Re: [clamav-users] Sanesecurity FakeDate questions

2015-02-16 Thread G.W. Haywood 

Hi there,

On Mon, 16 Feb 2015, Alex Regan wrote:


Specifically, can someone tell me if the following are legitimate
senders or if they should be blocked anyway?

From: "Enterprise Guide" 
From: Fred Pryor Seminars/CareerTrack

From: TravelMole Daily UK Newswire 

I'm hoping someone has an opinion on these senders and can help me
determine if fakedate is enough to quarantine them or if they're
considered spam anyway?


It's up to you to decide whether you consider any particular message
spam or not.  I would take the view that all of those would qualify,
but I'm on the hanging bench.

--

73,
Ged.
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

[clamav-users] Sanesecurity FakeDate questions

2015-02-16 Thread Alex Regan 

Hi,

I'm using the sanesecurity rules with clamav on fedora20. I'm hoping 
it's okay to ask sanesecurity questions here.


I'm finding that it's very frequently hitting on fakedate, causing the 
message to be quarantined, and wondered what other people's experiences 
were with this one rule.


X-Amavis-Alert: INFECTED, message contains virus:
Sanesecurity.Spam.12283.Fakedate.UNOFFICIAL

Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 02:00:00 -0500

Specifically, can someone tell me if the following are legitimate 
senders or if they should be blocked anyway?


From: "Enterprise Guide" 
From: Fred Pryor Seminars/CareerTrack 


From: TravelMole Daily UK Newswire 

I'm hoping someone has an opinion on these senders and can help me 
determine if fakedate is enough to quarantine them or if they're 
considered spam anyway?


Thanks,
Alex


___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml