Re: Why is this so difficult?
I too suggest taking a second look at CCW. I'll never be an Emacs guy and current CCW should be an almost seamless setup with Lein. On Friday, February 15, 2013 8:53:47 AM UTC-6, lpetit wrote: > > Hello, > > 2013/2/15 BJG145 >: > > Jules sums up pretty exactly where I was at...tried CCW, nope, tried > light > > Sorry to be a little bit off topic (or am I ?), but as one of the main > developers of CCW, I'd like to learn from this "nope". > > Indeed, one of the main goals of CCW is to be beginner friendly so ... > what was (were) the problem(s) ? > > > Table, nope, looked at Leiningen, thought: "Edit PATH? What, I haven't > done > > that since I was on Windows 3.1, and what does this thing do anyway"...I > > appreciate the time people have put into all the advice given above > because > > I can see the subject has probably been done to death already. I'm sure > it's > > not really that hard, it's just that I've been spoiled by simple > friendly > > IDEs like Code::Blocks, Visual Studio, Gideros Studio, and I resented > > mucking about with Linux-on-Windows and command prompts. But, it's cool, > I'm > > sure it'll be worth it...;-) > > > > I do think the Leiningen homepage could do with a revamp...I reckon it's > > likely one of the main entry points for beginners and it needs to be > > simplified for cosseted Windows users like me. > > > > -- > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your > > first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > --- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "Clojure" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > > email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Recommendation for Clojure Enterprise Development toolkit
As a tech lead or architect you should be fired for even suggesting to use Clojure as an enterprise greenfield. Industry and academia is moving towards advanced type systems. Nobody in industry seriously considers Clojure for enterprise systems. On Jul 8, 12:43 pm, Colin Yates wrote: > *This isn't meant to start a flame-war!* > > I am pretty convinced that I want to use Clojure as my primary tool > (in place of Java/Groovy Spring and Hibernate) in writing Enterprise > applications on the JVM. By Enterprise I mean that my solution has to > be very stable, maintainable by others, subject to a number of stake- > holders and so on. > > Part of the attraction of Java is the set of well-established tools > for certain things: > > - maven/gradle/ant for building > - Spring for glue and a gazillion other things (disclaimer: I used to > work for them as a Consultant) > - Hibernate for ORM > - JUnit/TestNG > - and so on > > I am convinced that Clojure offers a different playing field in terms > of building blocks; due to its power it seems that there isn't the > need for such heavyweight players, rather rolling your own, or using > light-weigh libraries seems to possible. > > That is excellent news, but I need to start somewhere. > > So, what do other enterprise developers use? There are a gazillion > libraries out there but where do you start? For example (religious > war starts now): > > - cake seems to be a superset of lein but lein seems to be the > preferred choice - which should a newbie go with > - what behaviour driven testing (i.e. BDD) library would you use (for > integration tests) > - which unit testing framework do you use (lazy-test's watch method > is very appealing) > - which CI servers have you integrated Clojure with, and how? > - which other high quality libraries can you recommend (akin to > JodaTime) > > Basically, what supporting infrastructure do you guys use to build > large Clojure apps. > > I hope the gist of this request comes through - I, of course, should > try them all, but if recommendations are always welcome. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: ANN: ClojureQL 1.0.0 finally released as public beta
On Nov 18, 1:10 pm, LauJensen wrote: > Hi gents, > > For those of you who have followed the development > of ClojureQL over the past 2.5 years you'll be excited > to know that ClojureQL is as of today being released > as 1.0.0 beta1. > > That means that the significant primitives from Relational > Algebra are all in place and functional. The documentation > is there and I've even made a screencast in order to get > you guys started. > > Personally Im excited about this version because it really > does change the way you work with a database. Queries > are incredibly composable! > > For more information, please checkout this blogpost + > screencast:http://bestinclass.dk/index.clj/2010/11/clojureql--1.0.0-now-in-beta > > Best regards, > Lau Great stuff Lau. I enjoyed the screencast. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: clojure-clr and mono
On Oct 9, 9:21 am, Sampo Vuori wrote: > On Oct 9, 2:53 am, MarkH wrote: > > > Mono 2.8 just came out yesterday. You don't have to wait for your > > distro to package it up. Building official source releases are as > > easy as ./configure && make && make install. I just did it last night. > > Any idea if the clojure-clr works on the mono 2.8? > But if I recall correctly, Mono 2.8 did get the open-sourced DLR integrated in with this release. http://www.mono-project.com/Release_Notes_Mono_2.8 Give it a shot. > - Sampo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: clojure-clr and mono
On Oct 9, 9:21 am, Sampo Vuori wrote: > On Oct 9, 2:53 am, MarkH wrote: > > > Mono 2.8 just came out yesterday. You don't have to wait for your > > distro to package it up. Building official source releases are as > > easy as ./configure && make && make install. I just did it last night. > > Any idea if the clojure-clr works on the mono 2.8? > No idea. I've never used ClojureCLR. > - Sampo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: clojure-clr and mono
Mono 2.8 just came out yesterday. You don't have to wait for your distro to package it up. Building official source releases are as easy as ./configure && make && make install. I just did it last night. On Oct 8, 7:23 am, Sampo Vuori wrote: > Hello, > I would be very interested in getting clojure-clr to work on mono. To > me, mono would be a nice platform as it has access to many libraries I > would like to use (and jvm doesn't) but there is not a single good > lisp implementation which would work on top of mono! So I would really > like to get clojure working on it. > > Bear with me as I'm not too well versed with the clr/mono/monodevelop > yet.. I have mono 2.4 installed and monodevelop 2.2.1. I downloaded > clojure-clr and DLR. The newest DLR from the version control doesn't > work, since it doesn't have DLR_Main/Runtime/Microsoft.Scripting.Core/ > Microsoft.Scripting.ExtensionAttribute.csproj anymore.. So I > downloaded the older one. I open the solution file in monodevelop and > try to compile it.. I get following error messages (among others): > > Warning: The reference 'System.Core, Version=3.5.0.0, Culture=neutral, > PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089' is not valid for the target framework > of the project. (Microsoft.Scripting) > Warning: Assembly 'mscorlib, Version=2.0.5.0, Culture=neutral, > PublicKeyToken=7cec85d7bea7798e' not found. Make sure that the > assembly exists in disk. If the reference is required to build the > project you may get compilation errors. (Microsoft.Scripting) > Warning: Assembly 'System, Version=2.0.5.0, Culture=neutral, > PublicKeyToken=7cec85d7bea7798e' not found. Make sure that the > assembly exists in disk. If the reference is required to build the > project you may get compilation errors. (Microsoft.Scripting) > > etc. Anyone know how to get over these? Anyone got further? Is Mono > 2.4 too old? > > Thanks, > > - Sampo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Thinking in Clojure
Sean and Peter made comments that ring very true for me. I've always had a problem with Java/Smalltalk/C# type OO. I also thought the Common Lisp/Dylan way of generic functions and data structures made more sense. Like Peter mentioned, I tend to think in terms of verbs and transformations of data. It just makes a lot more sense to me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: New release of the enclojure plugin is up.
Enclojure is shaping up to be a really nice development environment for Clojure. Great work Eric. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Java Posse exposure
Thanks for the article. I found it very informative. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: alternate syntax
Yes, clojure needs an alternative surface syntax for obvious reasons. And anybody that brings up Dylan as a counter-example doesn't know what they're talking about. Dylan died because Apple killed it. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
