Re: [Clamav-users] Re: There is something I dont get here ...

2004-05-06 Thread Joe Maimon


Flynn wrote:

There are many ways to do this - using the --mbox option should detect
the virus if the _full_ e-mail is scanned by ClamAV.
   

Well - let me clarify this situation very carefully :

(v0.70)-clamscan --mbox does *NOT* recognized the _full_ email as a virus.
 

I have experienced the same issue.
There is always supposed to be a Received: header but..stuff was 
being quarantined by amavis that did not have one or be otherwise 
recognized as mbox..
See mbox-force patch at http://www.jmaimon.com/clamav for an 
experimental workaround.

---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to 
deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
___
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users


Re: [Clamav-users] Re: There is something I dont get here ...

2004-05-06 Thread Nigel Horne
On Thursday 06 May 2004 9:46 am, Flynn wrote:

> Honest: I am convinced we face a bug here.

Have you tried with the latest version in CVS? If so and
it still fails, zip the e-mail, password virus, and send me copy.

> Rgds,
> Flynn

-Nigel

-- 
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK.  ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bandsman.co.uk



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to 
deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
___
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users


RE: [Clamav-users] Re: There is something I dont get here ...

2004-05-06 Thread Diego d'Ambra
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:clamav-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Flynn
> Sent: 6. maj 2004 10:46
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Clamav-users] Re: There is something I dont get here ...
> 
> > There are many ways to do this - using the --mbox option should
detect
> > the virus if the _full_ e-mail is scanned by ClamAV.
> 
> Well - let me clarify this situation very carefully :
> 
> (v0.70)-clamscan --mbox does *NOT* recognized the _full_ email as a
virus.
>

Sorry, but this is not true.

If I add the missing header line:
---snip, header sample---
Received: from some.domain.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9322FB24
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 06:09:04 +0100 (CET)
---snip---

The result is:
---snip---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus]# clamscan --mbox ./virus.eml
./virus.eml: Worm.SomeFool.Gen-1 FOUND

--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Known viruses: 21425
Scanned directories: 0
Scanned files: 1
Infected files: 1
Data scanned: 0.02 MB
I/O buffer size: 131072 bytes
Time: 1.656 sec (0 m 1 s)
--snip---

> snapshot-clamscan --mbox does *NOT* recognized the _full_ email as a
> virus.
> clamscan --mbox does *NOT* recognized the included corrupted email as
a
> virus.
> clamscan does recognized the included script (the virus itself) as a
> virus.
> 

Hmm, again I'm able to detect the virus.

Extract of the binary:
---snip---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus]# reformime -e -s 1.2 < virus.eml > virus.bin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus]# clamscan ./virus.bin
./virus.bin: Worm.SomeFool.Gen-1 FOUND

--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Known viruses: 21425
Scanned directories: 0
Scanned files: 1
Infected files: 1
Data scanned: 0.02 MB
I/O buffer size: 131072 bytes
Time: 1.358 sec (0 m 1 s)
---snip---

> 
> Honest: I am convinced we face a bug here.
> 

I'm not, but you're welcome to submit the _full_ e-mail (I suspect the
sample I'm looking at is only a partial bounced sample) :-)

Best regards,
Diego d'Ambra



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


[Clamav-users] Re: There is something I dont get here ...

2004-05-06 Thread Flynn
> There are many ways to do this - using the --mbox option should detect
> the virus if the _full_ e-mail is scanned by ClamAV.

Well - let me clarify this situation very carefully :

(v0.70)-clamscan --mbox does *NOT* recognized the _full_ email as a virus.
snapshot-clamscan --mbox does *NOT* recognized the _full_ email as a virus.
clamscan --mbox does *NOT* recognized the included corrupted email as a
virus.
clamscan does recognized the included script (the virus itself) as a virus.

Fprot does recognize tha _full_ email as a virus
Fprot does recognized the included corrupted email as a virus.
Fprot does recognized the included script (the virus itself) as a virus.

your on-line scanner does recognize tha _full_ email as a virus
your on-line scanner does *NOT* recognized the included corrupted email as a
virus.
I suppose that your on-line scanner does recognized the included script (the
virus itself) as a virus.

Honest: I am convinced we face a bug here.

Rgds,
Flynn



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to 
deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
___
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users