Re: Anyone else working on a Common Lisp style "loop"?
> +1 for a Clojure port of Iterate; it's a fantastic library. I believe it's also completely specified, which is not the case for LOOP. LOOP is a little like English in that regard... very powerful, but time flies like an arrow, and fruit flies like a banana! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Anyone else working on a Common Lisp style "loop"?
>> Heh, I've always wanted one of these. Anyways, I think that instead of >> emulating loop , you should try to somewhat emulate iterate. >> http://common-lisp.net/project/iterate/ > > Good point! I only used Iterate a couple times, and now I'm reading up > more seriously on it... I think I can keep the conciseness of loop (in > typical cases) while also having the extensibility and power of > iterate. +1 for a Clojure port of Iterate; it's a fantastic library. Regards, BG -- Baishampayan Ghose oCricket.com signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Anyone else working on a Common Lisp style "loop"?
On Sep 7, 2:51 pm, Gorsal wrote: > Heh, I've always wanted one of these. Anyways, I think that instead of > emulating loop , you should try to somewhat emulate iterate. > http://common-lisp.net/project/iterate/ Good point! I only used Iterate a couple times, and now I'm reading up more seriously on it... I think I can keep the conciseness of loop (in typical cases) while also having the extensibility and power of iterate. Thanks, Tayssir On Sep 7, 2:51 pm, Gorsal wrote: > Heh, I've always wanted one of these. Anyways, I think that instead of > emulating loop , you should try to somewhat emulate iterate. You would > need a code walker, though, because you probably wouldn't want to use > brackets for all the special case loop constructs. Is there one for > clojure? I don't know. > Looks great, btw. I don't know anyone that has done it, but then again > i'm not really on top of things. > > http://common-lisp.net/project/iterate/ > > On Sep 7, 6:59 am, Tayssir John Gabbour > wrote: > > > Hi! > > > Is anyone else working on a Common Lisp style "loop"? I'd hate to > > duplicate effort. > > > I wrote one yesterday, though I still have to read that stuff on how > > to decently package a lib. ;)http://github.com/tayssir/cl-loop/tree/master > > > (I might not have written this, but I couldn't figure out a pleasant > > way to iterate many things serially. List comprehensions are really > > close, but they're not "serial" in the sense I mean it.) > > > All the best, > > Tayssir --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Anyone else working on a Common Lisp style "loop"?
Heh, I've always wanted one of these. Anyways, I think that instead of emulating loop , you should try to somewhat emulate iterate. You would need a code walker, though, because you probably wouldn't want to use brackets for all the special case loop constructs. Is there one for clojure? I don't know. Looks great, btw. I don't know anyone that has done it, but then again i'm not really on top of things. http://common-lisp.net/project/iterate/ On Sep 7, 6:59 am, Tayssir John Gabbour wrote: > Hi! > > Is anyone else working on a Common Lisp style "loop"? I'd hate to > duplicate effort. > > I wrote one yesterday, though I still have to read that stuff on how > to decently package a lib. ;)http://github.com/tayssir/cl-loop/tree/master > > (I might not have written this, but I couldn't figure out a pleasant > way to iterate many things serially. List comprehensions are really > close, but they're not "serial" in the sense I mean it.) > > All the best, > Tayssir --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
