Re: Why is `binding-conveyor-fn` private?

[jum...@gmail.com]

I'm just wondering what's the point of binding-conveyor-fn and why is the 
implementation so different from `bound-fn` et al.
It seems that the core functions use only binding-conveyor-fn.

On Friday, 21 August 2020 at 20:32:14 UTC+2 Sean Corfield wrote:

> Isn't that what bound-fn and bound-fn* are for?
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 11:21 AM Dimitrios Jim Piliouras <
> jimpi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I don’t get this…
>>
>> Why would such a neat/important utility private? Every time I 
>> submit/schedule a function to some Executor manually (not via `future`
>>  or `agent`), I need to remember to wrap it with `binding-conveyor-fn` 
>> (otherwise dynamic bindings won’t get propagated), and every time I have to 
>> copy/paste it into whatever project I’m working in. 
>>
>> Shouldn’t it, not only be public, but also come with a doc-string that 
>> strongly encourages its use  when manually submitting functions to 
>> Executors? Am I missing something?
>>
>> Many thanks in advance... 
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Dimitrios
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/A6C14F3B-D725-4B11-9A8F-4C008DC1BB3D%40gmail.com
>> .
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
> An Architect's View -- https://corfield.org/
> World Singles Networks, LLC. -- https://worldsinglesnetworks.com/
>
> "Perfection is the enemy of the good."
> -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/89be86cf-b2c1-4fab-a9fa-80eae2142been%40googlegroups.com.

Re: Why is `binding-conveyor-fn` private?

[Dimitrios Jim Piliouras]

Yeah good point, thanks Sean :)

Kind regards

On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, 19:32 Sean Corfield,  wrote:

> Isn't that what bound-fn and bound-fn* are for?
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 11:21 AM Dimitrios Jim Piliouras <
> jimpil1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I don’t get this…
>>
>> Why would such a neat/important utility private? Every time I
>> submit/schedule a function to some Executor manually (not via `future`
>>  or `agent`), I need to remember to wrap it with `binding-conveyor-fn`
>> (otherwise dynamic bindings won’t get propagated), and every time I have to
>> copy/paste it into whatever project I’m working in.
>>
>> Shouldn’t it, not only be public, but also come with a doc-string that
>> strongly encourages its use  when manually submitting functions to
>> Executors? Am I missing something?
>>
>> Many thanks in advance...
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Dimitrios
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/A6C14F3B-D725-4B11-9A8F-4C008DC1BB3D%40gmail.com
>> .
>>
>
>
> --
> Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
> An Architect's View -- https://corfield.org/
> World Singles Networks, LLC. -- https://worldsinglesnetworks.com/
>
> "Perfection is the enemy of the good."
> -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAD4thx9LUmLFmi90TBoDNV5AtFmGx7HEh3wiiJqMAzUOsJn%3DiA%40mail.gmail.com
> 
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAE3KzwJs_nN12%2BGfnWeCgez%2Bg_AgYMWYSq%2BB9%3D4WO1F-BqbsQw%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: Why is `binding-conveyor-fn` private?

[Sean Corfield]

Isn't that what bound-fn and bound-fn* are for?

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 11:21 AM Dimitrios Jim Piliouras <
jimpil1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I don’t get this…
>
> Why would such a neat/important utility private? Every time I
> submit/schedule a function to some Executor manually (not via `future`
>  or `agent`), I need to remember to wrap it with `binding-conveyor-fn`
> (otherwise dynamic bindings won’t get propagated), and every time I have to
> copy/paste it into whatever project I’m working in.
>
> Shouldn’t it, not only be public, but also come with a doc-string that
> strongly encourages its use  when manually submitting functions to
> Executors? Am I missing something?
>
> Many thanks in advance...
>
> Kind regards,
> Dimitrios
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/A6C14F3B-D725-4B11-9A8F-4C008DC1BB3D%40gmail.com
> .
>


-- 
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- https://corfield.org/
World Singles Networks, LLC. -- https://worldsinglesnetworks.com/

"Perfection is the enemy of the good."
-- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAD4thx9LUmLFmi90TBoDNV5AtFmGx7HEh3wiiJqMAzUOsJn%3DiA%40mail.gmail.com.

Why is `binding-conveyor-fn` private?

[Dimitrios Jim Piliouras]

Hi folks,

I don’t get this…

Why would such a neat/important utility private? Every time I submit/schedule a 
function to some Executor manually (not via `future`
 or `agent`), I need to remember to wrap it with `binding-conveyor-fn` 
(otherwise dynamic bindings won’t get propagated), and every time I have to 
copy/paste it into whatever project I’m working in. 

Shouldn’t it, not only be public, but also come with a doc-string that strongly 
encourages its use  when manually submitting functions to Executors? Am I 
missing something?

Many thanks in advance... 

Kind regards,
Dimitrios

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/A6C14F3B-D725-4B11-9A8F-4C008DC1BB3D%40gmail.com.