Re: [CMake] CMake and CURL
Hi Sébastien, On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:23:25 +0200 Sébastien caron sca...@aldebaran-robotics.com wrote: Hello everyone, I am trying to use CURL with a CMakeList file. But the command find_package(CURL) isnt working (it find the FindCURL.cmake file, but not the libraries). You can try debugging it by using MESSAGE(...)s, strace/etc. I have on my system curl, libcurl3, libcurl3-gnutls and libcurl4-openssl-dev. Do you have libcurl4-dev? Regards, Shlomi Fish Should I modify the auto-generated file FindCURL.cmake, to give him the way manually ? Thanks Sebastien Caron -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ Parody of The Fountainhead - http://shlom.in/towtf The apple completely supplanted the tree. — http://www.shlomifish.org/humour/Summerschool-at-the-NSA/ Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Re: [CMake] Bootstrapping CMake
Hi, On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:57:04 -0700 Frerich Raabe ra...@froglogic.com wrote: Hi, one of the projects I'm working on requires that the build system can be bootstrapped, i.e. when unpacking a source tarball you run 'configure' which is actually a shell script which first runs 'make' to build the actual (proprietary) build tool - which has no dependencies other than a C++ compiler and a C++ library - and then it runs the build tool. So even though our software has a significant number of external dependencies (the Qt libraries, for instance), the build tool itself is shipped with the sources, and it builds on a wide range of platforms. Whether this design is sensible or not is a different discussion, I'd rather not get dragged into discussing that. :-) I considered porting this project to CMake, and one of the issues which came up is that it requires customers to install CMake to build from sources - and CMake may (or may not?) be available on all the platforms we would like to support. So the question came up: is it feasible (and legally possible, as far as the license goes) to ship a (subset?) of CMake so that we can build CMake ourselves? Did anybody do this already? It is legally possible because CMake is under the modified BSD licence: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses which is a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permissive_free_software_licence , and allows almost every use. Regards, Shlomi Fish -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ UNIX Fortune Cookies - http://www.shlomifish.org/humour/fortunes/ Selina: Toothpicks? Have you blokes been watching too much Sesame Street? Warrior #1: Why, of course! Every mighty Klingon warrior has watched Sesame Street. — http://www.shlomifish.org/humour/Selina-Mandrake/ Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Re: [CMake] Creating a common (= across several projects) CMake module/include-file/library
Hi Matthew, On Mon, 13 May 2013 18:17:58 -0400 Matthew Woehlke matthew.woeh...@kitware.com wrote: On 2013-05-11 17:22, Shlomi Fish wrote: many of my CMake-based projects carry a common top-level Common.cmake file that I copy from one project to another and enhance, and since this is duplicate code/functionality I would like to consolidate it. What I want to be able to do is say something like: CODE INCLUDE(ShlomifCommon) /CODE at the top, and then have it read from a system wide ShlomifCommon.cmake file that I will maintain in one central location, and install. If you put the file in one of CMake's default module search paths, it should Just Work. And/or if you arrange for your software process to set CMAKE_MODULE_PATH to the location of the same, then again it should Just Work. Thanks! That worked. For redistribution, I would have your project do a list(APPEND) on the same to where the file will exist when building from a distribution source package. In development, just don't have a copy in that location (or you could put one there to override the system copy if for some reason you need to do so). OK. Another option to consider is keeping the file in an external repository and using your VCS's external-repo support to bring it into your other projects. This way the file exists in your source tree, but your VCS is tracking it against a central repository, rather than each project's repo having independent copies. (This will also probably make getting the file into your source packages easier.) OK. For a bonus point, I'd like to have a way to copy this file into every project's tarball so it won't require installation. How do you create tarballs? Using CPack’s make package_source. Regards, Shlomi Fish -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ Why I Love Perl - http://shlom.in/joy-of-perl C++ is complex, complexifying and complexified. (With apologies to the Oxford English Dictionary). Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Re: [CMake] Creating a common (= across several projects) CMake module/include-file/library
Hi Jean-Christophe, On Mon, 13 May 2013 18:27:03 -0400 Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin jchris.filli...@kitware.com wrote: Hi, To download the common file(s) at configure time, you could follow the approach discussed here: http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/is-it-possible-to-download-CMake-modules-at-configure-time-td7583968.html#a7584113 I see, but it's hard to see what to do based on this git commit: https://github.com/commontk/CTK/compare/00694c9f8a0da6ee28fb079902e6a8c3ec428058...891aa5443b110cc7e6aa0ec1339aad4b2c83ef9d Regards, Shlomi Fish Hth Jc On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Matthew Woehlke matthew.woeh...@kitware.com wrote: On 2013-05-11 17:22, Shlomi Fish wrote: many of my CMake-based projects carry a common top-level Common.cmake file that I copy from one project to another and enhance, and since this is duplicate code/functionality I would like to consolidate it. What I want to be able to do is say something like: CODE INCLUDE(ShlomifCommon) /CODE at the top, and then have it read from a system wide ShlomifCommon.cmake file that I will maintain in one central location, and install. If you put the file in one of CMake's default module search paths, it should Just Work. And/or if you arrange for your software process to set CMAKE_MODULE_PATH to the location of the same, then again it should Just Work. For redistribution, I would have your project do a list(APPEND) on the same to where the file will exist when building from a distribution source package. In development, just don't have a copy in that location (or you could put one there to override the system copy if for some reason you need to do so). Another option to consider is keeping the file in an external repository and using your VCS's external-repo support to bring it into your other projects. This way the file exists in your source tree, but your VCS is tracking it against a central repository, rather than each project's repo having independent copies. (This will also probably make getting the file into your source packages easier.) For a bonus point, I'd like to have a way to copy this file into every project's tarball so it won't require installation. How do you create tarballs? -- Matthew -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/** opensource/opensource.htmlhttp://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/**CMake_FAQhttp://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/**listinfo/cmakehttp://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ List of Text Processing Tools - http://shlom.in/text-proc http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evil redirects to XSLT. — http://www.shlomifish.org/humour/bits/facts/XSLT/ Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
[CMake] Creating a common (= across several projects) CMake module/include-file/library
Hi all, many of my CMake-based projects carry a common top-level Common.cmake file that I copy from one project to another and enhance, and since this is duplicate code/functionality I would like to consolidate it. What I want to be able to do is say something like: CODE INCLUDE(ShlomifCommon) /CODE at the top, and then have it read from a system wide ShlomifCommon.cmake file that I will maintain in one central location, and install. For a bonus point, I'd like to have a way to copy this file into every project's tarball so it won't require installation. What would be the best way to achieve this? Regards, Shlomi Fish -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ The Case for File Swapping - http://shlom.in/file-swap There is no IGLU cabal! The former cabalists are trying to prove the correctness of a program that proves the correctness of proofs of other programs. Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Re: [cmake-developers] Request for Comments: Will implementing an interactive CMake debugger be welcome?
Hi Matt, On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 17:06:11 -0700 Matt McCormick matt.mccorm...@kitware.com wrote: Hi Shlomi, I also think this would be a great feature. I started on an implementation here: https://github.com/thewtex/cmakedbg but I have not had time to follow it through. The user interface is written in Python/Cython for fast prototyping purposes, but it could be written all C/C++ if you would like. I believe I got to the point where it was possible to set a breakpoint. I was building against this branch: https://github.com/thewtex/CMake/tree/cmakedbg Great! Thanks for the link. I'll check it out. Overall, I think the approach is fairly solid. When CMake processes a line, it asks a debugger if it is interested. For there, the debugger can pause if a breakpoint is set at that point, let the user print the content of current variables that are defined, ... Since it uses CMake for processing all the code, the debugger will behave exactly the same as a cmake executable. Feel free to take the project and run with it. I'll try to - thanks. Regards, Shlomi Fish Matt -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ Original Riddles - http://www.shlomifish.org/puzzles/ Sisko: Q: would it be OK if my crew brought along their phasers with them? Q: Of course. They can also bring some photon torpedoes if they wish. None of them will work, but I don’t mind them taking them. Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
[cmake-developers] Request for Comments: Will implementing an interactive CMake debugger be welcome?
Hi all, following a discussion we had on ##llvm on irc.oftc.net (the main LLVM channel, because LLVM+clang can be built using CMake), I've been wondering if you would like someone (like me) to implement an interactive debugger (or debugging mode) for cmake invocations, similar to gdb, perl -d, pdb.py, etc.? I saw this thread: http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2009-July/030728.html Where it was recommended to use cmake --trace, and I've been using MESSAGE ( ... ) and MESSAGE (FATAL_ERROR ...) for most of my debugging, but I'm interested in something better. I can try working on it given the time and motivation (in a separate git branch on a GitHub/Bitbucket repository), but I want to get a green light for it, because once introduced, it naturally should be supported in the future (and if I'm going to write it, I am willing to help support it). Regards, Shlomi Fish -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ Parody of The Fountainhead - http://shlom.in/towtf I started out as a BASIC programmer. Some people would say that I’m permanently damaged. Some people are undoubtedly right. — Larry Wall Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
Re: [cmake-developers] CMake 2.8.10 available for download
Hi David, On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 21:45:59 -0400 David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote: On behalf of myself, Ken, Bill, Brad, Alex, Eike, Steve, Eric, Zach, Ben and the rest of the CMake team from all around the world, we are pleased to announce that CMake 2.8.10 is now available for download at: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/?C=M;O=D It is also available from the usual download links found on the CMake web site: http://www.cmake.org/cmake/resources/software.html that's great. Thanks to all the people involved. Regards, Shlomi Fish -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ Apple Inc. is Evil - http://www.shlomifish.org/open-source/anti/apple/ But if you're writing [open source software] for the world, you have to listen to your customers — this doesn't change just because they're not paying you in money. — Eric S. Raymond in The Cathedral and the Bazaar Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
Re: [cmake-developers] CMake 2.8.10-rc3 ready for testing!
Hi David, On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:28:57 -0400 David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote: The following output is what causes the test to fail: 267: # Untracked files: 267: # (use git add file... to include in what will be committed) 267: # 267: # build/ It's just because you're building the code in a sub-directory of the source dir. (Therefore we can't really do a CheckSourceTree test -- the point of the test is to make sure that no previous tests have written anything anywhere underneath the source dir.) You can safely ignore this test failure. To avoid it, build CMake in a sibling directory of the source dir rather than underneath the source dir. HTH, David Thanks, after I did that all tests are successful. Regards, Shlomi Fish -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ My Aphorisms - http://www.shlomifish.org/humour.html There’s no point in keeping an idea to yourself since there’s a 10 to 1 chance that somebody already has it and will share it before you. Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
Re: [cmake-developers] CMake 2.8.10-rc3 ready for testing!
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:16:39 -0400
David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Instead of make test, please run ctest -VV -R CheckSourceTree and
send the output.
It probably just means you have some local mods to your source tree,
or an untracked file is present.
Here you go (the outputs of the ctest command and the ./bin/ctest command
are nearly identical except for a small difference in run times):
[QUOTE]
UpdateCTestConfiguration from
:/home/shlomif/Download/unpack/prog/cmake/cmake/build/DartConfiguration.tcl
Parse Config
file:/home/shlomif/Download/unpack/prog/cmake/cmake/build/DartConfiguration.tcl
Add coverage exclude regular expressions.
Add coverage exclude: XCode
Add coverage exclude: Kdevelop
Add coverage exclude: /Source/(cm|kw)sys/
Add coverage exclude: /CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp/
Add coverage exclude: [A-Za-z]./[Qq]t/qt-.+-opensource-src
UpdateCTestConfiguration from
:/home/shlomif/Download/unpack/prog/cmake/cmake/build/DartConfiguration.tcl
Parse Config
file:/home/shlomif/Download/unpack/prog/cmake/cmake/build/DartConfiguration.tcl
Test project /home/shlomif/Download/unpack/prog/cmake/cmake/build
Constructing a list of tests
Guessing configuration NoConfig
Done constructing a list of tests
Checking test dependency graph...
Checking test dependency graph end
test 267
Start 267: CMake.CheckSourceTree
267: Test command:
/home/shlomif/Download/unpack/prog/cmake/cmake/build/bin/cmake
-DCMake_BINARY_DIR:PATH=/home/shlomif/Download/unpack/prog/cmake/cmake/build
-DCMake_SOURCE_DIR:PATH=/home/shlomif/Download/unpack/prog/cmake/cmake
-DGIT_EXECUTABLE:STRING=/bin/git -DHOME:STRING=/home/shlomif -P
/home/shlomif/Download/unpack/prog/cmake/cmake/build/Tests/CMakeTests/CheckSourceTreeTest.cmake
267: Test timeout computed to be: 1500
267:
=
267: CTEST_FULL_OUTPUT (Avoid ctest truncation of output)
267:
267: CMake_BINARY_DIR='/home/shlomif/Download/unpack/prog/cmake/cmake/build'
267: CMake_SOURCE_DIR='/home/shlomif/Download/unpack/prog/cmake/cmake'
267: GIT_EXECUTABLE='/bin/git'
267: HOME='/home/shlomif'
267: ENV{DASHBOARD_TEST_FROM_CTEST}=''
267:
267: build dir is under source dir
267: src_len='46'
267: bin_len='52'
267: substr_len='47'
267: bin_dir='/home/shlomif/Download/unpack/prog/cmake/cmake/'
267: in_source_build='1'
267:
267: is_git_checkout='1'
267:
267:
=
267: This is a git checkout, using git to verify source tree
267:
267: === output of 'git --version' ===
267: git version 1.8.0
267: === end output ===
267:
267: === output of 'git branch -a' ===
267: * master
267: remotes/origin/HEAD - origin/master
267: remotes/origin/dashboard
267: remotes/origin/hooks
267: remotes/origin/maint
267: remotes/origin/master
267: remotes/origin/next
267: remotes/origin/nightly
267: remotes/origin/nightly-master
267: remotes/origin/release
267: === end output ===
267:
267: === output of 'git log -1' ===
267: commit f551fa62450379b41b510054948e097582538357
267: Author: Kitware Robot kwro...@kitware.com
267: Date: Wed Oct 24 00:01:07 2012 -0400
267:
267: CMake Nightly Date Stamp
267: === end output ===
267:
267: Copy/paste this command to reproduce:
267: cd /home/shlomif/Download/unpack/prog/cmake/cmake /bin/git status
267:
267: Results of running /bin/git;status
267: rv='0'
267: ov='# On branch master
267: # Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 533 commits.
267: #
267: # Untracked files:
267: # (use git add file... to include in what will be committed)
267: #
267: # build/
267: nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use git add to
track)
267: '
267: ev=''
267:
267: '# On branch masterE'
267: '# Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 533 commits.E'
267: '#E'
267: '# Untracked files:E'
267:locally non-added file/directory detected...
267: '# (use git add file... to include in what will be committed)E'
267: '#E'
267: '# build/E'
267: 'nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use git add to
track)E'
267:
=
267: additions='0'
267: conflicts='0'
267: modifications='0'
267: nonadditions='1'
267:
267:
=
267: interactive test run
267:
267: CMake Error at CheckSourceTreeTest.cmake:345 (message):
267: test fails: local source tree non-additions: use git add before
committing,
267: or remove the files from the source tree
267:
267:
1/1 Test #267: CMake.CheckSourceTree ***Failed0.04 sec
0% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 1
Total Test time (real) = 0.94 sec
The following tests FAILED:
267 - CMake.CheckSourceTree (Failed)
Errors while running CTest
[/QUOTE]
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
--
-
Shlomi Fish
Re: [cmake-developers] CMake 2.8.10-rc3 ready for testing!
Hi all, thanks for your work on CMake. On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:39:07 -0400 David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote: The CMake 2.8.10 release candidate stream continues! This is the last RC unless somebody finds a critical, must-fix issue with it. You can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/?C=M;O=D This email is also available as blog posts: http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/406 http://cmake.blogspot.com/2012/10/cmake-2810-rc3-ready-for-testing.html Some of the notable changes in this release are: OK, I did cmake .. ; make ; make test on the latest git source, and I got this: 99% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 267 Label Time Summary: Label1= 0.06 sec Label2= 0.06 sec Total Test time (real) = 619.32 sec The following tests FAILED: 267 - CMake.CheckSourceTree (Failed) Errors while running CTest make: *** [test] Error 8 Regards, Shlomi Fish -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ My Favourite FOSS - http://www.shlomifish.org/open-source/favourite/ That's why I feed my leprechaun every day — because there are not enough phonemes in Navajo to tell him to get his act together and find a job. — My comment on http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izne8XcaBBg . Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
Re: [cmake-developers] Ninja: files per second
Hi Peter, On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 14:03:48 +0200 Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net wrote: On 28.07.2012 11:43, Shlomi Fish wrote: Nice. I was now able to get the Freecell Solver test suite to pass with ninja test, but there is one problem: when I run ninja -vv test, then ninja displays the line [1/1] cd /home/shlomif/progs/freecell/git/fc-solve/fc-solve/source/n perl /home/shlomif/progs/freecell/git/fc-solve/fc-solve/source/run-tests.pl and then it waits for the entire test suite to run, and only then displays its output. This is frustrating because I want to see the output while the test suite is running. Is there anyway to do it like that? No, this is by design, ninja collects the whole output so it is not interweaved with the output of other processes. Peter Well, when I run ninja test, then eventually there's only one process running and this it the test harness (for which I don't want to wait to finish to view intermediate output). Can you consider integrating Nicolas’ solution from: http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake-developers/2012-July/004701.html Regards, Shlomi Fish -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ First stop for Perl beginners - http://perl-begin.org/ English spelling aims to be consistent. Publicly and methodically. Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
Re: [cmake-developers] Ninja: files per second
Hi Peter, thanks for your work on Ninja. On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 10:57:44 +0200 Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net wrote: I've added a nice feature to ninja which is now upstream: By setting the environment variable NINJA_STATUS bash: export NINJA_STATUS=[%s/%t %o(%c)/s] cmd.exe (with space at the end): set NINJA_STATUS=[%s/%t %o(%c)/s] Ninja prints the overall processed files per second and the the current rate of files per second (averaged over the last -j files). For instance compiling cmake I get (-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release): - Linux gcc 4.6: [397/397 6.6(12)/s] - Windows gcc 4.7: [438/438 5.9(11)/s] - Mac gcc 4.2: [462/462 4.9(3)/s] Nice. I was now able to get the Freecell Solver test suite to pass with ninja test, but there is one problem: when I run ninja -vv test, then ninja displays the line [1/1] cd /home/shlomif/progs/freecell/git/fc-solve/fc-solve/source/n perl /home/shlomif/progs/freecell/git/fc-solve/fc-solve/source/run-tests.pl and then it waits for the entire test suite to run, and only then displays its output. This is frustrating because I want to see the output while the test suite is running. Is there anyway to do it like that? Regards, Shlomi Fish See also https://github.com/martine/ninja/blob/master/doc/manual.asciidoc#environment-variables Happy benchmarking, Peter -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ List of Portability Libraries - http://shlom.in/port-libs * Backward compatibility is your worst enemy. * Backward compatibility is your users’ best friend. Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
Re: [CMake] [cmake-developers] Ninja: files per second
Hi Peter, thanks for your work on Ninja. On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 10:57:44 +0200 Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net wrote: I've added a nice feature to ninja which is now upstream: By setting the environment variable NINJA_STATUS bash: export NINJA_STATUS=[%s/%t %o(%c)/s] cmd.exe (with space at the end): set NINJA_STATUS=[%s/%t %o(%c)/s] Ninja prints the overall processed files per second and the the current rate of files per second (averaged over the last -j files). For instance compiling cmake I get (-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release): - Linux gcc 4.6: [397/397 6.6(12)/s] - Windows gcc 4.7: [438/438 5.9(11)/s] - Mac gcc 4.2: [462/462 4.9(3)/s] Nice. I was now able to get the Freecell Solver test suite to pass with ninja test, but there is one problem: when I run ninja -vv test, then ninja displays the line [1/1] cd /home/shlomif/progs/freecell/git/fc-solve/fc-solve/source/n perl /home/shlomif/progs/freecell/git/fc-solve/fc-solve/source/run-tests.pl and then it waits for the entire test suite to run, and only then displays its output. This is frustrating because I want to see the output while the test suite is running. Is there anyway to do it like that? Regards, Shlomi Fish See also https://github.com/martine/ninja/blob/master/doc/manual.asciidoc#environment-variables Happy benchmarking, Peter -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ List of Portability Libraries - http://shlom.in/port-libs * Backward compatibility is your worst enemy. * Backward compatibility is your users’ best friend. Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Re: [cmake-developers] CMake 2.8.9-rc2 ready for testing!
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 09:11:49 -0400 Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote: On 07/17/2012 05:41 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote: The following tests FAILED: 182 - BootstrapTest (Failed) 198 - CMakeOnly.AllFindModules (Failed) Thanks for testing. Please run the tests like this: $ bin/ctest -R '(BootstrapTest|AllFindModules)' -V to see verbose output so we know why they failed. The output of that command is attached to this message after compressed with xz. Regards, Shlomi Fish -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ Star Trek: We, the Living Dead - http://shlom.in/st-wtld You name it — COBOL does not have it. Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . ctest.output.txt.xz Description: application/xz -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
Re: [cmake-developers] BootstrapTest on Mageia (was: CMake 2.8.9-rc2 ready for testing!)
Hi Brad, On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:49:15 -0400 Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote: On 07/17/2012 10:20 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote: The output of that command is attached to this message after compressed with xz. The output contains CMake 2^M .8^M .9^M .0^M , Copyright 2000-2011 Kitware, Inc. and later .../build/Tests/BootstrapTest/Bootstrap.cmk/cmConfigure.h:27:24: warning: missing terminating character [enabled by default] .../build/Tests/BootstrapTest/Bootstrap.cmk/cmConfigure.h:29:1: warning: missing terminating character [enabled by default] .../build/Tests/BootstrapTest/Bootstrap.cmk/cmConfigure.h:29:1: error: missing terminating character Did you extract the source from the .zip file or some other way that leads to CRLF newlines? What I did was: tar -xvf cmake-2.8.9-rc2-1-src.tar.bz2 And then: tar -xvf cmake-2.8.9-rc2.tar.bz2. Regards, Shlomi Fish -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ List of Portability Libraries - http://shlom.in/port-libs Q: I’ll be about 6.5 milliard Terran years next September. — Star Trek, “We, the Living Dead” by Shlomi Fish Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
Re: [cmake-developers] FindJasper version in AllFindModules test (was: CMake 2.8.9-rc2 ready for testing!)
Hi, On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:38:58 -0400 Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote: On 07/17/2012 05:41 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote: With cmake-2.8.9-rc2 on Mageia Linux Cauldron (see https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Cauldron ) I am getting: [snip] On 07/17/2012 10:20 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote: $ bin/ctest -R '(BootstrapTest|AllFindModules)' -V The output of that command is attached to this message after compressed with xz. The AllFindModules test fails with: --Checking FindJasper -- Found Jasper: /usr/lib64/libjasper.so -- JASPER_VERSION_STRING='' CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:53 (message): unexpected: JASPER_VERSION_STRING does not begin with a decimal digit Call Stack (most recent call first): CMakeLists.txt:75 (check_version_string) CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:56 (message): unexpected: JASPER_VERSION_STRING is empty Call Stack (most recent call first): CMakeLists.txt:75 (check_version_string) CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:59 (message): unexpected: JASPER_VERSION_STRING is VERSION_EQUAL 0 Call Stack (most recent call first): CMakeLists.txt:75 (check_version_string) CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:62 (message): unexpected: JASPER_VERSION_STRING is NOT VERSION_GREATER 0 Call Stack (most recent call first): CMakeLists.txt:75 (check_version_string) Shlomi, what version of Jasper is installed? Does jasper/jas_config.h have a JAS_VERSION macro? shlomif@telaviv1:~$ rpm -qa '*jasper*' lib64jasper-devel-1.900.1-13.mga2 lib64jasper1-1.900.1-13.mga2 shlomif@telaviv1:~$ rpm -ql lib64jasper-devel | xargs grep JAS_VERSION grep: /usr/include/jasper: Is a directory /usr/include/jasper/jas_version.h:#ifndef JAS_VERSION_H /usr/include/jasper/jas_version.h:#define JAS_VERSION_H /usr/include/jasper/jas_version.h:#if !defined(JAS_VERSION) /usr/include/jasper/jas_version.h:#define JAS_VERSION unknown /usr/include/jasper/jas_version.h: returned by this function may not necessarily correspond to JAS_VERSION. */ grep: /usr/include/multiarch-x86_64-linux/jasper: Is a directory /usr/include/multiarch-x86_64-linux/jasper/jas_config.h:#define JAS_VERSION 1.900.1 /usr/include/multiarch-x86_64-linux/jasper/jas_config.h:#define JAS_VERSION 1.900.1 grep: /usr/share/doc/lib64jasper-devel: Is a directory hope it helps. /usr/include/jasper/jas_config.h just contains this: #define _MULTIARCH_HEADER jasper/jas_config.h #include multiarch-dispatch.h Regards, Shlomi Fish Eike, other questions/ideas? -Brad -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ Freecell Solver - http://fc-solve.shlomifish.org/ “Interesting” has a negative correlation with “successful”. — Anno on Freenode's #perl Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
Re: [cmake-developers] BootstrapTest v. CRLF newlines
Hello David, On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:49:43 -0400 David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote: On 07/17/2012 11:12 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote: What I did was: tar -xvf cmake-2.8.9-rc2-1-src.tar.bz2 And then: tar -xvf cmake-2.8.9-rc2.tar.bz2. The original source tarball is here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/cmake-2.8.9-rc2.tar.gz Please try that one. Dave, what produces the -src package and why are we distributing it? -Brad The -1-src package is the cygwin source package. Not intended for use outside of a cygwin installation. Well, it is titled confusingly. Can it be moved to under a cygwin sub-directory or contain cygwin in its file name? Regards, Shlomi Fish -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ Chuck Norris/etc. Facts - http://www.shlomifish.org/humour/bits/facts/ Chuck Norris wrote a complete Perl 6 implementation in a day, but then destroyed all evidence with his bare hands, so no‐one will know his secrets. Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
[CMake] Why does make pdfs build all targets and then warns on cannot build TODO_pdf?
Hi all! In: https://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/fc-solve/branches/online-documents- unification-into-markup-lang/fc-solve/source/ (short URL - http://xrl.us/bffnp2 ) After I do cmake ., I'm getting: shlomi:$trunk/fc-solve/source$ make pdfs [ 14%] Built target README_pdf [ 28%] Built target AUTHORS_pdf [ 42%] Built target COPYING_pdf [ 57%] Built target HACKING_pdf [ 71%] Built target INSTALL_pdf [ 85%] Built target USAGE_pdf [100%] Built target TODO_pdf make[3]: *** No rule to make target `TODO_pdf', needed by `CMakeFiles/pdfs'. Stop. make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/pdfs.dir/all] Error 2 make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/pdfs.dir/rule] Error 2 make: *** [pdfs] Error 2 I'm on Linux (Mandriva Linux Cooker), using cmake-2.6.4-3mdv2010.0.src.rpm . Regards, Shlomi Fish -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ What does Zionism mean? - http://shlom.in/def-zionism God gave us two eyes and ten fingers so we will type five times as much as we read. ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Re: [CMake] How to make sure make test depends on make all
On Thursday 25 June 2009 10:35:30 Marcel Loose wrote:
Hi Shlomi,
If you want to RUN the tests as part of 'make all', I think you're out
of luck.
No, I don't want that. What I do want is to that make test (or alternatively
make check) to depend on make all and run it automatically before starting
the tests.
In the method I proposed, you can use 'make check', which will
build all the test programs and run them. If all your sources have
associated test programs, this will effectively build all your source
code as well!
For this to work, you should use:
- add_custom_target(check COMMAND ${CMAKE_CTEST_COMMAND}) (only ONCE!)
- The following triad (for each test program):
- add_executable(${name} srcs...)
- add_test(${name} ${name})
- add_dependencies(check ${name})
This seems like it would build build a few executables and then run them as
tests. My test, on the other hand, is a Perl program that runs a few TAP
scripts (see http://testanything.org/ ) and depends on the normal executables
(that may later get installed or run from ./) to work. So I need a dependency
for make all on make check/make test.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 15:04 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Hi Marcel!
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 13:03:25 Marcel Loose wrote:
Hi Shlomi
You might consider using another target, say 'check'. I've used that to
mimic more or less the GNU autotools behaviour. See
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMakeEmulateMakeCheck. Don't use
EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL if you want your test programs to depend on the target
'all'.
Tried it and it didn't work. I still couldn't get it to run the all
target by default (i.e: depend on it). The EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL specifies
whether check will be built as part of all - not vice versa.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Heden hugohe...@gmail.com
To: Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il
Cc: Cmake Mailing List cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] How to make sure make test depends on make all
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:57:16 +0200
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il
wrote:
Hi all!
I'm using cmake-2.6.4-3mdv2010.0 on Mandriva Linux Cooker, and
ran into a
problem. I want make test (which is a custom target) to
depend on make
all, in this codebase:
I can't say that I understand the error messages you're getting, but it
is unfortunately *not* possible to make built-in targets like test,
all and install depend on each other. See for example this bug:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=8438
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
--
-
Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/
Star Trek: We, the Living Dead - http://xrl.us/omqz4
God gave us two eyes and ten fingers so we will type five times as much as we
read.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Re: [CMake] How to make sure make test depends on make all
Hi Marcel!
On Thursday 25 June 2009 13:30:53 Marcel Loose wrote:
Hi Shlomi,
It's not completely clear to me how you'd normally run a test. Is that
something like:
$ tap mytest-prog
If so, you could do 'add_test(${name} tap ${name})
No, the TAP harness is written in Perl and I just run perl run-tests.pl to
run all the TAP tests and report the results. Some tests are written in Perl ,
and some are written in C, and they all output results in the TAP format that
are processed by the harness.
What I want is that make check will run make all before running the test
harness.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 12:45 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Thursday 25 June 2009 10:35:30 Marcel Loose wrote:
Hi Shlomi,
If you want to RUN the tests as part of 'make all', I think you're out
of luck.
No, I don't want that. What I do want is to that make test (or
alternatively make check) to depend on make all and run it
automatically before starting the tests.
In the method I proposed, you can use 'make check', which will
build all the test programs and run them. If all your sources have
associated test programs, this will effectively build all your source
code as well!
For this to work, you should use:
- add_custom_target(check COMMAND ${CMAKE_CTEST_COMMAND}) (only ONCE!)
- The following triad (for each test program):
- add_executable(${name} srcs...)
- add_test(${name} ${name})
- add_dependencies(check ${name})
This seems like it would build build a few executables and then run them
as tests. My test, on the other hand, is a Perl program that runs a few
TAP scripts (see http://testanything.org/ ) and depends on the normal
executables (that may later get installed or run from ./) to work. So I
need a dependency for make all on make check/make test.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 15:04 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Hi Marcel!
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 13:03:25 Marcel Loose wrote:
Hi Shlomi
You might consider using another target, say 'check'. I've used
that to mimic more or less the GNU autotools behaviour. See
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMakeEmulateMakeCheck. Don't use
EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL if you want your test programs to depend on the
target 'all'.
Tried it and it didn't work. I still couldn't get it to run the all
target by default (i.e: depend on it). The EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL specifies
whether check will be built as part of all - not vice versa.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Heden hugohe...@gmail.com
To: Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il
Cc: Cmake Mailing List cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] How to make sure make test depends on make
all Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:57:16 +0200
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il
wrote:
Hi all!
I'm using cmake-2.6.4-3mdv2010.0 on Mandriva Linux Cooker,
and ran into a
problem. I want make test (which is a custom target) to
depend on make
all, in this codebase:
I can't say that I understand the error messages you're getting,
but it is unfortunately *not* possible to make built-in targets
like test, all and install depend on each other. See for
example this bug:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=8438
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
--
-
Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/
http://www.shlomifish.org/humour/ways_to_do_it.html
God gave us two eyes and ten fingers so we will type five times as much as we
read.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Re: [CMake] How to make sure make test depends on make all
On Thursday 25 June 2009 14:50:39 Marcel Loose wrote:
Hi Shlomi,
As you already found out the hard way, it is not possible to let the
target 'all' depend on, e.g., 'test'. Targets like 'all' and 'test' are
special to CMake.
OK. I want check or test to depend on all - not vice versa.
How does run-tests.pl know which tests to run? Does it read some kind of
configuration file?
No, I'm just globbing all files that match a certain pattern:
{{{
my $tests_glob = *.{exe,t};
[and later]
# Put the valgrind test last because it takes a long time.
my @tests =
sort
{
(($a =~ /valgrind/) = ($b =~ /valgrind/))
||
($a cmp $b)
}
glob(t/$tests_glob)
;
}}}
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
--
-
Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/
Funny Anti-Terrorism Story - http://xrl.us/bjn7t
God gave us two eyes and ten fingers so we will type five times as much as we
read.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Re: [CMake] How to make sure make test depends on make all
On Thursday 25 June 2009 19:00:11 Tyler Roscoe wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 04:58:46PM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Thursday 25 June 2009 14:50:39 Marcel Loose wrote:
As you already found out the hard way, it is not possible to let the
target 'all' depend on, e.g., 'test'. Targets like 'all' and 'test' are
special to CMake.
OK. I want check or test to depend on all - not vice versa.
The best way I can think of is to collect all the targets that are run
when you do make all into ${all_targets} and then do:
add_dependencies (check ${all_targets})
Yes, I've thought about it too. More work and somewhat more complicated logic,
but it may be worth it.
Or I can try fixing the CMake bug at the source.
Thanks!
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
hth,
tyler
--
-
Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/
The Case for File Swapping - http://xrl.us/bjn7i
God gave us two eyes and ten fingers so we will type five times as much as we
read.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Re: [CMake] How to make sure make test depends on make all
Hi Marcel! On Tuesday 23 June 2009 13:03:25 Marcel Loose wrote: Hi Shlomi You might consider using another target, say 'check'. I've used that to mimic more or less the GNU autotools behaviour. See http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMakeEmulateMakeCheck. Don't use EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL if you want your test programs to depend on the target 'all'. Tried it and it didn't work. I still couldn't get it to run the all target by default (i.e: depend on it). The EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL specifies whether check will be built as part of all - not vice versa. Regards, Shlomi Fish Best regards, Marcel Loose. -Original Message- From: Hugo Heden hugohe...@gmail.com To: Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il Cc: Cmake Mailing List cmake@cmake.org Subject: Re: [CMake] How to make sure make test depends on make all Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:57:16 +0200 On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il wrote: Hi all! I'm using cmake-2.6.4-3mdv2010.0 on Mandriva Linux Cooker, and ran into a problem. I want make test (which is a custom target) to depend on make all, in this codebase: I can't say that I understand the error messages you're getting, but it is unfortunately *not* possible to make built-in targets like test, all and install depend on each other. See for example this bug: http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=8438 ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ Stop Using MSIE - http://www.shlomifish.org/no-ie/ God gave us two eyes and ten fingers so we will type five times as much as we read. ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Re: [CMake] How to make sure make test depends on make all
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 11:57:16 Hugo Heden wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il wrote: Hi all! I'm using cmake-2.6.4-3mdv2010.0 on Mandriva Linux Cooker, and ran into a problem. I want make test (which is a custom target) to depend on make all, in this codebase: http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/fc-solve/trunk/fc-solve/source/ I can't say that I understand the error messages you're getting, but it is unfortunately *not* possible to make built-in targets like test, all and install depend on each other. See for example this bug: http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=8438 Interesting. Is this a bug or a (mis-)feature? If I work on it and contribute a patch that will fix it, will it be accepted? Regards, Shlomi Fish -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ Rethinking CPAN - http://xrl.us/bjn7p God gave us two eyes and ten fingers so we will type five times as much as we read. ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
[CMake] How to make sure make test depends on make all
Hi all!
I'm using cmake-2.6.4-3mdv2010.0 on Mandriva Linux Cooker, and ran into a
problem. I want make test (which is a custom target) to depend on make
all, in this codebase:
http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/fc-solve/trunk/fc-solve/source/
I have this code:
{{{
ADD_CUSTOM_TARGET(
test
perl run-tests.pl
)
ADD_DEPENDENCIES(
test
all
)
}}}
However, doing make test after make clean results in:
{{{
shlomi:$trunk/fc-solve/source$ make clean
shlomi:$trunk/fc-solve/source$ make test
[ 25%] Generating card-test-parse.c
[ 50%] Building C object t/CMakeFiles/t/card-test-parse.exe.dir/card-test-
parse.c.o
Linking C executable t/card-test-parse.exe
[ 50%] Built target t/card-test-parse.exe
[ 75%] Building C object t/CMakeFiles/t/card-test-render.exe.dir/card-test-
render.c.o
Linking C executable t/card-test-render.exe
[100%] Built target t/card-test-render.exe
FCS_PATH = /home/shlomi/progs/freecell/trunk/fc-solve/source
t/board-gen.ok
t/build-process.skipped
all skipped: Skipping because FCS_TEST_BUILD is not set
t/card-test-parse...ok
t/card-test-render..ok
t/compare-digests-and-lens..sh:
/home/shlomi/progs/freecell/trunk/fc-solve/source/fc-solve: No such file or
directory
close failed in file object destructor:
Error in sys.excepthook:
Original exception was:
t/compare-digests-and-lens..NOK 1
# Failed test 'Verifying the solution of deal \#24'
# at t/compare-digests-and-lens.t line 101.
# Expected Digest:
ef0fd5fb21649c349a8283553c83502ba831a9cf765f4372bff9243bf399fc15
# Got Digest: e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855
# Expected Len: 32193
# Got Len: 0
sh: /home/shlomi/progs/freecell/trunk/fc-solve/source/fc-solve: No such file
or directory
close failed in file object destructor:
Error in sys.excepthook:
}}}
As you can see - the binaries themselves were not built.
How can I solve this problem?
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
--
-
Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/
What does Zionism mean? - http://xrl.us/bjn8u
God gave us two eyes and ten fingers so we will type five times as much as we
read.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
[CMake] Win2 NSIS Installer says CMake . Setup instead of Program Name
Hi all, when trying to build the source in this directory: http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/fc-solve/trunk/fc-solve/source/ using CMake-2.6.3/CPack/NSIS and make package on Win32, the package is built successfully, but the installed says CMake . Setup as the title and Welcome to CMake . Setup. I think I've covered all the relevant NSIS variables. Here is a screenshot: http://www.shlomifish.org/Files/files/cmake-installer.png Have I run into this bug: http://public.kitware.com/Bug/print_bug_page.php?bug_id=8682 When will it be fixed? Regards, Shlomi Fish -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ What Makes Software Apps High Quality - http://xrl.us/bkeuk God gave us two eyes and ten fingers so we will type five times as much as we read. ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
[CMake] Emulating libtool's -version-info with CMake?
Hi all! I have a .so library (for Unix/Windows) that I maintain several versions of. I'd like to have a symbolic links structure similar to libtool's -version-info : http://www.ensta.fr/~diam/dev/online/autoconf/autobook/autobook_91.html The problem is that when doing ADD_LIBRARY, the resultant .so is just .so with no versions inside. How can I emulate the behaviour of libtool in this regard using CMake? Regards, Shlomi Fish -- - Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ The Case for File Swapping - http://xrl.us/bjn7i Shlomi, so what are you working on? Working on a new wiki about unit testing fortunes in freecell? -- Ran Eilam ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
