Re: Regressions from 0.96.1
On 20/02/2008, Mario Torre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Il giorno mer, 20/02/2008 alle 13.02 +0100, Mark Wielaard ha scritto: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > +FAIL: java.util.prefs.PreferenceTest > > > > Only these 3 do relly worry me a bit. > > Uff.. I can't reproduce this on my machine. > > What version of GConf are you using? > It maybe a synchronization issue, but I doubt about that. > > Andrew, if I send you a patch, you can test it on builder if we have the > same issue before I commit it? > > Thanks, > Mario > -- > Lima Software - http://www.limasoftware.net/ > GNU Classpath Developer - http://www.classpath.org/ > Fedora Ambassador - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MarioTorre > Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF > Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF > > Please, support open standards: > http://opendocumentfellowship.org/petition/ > http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ > > Hi Mario, Thanks for checking this out. I assume it's which ever version of GConf is in Debian stable as both builder and another machine I tested on run this. You may be requiring something newer. I can test a patch for you, no problem. -- Andrew :-) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://openjdk.java.net
note on readdir_r
While looking into http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24170, I noticed that Classpath is also using readdir_r. There is no reason to use this. Ulrich wrote a blog entry a while back explaining why: http://udrepper.livejournal.com/18555.html I'm not planning to fix this in Classpath, sorry. It should just be a matter of deleting the readdir_r case and configure checks, though. Tom
Re: brandweg hacking session on friday
Hi, I will be in Brussels at around 1pm and would like to join you for a Brandweg hacking session. The people in Brussel have a public wireless mesh-network like Freifunk in Germany. Here is a map with some node locations: http://boum.no-ip.com/gmap/gmap.php If we meet in a hotel room, will be near such a node or is the room sufficiently high? I have a suitable wireless router as well as a 4quad antenna which I can bring along. I can also explain everybody who wants to hear it how public mesh-networking works, just in case you want to start such a community in your hometown. :D Regards Robert Dalibor Topic schrieb: > hi all, > > so, since a couple of us want to get some development done on Friday, I > wanted to ask around who's coming and when, so please reply when you'll > be around on Friday, if you're interested in poking around at making > this merge work out. That's how we'll figure out time. > > There are two easy options for locations: > > a) squatting in someone's hotel (rooms) for a few hours (mhm, wifi!) > b) taking over a cafe downtown and doing the work there (mhm, waffles!) > > or a combination of both (wifi & waffles!). > > Preferences, ideas, etc? > > fire away, > dalibor topic > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Regressions from 0.96.1
Il giorno mer, 20/02/2008 alle 13.02 +0100, Mark Wielaard ha scritto: > Hi Andrew, > > +FAIL: java.util.prefs.PreferenceTest > > Only these 3 do relly worry me a bit. Uff.. I can't reproduce this on my machine. What version of GConf are you using? It maybe a synchronization issue, but I doubt about that. Andrew, if I send you a patch, you can test it on builder if we have the same issue before I commit it? Thanks, Mario -- Lima Software - http://www.limasoftware.net/ GNU Classpath Developer - http://www.classpath.org/ Fedora Ambassador - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MarioTorre Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF Please, support open standards: http://opendocumentfellowship.org/petition/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ signature.asc Description: Questa รจ una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Re: Regressions from 0.96.1
Hi Andrew, On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 22:14 +, Andrew John Hughes wrote: > Latest results: Thanks for doing the comparisons. > +FAIL: java.awt.Canvas.PaintTest > +FAIL: java.awt.Checkbox.PaintTest > +FAIL: java.awt.Label.PaintTest > +FAIL: java.awt.Robot.mouseMove > +FAIL: java.awt.TextField.PaintTest At least these need to be double checked if they are real regressions because they might fail spuriously unfortunately. Which might also be the case for the other awt/swing tests. > +FAIL: java.net.URI.ComparisonTest > +FAIL: gnu/testlet/java/lang/reflect/Proxy/DeclaringClass > +FAIL: java.util.prefs.PreferenceTest Only these 3 do relly worry me a bit. Cheers, Mark
