Re: [Clamav-users] LibclamAV - Very Slow

2006-09-27 Thread Webmaster 
Hi,

Le Mercredi 27 Septembre 2006 14:27, Alexander Hagenah a écrit :

 My application is called every time, a mail arrives.
...And every time you load the signature databases, I guess...

Cordialement,

Arnaud Jacques
Consultant Sécurité

Téléphone / Fax : +33-(0)3.44.39.76.46
Portable : +33-(0)6.24.40.95.03
E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Securiteinfo.com
La Sécurité Informatique - La Sécurité des Informations.
266, rue de Villers
60123 Bonneuil en Valois
___
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] LibclamAV - Very Slow

2006-09-27 Thread Paul Bijnens 

On 2006-09-27 14:27, Alexander Hagenah wrote:

But they are as different speedy, I never expected.


You're loading and unpacking the virus database each time.
You see the same difference between clamscan and clamdscan.


--
Paul Bijnens, xplanation Technology ServicesTel  +32 16 397.511
Technologielaan 21 bus 2, B-3001 Leuven, BELGIUMFax  +32 16 397.512
http://www.xplanation.com/  email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
* I think I've got the hang of it now:  exit, ^D, ^C, ^\, ^Z, ^Q, ^^, *
* F6, quit, ZZ, :q, :q!, M-Z, ^X^C, logoff, logout, close, bye, /bye, *
* stop, end, F3, ~., ^]c, +++ ATH, disconnect, halt,  abort,  hangup, *
* PF4, F20, ^X^X, :D::D, KJOB, F14-f-e, F8-e,  kill -1 $$,  shutdown, *
* init 0, kill -9 1, Alt-F4, Ctrl-Alt-Del, AltGr-NumLock, Stop-A, ... *
* ...  Are you sure?  ...   YES   ...   Phew ...   I'm out  *
***

___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] LibclamAV - Very Slow

2006-09-27 Thread tBB 
My application is called every time, a mail arrives.
 
 ...And every time you load the signature databases, I guess...

 What he probably means is that you should use ClamD/ClamDScan instead of
 ClamScan.

Sorry, I brain-farted. What I probably meant is that you should use
ClamD if possible and connect directly to it instead of using libclamav.

Best regards, Nico

-- 
+--+

 Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?

___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

RE: [Clamav-users] LibclamAV - Very Slow

2006-09-27 Thread Alexander Hagenah 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  schrieb am :

 On 2006-09-27 14:27, Alexander Hagenah wrote:
 But they are as different speedy, I never expected.
 
 You're loading and unpacking the virus database each time.
 You see the same difference between clamscan and clamdscan.

I see and found the fault in my code.
But, can't I change it like I the signatures/database is loaded once
into memory and after, I just call this instead?

-- 

Mit freundlichem Gruss

Alexander Hagenah
Technik

top concepts Internetmarketing GmbH
Am Steinkamp 7 - D-21684 Stade - Germany


Damit wir Ihnen bestmöglichen Service bieten können, senden
Sie Ihre E-Mail-Anfragen bitte an [EMAIL PROTECTED]


http://www.topconcepts.deTel. +49 1805 9977 501*
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Fax. +49 1805 9977 502*

Handelsregister: AG Tostedt HRB 100687 - UstId: DE 213645563

*) EUR 0,12/Min. (CNS24)

___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] LibclamAV - Very Slow

2006-09-27 Thread tBB 
My application is called every time, a mail arrives.
 
 ...And every time you load the signature databases, I guess...

What he probably means is that you should use ClamD/ClamDScan instead of
ClamScan.

Best regards

Nico

-- 
+--+

 Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html