Re: Any chance of core.logic getting extended with probKanren?
No worries. I was just trying to point out that at least conceptually it is a very natural extension. On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Dragan Djuric wrote: > I am sorry if my reply sounded like I was offended. I was not, I was just > going straight to the point without beating around the bush :) > > On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 3:28:14 PM UTC+1, Carl Cotner wrote: >> >> Sorry, didn't mean to offend. I was just offering a reason for the >> "even why". Perhaps I misinterpreted ... >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Dragan Djuric wrote: >> > I know well how probabilistic logic works. It is a superset of the >> > true/false logic, and goes much beyond "half true" etc. My question was >> > about how this would look like when integrated with core.logic vs just >> > using >> > full-blown probabilistic logic-based library/language. >> > >> > On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 3:15:11 PM UTC+1, Carl Cotner wrote: >> >> >> >> > Although some key building blocks are the same (MCMC), I really >> >> > cannot >> >> > see >> >> > how such things could be integrated to core.logic, and even why. >> >> >> >> This is not a concrete answer to your question, but probability can be >> >> thought of as a continuous extension of logic where 0 = False and 1 = >> >> True (and .5 = "half true", etc.). >> >> >> >> This extension is unique given a few natural conditions. >> >> >> >> Carl >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Dragan Djuric >> >> wrote: >> >> > I am working on something related to probabilistic >> >> > programming/inference/learning. Not yet ready for use but I hope to >> >> > get >> >> > it >> >> > there the next year. >> >> > Although some key building blocks are the same (MCMC), I really >> >> > cannot >> >> > see >> >> > how such things could be integrated to core.logic, and even why. So, >> >> > I >> >> > would >> >> > like very much to hear some of the needed use cases for this (without >> >> > reading hundreds of pages of someone's PhD dissertation, please :) >> >> > >> >> > Can you write a few "hello world" examples of what you would like to >> >> > see >> >> > in >> >> > core.logic related to probabilistic programming? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Friday, November 20, 2015 at 2:51:05 PM UTC+1, Henrik Larsson >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> I have started to play around with ProbLog2 and find the concept of >> >> >> probabilistic logic programming to be super fun. When googeling >> >> >> miniKanren >> >> >> and probabilistic logic programming the following came up: >> >> >> https://github.com/webyrd/probKanren >> >> >> >> >> >> So my question now is what are the chances that something like >> >> >> probKanren >> >> >> getting implemented in core.logic and how advance is probKanren vs >> >> >> ProbLog2? >> >> >> What im after is the conditional probabilites that ProbLog2 can >> >> >> handle. >> >> >> >> >> >> There are some documentation on core.logic >> >> >> (https://github.com/clojure/core.logic/wiki/CLP(Prob)) but it is >> >> >> dated >> >> >> at >> >> >> 2013 and im not sure what the roadmap is for core.logic or if it >> >> >> even >> >> >> has a >> >> >> roadmap. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for any input regarding this. >> >> >> >> >> >> Best regards Henrik >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >> > Groups "Clojure" group. >> >> > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com >> >> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient >> >> > with >> >> > your >> >> > first post. >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >> > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com >> >> > For more options, visit this group at >> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> >> > --- >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >> > Groups >> >> > "Clojure" group. >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >> >> > send >> >> > an >> >> > email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com. >> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > Groups "Clojure" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com >> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> > your >> > first post. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com >> > For more options, visit this group at >> > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> > --- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > Groups >> > "Clojure" group. >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> > an >> > email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com. >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, s
Re: Any chance of core.logic getting extended with probKanren?
The rationale is simply that Prolog-like systems have embraced it as it appears to be a very natural fit - https://dtai.cs.kuleuven.be/problog/ David On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Dragan Djuric wrote: > I know well how probabilistic logic works. It is a superset of the > true/false logic, and goes much beyond "half true" etc. My question was > about how this would look like when integrated with core.logic vs just > using full-blown probabilistic logic-based library/language. > > On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 3:15:11 PM UTC+1, Carl Cotner wrote: >> >> > Although some key building blocks are the same (MCMC), I really cannot >> see >> > how such things could be integrated to core.logic, and even why. >> >> This is not a concrete answer to your question, but probability can be >> thought of as a continuous extension of logic where 0 = False and 1 = >> True (and .5 = "half true", etc.). >> >> This extension is unique given a few natural conditions. >> >> Carl >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Dragan Djuric >> wrote: >> > I am working on something related to probabilistic >> > programming/inference/learning. Not yet ready for use but I hope to get >> it >> > there the next year. >> > Although some key building blocks are the same (MCMC), I really cannot >> see >> > how such things could be integrated to core.logic, and even why. So, I >> would >> > like very much to hear some of the needed use cases for this (without >> > reading hundreds of pages of someone's PhD dissertation, please :) >> > >> > Can you write a few "hello world" examples of what you would like to >> see in >> > core.logic related to probabilistic programming? >> > >> > >> > On Friday, November 20, 2015 at 2:51:05 PM UTC+1, Henrik Larsson wrote: >> >> >> >> I have started to play around with ProbLog2 and find the concept of >> >> probabilistic logic programming to be super fun. When googeling >> miniKanren >> >> and probabilistic logic programming the following came up: >> >> https://github.com/webyrd/probKanren >> >> >> >> So my question now is what are the chances that something like >> probKanren >> >> getting implemented in core.logic and how advance is probKanren vs >> ProbLog2? >> >> What im after is the conditional probabilites that ProbLog2 can >> handle. >> >> >> >> There are some documentation on core.logic >> >> (https://github.com/clojure/core.logic/wiki/CLP(Prob)) but it is >> dated at >> >> 2013 and im not sure what the roadmap is for core.logic or if it even >> has a >> >> roadmap. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for any input regarding this. >> >> >> >> Best regards Henrik >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > Groups "Clojure" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com >> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your >> > first post. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com >> > For more options, visit this group at >> > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> > --- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> > "Clojure" group. >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> an >> > email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com. >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Any chance of core.logic getting extended with probKanren?
I am sorry if my reply sounded like I was offended. I was not, I was just going straight to the point without beating around the bush :) On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 3:28:14 PM UTC+1, Carl Cotner wrote: > > Sorry, didn't mean to offend. I was just offering a reason for the > "even why". Perhaps I misinterpreted ... > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Dragan Djuric > wrote: > > I know well how probabilistic logic works. It is a superset of the > > true/false logic, and goes much beyond "half true" etc. My question was > > about how this would look like when integrated with core.logic vs just > using > > full-blown probabilistic logic-based library/language. > > > > On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 3:15:11 PM UTC+1, Carl Cotner wrote: > >> > >> > Although some key building blocks are the same (MCMC), I really > cannot > >> > see > >> > how such things could be integrated to core.logic, and even why. > >> > >> This is not a concrete answer to your question, but probability can be > >> thought of as a continuous extension of logic where 0 = False and 1 = > >> True (and .5 = "half true", etc.). > >> > >> This extension is unique given a few natural conditions. > >> > >> Carl > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Dragan Djuric > wrote: > >> > I am working on something related to probabilistic > >> > programming/inference/learning. Not yet ready for use but I hope to > get > >> > it > >> > there the next year. > >> > Although some key building blocks are the same (MCMC), I really > cannot > >> > see > >> > how such things could be integrated to core.logic, and even why. So, > I > >> > would > >> > like very much to hear some of the needed use cases for this (without > >> > reading hundreds of pages of someone's PhD dissertation, please :) > >> > > >> > Can you write a few "hello world" examples of what you would like to > see > >> > in > >> > core.logic related to probabilistic programming? > >> > > >> > > >> > On Friday, November 20, 2015 at 2:51:05 PM UTC+1, Henrik Larsson > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> I have started to play around with ProbLog2 and find the concept of > >> >> probabilistic logic programming to be super fun. When googeling > >> >> miniKanren > >> >> and probabilistic logic programming the following came up: > >> >> https://github.com/webyrd/probKanren > >> >> > >> >> So my question now is what are the chances that something like > >> >> probKanren > >> >> getting implemented in core.logic and how advance is probKanren vs > >> >> ProbLog2? > >> >> What im after is the conditional probabilites that ProbLog2 can > handle. > >> >> > >> >> There are some documentation on core.logic > >> >> (https://github.com/clojure/core.logic/wiki/CLP(Prob)) but it is > dated > >> >> at > >> >> 2013 and im not sure what the roadmap is for core.logic or if it > even > >> >> has a > >> >> roadmap. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Thanks for any input regarding this. > >> >> > >> >> Best regards Henrik > >> > > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> > Groups "Clojure" group. > >> > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com > >> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient > with > >> > your > >> > first post. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com > >> > For more options, visit this group at > >> > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > >> > --- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> > Groups > >> > "Clojure" group. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > send > >> > an > >> > email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com. > >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com > > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your > > first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > --- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "Clojure" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > > email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit
Re: Any chance of core.logic getting extended with probKanren?
Sorry, didn't mean to offend. I was just offering a reason for the "even why". Perhaps I misinterpreted ... On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Dragan Djuric wrote: > I know well how probabilistic logic works. It is a superset of the > true/false logic, and goes much beyond "half true" etc. My question was > about how this would look like when integrated with core.logic vs just using > full-blown probabilistic logic-based library/language. > > On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 3:15:11 PM UTC+1, Carl Cotner wrote: >> >> > Although some key building blocks are the same (MCMC), I really cannot >> > see >> > how such things could be integrated to core.logic, and even why. >> >> This is not a concrete answer to your question, but probability can be >> thought of as a continuous extension of logic where 0 = False and 1 = >> True (and .5 = "half true", etc.). >> >> This extension is unique given a few natural conditions. >> >> Carl >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Dragan Djuric wrote: >> > I am working on something related to probabilistic >> > programming/inference/learning. Not yet ready for use but I hope to get >> > it >> > there the next year. >> > Although some key building blocks are the same (MCMC), I really cannot >> > see >> > how such things could be integrated to core.logic, and even why. So, I >> > would >> > like very much to hear some of the needed use cases for this (without >> > reading hundreds of pages of someone's PhD dissertation, please :) >> > >> > Can you write a few "hello world" examples of what you would like to see >> > in >> > core.logic related to probabilistic programming? >> > >> > >> > On Friday, November 20, 2015 at 2:51:05 PM UTC+1, Henrik Larsson wrote: >> >> >> >> I have started to play around with ProbLog2 and find the concept of >> >> probabilistic logic programming to be super fun. When googeling >> >> miniKanren >> >> and probabilistic logic programming the following came up: >> >> https://github.com/webyrd/probKanren >> >> >> >> So my question now is what are the chances that something like >> >> probKanren >> >> getting implemented in core.logic and how advance is probKanren vs >> >> ProbLog2? >> >> What im after is the conditional probabilites that ProbLog2 can handle. >> >> >> >> There are some documentation on core.logic >> >> (https://github.com/clojure/core.logic/wiki/CLP(Prob)) but it is dated >> >> at >> >> 2013 and im not sure what the roadmap is for core.logic or if it even >> >> has a >> >> roadmap. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for any input regarding this. >> >> >> >> Best regards Henrik >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > Groups "Clojure" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com >> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> > your >> > first post. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com >> > For more options, visit this group at >> > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> > --- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > Groups >> > "Clojure" group. >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> > an >> > email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com. >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Any chance of core.logic getting extended with probKanren?
I know well how probabilistic logic works. It is a superset of the true/false logic, and goes much beyond "half true" etc. My question was about how this would look like when integrated with core.logic vs just using full-blown probabilistic logic-based library/language. On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 3:15:11 PM UTC+1, Carl Cotner wrote: > > > Although some key building blocks are the same (MCMC), I really cannot > see > > how such things could be integrated to core.logic, and even why. > > This is not a concrete answer to your question, but probability can be > thought of as a continuous extension of logic where 0 = False and 1 = > True (and .5 = "half true", etc.). > > This extension is unique given a few natural conditions. > > Carl > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Dragan Djuric > wrote: > > I am working on something related to probabilistic > > programming/inference/learning. Not yet ready for use but I hope to get > it > > there the next year. > > Although some key building blocks are the same (MCMC), I really cannot > see > > how such things could be integrated to core.logic, and even why. So, I > would > > like very much to hear some of the needed use cases for this (without > > reading hundreds of pages of someone's PhD dissertation, please :) > > > > Can you write a few "hello world" examples of what you would like to see > in > > core.logic related to probabilistic programming? > > > > > > On Friday, November 20, 2015 at 2:51:05 PM UTC+1, Henrik Larsson wrote: > >> > >> I have started to play around with ProbLog2 and find the concept of > >> probabilistic logic programming to be super fun. When googeling > miniKanren > >> and probabilistic logic programming the following came up: > >> https://github.com/webyrd/probKanren > >> > >> So my question now is what are the chances that something like > probKanren > >> getting implemented in core.logic and how advance is probKanren vs > ProbLog2? > >> What im after is the conditional probabilites that ProbLog2 can handle. > >> > >> There are some documentation on core.logic > >> (https://github.com/clojure/core.logic/wiki/CLP(Prob)) but it is dated > at > >> 2013 and im not sure what the roadmap is for core.logic or if it even > has a > >> roadmap. > >> > >> > >> Thanks for any input regarding this. > >> > >> Best regards Henrik > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com > > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your > > first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > --- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "Clojure" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > > email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Any chance of core.logic getting extended with probKanren?
> Although some key building blocks are the same (MCMC), I really cannot see > how such things could be integrated to core.logic, and even why. This is not a concrete answer to your question, but probability can be thought of as a continuous extension of logic where 0 = False and 1 = True (and .5 = "half true", etc.). This extension is unique given a few natural conditions. Carl On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Dragan Djuric wrote: > I am working on something related to probabilistic > programming/inference/learning. Not yet ready for use but I hope to get it > there the next year. > Although some key building blocks are the same (MCMC), I really cannot see > how such things could be integrated to core.logic, and even why. So, I would > like very much to hear some of the needed use cases for this (without > reading hundreds of pages of someone's PhD dissertation, please :) > > Can you write a few "hello world" examples of what you would like to see in > core.logic related to probabilistic programming? > > > On Friday, November 20, 2015 at 2:51:05 PM UTC+1, Henrik Larsson wrote: >> >> I have started to play around with ProbLog2 and find the concept of >> probabilistic logic programming to be super fun. When googeling miniKanren >> and probabilistic logic programming the following came up: >> https://github.com/webyrd/probKanren >> >> So my question now is what are the chances that something like probKanren >> getting implemented in core.logic and how advance is probKanren vs ProbLog2? >> What im after is the conditional probabilites that ProbLog2 can handle. >> >> There are some documentation on core.logic >> (https://github.com/clojure/core.logic/wiki/CLP(Prob)) but it is dated at >> 2013 and im not sure what the roadmap is for core.logic or if it even has a >> roadmap. >> >> >> Thanks for any input regarding this. >> >> Best regards Henrik > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Any chance of core.logic getting extended with probKanren?
I am working on something related to probabilistic programming/inference/learning. Not yet ready for use but I hope to get it there the next year. Although some key building blocks are the same (MCMC), I really cannot see how such things could be integrated to core.logic, and even why. So, I would like very much to hear some of the needed use cases for this (without reading hundreds of pages of someone's PhD dissertation, please :) Can you write a few "hello world" examples of what you would like to see in core.logic related to probabilistic programming? On Friday, November 20, 2015 at 2:51:05 PM UTC+1, Henrik Larsson wrote: > > I have started to play around with ProbLog2 and find the concept of > probabilistic logic programming to be super fun. When googeling miniKanren > and probabilistic logic programming the following came up: > https://github.com/webyrd/probKanren > > So my question now is what are the chances that something like probKanren > getting implemented in core.logic and how advance is probKanren vs > ProbLog2? What im after is the conditional probabilites that ProbLog2 can > handle. > > There are some documentation on core.logic ( > https://github.com/clojure/core.logic/wiki/CLP(Prob)) but it is dated at > 2013 and im not sure what the roadmap is for core.logic or if it even has a > roadmap. > > > Thanks for any input regarding this. > > Best regards Henrik > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Any chance of core.logic getting extended with probKanren?
On Friday, November 20, 2015 at 5:51:05 AM UTC-8, Henrik Larsson wrote: > > I have started to play around with ProbLog2 and find the concept of > probabilistic logic programming to be super fun. When googeling miniKanren > and probabilistic logic programming the following came up: > https://github.com/webyrd/probKanren > Do you know if there have been any publications on this work? I've looked around a little bit, but I can only find the source code. - Russell -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Any chance of core.logic getting extended with probKanren?
Definitely interested in it! But I don't have time to work on it myself. So the likelihood of this feature landing is entirely dependent on contributions :) HTH, David On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Henrik Larsson wrote: > I have started to play around with ProbLog2 and find the concept of > probabilistic logic programming to be super fun. When googeling miniKanren > and probabilistic logic programming the following came up: > https://github.com/webyrd/probKanren > > So my question now is what are the chances that something like probKanren > getting implemented in core.logic and how advance is probKanren vs > ProbLog2? What im after is the conditional probabilites that ProbLog2 can > handle. > > There are some documentation on core.logic ( > https://github.com/clojure/core.logic/wiki/CLP(Prob)) but it is dated at > 2013 and im not sure what the roadmap is for core.logic or if it even has a > roadmap. > > > Thanks for any input regarding this. > > Best regards Henrik > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
