Re: GNU Classpath 0.06 created
Hi, On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 19:51, Per Bothner wrote: > If you've created a cvs tag, and given it a real version number, > I'd call it a release, even if it's not a 1.0 relase. alpha.gnu.org > has outlived its usefulness (evidenced by the fact that it is little > used) now that "alpha" code is available in CVS for most projects. > > Note that alpha.gnu.org is not mirrored the way ftp.gnu.org is. The 0.06 release is now finally up on ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/classpath/ I changed the webpages to point again to this location for downloading it. And added a little news item to the Savannah pages. I did ask about moving it to ftp.gnu.org, and about putting back older releases and putting up daily snapshot releases, but they didn't currently have time to do that. They are looking for an extra system administrator BTW so in the future these things will hopefully be handled a little smoother. See http://www.gnu.org/jobs/fsf-sysadmin.html Cheers, Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
RE: GNU Classpath 0.06 created
Hi, Does ORP 1.10 work with this new release? After browsing through the mailing list archives, I cannot find why ORP is broken with the classpath. I really like to do some experiments on some server benchmarks like tomcat/jboss and jbb by using ORP+classpath, and I believe the latest classpath support these benchmarks arleady. Qiong On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 18:07, Per Bothner wrote: > You don't put releases on alpha.gnu.org - you put them on ftp.gnu.org. > You can put pre-releases on alpha.gnu.org, but if you already have a > release there seems little point. My thinking was that the 0.0x releases are actually the pre-releases while we work towards the first real GNU Classpath 1.0 release. People can combine these pre-releases with their own VMs like gcj, kissme, jikesRVM, Jaos, etc already do. But as long as we don't have at least a minimum of functionality to offer (we are hoping that 1.0 will have the equivalent functionality as core libraries that come with some proprietary 1.1 JDKs) and a stable/maintainable VM interface we cannot call it a real release. We do hope that people try these pre-releases out to create compilers and/or VM environments so they can give us feedback what should be improved for the real 1.0 release. (And I also don't have access to ftp.gnu.org) Cheers, Mark ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
RE: GNU Classpath 0.06 created
Hi, On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 08:07, Qiong Cai wrote: > Does ORP 1.10 work with this new release? After browsing through the > mailing list archives, I cannot find why ORP is broken with the > classpath. I don't think Orp will work out of the box with the 0.06 snapshot. But the changes since the last version aren't that big. All changes relevant to VM implementers are listed in the NEWS file. Most will just require updating some vm/reference classes. If you contact the Orp developers about this please let us know if/when it works. > I really like to do some experiments on some server > benchmarks like tomcat/jboss and jbb by using ORP+classpath, and I > believe the latest classpath support these benchmarks arleady. I would be very interested in how this works out. Note that there are some patches by the JikesRVM hackers for javax.naming that are labeled as JBoss improvements but that didn't make it for 0.06. Cheers, Mark ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
Re: GNU Classpath 0.06 created
Hi, On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 18:07, Per Bothner wrote: > You don't put releases on alpha.gnu.org - you put them on ftp.gnu.org. > You can put pre-releases on alpha.gnu.org, but if you already have > a release there seems little point. My thinking was that the 0.0x releases are actually the pre-releases while we work towards the first real GNU Classpath 1.0 release. People can combine these pre-releases with their own VMs like gcj, kissme, jikesRVM, Jaos, etc already do. But as long as we don't have at least a minimum of functionality to offer (we are hoping that 1.0 will have the equivalent functionality as core libraries that come with some proprietary 1.1 JDKs) and a stable/maintainable VM interface we cannot call it a real release. We do hope that people try these pre-releases out to create compilers and/or VM environments so they can give us feedback what should be improved for the real 1.0 release. (And I also don't have access to ftp.gnu.org) Cheers, Mark ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
Re: GNU Classpath 0.06 created
Mark Wielaard wrote: Although I don't have access yet to alpha.gnu.org to publish the release I have already created the 0.06 release tarball. I also tagged the CVS tree as 'classpath-0_06-release'. You don't put releases on alpha.gnu.org - you put them on ftp.gnu.org. You can put pre-releases on alpha.gnu.org, but if you already have a release there seems little point. -- --Per Bothner [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://per.bothner.com/ ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
Re: GNU Classpath 0.06 created
Mark Wielaard wrote: My thinking was that the 0.0x releases are actually the pre-releases while we work towards the first real GNU Classpath 1.0 release. People can combine these pre-releases with their own VMs like gcj, kissme, jikesRVM, Jaos, etc already do. But as long as we don't have at least a minimum of functionality to offer (we are hoping that 1.0 will have the equivalent functionality as core libraries that come with some proprietary 1.1 JDKs) and a stable/maintainable VM interface we cannot call it a real release. If you've created a cvs tag, and given it a real version number, I'd call it a release, even if it's not a 1.0 relase. alpha.gnu.org has outlived its usefulness (evidenced by the fact that it is little used) now that "alpha" code is available in CVS for most projects. Note that alpha.gnu.org is not mirrored the way ftp.gnu.org is. -- --Per Bothner [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://per.bothner.com/ ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
GNU Classpath 0.06 created
Hi, Although I don't have access yet to alpha.gnu.org to publish the release I have already created the 0.06 release tarball. I also tagged the CVS tree as 'classpath-0_06-release'. Current tarball can be found at: http://www.klomp.org/mark/classpath/classpath-0.06.tar.gz It has the following MD5 sum: d6f6506790d1166d0cd20dcde3221297 classpath-0.06.tar.gz I will make the real announcement about 0.06 as soon as it is up at the official GNU ftp server. Please feel free to hack on the CVS tree again. Hope this message makes it to the mailinglist since messages seem to go very slow the last couple of days. Cheers, Mark ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
