On Friday 06 August 2004 16:28, Nigel Horne wrote: > > 1. You are leave one % before clamav variables. It isn't multipurpose: > > you can't create variables more one symbol in this case. > > I have no plans to make the syntax of clamav-milter incompatible with clamd > (see VirusEvent).
I'm understand. Well. But it's limit of template functionality. I think what is time for change syntax (may be it's not good because it's only for milter) or create third class of variables - clamav-milter specific. So, you select %X - for ClamAV general variables; @X@ - for sendmail's variables. You can use &X& for clamav-milter specific for cancel general limit. > > 2. > > will be work more quickly - many file operations changed by one. > > putc uses stdio, so the number of file operations remains the same since the > output is buffered in the stdio library. Ok. I'm not good C-coder, I will be trust. -- Regards, Sergey ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ Clamav-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-devel
