Re: savannah/CVS

2007-03-17 Thread Roman Kennke
Hi Mark,

> We lost only 2 patches. One configure patch I did just before the disk
> crash, which I have already put back. And the "InputStreamReader and
> OutputStreamWriter revisited" patch from Roman, which I haven't put back
> yet (Roman, let me know if you want me to put it in or whether you do
> it).

I'll do it, thanks. Especially since this particular patch was missing
one piece, which I tried to check in a little later, but couldn't.

/Roman

-- 
http://kennke.org/blog/




Re: savannah/CVS

2007-03-16 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi,

As you probably noticed from watching the cvs and patches mailinglist
savannah is back up again (see the attached email from the savannah
admins).

We lost only 2 patches. One configure patch I did just before the disk
crash, which I have already put back. And the "InputStreamReader and
OutputStreamWriter revisited" patch from Roman, which I haven't put back
yet (Roman, let me know if you want me to put it in or whether you do
it).

Cheers,

Mark
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

Savannah is up and running again after about 2 days 1/2 downtime.

The system was completely restored using the backup from Sunday night,
and a partial backup from Monday night (Boston time).

We still have concerns about the RAID hardware (3 old + 1 new SCSI
disks failed); we're going to order more parts and replace them asap.

We'll post more info on the Savannah homepage in a bit.


Thanks to everybody among the FSF Sysadmins and the Savannah Hackers
who stayed up late working on the recovery!

-- 
Sylvain

On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:00:05AM +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The server for savannah.gnu.org has experienced a multiple disk
> failure, bypassing the RAID5 safety. New disks were received (March 14
> AM). SV was brought to the offsite backup location (14 March 9PM GMT),
> where the FSF sysadmins are trying to recover the filesystem, or if
> that fails, restore the latest backup image. Then the machine will be
> brought back to the colocation at Quincy, MA (about 1h30 drive away
> afaik). We're sorry for the inconvenience.
> 
> We posted a notice about the downtime at gnu.org and fsf.org.
> 
> Webpages, mailing lists, ftp|alpha.gnu.org and other GNU services are
> not affected.


___
Savannah-announce@gnu.org mailing list
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-announce

--- End Message ---


Re: savannah/CVS

2007-03-14 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 20:56 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hardware knows when we want to prep for a release...
> 
> The server for savannah.gnu.org has experienced a complex
> hardware failure. Replacement parts are being shipped next-day
> air and should be installed the afternoon (EDT) of 14 March.
> We're sorry for the inconvenience -- the GNU sysadmins.
> 
> So savannah.gnu.org and cvs are out till tomorrow at least.

Latest status is as follows:

The server for savannah.gnu.org has experienced a multiple disk
failure. New disks were received. SV is being brought to the
offsite backup location (eta. 14 March 9PM GMT), where it will
be sync'd (eta. ???) and brought back to the colocation at
quincy, ma (est. 1/2h?). We're sorry for the inconvenience. |
Last confirmed full backup was completed circa 20:30 EDT on
Sunday 11 March.

So much for relying on a raid5 setup for making sure you can survive a
disk-failure...

Cheers,

Mark




savannah/CVS

2007-03-13 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hardware knows when we want to prep for a release...

The server for savannah.gnu.org has experienced a complex
hardware failure. Replacement parts are being shipped next-day
air and should be installed the afternoon (EDT) of 14 March.
We're sorry for the inconvenience -- the GNU sysadmins.

So savannah.gnu.org and cvs are out till tomorrow at least.