Re: ClojureScript new branches - feedback please

2011-11-27 Thread Alexander Kellett 
'prop-lookup'++.

First thing that really tricked me up with ClojureScript is
   (goog.net.XhrIo/send uri #(.getResponseJson (.target %)))
blowing up in my face as it isn't using getResponseJson() but rather 
returning the function. Ended up using (.getResponseJson (...) nil) to work 
around it.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

ClojureScript new branches - feedback please

2011-11-21 Thread David Nolen 
Note that none of the following branches are promises of features. I'm
merely bringing them up to get feedback from ClojureScript users:

prop-lookup
  New property syntax so that method calls and property lookup are no
longer ambiguous

33-type-fn
  Nicer printing of types defined via deftype and defrecord - CLJS types
now print properly at the REPL, can't do much for JS types since we can't
enumerate them and we can't distinguish JS type ctors from actual JS fns.

96-ifn
  Can now define types that can be called as fns

If you have some time please give these branches a spin and let us know
what you think.

https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/branches

David

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en