Re: Bug in clojure.contrib.core/-?> (improper quoting?)
> Effective communication tip: Please preserve links in responses, so that when > somebody is trying to track down issues they don't have to work back through > the thread to find links. > Effective communication tip #2: Please don't top post, so that when somebody is trying to track down issues they don't have to work back from response to stimulus. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Bug in clojure.contrib.core/-?> (improper quoting?)
Patch added. I'm unable to understand how I can do the following 2 actions that I should do, following the recipe in http://clojure.org/patches : a. please add the 'patch' tag. b. Please mark the ticket 'ready to test' by checking that option under Choose an action... Maybe a permissions problem ? 2010/12/8 Ken Wesson > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Jason Wolfe wrote: > >> Posting a reply to someone that consists solely of a link that, when > >> accessed by that someone, throws up an access denied message in their > >> face, is an equivalent act to sending them an encrypted reply for > >> which they don't have the key, or handing them a locked briefcase for > >> which they don't know the combination. So, kind of silly, and > >> ineffective at actually communicating with them since they can't read > >> your reply. > >> > >> Hence my assumption that a mistake of some sort had been made. It > >> seems unlikely that someone would intentionally send me a reply I > >> can't actually read, so I figured they did not intend that effect, but > >> technical problems of some kind occurred or they simply misspelled the > >> URL. > >> > >> Now I'm simply confused. What, exactly, was intended? And if there's > >> nothing actually private-to-me about the attempted communication and > >> someone here is prviy to its contents, perhaps they could simply > >> repost those contents here? > > > > I apologize for my terseness; thanks for your contribution to the > > discussion. I was in a rush, and assumed the link was world- > > viewable; it certainly didn't look protected, and I knew that issues > > for Clojure (but I guess not C-C) were publicly browsable without an > > account from prior experience. Looks like Stuart has fixed this wart > > (thanks!). > > That's OK. Thanks. > > I can confirm that the link works now. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Bug in clojure.contrib.core/-?> (improper quoting?)
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Jason Wolfe wrote: >> Posting a reply to someone that consists solely of a link that, when >> accessed by that someone, throws up an access denied message in their >> face, is an equivalent act to sending them an encrypted reply for >> which they don't have the key, or handing them a locked briefcase for >> which they don't know the combination. So, kind of silly, and >> ineffective at actually communicating with them since they can't read >> your reply. >> >> Hence my assumption that a mistake of some sort had been made. It >> seems unlikely that someone would intentionally send me a reply I >> can't actually read, so I figured they did not intend that effect, but >> technical problems of some kind occurred or they simply misspelled the >> URL. >> >> Now I'm simply confused. What, exactly, was intended? And if there's >> nothing actually private-to-me about the attempted communication and >> someone here is prviy to its contents, perhaps they could simply >> repost those contents here? > > I apologize for my terseness; thanks for your contribution to the > discussion. I was in a rush, and assumed the link was world- > viewable; it certainly didn't look protected, and I knew that issues > for Clojure (but I guess not C-C) were publicly browsable without an > account from prior experience. Looks like Stuart has fixed this wart > (thanks!). That's OK. Thanks. I can confirm that the link works now. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Bug in clojure.contrib.core/-?> (improper quoting?)
> Posting a reply to someone that consists solely of a link that, when > accessed by that someone, throws up an access denied message in their > face, is an equivalent act to sending them an encrypted reply for > which they don't have the key, or handing them a locked briefcase for > which they don't know the combination. So, kind of silly, and > ineffective at actually communicating with them since they can't read > your reply. > > Hence my assumption that a mistake of some sort had been made. It > seems unlikely that someone would intentionally send me a reply I > can't actually read, so I figured they did not intend that effect, but > technical problems of some kind occurred or they simply misspelled the > URL. > > Now I'm simply confused. What, exactly, was intended? And if there's > nothing actually private-to-me about the attempted communication and > someone here is prviy to its contents, perhaps they could simply > repost those contents here? I apologize for my terseness; thanks for your contribution to the discussion. I was in a rush, and assumed the link was world- viewable; it certainly didn't look protected, and I knew that issues for Clojure (but I guess not C-C) were publicly browsable without an account from prior experience. Looks like Stuart has fixed this wart (thanks!). -Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Bug in clojure.contrib.core/-?> (improper quoting?)
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Stuart Halloway wrote: > The permissions were not set correctly for anonymous read access. I have > changed them, you should be able to get there now: > http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CONTRIB-102. Ah, so there was indeed a technical snafu. Glad that's cleared up. > Effective communication tip: Please preserve links in responses, so that when > somebody is trying to track down issues they don't have to work back through > the thread to find links. Sorry. I'm using gmail's web interface, which gives a very good presentation of discussion threads and read/unread. (My first post excepted; I was replying to a post that was posted before I subscribed, so it wasn't mailed to me, and so I used the icky Google Groups interface to reply to that one. In particular, the link's just there a click away from any post to this thread -- at least, it is for me. I guess if you're using other mail software (or deleting old messages once read) you'd have more trouble finding it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Bug in clojure.contrib.core/-?> (improper quoting?)
The permissions were not set correctly for anonymous read access. I have changed them, you should be able to get there now: http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CONTRIB-102. Effective communication tip: Please preserve links in responses, so that when somebody is trying to track down issues they don't have to work back through the thread to find links. Stu > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Alan wrote: >> Link works fine. > > Does it? > >> You have to be logged in > > Then, in my opinion, it does NOT work fine. I should be able to VIEW > anything non-confidential without logging in, though I expect to > possibly have to login to POST stuff. (And if something IS > confidential, but is also intended for me, then I should actually have > whatever login is needed to view it. Say, the login for my gmail > account.) > > Furthermore, the link was posted as a response to one of my posts > here. This implies that the link is meant for me, and that I should be > able to read whatever's there (the actual meat of the response to my > post, presumably) with my existing access credentials. > > Posting a reply to someone that consists solely of a link that, when > accessed by that someone, throws up an access denied message in their > face, is an equivalent act to sending them an encrypted reply for > which they don't have the key, or handing them a locked briefcase for > which they don't know the combination. So, kind of silly, and > ineffective at actually communicating with them since they can't read > your reply. > > Hence my assumption that a mistake of some sort had been made. It > seems unlikely that someone would intentionally send me a reply I > can't actually read, so I figured they did not intend that effect, but > technical problems of some kind occurred or they simply misspelled the > URL. > > Now I'm simply confused. What, exactly, was intended? And if there's > nothing actually private-to-me about the attempted communication and > someone here is prviy to its contents, perhaps they could simply > repost those contents here? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Bug in clojure.contrib.core/-?> (improper quoting?)
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Alan wrote: > Link works fine. Does it? > You have to be logged in Then, in my opinion, it does NOT work fine. I should be able to VIEW anything non-confidential without logging in, though I expect to possibly have to login to POST stuff. (And if something IS confidential, but is also intended for me, then I should actually have whatever login is needed to view it. Say, the login for my gmail account.) Furthermore, the link was posted as a response to one of my posts here. This implies that the link is meant for me, and that I should be able to read whatever's there (the actual meat of the response to my post, presumably) with my existing access credentials. Posting a reply to someone that consists solely of a link that, when accessed by that someone, throws up an access denied message in their face, is an equivalent act to sending them an encrypted reply for which they don't have the key, or handing them a locked briefcase for which they don't know the combination. So, kind of silly, and ineffective at actually communicating with them since they can't read your reply. Hence my assumption that a mistake of some sort had been made. It seems unlikely that someone would intentionally send me a reply I can't actually read, so I figured they did not intend that effect, but technical problems of some kind occurred or they simply misspelled the URL. Now I'm simply confused. What, exactly, was intended? And if there's nothing actually private-to-me about the attempted communication and someone here is prviy to its contents, perhaps they could simply repost those contents here? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Bug in clojure.contrib.core/-?> (improper quoting?)
Link works fine. You have to be logged in (this is a point of contention, I think). On Dec 7, 6:58 pm, Ken Wesson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Jason Wolfe wrote: > >http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CONTRIB-102 > > Link doesn't work. It goes to a login prompt and not to ... well, > whatever you intended it to go to. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Bug in clojure.contrib.core/-?> (improper quoting?)
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Jason Wolfe wrote: > http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CONTRIB-102 Link doesn't work. It goes to a login prompt and not to ... well, whatever you intended it to go to. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Bug in clojure.contrib.core/-?> (improper quoting?)
Great, thanks! -Jason On Dec 7, 2:52 pm, Laurent PETIT wrote: > Will provide a patch soon, > > thanks for the bug report > > 2010/12/7 Jason Wolfe > > > > > On Dec 6, 8:41 pm, Ken Wesson wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Jason Wolfe > > wrote: > > > > This happens in both Clojure 1.2 and 1.3-latest: > > > > > user=> (require 'clojure.contrib.core) > > > > nil > > > > user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc) > > > > 2 > > > > user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc inc) > > > > CompilerException java.lang.Exception: Unable to resolve symbol: -?> > > > > in this context, compiling:(NO_SOURCE_PATH:3) > > > > Sure looks like a quoting problem: > > > > user=> (require 'clojure.contrib.core) > > > nil > > > user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc) > > > 2 > > > user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc inc) > > > # > > > in this context (NO_SOURCE_FILE:214)> > > > user=> (use 'clojure.contrib.core) > > > nil > > > user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc) > > > 2 > > > user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc inc) > > > 3 > > > user=> > > > > It's obviously calling -?> recursively when there's additional args, > > > and when it does, it's obviously looking for -?> in the current ns > > > instead of for clojure.contrib.core/-?>. Which wouldn't happen with > > > `(-?> ~foo ~bar). Someone used something like (list '-?> foo bar) > > > instead, or something. > > > > Someone ought to open an Assembla ticket for this. > > >http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CONTRIB-102 > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group.> To post to this group, send email > > tocloj...@googlegroups.com > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > > your first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email > > to>clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Bug in clojure.contrib.core/-?> (improper quoting?)
Will provide a patch soon, thanks for the bug report 2010/12/7 Jason Wolfe > > > On Dec 6, 8:41 pm, Ken Wesson wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Jason Wolfe > wrote: > > > This happens in both Clojure 1.2 and 1.3-latest: > > > > > user=> (require 'clojure.contrib.core) > > > nil > > > user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc) > > > 2 > > > user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc inc) > > > CompilerException java.lang.Exception: Unable to resolve symbol: -?> > > > in this context, compiling:(NO_SOURCE_PATH:3) > > > > Sure looks like a quoting problem: > > > > user=> (require 'clojure.contrib.core) > > nil > > user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc) > > 2 > > user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc inc) > > # > > in this context (NO_SOURCE_FILE:214)> > > user=> (use 'clojure.contrib.core) > > nil > > user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc) > > 2 > > user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc inc) > > 3 > > user=> > > > > It's obviously calling -?> recursively when there's additional args, > > and when it does, it's obviously looking for -?> in the current ns > > instead of for clojure.contrib.core/-?>. Which wouldn't happen with > > `(-?> ~foo ~bar). Someone used something like (list '-?> foo bar) > > instead, or something. > > > > Someone ought to open an Assembla ticket for this. > > http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CONTRIB-102 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Bug in clojure.contrib.core/-?> (improper quoting?)
On Dec 6, 8:41 pm, Ken Wesson wrote: > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Jason Wolfe wrote: > > This happens in both Clojure 1.2 and 1.3-latest: > > > user=> (require 'clojure.contrib.core) > > nil > > user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc) > > 2 > > user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc inc) > > CompilerException java.lang.Exception: Unable to resolve symbol: -?> > > in this context, compiling:(NO_SOURCE_PATH:3) > > Sure looks like a quoting problem: > > user=> (require 'clojure.contrib.core) > nil > user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc) > 2 > user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc inc) > # > in this context (NO_SOURCE_FILE:214)> > user=> (use 'clojure.contrib.core) > nil > user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc) > 2 > user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc inc) > 3 > user=> > > It's obviously calling -?> recursively when there's additional args, > and when it does, it's obviously looking for -?> in the current ns > instead of for clojure.contrib.core/-?>. Which wouldn't happen with > `(-?> ~foo ~bar). Someone used something like (list '-?> foo bar) > instead, or something. > > Someone ought to open an Assembla ticket for this. http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CONTRIB-102 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Bug in clojure.contrib.core/-?> (improper quoting?)
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Jason Wolfe wrote: > This happens in both Clojure 1.2 and 1.3-latest: > > user=> (require 'clojure.contrib.core) > nil > user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc) > 2 > user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc inc) > CompilerException java.lang.Exception: Unable to resolve symbol: -?> > in this context, compiling:(NO_SOURCE_PATH:3) Sure looks like a quoting problem: user=> (require 'clojure.contrib.core) nil user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc) 2 user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc inc) # in this context (NO_SOURCE_FILE:214)> user=> (use 'clojure.contrib.core) nil user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc) 2 user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc inc) 3 user=> It's obviously calling -?> recursively when there's additional args, and when it does, it's obviously looking for -?> in the current ns instead of for clojure.contrib.core/-?>. Which wouldn't happen with `(-?> ~foo ~bar). Someone used something like (list '-?> foo bar) instead, or something. Someone ought to open an Assembla ticket for this. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Bug in clojure.contrib.core/-?> (improper quoting?)
This happens in both Clojure 1.2 and 1.3-latest: user=> (require 'clojure.contrib.core) nil user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc) 2 user=> (clojure.contrib.core/-?> 1 inc inc) CompilerException java.lang.Exception: Unable to resolve symbol: -?> in this context, compiling:(NO_SOURCE_PATH:3) I assume the other nil-safe operators are affected as well. -Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en