Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Clamav-milter with Postfix
G.W. Haywood wrote: Hi there, On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 Gerard Seibert wrote: I would rather not use the '--force-scan' option since I am not particularly interested in scanning outgoing mail. Perhaps someone has an idea how to correct this problem. Because you don't scan outgoing mail I have to scan incoming mail from you. My usual response when I read this kind of thing is to just go ahead and blacklist you now rather than later... That makes zero sense. Are you implying that if I were to scan an outbound message you would eliminate your inbound scan? You do know how stupid that sounds I assume. Anyway, we send out several times a week flyers to our customers. These mailings range from 750 to 2000 messages per run. Ah, so you're a spammer - why didn't you say so in the first place? I've blacklisted you. That hardly seems fair to label somebody a spammer because they send e-mail to hundreds or thousands of people...(the poster did say customers) I'm assuming here those customers opted in for such messages... ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
[Clamav-users] Re: Clamav-milter with Postfix
Hi there, On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 Gerard Seibert wrote: I would rather not use the '--force-scan' option since I am not particularly interested in scanning outgoing mail. Perhaps someone has an idea how to correct this problem. Because you don't scan outgoing mail I have to scan incoming mail from you. My usual response when I read this kind of thing is to just go ahead and blacklist you now rather than later... That makes zero sense. Are you implying that if I were to scan an outbound message you would eliminate your inbound scan? You do know how stupid that sounds I assume. Anyway, we send out several times a week flyers to our customers. These mailings range from 750 to 2000 messages per run. Ah, so you're a spammer - why didn't you say so in the first place? I've blacklisted you. 73, Ged. ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
