Re: [cmake-developers] Config files and version components

2013-01-21 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 21 January 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Currently it is common to set somepackage_VERSION_{MAJOR,MINOR,PATCH} in a
 Config.cmake file.
 
 The somepackage_VERSION_{MAJOR,MINOR,PATCH,TWEAK} variables are already set
 if parsable from the PACKAGE_VERSION if set. This is the case if using
 WRITE_BASIC_PACKAGE_VERSION_FILE().
 
 The problem I see is that those variables are set to 0 if the version
 component is not set. This appears to be a side-effect of the way they are
 stored in the cmFindPackageCommand (eg, unsigned int VersionMinor). There
 is also the somepackage_VERSION_COUNT to say how many components are
 valid.
 
 I consider it a bug that the variables are set to 0 if the version
 component is not set. Can we change that?

Not sure I remember correctly.

I think initially somewhere not all component-wise version variables had been 
set. I think after some discussion we concluded that it makes sense to set 
unset version components to 0.
I.e. 4.0 means IMO implicitely 4.0.0.0.

Where do you see a problem with this ?

Alex
--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers


Re: [cmake-developers] Config files and version components

2013-01-21 Thread Stephen Kelly
Alexander Neundorf wrote:

 On Monday 21 January 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Currently it is common to set somepackage_VERSION_{MAJOR,MINOR,PATCH} in
 a Config.cmake file.
 
 The somepackage_VERSION_{MAJOR,MINOR,PATCH,TWEAK} variables are already
 set if parsable from the PACKAGE_VERSION if set. This is the case if
 using WRITE_BASIC_PACKAGE_VERSION_FILE().
 
 The problem I see is that those variables are set to 0 if the version
 component is not set. This appears to be a side-effect of the way they
 are stored in the cmFindPackageCommand (eg, unsigned int VersionMinor).
 There is also the somepackage_VERSION_COUNT to say how many components
 are valid.
 
 I consider it a bug that the variables are set to 0 if the version
 component is not set. Can we change that?
 
 Not sure I remember correctly.
 
 I think initially somewhere not all component-wise version variables had
 been set. I think after some discussion we concluded that it makes sense
 to set unset version components to 0.
 I.e. 4.0 means IMO implicitely 4.0.0.0.
 
 Where do you see a problem with this ?

Only that I think it's odd.

The Foo package name is 4.3.2, but if you check all the components, it looks 
like 4.3.2.0, which is not 'true'.

Thanks,

Steve.


--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers


Re: [cmake-developers] Config files and version components

2013-01-21 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 21 January 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote:
 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
  On Monday 21 January 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote:
  Hi,
  
  Currently it is common to set somepackage_VERSION_{MAJOR,MINOR,PATCH} in
  a Config.cmake file.
  
  The somepackage_VERSION_{MAJOR,MINOR,PATCH,TWEAK} variables are already
  set if parsable from the PACKAGE_VERSION if set. This is the case if
  using WRITE_BASIC_PACKAGE_VERSION_FILE().
  
  The problem I see is that those variables are set to 0 if the version
  component is not set. This appears to be a side-effect of the way they
  are stored in the cmFindPackageCommand (eg, unsigned int VersionMinor).
  There is also the somepackage_VERSION_COUNT to say how many components
  are valid.
  
  I consider it a bug that the variables are set to 0 if the version
  component is not set. Can we change that?
  
  Not sure I remember correctly.
  
  I think initially somewhere not all component-wise version variables had
  been set. I think after some discussion we concluded that it makes sense
  to set unset version components to 0.
  I.e. 4.0 means IMO implicitely 4.0.0.0.
  
  Where do you see a problem with this ?
 
 Only that I think it's odd.
 
 The Foo package name is 4.3.2, but if you check all the components, it
 looks like 4.3.2.0, which is not 'true'.

Is VERSION_COUNT then actually set to 3 or 4 ?

Alex
--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers


Re: [cmake-developers] Config files and version components

2013-01-21 Thread Stephen Kelly
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
  Where do you see a problem with this ?
 
 Only that I think it's odd.
 
 The Foo package name is 4.3.2, but if you check all the components, it
 looks like 4.3.2.0, which is not 'true'.
 
 Is VERSION_COUNT then actually set to 3 or 4 ?

It is set correctly to 3, but still, it's something else to check. You can't 
just check the MINOR or PATCH version. You have to also check the COUNT.

This isn't something I'll fight against. Just something I noticed that I 
considered odd and not ideal for using.

Thanks,

Steve.


--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers


Re: [cmake-developers] General Config.cmake file issue on ArchLinux

2013-01-21 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Sunday 18 November 2012, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
 On Saturday 17 November 2012 20:24:42 you wrote:
  Hi,
  
  maybe I am missing something, but here we go:
  
  on 64bit ArchLinux installations, /lib64/ is a symlink to /usr/lib/.
  /bin/ and /usr/bin/ are normal directories, no symlinks.
 
 Hi Alexander,
 that's true, anyway we'll symlink /bin to /usr/bin in the next year.
 
  Now if a Config.cmake files is installed into /usr/lib/foo/, and
  references other files of its installations using relative paths from
  its own location to e.g. /usr/bin/ (../../bin/ ), there is breakage.
 
 Note, that this only applies when $PATH contains a different order than the
 default one we ship; which is
 PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin.
 
 In detail, when /bin is before /usr/bin cmake looks for the binary in /bin.
 
  CMake finds FooConfig.cmake in /lib64/foo/FooConfig.cmake (which it seems
  to search before /usr/lib). Then it goes ../../bin/, but doesn't end up
  in /usr/bin/, where e.g. some executable is located, but instead it goes
  to /lib64/foo/../../bin/, which is /bin/, but the expected executable is
  not there, and so the FooConfig.cmake file fails.
 
 I'm not familiar with the cmake code, but I guess that the different PATH
 order I said above cause cmake to take the FooConfig.cmake file from
 /lib64 rather than /usr/lib.
 
  If so, maybe the best thing to do is to tell the ArchLinux developers to
  set up their symlinks in a different way ?
  Having e.g. /usr/lib64/ point to /usr/lib/ would make it work I think.
  Or if /lib64/ points to /usr/lib/, then maybe /bin/ should also point to
  /usr/bin/.
 
 We are going to move everything to /usr. As I said above /bin will be
 symlinked to /usr/bin in the next year.

what about /include/ ?
This typically does not exist, but this will also make the Config.cmake files 
fail.
The Config.cmake files typically reference the include/ subdir, relativ to 
their own position. If there is no /include/, which is symlinked to 
/usr/include/, this will fail too.
The same for share/ and the other subdirs, but they are somewhat less common.

Alex
--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers


[cmake-developers] Remaining issues around umbrella Config files?

2013-01-21 Thread Stephen Kelly

Hi,

I have this pending patch:

 https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,44532

Given 

 find_package(Qt5 COMPONENTS  Widgets
  OPTIONAL_COMPONENTS Svg Quick 
 )

 message(Qt5_FOUND: ${Qt5_FOUND})
 message(Qt5Gui_FOUND: ${Qt5Gui_FOUND})
 message(Qt5Widgets_FOUND: ${Qt5Widgets_FOUND})
 message(Qt5Svg_FOUND: ${Qt5Svg_FOUND})
 message(Qt5Quick_FOUND: ${Qt5Quick_FOUND})

the output is 

 $ cmake ..
 CMake Warning at 
/home/stephen/dev/prefix/qtbase/lib/cmake/Qt5/Qt5Config.cmake:24 
(find_package):
   Could not find a package configuration file provided by Qt5Quick with 
any
   of the following names:

 Qt5QuickConfig.cmake
 qt5quick-config.cmake

   Add the installation prefix of Qt5Quick to CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH or set
   Qt5Quick_DIR to a directory containing one of the above files.  If
   Qt5Quick provides a separate development package or SDK, be sure it has
   been installed.
 Call Stack (most recent call first):
   CMakeLists.txt:62 (find_package)


 Qt5_FOUND: 1
 Qt5Gui_FOUND: 1
 Qt5Widgets_FOUND: 1
 Qt5Svg_FOUND: 1
 Qt5Quick_FOUND: 0
 -- Configuring done
 -- Generating done
 -- Build files have been written to: 
/home/stephen/dev/src/playground/cmake/build

--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers


Re: [cmake-developers] Remaining issues around umbrella Config files?

2013-01-21 Thread Stephen Kelly
Stephen Kelly wrote:

 
 Hi,
 
 I have this pending patch:

Please ignore this one. Sent too early.

--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers


Re: [cmake-developers] Remaining issues around umbrella Config files?

2013-01-21 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 21 January 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I have this pending patch:
 
  https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,44532
 
 Given
 
  find_package(Qt5 COMPONENTS  Widgets
   # I don't have QtQuick installed.
   OPTIONAL_COMPONENTS Svg Quick
  )
 
  message(Qt5_FOUND: ${Qt5_FOUND})
  message(Qt5Gui_FOUND: ${Qt5Gui_FOUND})
  message(Qt5Widgets_FOUND: ${Qt5Widgets_FOUND})
  message(Qt5Svg_FOUND: ${Qt5Svg_FOUND})
  message(Qt5Quick_FOUND: ${Qt5Quick_FOUND})
 
 the output is
 
  $ cmake ..
  CMake Warning at
 /home/stephen/dev/prefix/qtbase/lib/cmake/Qt5/Qt5Config.cmake:24
 (find_package):
Could not find a package configuration file provided by Qt5Quick with
 any
of the following names:
 
  Qt5QuickConfig.cmake
  qt5quick-config.cmake
 
Add the installation prefix of Qt5Quick to CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH or set
Qt5Quick_DIR to a directory containing one of the above files.  If
Qt5Quick provides a separate development package or SDK, be sure it
 has been installed.
  Call Stack (most recent call first):
CMakeLists.txt:62 (find_package)
 
 
  Qt5_FOUND: 1
  Qt5Gui_FOUND: 1
  Qt5Widgets_FOUND: 1
  Qt5Svg_FOUND: 1
  Qt5Quick_FOUND: 0
  -- Configuring done
  -- Generating done
  -- Build files have been written to:
 /home/stephen/dev/src/playground/cmake/build
 
 
 Given:
 
  find_package(Qt5 COMPONENTS Widgets Quick)
 
  message(Qt5_FOUND: ${Qt5_FOUND})
  message(Qt5Gui_FOUND: ${Qt5Gui_FOUND})
  message(Qt5Widgets_FOUND: ${Qt5Widgets_FOUND})
  message(Qt5Quick_FOUND: ${Qt5Quick_FOUND})
 
 The output is:
 
  CMake Warning at
 /home/stephen/dev/prefix/qtbase/lib/cmake/Qt5/Qt5Config.cmake:24
 (find_package):
Could not find a package configuration file provided by Qt5Quick with
 any
of the following names:
 
  Qt5QuickConfig.cmake
  qt5quick-config.cmake
 
Add the installation prefix of Qt5Quick to CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH or set
Qt5Quick_DIR to a directory containing one of the above files.  If
Qt5Quick provides a separate development package or SDK, be sure it
 has been installed.
  Call Stack (most recent call first):
CMakeLists.txt:62 (find_package)
 
 
  CMake Warning at CMakeLists.txt:62 (find_package):
Found package configuration file:
 
  /home/stephen/dev/prefix/qtbase/lib/cmake/Qt5/Qt5Config.cmake
 
but it set Qt5_FOUND to FALSE so package Qt5 is considered to be NOT
FOUND.  Reason given by package:
 
Failed to find module Qt5Quick in prefix
/home/stephen/dev/prefix/qtbase
 
 
 
  Qt5_FOUND: 0
  Qt5Gui_FOUND: 1
  Qt5Widgets_FOUND: 1
  Qt5Svg_FOUND:
  Qt5Quick_FOUND: 0
  -- Configuring done
  -- Generating done
  -- Build files have been written to:
 /home/stephen/dev/src/playground/cmake/build
 
 
 I didn't closely follow the threads around this. Is there any other
 behavior that I should account for here?

Seems ok.

Minor nitpick:
I would probably prefer an error message which mentions component and the 
exact name of the expected config-file instead of the generic find_package() 
error message. Also, since in the patch you only have find_package() check in 
${_qt5_install_prefix}, I think the error message should mention where it 
expects this file exactly.

Alex
--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers


Re: [cmake-developers] General Config.cmake file issue on ArchLinux

2013-01-21 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 21 January 2013, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
 On Monday 21 January 2013 20:09:57 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
  what about /include/ ?
  This typically does not exist, but this will also make the Config.cmake
  files fail.
  The Config.cmake files typically reference the include/ subdir, relativ
  to their own position. If there is no /include/, which is symlinked to
  /usr/include/, this will fail too.
 
 Hi, there's no /include/ in Arch.

Ok, that's actually what I expected.
This means that symlinking /lib64/ to /usr/lib/ will break most Config.cmake 
files which have been installed to /usr/lib/ (i.e. least all which do not 
hardcode the path to the include dir, but instead store it as a relative path, 
relative to the config.cmake file).

Alex



--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers


[cmake-developers] FindPackageCheckArchLinuxSymlinks branch on stage

2013-01-21 Thread Alexander Neundorf
Hi,

I pushed the FindPackageCheckArchLinuxSymlinks branch to stage, haven't merged 
it yet.

It makes cmake warn if /lib64/ is a symbolic link to /usr/lib/ and a 
Config.cmake file has been found in one of both (since any relative directory 
references may be wrong then), see the General Config.cmake file issue on 
ArchLinux thread here from November.

The branch doesn't actually fix anything, it only detects this very specific 
situation and prints a warning message. I am actually not aware of a solution 
for this problem, except using full absolute paths in the Config.cmake files 
and so making the Config.cmake files not relocatable again.

Comments ?
Should I merge into next ?

Alex
--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers


[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013862]: cmake-gui doesn't delete entirely the cache when using delete cache option

2013-01-21 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker

The following issue has been SUBMITTED. 
== 
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=13862 
== 
Reported By:Jonathan De Wachter
Assigned To:
== 
Project:CMake
Issue ID:   13862
Category:   CMake
Reproducibility:always
Severity:   major
Priority:   immediate
Status: new
== 
Date Submitted: 2013-01-21 17:11 EST
Last Modified:  2013-01-21 17:11 EST
== 
Summary:cmake-gui  doesn't delete entirely the cache when
using delete cache option
Description: 
Changes made in my tool-chain file are not taken into accounts after I use this
option. I need to delete manually the build/ directory.

Additional Information: 
Annoying bug, I lost one hour finding out where the problem was from.
== 

Issue History 
Date ModifiedUsername   FieldChange   
== 
2013-01-21 17:11 Jonathan De WachterNew Issue   

==

--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers


[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013863]: CMAKE_FORCE_C_COMPILER doesn't work...

2013-01-21 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker

The following issue has been SUBMITTED. 
== 
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=13863 
== 
Reported By:Jonathan De Wachter
Assigned To:
== 
Project:CMake
Issue ID:   13863
Category:   CMake
Reproducibility:always
Severity:   major
Priority:   high
Status: new
== 
Date Submitted: 2013-01-21 17:18 EST
Last Modified:  2013-01-21 17:18 EST
== 
Summary:CMAKE_FORCE_C_COMPILER doesn't work...
Description: 
CMAKE_FORCE_C_COMPILER doesn't work while the traditional version
CMAKE_C_COMPILER does.

Here is my code:
include(CMakeForceCompiler)

SET(CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME Android)

set(NDK_PATH
C:/Users/Sonkun/Desktop/my-android-toolchain/arm-linux-androideabi)

# I get my compilers found when using the following. The only problem: it
doesn't compile, without extra flags, a simple program so I need to force.
SET(CMAKE_C_COMPILER gcc) 
SET(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER g++)

# So I comment the two line above and try the following. It results two errors
saying CMake was unable to find the compilers...
CMAKE_FORCE_C_COMPILER(gcc GNU)
CMAKE_FORCE_CXX_COMPILER(g++ GNU)

== 

Issue History 
Date ModifiedUsername   FieldChange   
== 
2013-01-21 17:18 Jonathan De WachterNew Issue   

==

--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers


Re: [cmake-developers] Remaining issues around umbrella Config files?

2013-01-21 Thread Stephen Kelly
Alexander Neundorf wrote:

 On Monday 21 January 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote:

 I didn't closely follow the threads around this. Is there any other
 behavior that I should account for here?
 
 Seems ok.
 
 Minor nitpick:
 I would probably prefer an error message which mentions component and the
 exact name of the expected config-file instead of the generic
 find_package() error message.

Sorry, I don't understand. Could you be more specific and write the error 
you expect?

 Also, since in the patch you only have
 find_package() check in ${_qt5_install_prefix}, I think the error message
 should mention where it expects this file exactly.

Generically, it could be in one of (for example):

 ${_qt5_install_prefix}/Qt5QuickConfig.cmake
 ${_qt5_install_prefix}/Qt5Quick/Qt5QuickConfig.cmake
 ${_qt5_install_prefix}/lib/cmake/Qt5Quick/Qt5QuickConfig.cmake
 // etc

so, in the general case for umbrella config files, the prefix is the best we 
can put in the error message (and I already do, in the patch).

I was thinking though that as Qt puts all cmake files in 

 ${_qt5_install_prefix}/lib/cmake/name

that I could put that in the error message. Is that what you meant too?

Thanks,

Steve.


--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers


Re: [cmake-developers] Remaining issues around umbrella Config files?

2013-01-21 Thread Stephen Kelly
Stephen Kelly wrote:

 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
 
 On Monday 21 January 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote:
 
 I didn't closely follow the threads around this. Is there any other
 behavior that I should account for here?
 
 Seems ok.
 
 Minor nitpick:
 I would probably prefer an error message which mentions component and the
 exact name of the expected config-file instead of the generic
 find_package() error message.
 
 Sorry, I don't understand. Could you be more specific and write the error
 you expect?
 
 Also, since in the patch you only have
 find_package() check in ${_qt5_install_prefix}, I think the error message
 should mention where it expects this file exactly.
 
 Generically, it could be in one of (for example):
 
  ${_qt5_install_prefix}/Qt5QuickConfig.cmake
  ${_qt5_install_prefix}/Qt5Quick/Qt5QuickConfig.cmake
  ${_qt5_install_prefix}/lib/cmake/Qt5Quick/Qt5QuickConfig.cmake
  // etc
 
 so, in the general case for umbrella config files, the prefix is the best
 we can put in the error message (and I already do, in the patch).
 
 I was thinking though that as Qt puts all cmake files in
 
  ${_qt5_install_prefix}/lib/cmake/name
 
 that I could put that in the error message. Is that what you meant too?
 

I've now updated the patch to generate this in the case of not-found non-
optional components:

  Failed to find Qt5 component Qml config file at
  /home/stephen/dev/prefix/qtbase/lib/cmake/Qt5Qml/Qt5QmlConfig.cmake

I notice there does not seem to be any way to warn about why missing 
optional components are missing. Is that a missing feature? I mean, when I 
do this:

 find_package(Qt5 COMPONENTS Qml)

Qt5 is not found, and the warning is printed. However, with:

 find_package(Qt5 OPTIONAL_COMPONENTS Qml)

Qt5 *is* found, and no warning can be printed.

Bug or feature?

Thanks,

Steve.


--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers


[cmake-developers] [PATCH] spell: fix a few typos in comments

2013-01-21 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
From: Yury G. Kudryashov urkud.ur...@gmail.com

---
 Source/cmMakefile.cxx | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Source/cmMakefile.cxx b/Source/cmMakefile.cxx
index b432986..d1dc5a2 100644
--- a/Source/cmMakefile.cxx
+++ b/Source/cmMakefile.cxx
@@ -2243,7 +2243,7 @@ bool cmMakefile::CanIWriteThisFile(const char* fileName)
 {
 return true;
 }
-  // If we are doing an in-source build, than the test will always fail
+  // If we are doing an in-source build, then the test will always fail
   if ( cmSystemTools::SameFile(this-GetHomeDirectory(),
this-GetHomeOutputDirectory()) )
 {
@@ -2254,8 +2254,8 @@ bool cmMakefile::CanIWriteThisFile(const char* fileName)
 return true;
 }
 
-  // Check if this is subdirectory of the source tree but not a
-  // subdirectory of a build tree
+  // Check if this is a subdirectory of the source tree but not a
+  // subdirectory of the build tree
   if ( cmSystemTools::IsSubDirectory(fileName,
   this-GetHomeDirectory()) 
 !cmSystemTools::IsSubDirectory(fileName,
-- 
1.8.0

--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers


[CMake] Always build release version of a librart

2013-01-21 Thread Fedor Gusev
Hello.
I have a project with a number of libraries. For a certain library i want
to always build release version, whatever CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE is set to.

Right now I am using set(CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE Release) in CMakeLists.txt for
this library. But that does not  work with multiconfiguration generators
like Visual Studio while fine for nmake generator.

What can I do here? Thanks in advance.
--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] Why does ExternalProject require root access?

2013-01-21 Thread Theodore Papadopoulo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 01/20/2013 10:54 PM, Eric Noulard wrote:
 
 
 2013/1/20 Ansis Māliņš ansis.mal...@gmail.com 
 mailto:ansis.mal...@gmail.com
 
 The line ExternalProject_Add(bullet PREFIX ${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}) 
 fails with Install the project... -- Install configuration:
 Release CMake Error at cmake_install.cmake:38 (FILE): file cannot
 create directory: /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig.  Maybe need 
 administrative privileges.
 
 Why? How do I avoid needing root for building my project?

The bullet project uses pkgconfig which is not installed on your
computer so that your system proposes you to pass root and install it.

So just find the proper package and install it (as root or compile it
and put it somewhere on your path) and it should work.

Theo.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlD9Dc8ACgkQEr8WrU8nPV2+lQCglobLGNOHFH4+VF4s81AzK7LN
zYAAn2sDueCMzdqXsVKSPrsTQpu9+qiq
=Vdcq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] Why does ExternalProject require root access?

2013-01-21 Thread Luigi Calori
I' m not sure of which are exactly your problems but I probably had 
similar ones:
I use to have a meta-project which assembles all the needed external 
project set up to download,configure,build and install.
I setup for all the project the same CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX and the same 
CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH ( passed as cmake configure options with -D)

For configure based project you need to use the --prefix option

If this assumption can work for you,  let me know,
I can try to figure out something useful out of my mess of 
external_project cmake-based builds


HTH

On 01/21/2013 12:00 AM, Ansis Ma-lin,s( wrote:
There is no Bullet package for Ubuntu. But most importantly there is 
no such thing as packages in Windows. So I have to build it into my app.


I also want to avoid having to alter the CMake files of my 
dependencies. I want other devs to be able to just check out the 
latest version of Bullet into a specific folder and hit compile on my 
meta project.



--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake



--
Luigi Calori
SuperComputing Applications and Innovation Department
CINECA - via Magnanelli, 6/3, 40033 Casalecchio di Reno (Bologna) - ITALY
Tel: +39 051 6171509  Fax: +39 051 6132198
hpc.cineca.it

--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] How to handle RelWithDebInfo and MinSizeRel when not built?

2013-01-21 Thread Stephen Kelly
John Drescher wrote:

 The suggestion in the bug report looks somewhat reasonable to me, but
 then again, we don't actually create separate debug info, and the
 'Release' configuration would be no different to the 'RelWithDebInfo'
 configuration, so it's sort of a 'lie'.

 The real need for it though is probably that it allows the downstream of
 Qt to use RelWithDebInfo themselves?

 The alternative way to do that would be to set the MAP_IMPORTED_CONFIG*
 properties. I'm not sure whether I should advise that and close the bug
 report, or should I implement the suggested change.

 Any ideas?

 As a windows programmer who regularly uses CMake generated
 RelWithDebInfo targets with Qt4 since 2008 I believe the behavior of
 using the Release versions for RelWithDebugInfo is fine (and actually
 preferred for me).

Hi John,

Thanks for your input. Do you have to do anything in particular to enable 
this when working with FindQt4.cmake?

 If I need to debug deeply into a Qt problem I will
 switch to use the Debug build however most of the time for itk or vtk
 I want to use RelWithDebInfo to debug since these tend to be slow to
 Debug in Debug mode that is when I use dicom images that are similar
 resolution to what my programs typically use.

Do you have to do anything in particular to enable this when working with 
FindQt4.cmake? Or do you mean that you use vtk in RelWithDebInfo config, and 
Qt in Release config in that case?

Thanks,

Steve.


--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake


[CMake] fixup_bundle and output dirs

2013-01-21 Thread Mikael Sundell
I'm running fixup_bundle on macosx to fix up bundles and make them
standalone for distribution. I've got mostly Qt libraries and different
internal and external dependencies.
For some reason ALL dependencies except for Frameworks are copied into the
program.app/Contents/MacOS directory, any chance I can change this?
It would be better if internal and external libraries (dylibs) goes into
program.app/Contents/lib and Qt plugins in program.app/Contents/Plugins.
Anyone?
Mikael
--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.10 with Xcode 4.4.1

2013-01-21 Thread Asmodehn Shade
Hello,

Is there any news on that ?
Any way to fix it, or work around or even a hack I can try ?
From what I understand the CMAKE_OSX_SYSROOT variable is mandatory to
specify the base SDK, and therefore to be able to build a project...

Or should I just revert to using cmake 2.8.9 ?

Thank you,
--
AlexV

2013/1/15 Asmodehn Shade asmod...@gmail.com

 Hello,

 I managed to reproduce the problem with the simple HelloWorld given by
 Nicholas a bit earlier in this thread, with a slight modification.
 The problem seems to come from : *set(CMAKE_OSX_SYSROOT iphoneos6.0)*

 Just add this line to the CMakeLists.txt, and you will see that the path
 for the build changes from Debug/ to Debug-iphoneos/
 This seems to confuse cmake 2.8.10 paths ( but is fine with cmake 2.8.9 )

 Let me know if you need anything else,
 --
 AlexV

 2013/1/15 Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com

 On 01/13/2013 09:37 PM, Asmodehn Shade wrote:
  bash-3.2$ xcodebuild Tutorial.xcodeproj/
  === BUILD AGGREGATE TARGET ZERO_CHECK OF PROJECT Tutorial WITH
 THE DEFAULT CONFIGURATION (Debug) ===
  Check dependencies
  unsupported build action 'Tutorial.xcodeproj'

 The xcodebuild command does not take the .xcodeproj as an argument.
 You need to use -project $proj if there is more than one project
 in a directory.  Otherwise you do not need to specify it at all.

  2) cmake --build . --config Debug works too :
  /** BUILD SUCCEEDED **/
 
  = Does cmake --build . --config Debug does something special ?

 It runs a valid xcodebuild command line.

  = Another thing to consider is that my original project fails to
  build *in the IDE*, with the same error as Nicholas previously stated
  in this thread :
 [snip]
  make[1]: *** No rule to make target
 `/Users/alexandre.vincent/Projects/my_project/prj/iOS/CMakeFiles/2.8.10/CMakeCCompiler.cmake',
 needed by `CMakeFiles/cmake.check_cache'.
 [snip]
  So is it possible that the Tutorial sample problem may not match the
  actual cause of the original problem ?

 Yes.  The tutorial build does work as seen with cmake --build.
 There must be something about the project itself that is different
 from the tutorial example and triggers the problem.

 Can you provide a small example project that does reproduce the
 problem?

 -Brad



--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.10.2-1705-ga29475a

2013-01-21 Thread Stephen Kelly
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.

The branch, next has been updated
   via  a29475a36e8471c774b83980103d4e088703a291 (commit)
   via  ba1f498da8b4692344bf8c911f4799a741da7e8a (commit)
  from  b54c10d333b33b61f14bde589fd40913524b5391 (commit)

Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.

- Log -
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=a29475a36e8471c774b83980103d4e088703a291
commit a29475a36e8471c774b83980103d4e088703a291
Merge: b54c10d ba1f498
Author: Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com
AuthorDate: Mon Jan 21 03:04:52 2013 -0500
Commit: CMake Topic Stage kwro...@kitware.com
CommitDate: Mon Jan 21 03:04:52 2013 -0500

Merge topic 'fix-COMPATIBLE_INTERFACE-properties' into next

ba1f498 Plug memory leak.


http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=ba1f498da8b4692344bf8c911f4799a741da7e8a
commit ba1f498da8b4692344bf8c911f4799a741da7e8a
Author: Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com
AuthorDate: Mon Jan 21 09:04:24 2013 +0100
Commit: Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com
CommitDate: Mon Jan 21 09:04:24 2013 +0100

Plug memory leak.

diff --git a/Source/cmTarget.cxx b/Source/cmTarget.cxx
index 8a39424..2600db5 100644
--- a/Source/cmTarget.cxx
+++ b/Source/cmTarget.cxx
@@ -1520,6 +1520,12 @@ void cmTarget::ClearLinkMaps()
   this-Internal-LinkImplMap.clear();
   this-Internal-LinkInterfaceMap.clear();
   this-Internal-LinkClosureMap.clear();
+  for (cmTargetLinkInformationMap::const_iterator it
+  = this-LinkInformation.begin();
+  it != this-LinkInformation.end(); ++it)
+{
+delete it-second;
+}
   this-LinkInformation.clear();
 }
 

---

Summary of changes:
 Source/cmTarget.cxx |6 ++
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)


hooks/post-receive
-- 
CMake
___
Cmake-commits mailing list
Cmake-commits@cmake.org
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-commits


[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.10.2-1708-gb6d0e87

2013-01-21 Thread Stephen Kelly
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.

The branch, next has been updated
   via  b6d0e87352b2fda6a5e6a542f7433ca9e0ac62e4 (commit)
   via  830246e841d24cc9513c857859a4327ffb1d3da5 (commit)
   via  bd82bb4787410a0bdd6120b8c449f5d31ecc4c28 (commit)
  from  a29475a36e8471c774b83980103d4e088703a291 (commit)

Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.

- Log -
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=b6d0e87352b2fda6a5e6a542f7433ca9e0ac62e4
commit b6d0e87352b2fda6a5e6a542f7433ca9e0ac62e4
Merge: a29475a 830246e
Author: Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com
AuthorDate: Mon Jan 21 03:05:24 2013 -0500
Commit: CMake Topic Stage kwro...@kitware.com
CommitDate: Mon Jan 21 03:05:24 2013 -0500

Merge topic 'fix-COMPATIBLE_INTERFACE-properties' into next

830246e Export the COMPATIBLE_INTERFACE_BOOL content properties
bd82bb4 Clear the link information in ClearLinkMaps.


http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=830246e841d24cc9513c857859a4327ffb1d3da5
commit 830246e841d24cc9513c857859a4327ffb1d3da5
Author: Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com
AuthorDate: Sun Jan 20 17:09:29 2013 +0100
Commit: Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com
CommitDate: Mon Jan 21 09:05:03 2013 +0100

Export the COMPATIBLE_INTERFACE_BOOL content properties

diff --git a/Source/cmExportBuildFileGenerator.cxx 
b/Source/cmExportBuildFileGenerator.cxx
index 61e130d..7147f86 100644
--- a/Source/cmExportBuildFileGenerator.cxx
+++ b/Source/cmExportBuildFileGenerator.cxx
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ bool 
cmExportBuildFileGenerator::GenerateMainFile(std::ostream os)
 properties, missingTargets);
 this-PopulateInterfaceProperty(INTERFACE_POSITION_INDEPENDENT_CODE,
   te, properties);
+this-PopulateCompatibleInterfaceProperties(te, properties);
 
 this-GenerateInterfaceProperties(te, os, properties);
 }
diff --git a/Source/cmExportFileGenerator.cxx b/Source/cmExportFileGenerator.cxx
index 4a7c6f9..3a6294a 100644
--- a/Source/cmExportFileGenerator.cxx
+++ b/Source/cmExportFileGenerator.cxx
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include cmTarget.h
 #include cmTargetExport.h
 #include cmVersion.h
+#include cmComputeLinkInformation.h
 
 #include cmsys/auto_ptr.hxx
 
@@ -177,6 +178,79 @@ void 
cmExportFileGenerator::PopulateInterfaceProperty(const char *propName,
 properties, missingTargets);
 }
 
+
+//
+void getPropertyContents(cmTarget *tgt, const char *prop,
+ std::setstd::string ifaceProperties)
+{
+  const char *p = tgt-GetProperty(prop);
+  if (!p)
+{
+return;
+}
+  std::vectorstd::string content;
+  cmSystemTools::ExpandListArgument(p, content);
+  for (std::vectorstd::string::const_iterator ci = content.begin();
+ci != content.end(); ++ci)
+{
+ifaceProperties.insert(*ci);
+}
+}
+
+//
+void getCompatibleInterfaceProperties(cmTarget *target,
+  std::setstd::string ifaceProperties,
+  const char *config)
+{
+  cmComputeLinkInformation *info = target-GetLinkInformation(config);
+
+  const cmComputeLinkInformation::ItemVector deps = info-GetItems();
+
+  for(cmComputeLinkInformation::ItemVector::const_iterator li =
+  deps.begin();
+  li != deps.end(); ++li)
+{
+if (!li-Target)
+  {
+  continue;
+  }
+getPropertyContents(li-Target,
+COMPATIBLE_INTERFACE_BOOL,
+ifaceProperties);
+}
+}
+
+//
+void cmExportFileGenerator::PopulateCompatibleInterfaceProperties(
+cmTarget *target,
+ImportPropertyMap properties)
+{
+  this-PopulateInterfaceProperty(COMPATIBLE_INTERFACE_BOOL,
+target, properties);
+
+  std::setstd::string ifaceProperties;
+
+  getPropertyContents(target, COMPATIBLE_INTERFACE_BOOL, ifaceProperties);
+
+  getCompatibleInterfaceProperties(target, ifaceProperties, 0);
+
+  std::vectorstd::string configNames;
+  target-GetMakefile()-GetConfigurations(configNames);
+
+  for (std::vectorstd::string::const_iterator ci = configNames.begin();
+ci != configNames.end(); ++ci)
+{
+getCompatibleInterfaceProperties(target, ifaceProperties, ci-c_str());
+}
+
+  for (std::setstd::string::const_iterator it = ifaceProperties.begin();
+it != ifaceProperties.end(); ++it)
+{
+

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.10.2-1710-g86a6d55

2013-01-21 Thread Stephen Kelly
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.

The branch, next has been updated
   via  86a6d55ddc0c2bc59e80a697c2656dbf610df366 (commit)
   via  bdb62f63099d2cad264a963a5e57020cbd157ddb (commit)
  from  b6d0e87352b2fda6a5e6a542f7433ca9e0ac62e4 (commit)

Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.

- Log -
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=86a6d55ddc0c2bc59e80a697c2656dbf610df366
commit 86a6d55ddc0c2bc59e80a697c2656dbf610df366
Merge: b6d0e87 bdb62f6
Author: Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com
AuthorDate: Mon Jan 21 03:12:06 2013 -0500
Commit: CMake Topic Stage kwro...@kitware.com
CommitDate: Mon Jan 21 03:12:06 2013 -0500

Merge topic 'clean-include-dirs-debugging' into next

bdb62f6 Don't use insert on a std::set with a range.


http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=bdb62f63099d2cad264a963a5e57020cbd157ddb
commit bdb62f63099d2cad264a963a5e57020cbd157ddb
Author: Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com
AuthorDate: Mon Jan 21 09:09:54 2013 +0100
Commit: Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com
CommitDate: Mon Jan 21 09:11:39 2013 +0100

Don't use insert on a std::set with a range.

diff --git a/Source/cmMakefile.cxx b/Source/cmMakefile.cxx
index f5aa932..4721e4c 100644
--- a/Source/cmMakefile.cxx
+++ b/Source/cmMakefile.cxx
@@ -1657,7 +1657,11 @@ void cmMakefile::AddIncludeDirectories(const 
std::vectorstd::string incs,
 void
 cmMakefile::AddSystemIncludeDirectories(const std::setcmStdString incs)
 {
-  this-SystemIncludeDirectories.insert(incs.begin(), incs.end());
+  for(std::setcmStdString::const_iterator li = incs.begin();
+  li != incs.end(); ++li)
+{
+this-SystemIncludeDirectories.insert(*li);
+}
 }
 
 //

---

Summary of changes:
 Source/cmMakefile.cxx |6 +-
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)


hooks/post-receive
-- 
CMake
___
Cmake-commits mailing list
Cmake-commits@cmake.org
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-commits


[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.10.2-1715-gf37b5c0

2013-01-21 Thread Stephen Kelly
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.

The branch, next has been updated
   via  f37b5c05380ba73c064885b30311be5f64e4a638 (commit)
   via  6063fef226d35aad0629d7098f72afa650e7a149 (commit)
   via  aa6674831c3ea3bf3cca7c9f667d2e5c75873a3d (commit)
   via  d70204a86aa3e454e73049efda3e1ccea8c60720 (commit)
   via  0d46e9a0297d78dabc9988604a15c0096c702855 (commit)
  from  86a6d55ddc0c2bc59e80a697c2656dbf610df366 (commit)

Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.

- Log -
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=f37b5c05380ba73c064885b30311be5f64e4a638
commit f37b5c05380ba73c064885b30311be5f64e4a638
Merge: 86a6d55 6063fef
Author: Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com
AuthorDate: Mon Jan 21 03:12:56 2013 -0500
Commit: CMake Topic Stage kwro...@kitware.com
CommitDate: Mon Jan 21 03:12:56 2013 -0500

Merge topic 'clean-include-dirs-debugging' into next

6063fef Output include directories as LOG messages, not warnings.
aa66748 Specify the target whose includes are being listed.
d70204a Only output includes once after the start of 'generate-time' when 
debugging.
0d46e9a Store includes from the same include_directories call together.


http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=6063fef226d35aad0629d7098f72afa650e7a149
commit 6063fef226d35aad0629d7098f72afa650e7a149
Author: Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com
AuthorDate: Sun Jan 20 13:07:31 2013 +0100
Commit: Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com
CommitDate: Mon Jan 21 09:12:22 2013 +0100

Output include directories as LOG messages, not warnings.

diff --git a/Source/cmake.cxx b/Source/cmake.cxx
index 2eecfba..932c996 100644
--- a/Source/cmake.cxx
+++ b/Source/cmake.cxx
@@ -4394,6 +4394,10 @@ void cmake::IssueMessage(cmake::MessageType t, 
std::string const text,
 isError = true;
 msg  CMake Internal Error (please report a bug);
 }
+  else if(t == cmake::LOG)
+{
+msg  CMake Debug Log;
+}
   else
 {
 msg  CMake Warning;
diff --git a/Tests/RunCMake/include_directories/DebugIncludes-stderr.txt 
b/Tests/RunCMake/include_directories/DebugIncludes-stderr.txt
index 379174a..736fe69 100644
--- a/Tests/RunCMake/include_directories/DebugIncludes-stderr.txt
+++ b/Tests/RunCMake/include_directories/DebugIncludes-stderr.txt
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-CMake Warning at DebugIncludes.cmake:8 \(include_directories\):
+CMake Debug Log at DebugIncludes.cmake:8 \(include_directories\):
   Used includes for target lll:
 
\* .*/Tests/RunCMake/include_directories/one
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ CMake Warning at DebugIncludes.cmake:8 \(include_directories\):
 Call Stack \(most recent call first\):
   CMakeLists.txt:3 \(include\)
 +
-CMake Warning at DebugIncludes.cmake:13 \(set_property\):
+CMake Debug Log at DebugIncludes.cmake:13 \(set_property\):
   Used includes for target lll:
 
\* .*/Tests/RunCMake/include_directories/three
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ CMake Warning at DebugIncludes.cmake:13 \(set_property\):
 Call Stack \(most recent call first\):
   CMakeLists.txt:3 \(include\)
 +
-CMake Warning at DebugIncludes.cmake:18 \(include_directories\):
+CMake Debug Log at DebugIncludes.cmake:18 \(include_directories\):
   Used includes for target lll:
 
\* .*/Tests/RunCMake/include_directories/four
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ CMake Warning at DebugIncludes.cmake:18 
\(include_directories\):
 Call Stack \(most recent call first\):
   CMakeLists.txt:3 \(include\)
 +
-CMake Warning at DebugIncludes.cmake:25 \(set_property\):
+CMake Debug Log at DebugIncludes.cmake:25 \(set_property\):
   Used includes for target lll:
 
\* .*/Tests/RunCMake/include_directories/five

http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=aa6674831c3ea3bf3cca7c9f667d2e5c75873a3d
commit aa6674831c3ea3bf3cca7c9f667d2e5c75873a3d
Author: Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com
AuthorDate: Sun Jan 20 12:57:25 2013 +0100
Commit: Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com
CommitDate: Mon Jan 21 09:12:22 2013 +0100

Specify the target whose includes are being listed.

diff --git a/Source/cmTarget.cxx b/Source/cmTarget.cxx
index fb99b4a..6c9ed1b 100644
--- a/Source/cmTarget.cxx
+++ b/Source/cmTarget.cxx
@@ -2785,8 +2785,8 @@ std::vectorstd::string 
cmTarget::GetIncludeDirectories(const char *config)
 if (!usedIncludes.empty())
   {
   this-Makefile-GetCMakeInstance()-IssueMessage(cmake::LOG,
-Used includes:\n + usedIncludes,
-(*it)-ge-GetBacktrace());
+Used includes for target  + this-Name + :\n
++ usedIncludes, (*it)-ge-GetBacktrace());
   }
 }
   return includes;
diff --git 

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.10.2-1719-g92bd826

2013-01-21 Thread Stephen Kelly
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.

The branch, next has been updated
   via  92bd826c214da93726e7a3186009a2993a7ef327 (commit)
   via  b98d14d40016efee420bee26b9795880fdf6a5f8 (commit)
   via  48a4cf21825c9ed5f53ac25d5f4577baaf92d1f7 (commit)
   via  3ded614e31e9dcc4afa3ee9885dadf830a05dd21 (commit)
  from  f37b5c05380ba73c064885b30311be5f64e4a638 (commit)

Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.

- Log -
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=92bd826c214da93726e7a3186009a2993a7ef327
commit 92bd826c214da93726e7a3186009a2993a7ef327
Merge: f37b5c0 b98d14d
Author: Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com
AuthorDate: Mon Jan 21 06:39:52 2013 -0500
Commit: CMake Topic Stage kwro...@kitware.com
CommitDate: Mon Jan 21 06:39:52 2013 -0500

Merge topic 'disallow-IMPORTED-interface-porcelain' into next

b98d14d Disallow porcelain to populate includes and defines of IMPORTED 
targets.
48a4cf2 Revert Allow target_link_libraries with IMPORTED targets.
3ded614 CMake Nightly Date Stamp

diff --cc Tests/CMakeCommands/target_include_directories/CMakeLists.txt
index 8fa2eae,486bca0..e190161
--- a/Tests/CMakeCommands/target_include_directories/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/Tests/CMakeCommands/target_include_directories/CMakeLists.txt
@@@ -33,19 -30,9 +30,14 @@@ target_include_directories(target_inclu
PUBLIC ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/poison
  )
  target_include_directories(target_include_directories
 -  BEFORE PUBLIC ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/cure
 +  BEFORE PUBLIC 
$$TARGET_DEFINED:target_include_directories:${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/cure
 +)
 +
 +# Has no effect because the target is not defined:
 +target_include_directories(target_include_directories
 +  BEFORE PUBLIC 
$$TARGET_DEFINED:notdefined:${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/poison
  )
  
- add_library(importedlib UNKNOWN IMPORTED)
- target_include_directories(importedlib
-   INTERFACE ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/importedinterfaceinclude
- )
- 
  add_executable(consumer
${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/consumer.cpp
  )

http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=b98d14d40016efee420bee26b9795880fdf6a5f8
commit b98d14d40016efee420bee26b9795880fdf6a5f8
Author: Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com
AuthorDate: Mon Jan 21 12:28:27 2013 +0100
Commit: Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com
CommitDate: Mon Jan 21 12:32:46 2013 +0100

Disallow porcelain to populate includes and defines of IMPORTED targets.

With similar reasoning to the parent commit, as downstreams, we can't
determine what $CONFIG generator expressions would be appropriate.

Upstream would have populated the INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES with
config-specific generator expressions, possibly appropriate for
their DEBUG_CONFIGURATIONS. In theory, if we would add include
directories for a DEBUG intent, we would have to match the upstream
configurations for that.

Rather than attempting to discover the appropriate configurations
at this time, simplify the feature instead. The use of IMPORTED targets
with these commands could still be added in the future if targets
would export their DEBUG_CONFIGURATIONS somehow.

diff --git a/Source/cmTargetCompileDefinitionsCommand.cxx 
b/Source/cmTargetCompileDefinitionsCommand.cxx
index 492a1b7..683eff6 100644
--- a/Source/cmTargetCompileDefinitionsCommand.cxx
+++ b/Source/cmTargetCompileDefinitionsCommand.cxx
@@ -20,13 +20,11 @@ bool cmTargetCompileDefinitionsCommand
 }
 
 void cmTargetCompileDefinitionsCommand
-::HandleImportedTargetInvalidScope(const std::string scope,
-   const std::string tgt)
+::HandleImportedTarget(const std::string tgt)
 {
   cmOStringStream e;
-  e  Cannot specify   scope   compile definitions for imported 
-   target \  tgt  \.  Compile definitions can only be 
-   specified for an imported target in the INTERFACE mode.;
+  e  Cannot specify compile definitions for imported target \
+ tgt  \.;
   this-Makefile-IssueMessage(cmake::FATAL_ERROR, e.str());
 }
 
diff --git a/Source/cmTargetCompileDefinitionsCommand.h 
b/Source/cmTargetCompileDefinitionsCommand.h
index 4b066b7..d49b9e8 100644
--- a/Source/cmTargetCompileDefinitionsCommand.h
+++ b/Source/cmTargetCompileDefinitionsCommand.h
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ public:
   Specify compile definitions or targets to use when compiling a given 
   target.  
   The named target must have been created by a command such as 
-  add_executable or add_library.  
+  add_executable or add_library and must not be an IMPORTED target.  
   The INTERFACE, PUBLIC and PRIVATE keywords are required to specify 
   the scope of the following 

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, master, updated. v2.8.10.2-480-g2db9b0b

2013-01-21 Thread Kitware Robot
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.

The branch, master has been updated
   via  2db9b0b06638ee9386391369823c204ea691576e (commit)
  from  3ded614e31e9dcc4afa3ee9885dadf830a05dd21 (commit)

Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.

- Log -
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=2db9b0b06638ee9386391369823c204ea691576e
commit 2db9b0b06638ee9386391369823c204ea691576e
Author: Kitware Robot kwro...@kitware.com
AuthorDate: Tue Jan 22 00:01:18 2013 -0500
Commit: Kitware Robot kwro...@kitware.com
CommitDate: Tue Jan 22 00:01:18 2013 -0500

CMake Nightly Date Stamp

diff --git a/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake b/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake
index 45fc936..f56e894 100644
--- a/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake
+++ b/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 set(CMake_VERSION_MAJOR 2)
 set(CMake_VERSION_MINOR 8)
 set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 10)
-set(CMake_VERSION_TWEAK 20130121)
+set(CMake_VERSION_TWEAK 20130122)
 #set(CMake_VERSION_RC 1)

---

Summary of changes:
 Source/CMakeVersion.cmake |2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)


hooks/post-receive
-- 
CMake
___
Cmake-commits mailing list
Cmake-commits@cmake.org
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-commits