Re: Re: clojars question
Thanks. It does get confusing some times. On , Mark Rathwell wrote: Anyone can create their own account on clojars and publish their own forks to their own group name. There are 22 forks of enlive on github, the original is by Chrisotphe Grand [1], [2]. His most recent version published to clojars is 1.0.0. Generally, people try not to publish their own forks to clojars unless they have good reason (eg the original is no longer maintained, or will not accept desired patches, or doesn't publish quickly enough, etc.). Unless there is something in one of the forked versions that you want, I would use the original: [enlive "1.0.0"]. You may, however, want to post to the enlive group [3] to see if maybe there is a reason to use one of the other versions. [1] https://github.com/cgrand/enlive [2] http://clojars.org/enlive [3] http://groups.google.com/group/enlive-clj On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:12 PM, labwor...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm confused on what version to obtain from clojars for enlive. I see > 1.2.0-alpha1 dated yesterday but I also see 2.00 dated from August. Which > one should I pick? are there several versions? Please enlighten me. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: clojars question
Anyone can create their own account on clojars and publish their own forks to their own group name. There are 22 forks of enlive on github, the original is by Chrisotphe Grand [1], [2]. His most recent version published to clojars is 1.0.0. Generally, people try not to publish their own forks to clojars unless they have good reason (e.g. the original is no longer maintained, or will not accept desired patches, or doesn't publish quickly enough, etc.). Unless there is something in one of the forked versions that you want, I would use the original: [enlive "1.0.0"]. You may, however, want to post to the enlive group [3] to see if maybe there is a reason to use one of the other versions. [1] https://github.com/cgrand/enlive [2] http://clojars.org/enlive [3] http://groups.google.com/group/enlive-clj On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:12 PM, wrote: > I'm confused on what version to obtain from clojars for enlive. I see > 1.2.0-alpha1 dated yesterday but I also see 2.00 dated from August. Which > one should I pick? are there several versions? Please enlighten me. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
clojars question
I'm confused on what version to obtain from clojars for enlive. I see 1.2.0-alpha1 dated yesterday but I also see 2.00 dated from August. Which one should I pick? are there several versions? Please enlighten me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Clojars question
2010/2/3 Laurent PETIT > And it's also standard in maven to have the final artifact (e.g. a jar) be > self-documented by having pom.xml and pom.properties in the META-INF > directory of the jar : > See: http://maven.apache.org/guides/getting-started/index.html#How_do_I_add_resources_to_my_JAR > > META-INF/maven///pom.xml > META-INF/maven///pom.properties > > Not sure if clojars can be fed by simply providing a jar providing > self-describing metadata yet, though. > > 2010/2/3 Konrad Hinsen > > On 2 Feb 2010, at 21:52, Alex Osborne wrote: >> >> Sure, you can just write the POM by hand. The reason the POM is >>> necessary is so clojars knows the groupId, artifacId, version and >>> description of your lib. So just create the jar however you want (eg >>> just use the 'jar' command-line tool). Then create a pom.xml file with >>> a text editor. >>> >> >> Thanks, that looks refreshingly simple! :-) >> >> >> tried it). However if your lib depends on nothing but clojure.core, >>> then you may as well leave off dependency section entirely, as anyone >>> consuming it is going to specify which version of Clojure they want. >>> >> >> Indeed. Except that I just figured out that it does require Clojure 1.2 >> after all... >> >> Konrad. >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Clojars question
And it's also standard in maven to have the final artifact (e.g. a jar) be self-documented by having pom.xml and pom.properties in the META-INF directory of the jar : META-INF/maven///pom.xml META-INF/maven///pom.properties Not sure if clojars can be fed by simply providing a jar providing self-describing metadata yet, though. 2010/2/3 Konrad Hinsen > On 2 Feb 2010, at 21:52, Alex Osborne wrote: > > Sure, you can just write the POM by hand. The reason the POM is >> necessary is so clojars knows the groupId, artifacId, version and >> description of your lib. So just create the jar however you want (eg >> just use the 'jar' command-line tool). Then create a pom.xml file with >> a text editor. >> > > Thanks, that looks refreshingly simple! :-) > > > tried it). However if your lib depends on nothing but clojure.core, >> then you may as well leave off dependency section entirely, as anyone >> consuming it is going to specify which version of Clojure they want. >> > > Indeed. Except that I just figured out that it does require Clojure 1.2 > after all... > > Konrad. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Clojars question
On 2 Feb 2010, at 21:52, Alex Osborne wrote: Sure, you can just write the POM by hand. The reason the POM is necessary is so clojars knows the groupId, artifacId, version and description of your lib. So just create the jar however you want (eg just use the 'jar' command-line tool). Then create a pom.xml file with a text editor. Thanks, that looks refreshingly simple! :-) tried it). However if your lib depends on nothing but clojure.core, then you may as well leave off dependency section entirely, as anyone consuming it is going to specify which version of Clojure they want. Indeed. Except that I just figured out that it does require Clojure 1.2 after all... Konrad. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Clojars question
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote: > PS: On Windows deployment to Clojars does not work due to scp trouble. Only > Unix/Mac OS X supported at the moment for deployment. > If that's a blocker for anyone on Windows, they should parameterize the Clojars scp program and set it to pscp.exe from the Putty folks. It's a champ. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Clojars question
Hi, On Feb 3, 3:58 pm, Konrad Hinsen wrote: > Gradle would be just a development dependency, right? Users of my > library would not need to install Gradle I guess. Yes. The users of your library can use whatever they want: maven, ant +ivy, gradle, wget, bit hand carry, ... They specify the dependency and get your jar. > My main issue with Gradle is that it's yet another tool to learn :-( True. But worth it AFAICT up to now. You can easily handle multiple projects with a single build.gradle, if you like, minimising boilerplate as much as possible. It is sufficiently flexible to do custom stuff without losing too much hair. With clojuresque there also some rough edges left. So it's by no way perfect, but does a pretty good job on the standard project. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Clojars question
On 2 Feb 2010, at 20:35, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote: clojuresque is independent of the Clojure version used in the project and allows easy deployment of non-AOT'd jars to Clojars. It handles POM and jar generation and gives reflection warnings (if desired) even if not AOT'ing. But gradle might be a too heavy dependence. YMMV. Gradle would be just a development dependency, right? Users of my library would not need to install Gradle I guess. My main issue with Gradle is that it's yet another tool to learn :-( PS: On Windows deployment to Clojars does not work due to scp trouble. Only Unix/Mac OS X supported at the moment for deployment. My brain doesn't work with Windows either, so that doesn't matter ;-) Konrad. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Clojars question
Hey Konrad, Konrad Hinsen writes: > I would like to deposit a small library on clojars.org. Is it possible > to do this without using either Maven or Leiningen? Neither of these > tools seems to be appropriate for my library. Sure, you can just write the POM by hand. The reason the POM is necessary is so clojars knows the groupId, artifacId, version and description of your lib. So just create the jar however you want (eg just use the 'jar' command-line tool). Then create a pom.xml file with a text editor. If you have no dependencies then at the bare minimum all you need is this: 4.0.0 yourlib yourlib 1.0.0 Does awesome things. Finally just upload it to clojars with scp: scp pom.xml yourlib.jar cloj...@clojars.org: > If my understanding of Leiningen and Maven is correct, neither one can > handle "any Clojure version" as a dependency. But it seems that > Clojars wants a pom.xml, which I don't know how to generate otherwise. There is a syntax for specifying version ranges in dependencies: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Dependency+Mediation+and+Conflict+Resolution#DependencyMediationandConflictResolution-DependencyVersionRanges It should work with Maven and since Leiningen uses Maven for dependency resolution in theory it should work with Leiningen too (I haven't tried it). However if your lib depends on nothing but clojure.core, then you may as well leave off dependency section entirely, as anyone consuming it is going to specify which version of Clojure they want. Cheers, Alex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Clojars question
Hi, Am 02.02.2010 um 19:11 schrieb Konrad Hinsen: > I would like to deposit a small library on clojars.org. Is it possible to do > this without using either Maven or Leiningen? Neither of these tools seems to > be appropriate for my library. > > My library consists of just a few very small source code files. It doesn't > need to be AOT compiled, and by not AOT-compiling it is compatible with all > Clojure versions (official releases and snapshots). A single source-file jar > should thus be fine for everyone. > > If my understanding of Leiningen and Maven is correct, neither one can handle > "any Clojure version" as a dependency. But it seems that Clojars wants a > pom.xml, which I don't know how to generate otherwise. clojuresque is independent of the Clojure version used in the project and allows easy deployment of non-AOT'd jars to Clojars. It handles POM and jar generation and gives reflection warnings (if desired) even if not AOT'ing. But gradle might be a too heavy dependence. YMMV. Sincerely Meikel PS: On Windows deployment to Clojars does not work due to scp trouble. Only Unix/Mac OS X supported at the moment for deployment. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Clojars question
I would like to deposit a small library on clojars.org. Is it possible to do this without using either Maven or Leiningen? Neither of these tools seems to be appropriate for my library. My library consists of just a few very small source code files. It doesn't need to be AOT compiled, and by not AOT-compiling it is compatible with all Clojure versions (official releases and snapshots). A single source-file jar should thus be fine for everyone. If my understanding of Leiningen and Maven is correct, neither one can handle "any Clojure version" as a dependency. But it seems that Clojars wants a pom.xml, which I don't know how to generate otherwise. Konrad. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
