 
end-user support issues when they want to use it on another device and/or move 
from one device type to another.

If I'm not mistaken, in this case, and, in any case where a primary phone is 
not set, more licenses are used then would need to be. The issue at hand here, 
is what happens when we deploy Jabber without a physical phone?

I'm already finding that the quick/add feature really only works when a phone 
is configured (although I have to work through that). So, I'm wondering, is it 
worthwhile to configure a "dummy" phone for Jabber users and set the primary 
phone for all Jabber clients to this dummy phone? Or should I ask them to pick 
the CSF jabber device as the primary phone for example?

What have others done?

Lelio

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-13 Thread Anthony Holloway
We have *not* had DLUs since...

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:38 PM Anthony Holloway <
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I might be saying something completely crazy here, but the Primary Phone
> field does nothing for you ever since CUCM 9x User Connect Licenses (UCL).
>
> Here's what the help says for that field:
>
> *Choose the physical phone that will be associated with the application,
> such as IP communicator or Cisco Unified Personal Communicator. When you
> choose a primary phone, the application consumes fewer device license units
> and is considered an "adjunct" license (to the primary phone).*
>
> We have had DLUs since 8x, so, unless you're on version 8.x, you can
> ignore this field.
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:29 PM Lelio Fulgenzi  wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm trying to setup an easy to replicate (troubleshoot/reconcile) system
>> in place for our Jabber deployment.
>>
>> We've decided to assign each Jabber device type to each user so there's
>> no end-user support issues when they want to use it on another device
>> and/or move from one device type to another.
>>
>> If I'm not mistaken, in this case, and, in any case where a primary phone
>> is not set, more licenses are used then would need to be. The issue at hand
>> here, is what happens when we deploy Jabber without a physical phone?
>>
>> I'm already finding that the quick/add feature really only works when a
>> phone is configured (although I have to work through that). So, I'm
>> wondering, is it worthwhile to configure a "dummy" phone for Jabber users
>> and set the primary phone for all Jabber clients to this dummy phone? Or
>> should I ask them to pick the CSF jabber device as the primary phone for
>> example?
>>
>> What have others done?
>>
>> Lelio
>>
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-13 Thread Anthony Holloway
I might be saying something completely crazy here, but the Primary Phone
field does nothing for you ever since CUCM 9x User Connect Licenses (UCL).

Here's what the help says for that field:

*Choose the physical phone that will be associated with the application,
such as IP communicator or Cisco Unified Personal Communicator. When you
choose a primary phone, the application consumes fewer device license units
and is considered an "adjunct" license (to the primary phone).*

We have had DLUs since 8x, so, unless you're on version 8.x, you can ignore
this field.

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:29 PM Lelio Fulgenzi  wrote:

>
> I'm trying to setup an easy to replicate (troubleshoot/reconcile) system
> in place for our Jabber deployment.
>
> We've decided to assign each Jabber device type to each user so there's no
> end-user support issues when they want to use it on another device and/or
> move from one device type to another.
>
> If I'm not mistaken, in this case, and, in any case where a primary phone
> is not set, more licenses are used then would need to be. The issue at hand
> here, is what happens when we deploy Jabber without a physical phone?
>
> I'm already finding that the quick/add feature really only works when a
> phone is configured (although I have to work through that). So, I'm
> wondering, is it worthwhile to configure a "dummy" phone for Jabber users
> and set the primary phone for all Jabber clients to this dummy phone? Or
> should I ask them to pick the CSF jabber device as the primary phone for
> example?
>
> What have others done?
>
> Lelio
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


[cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing

2020-01-13 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi

I'm trying to setup an easy to replicate (troubleshoot/reconcile) system in 
place for our Jabber deployment.

We've decided to assign each Jabber device type to each user so there's no 
end-user support issues when they want to use it on another device and/or move 
from one device type to another.

If I'm not mistaken, in this case, and, in any case where a primary phone is 
not set, more licenses are used then would need to be. The issue at hand here, 
is what happens when we deploy Jabber without a physical phone?

I'm already finding that the quick/add feature really only works when a phone 
is configured (although I have to work through that). So, I'm wondering, is it 
worthwhile to configure a "dummy" phone for Jabber users and set the primary 
phone for all Jabber clients to this dummy phone? Or should I ask them to pick 
the CSF jabber device as the primary phone for example?

What have others done?

Lelio

<>___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip