[commit-cp] classpath javax/security/auth/kerberos/ServiceP...
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/classpath Module name:classpath Branch: Changes by: Tom Tromey [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/04/06 01:20:40 Modified files: javax/security/auth/kerberos: ServicePermission.java . : ChangeLog Log message: * javax/security/auth/kerberos/ServicePermission.java: Now final. CVSWeb URLs: http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/classpath/classpath/javax/security/auth/kerberos/ServicePermission.java.diff?tr1=1.1tr2=1.2r1=textr2=text http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/classpath/classpath/ChangeLog.diff?tr1=1.7026tr2=1.7027r1=textr2=text
[commit-cp] classpath/javax/security/auth/kerberos
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/classpath Module name:classpath Branch: Changes by: Tom Tromey [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/04/03 19:19:52 classpath/javax/security/auth/kerberos Update of /cvsroot/classpath/classpath/javax/security/auth/kerberos In directory savannah:/tmp/cvs-serv2985/javax/security/auth/kerberos Log Message: Directory /cvsroot/classpath/classpath/javax/security/auth/kerberos added to the repository
Re: Kerberos
Hi Jeff, Am Samstag, den 19.11.2005, 23:09 -0500 schrieb Jeff Bailey: Hi! I sent in a patch to implement the KerberosPrincipal class. Cool! What I was thinking is that there should probably really be three implementations of the Kerberos stuff. The first two are glue code around MIT Kerberos and Heimdal Kerberos. That way if you have a user who's already got a ticket, it continues to be useful in their Java environment. I think this is important for distribution integration. Yeah, I think this would be extremely helpful. The third is a native implementation so that people don't need to install Kerberos in order to have classpath installed. I don't know if this is necessary or even desirable. I think (as with many other areas too, like imageio vs imagemagick) having an own implementation would also be very desirable. GNU Classpath is not only targetted to be used in Linux-Distros, but also in Embedded Systems or at least systems that are completely different from Linux (think of all the platforms that kaffe runs on). Also I don't think a 'native' implementation makes much sense, I would prefer a Java-only solutions for as much stuff as possible, since native code is always a little harder to port to strange platforms. But maybe you mean with 'native' something like 'our own implementation'? Or is there something in Kerberos that can't be done Java-only? Cheers, Roman signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil ___ Classpath mailing list Classpath@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
Re: Kerberos
On dim, 2005-11-20 at 20:42 +0100, Roman Kennke wrote: The third is a native implementation so that people don't need to install Kerberos in order to have classpath installed. I don't know if this is necessary or even desirable. I think (as with many other areas too, like imageio vs imagemagick) having an own implementation would also be very desirable. GNU Classpath is not only targetted to be used in Linux-Distros, but also in Embedded Systems or at least systems that are completely different from Linux (think of all the platforms that kaffe runs on). Also I don't think a 'native' implementation makes much sense, I would prefer a Java-only solutions for as much stuff as possible, since native code is always a little harder to port to strange platforms. But maybe you mean with 'native' something like 'our own implementation'? Or is there something in Kerberos that can't be done Java-only? Sorry, I chose my words poorly there. By 'native' I meant Done in Java. Is there a better word that means that? =) Tks, Jeff Bailey signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Classpath mailing list Classpath@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
Re: Kerberos
Jeff Bailey wrote: Sorry, I chose my words poorly there. By 'native' I meant Done in Java. Is there a better word that means that? =) Pure Java... ? -Archie __ Archie Cobbs *CTO, Awarix* http://www.awarix.com ___ Classpath mailing list Classpath@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
Re: Kerberos
Archie Cobbs wrote: Jeff Bailey wrote: Sorry, I chose my words poorly there. By 'native' I meant Done in Java. Is there a better word that means that? =) Pure Java... ? Nice, but I think it may be (tm) Sun Microsystems, Inc. ___ Classpath mailing list Classpath@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
Kerberos
Hi! I sent in a patch to implement the KerberosPrincipal class. Now comes the fun part. =) What I was thinking is that there should probably really be three implementations of the Kerberos stuff. The first two are glue code around MIT Kerberos and Heimdal Kerberos. That way if you have a user who's already got a ticket, it continues to be useful in their Java environment. I think this is important for distribution integration. The third is a native implementation so that people don't need to install Kerberos in order to have classpath installed. I don't know if this is necessary or even desirable. I'd imagine that if someone has Kerberos on their network on in their distribution they'll probably want to integrate getting a ticket with logging in and have multiple Kerberized application. It also means that our security issues are limited to glue code, and are not based around my understanding of asn.1 as an on-wire protocol. =) I imagine for now, it just means another command line switch to configure to enable it if possible, and select MIT vs. Heimdal. Comments, flames, etc., appreciated. In the absence of any, I'll just start hacking and feeding patches to classpath-patches. Tks, Jeff Bailey signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Classpath mailing list Classpath@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
