[Clamav-users] False PayPal positive [FW: Your submission to ClamAV]
ClamAV wrote: > Dear ClamAV user, > The following submissions have been processed and published: > - 504853 The submission was a PayPal e-mail that was falsely classified as Email.Phishing.Pay-10. Now, it is still identified as Phish. What should I do now? Submit it again? I know the DB people have a lot of work to do, so maybe one of the ClamAV people here on the list could comment on this. TIA, daniel ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
[Clamav-users] Re: False PayPal positive
Daniel Tiefnig wrote: > ClamAV wrote: > > Dear ClamAV user, > > The following submissions have been processed and published: > > - 504853 > > The submission was a PayPal e-mail that was falsely classified as > Email.Phishing.Pay-10. Now, it is still identified as Phish. What should > I do now? Submit it again? I know the DB people have a lot of work to > do, so maybe one of the ClamAV people here on the list could comment on > this. A propos, I'd appreciate it if the "disable phishing detection" option that has been in CVS for months could finally be released with a new ClamAV version, say 0.89... http://www.clamav.net/faq.html says: | 13. Can phishing be considered one kind of spam? ClamAV should not detect | it as some kind of malware. | | Starting from release 0.90, ClamAV allows you to choose whether to detect | phish as some kind of malware or not. This should put an end to the | endless threads on our mailing lists. So long, and thanks for all the | phish. Please! Thank you. Julian. pgpIoEsTcMhSL.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
[Clamav-users] Clamav on SCO Openserver Unix V 5.0.5
Hello All, I've tried to compile the Clamav sources on SCO Unix 5.0.5 with the gcc compiler v 2.95.2 19991024 In the manual of clamav is described that it should compile with this but actually it doesn't. I get first a message that strcasecmp is defined twice. I've modified all strcasecmp' s in the code to strcasecmp1. The error is gone, but then I get errors about the output.c file which is as far I see to be used to log output into the system log? I get the following errors: (console output) Making all in clamscan /bin/ksh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2-o clamscan output.o get opt.o memory.o cfgparser.o misc.o clamscan.o options.o others.o manager.o tre ewalk.o ../libclamav/libclamav.la LD_RUN_PATH="/usr/local/lib:$LD_RUN_PATH" gcc -g -O2 -o .libs/clamscan output.o getopt.o memory.o cfgparser.o misc.o clamscan.o options.o others.o manager.o tre ewalk.o ../libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so /usr/lib/libz.so /usr/lib/libbz2.so Undefined first referenced symbol in file std_syslog output.o ntohl ../libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so closelogoutput.o .libs/clamscan: fatal error: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to .li bs/clamscan collect2: ld returned 1 exit status *** Error code 1 (bu21) *** Error code 1 (bu21) *** Error code 1 (bu21) Would like to know how to resolve this. With Kind Regards, Frederik Hessels ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav on SCO Openserver Unix V 5.0.5
On Oct 12, 2006, at 6:34 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Undefined first referenced symbol in file std_syslog output.o ntohl ../libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so closelogoutput.o .libs/clamscan: fatal error: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to .libs/clamscan collect2: ld returned 1 exit status *** Error code 1 (bu21) *** Error code 1 (bu21) *** Error code 1 (bu21) Would like to know how to resolve this. On most platforms, all of the above symbols are in libc.a (or the .so shared equivalent). It's possible that "man 3 syslog" and "man 3 ntohl" will tell you which additional libraries you need to add to link successfully; perhaps your platform has a libsyslog.a or a librpc.a which are needed. You could always ask SCO about this; doing something helpful to support an actual customer of theirs would probably be a novelty to them. -- -Chuck ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
[Clamav-users] Re: Can't change dir to /usr/local/share/clamav [resolved]
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 06:54:51PM +0100, Pete wrote: > Hello, > > For the first time ever, I can't seem to get either clamd or freshclam to > work on my Slackware Linux 11.0 (2.4.33.3) system. > > I've just installed clamav 0.88.4, using (as I always have with various > distros of Linux) : > > ./configure > make > make install (root) > > This time however, when I try to run freshclam or start up clamd I get the > following error : > > Can't change dir to /usr/local/share/clamav Ahem. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local# ls -l total 40 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2006-10-11 22:32 bin/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2006-10-12 05:34 etc/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 1993-11-24 17:32 games/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2006-10-11 22:32 include/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 1993-11-24 17:32 info/ drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2006-10-11 22:32 lib/ drwxr-xr-x 22 root root 4096 1994-06-02 02:37 man/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2006-10-11 22:32 sbin/ drwx-- 7 root root 4096 2006-10-11 22:32 share/ <-- oops drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 1993-11-24 17:32 src/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local# chmod 755 share [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local# freshclam ClamAV update process started at Thu Oct 12 19:44:50 2006 Downloading main.cvd [*] .. .. Sorry people. Should've checked that. Occams razor and all. Carry on. :) Regards, Pete. ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
[Clamav-users] Can't change dir to /usr/local/share/clamav
Hello, For the first time ever, I can't seem to get either clamd or freshclam to work on my Slackware Linux 11.0 (2.4.33.3) system. I've just installed clamav 0.88.4, using (as I always have with various distros of Linux) : ./configure make make install (root) This time however, when I try to run freshclam or start up clamd I get the following error : Can't change dir to /usr/local/share/clamav I can actually go into this directory ok manually where two files currently exist : daily.cvd main.cvd What's happening ? I did Google around but ended up more confused when I found a reference to a space entered into a configuration file during (I'm assuming) the compiling of clamd/freshclam. But this Google reference was talking about version 0.88.1. Never had a problem with clamav on various Linux distros until now. Could anyone shed some light on this for me ? Regards, Pete. ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
[Clamav-users] Re: False PayPal positive [FW: Your submission to ClamAV]
"Daniel Tiefnig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ClamAV wrote: Dear ClamAV user, The following submissions have been processed and published: - 504853 The submission was a PayPal e-mail that was falsely classified as Email.Phishing.Pay-10. Now, it is still identified as Phish. What should I do now? Submit it again? I know the DB people have a lot of work to do, so maybe one of the ClamAV people here on the list could comment on this. Please read http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.virus.clamav.virusdb/1935 Best regards, Sven ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
