Re: Clojure Conj extracurricular activities spreadsheet
I am interested in the cKanren and go meetings, and I would be happy to add myself to them if given spreadsheet access. Jim On Oct 31, 6:36 am, Fogus wrote: > I've added everyone to this thread as an editor of the spreadsheet. > Please feel free to add yourself and your sessions at your leisure. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: heaps in clojure
Using PriorityQueue should give a good, fast result. Here's my implementation: (defn smallest-n [n xs] (let [q (java.util.PriorityQueue. xs)] (for [i (range n)] (.poll q (smallest-n 5 (shuffle (range 100))) ;; (0 1 2 3 4) Jim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Uncle Bob: bowling meets Clojure
On Jul 20, 7:01 pm, Mark Engelberg wrote: > Where is the original problem statement? It is hidden in Powerpoint slides (http://butunclebob.com/files/ downloads/Bowling%20Game%20Kata.ppt) linked on the description of the bowling game (http://butunclebob.com/ ArticleS.UncleBob.TheBowlingGameKata). This may not be a big deal since Uncle Bob did not include tests for roll but concentrated only on score. Jim --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Uncle Bob: bowling meets Clojure
My main concern was that the problem statement doesn't just specify the score function but also a roll function to accumulate the ball rolls. Obviously this will be different in Clojure since we would prefer immutable data structures, but it feels like we're losing part of the problem by ignoring roll altogether. Jim --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Classic TDD Bowling Game in Clojure
On Jul 20, 4:59 am, Perttu wrote: > He is not totally satisfied with what he came up with - especially on > the Unit Testing side. If you have any suggestions how to make it > cleaner and more explicit, leave them in the comments there. I left some comments about changes I thought were worth making, but I am sure it could use more work. I am not particularly excited about the score-* set of functions, but I haven't come up with a better design for it yet. Jim --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
