Re: Kissme and Classpath CVS
Unfortunately I also forgot to make a CVS tag when I released kissme 0.0.31. ... and I've checked in some bug fixes since 0.0.31 :-( I think we can fix this though. For example, cvs rtag with the -D option looks like it would do the trick. If that fails, we could tag the head revisions, and then carefully move the tags for those files that have changed since 0.0.31. BTW: this doesn't affect Aaron and other people trying to use Kissme right now. He/they need to checkout the older version of Classpath, not Kissme. BTW2: I think I'm close to getting Kissme to work with the new Thread classes anyway. -- Steve ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
Re: Bug report: java.util.GregorianCalendar
Hi, On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 23:42, Mark Wielaard wrote: I added your observation about the first day of the month to the test. But Jochen his email indicated that for Julian dates we also need to correct some things. So I also added tests for that. The resulting Mauve tests is attached. And the results with your patches applied gives: FAIL: gnu.testlet.java.util.GregorianCalendar.first: day 1-12-1400 (number 1) got 2 but expected 1 FAIL: gnu.testlet.java.util.GregorianCalendar.first: week 1-12-1400 (number 1) got 2 but expected 1 FAIL: gnu.testlet.java.util.GregorianCalendar.first: day 1-12-1404 (number 1) got 2 but expected 1 3 of 312 tests failed It seems that email to the classpath mailinglist is very slow again (I didn't got this message back through the list yet) but I already found my own thinko: for (int year = startYear; year = startYear + 5; year++) for (int month = 0; month = 12; month++) month = 12, should be month 12. With that your patches make GregorianCalendar pass all these tests. We still need to look at tests for overflow/roll-over for days and months since that should actually work correctly. But if you are confident that these changes are correct then we can check these in now. BTW. We can accept small one-liners like the above without worrying about copyrights. But if you want to contribute bigger changes, please see http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/docs/hacking.html#SEC2 and/or contact me off-list so we can make sure all your contributions can be easily and quickly accepted. Thanks, Mark ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
Re: Kissme and Classpath CVS
BTW2: I think I'm close to getting Kissme to work with the new Thread classes anyway. I did CVS checkouts earlier and everything seems to work perfectly, are your changes finished? I'm surprised to hear that. I haven't checked in any of the relevant Kissme changes yet! -- Steve ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
Re: Kissme and Classpath CVS
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 01:31, Stephen Crawley wrote: Unfortunately I also forgot to make a CVS tag when I released kissme 0.0.31. ... and I've checked in some bug fixes since 0.0.31 :-( I think we can fix this though. For example, cvs rtag with the -D option looks like it would do the trick. If that fails, we could tag the head revisions, and then carefully move the tags for those files that have changed since 0.0.31. I don't think it's too important, people can use -D if they want to retrieve a release from CVS that matches the released classpath 0.06. BTW: this doesn't affect Aaron and other people trying to use Kissme right now. He/they need to checkout the older version of Classpath, not Kissme. Yes. BTW2: I think I'm close to getting Kissme to work with the new Thread classes anyway. I did CVS checkouts earlier and everything seems to work perfectly, are your changes finished? -- John Leuner [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
request for comment on java2d stuff
hi, I recently posted some new files to the java-patches list of the gcj project, containing the beginnings of my cairo java2d implementation. I was wondering if anyone here had comments on the work. the messages are linked here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q3/msg00493.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q3/msg00494.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q3/msg00495.html thanks, -graydon ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
SableVM and Classpath 0.06
Classpath and SableVM developers, I started merging Classpath 0.06 with SableVM. My goal is to minimize the number of changes required in Classpath and SableVM. In the next few days / weeks, I will start giving some feedback to the Classpath team. (I couldn't wait to announce it!) Most work is currently done. As a test, I was able to run Ant with SableVM / Classpath 0.06 to build successfully SableCC. People interested in using/testing SableVM/Classpath 0.06 may get it from the SableVM svn repository. Note that it is still experimental. It will get much stable in the next few weeks. It is located in: /developers/belanger/sandbox/sablevm-classpath/ Info on how to access the svn repository is here: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=2629744forum_id=4154 SableVM is built as before. Look at /developers/belanger/sandbox/sablevm-classpath/bin/build_classpath to know how to build classpath for SableVM. You will have to do symlinks to map Classpath library names to SableVM library names. Look at: /developers/belanger/sandbox/sablevm-classpath/bin/make_symlinks David --- David Bélanger Graduate Student School of Computer Science McGill University Office: MC226 Web page: http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~dbelan2/ Public key: http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~dbelan2/public_key.txt ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
