Re: regressions in floating point
Hi David, On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 21:29 -0500, David P Grove wrote: Some change(s) to GNU classpath committed in the last 24 hours caused regression test failures on a number of Jikes RVM tests targeting floating point. The same cvs checkout of Jikes RVM passes the tests using classpath 0.20. My guess is that the problem is in the changes related to fdlibm and MVMath, but I haven't looked any further. Is anyone else seeing problems with this commit? I saw problems with it. But they seem to have been solved by Andrew's latest patch: 2006-02-26 Andrew John Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers, Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: regressions in floating point
the patch resolves all the problems; sanity running clean again with classpath cvs as of an hour ago. thanks, --dave Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/27/2006 07:07:01 AM: Hi David, On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 21:29 -0500, David P Grove wrote: Some change(s) to GNU classpath committed in the last 24 hours caused regression test failures on a number of Jikes RVM tests targeting floating point. The same cvs checkout of Jikes RVM passes the tests using classpath 0.20. My guess is that the problem is in the changes related to fdlibm and MVMath, but I haven't looked any further. Is anyone else seeing problems with this commit? I saw problems with it. But they seem to have been solved by Andrew's latest patch: 2006-02-26 Andrew John Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers, Mark [attachment signature.asc deleted by David P Grove/Watson/IBM]
regressions in floating point
Hi, Some change(s) to GNU classpath committed in the last 24 hours caused regression test failures on a number of Jikes RVM tests targeting floating point. The same cvs checkout of Jikes RVM passes the tests using classpath 0.20. My guess is that the problem is in the changes related to fdlibm and MVMath, but I haven't looked any further. Is anyone else seeing problems with this commit? One of the many tests that is failing is the Math.floor(1.6) is returning 1.6 instead of 1. --dave
