Re: [cmake-developers] Productbuild CPack generator

2016-06-06 Thread clinton 

On Jun 6, 2016 7:28 AM, Brad King  wrote:
>
> On 06/02/2016 12:03 PM, clin...@elemtech.com wrote: 
> > I have submitted a productbuild generator this morning. 
>
> Clinton, I see you followed up with some fixups to the topic and have 
> now squashed it down.  I've extended the revised topic with release notes: 
>
> Help: Add notes for 'productbuild' topic 
> https://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=63e5eb5f 
>
> Is the topic ready for 'master' now? 
Yes, I think it's ready.
Thanks,
Clint

-- 

Powered by www.kitware.com

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

Re: [cmake-developers] Productbuild CPack generator

2016-06-06 Thread Brad King 
On 06/05/2016 04:20 PM, Roman Wüger wrote:
> Is it in CMake 3.6.x?

No, this is brand new post-3.6 development.

-Brad

-- 

Powered by www.kitware.com

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

Re: [cmake-developers] Productbuild CPack generator

2016-06-06 Thread Brad King 
On 06/02/2016 12:03 PM, clin...@elemtech.com wrote:
> I have submitted a productbuild generator this morning.

Clinton, I see you followed up with some fixups to the topic and have
now squashed it down.  I've extended the revised topic with release notes:

 Help: Add notes for 'productbuild' topic
 https://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=63e5eb5f

Is the topic ready for 'master' now?

Thanks,
-Brad

-- 

Powered by www.kitware.com

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

Re: [cmake-developers] Productbuild CPack generator

2016-06-05 Thread Roman Wüger 
Is it in CMake 3.6.x?

Regards
Roman

> Am 02.06.2016 um 18:03 schrieb clin...@elemtech.com:
> 
> Hi Harry,
> 
> I have submitted a productbuild generator this morning.
> https://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commit;h=b746bd5c
> 
> Its capabilities should be about equal to the PackageMaker generator.  The 
> code for distribution.xml is shared between PackageMaker and productbuild.
> The preflight/postflight script support should be better with this new 
> generator than with PackageMaker.
> 
> Please do help with testing and development.
> 
> From your other email with suggestions, I have implemented the --version 
> parameter for pkgbuild and product build, and fixed finding the pkgutil and 
> productbuild exectuables.
> 
> I tried a user controlled setting for --install-location but ran into some 
> difficulty getting cmCPackGenerator to cooperate.
> I decided to leave --install-location as '/' and do not see any negative 
> effects of that.  That can be revisited, of course.
> 
> Does anyone here know if we have test coverage already for some cpack 
> generators where we create a package, then unpack it to verify the results?
> 
> Clint
> 
> - On Jun 2, 2016, at 6:21 AM, Harry Mallon  wrote:
> I found this on the other mailing list but it isn't getting much love. Is 
> anyone out there who can tell me how far from being merged in it is? It would 
> really reduce the hackery in our cmake scripts here and I am happy to 
> contribute to it's testing and development if I get some time.
> http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake/2016-May/063493.html
> 
> Harry
> Harry Mallon
> CODEX | Software Engineer
> 
> 60 Poland Street | London | England | W1F 7NT
> E ha...@codexdigital.com | T +44 203 7000 989 
> Website | Facebook | Twitter
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> 
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
> 
> Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
> information on each offering, please visit:
> 
> CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
> CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
> CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
> -- 
> 
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> 
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
> 
> Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
> information on each offering, please visit:
> 
> CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
> CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
> CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
-- 

Powered by www.kitware.com

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

Re: [cmake-developers] Productbuild CPack generator

2016-06-03 Thread Domen Vrankar 
> Does anyone here know if we have test coverage already for some cpack
> generators where we create a package, then unpack it to verify the results?
>

Tests/CPackComponentsDEB (Deb), Tests/CPackComponentsForAll (RPM) and tests
in Tests/RunCMake/CPack (at the moment Deb, RPM, TGZ) all verify content of
generated packages.

I intended for Tests/RunCMake/CPack to be the location of all tests for
CPack generated packages that can be verified with command line tools in a
way that you specify the type of test and if other generators have the same
capabilities they should use the same test with additional generator
specific variables in a separate file.
Unfortunately atm there are still some issues with those tests with the
most annoying being the verbosity because of:
- test should automatically cover different packaging styles [monolithic,
components, ...],
- for most tests files count and content should be the same with each
generator's Helpers.cmake providing the format (at the moment each test has
to provide special ExpectedFiles cmake script so it's too complicated to
write tests)

It's on my TODO list to extend Tests/RunCMake/CPack so hopefully I'll get
to it in the following week or two.
If you'd like to add your tests to it there is a README.txt file there that
explains how it works and how to add your own tests to it.

Regards,
Domen
-- 

Powered by www.kitware.com

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

Re: [cmake-developers] Productbuild CPack generator

2016-06-02 Thread clinton 
Hi Harry, 

I have submitted a productbuild generator this morning. 
https://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commit;h=b746bd5c 

Its capabilities should be about equal to the PackageMaker generator. The code 
for distribution.xml is shared between PackageMaker and productbuild. 
The preflight/postflight script support should be better with this new 
generator than with PackageMaker. 

Please do help with testing and development. 

>From your other email with suggestions, I have implemented the --version 
>parameter for pkgbuild and product build, and fixed finding the pkgutil and 
>productbuild exectuables. 

I tried a user controlled setting for --install-location but ran into some 
difficulty getting cmCPackGenerator to cooperate. 
I decided to leave --install-location as '/' and do not see any negative 
effects of that. That can be revisited, of course. 

Does anyone here know if we have test coverage already for some cpack 
generators where we create a package, then unpack it to verify the results? 

Clint 

- On Jun 2, 2016, at 6:21 AM, Harry Mallon  wrote: 

> I found this on the other mailing list but it isn't getting much love. Is 
> anyone
> out there who can tell me how far from being merged in it is? It would really
> reduce the hackery in our cmake scripts here and I am happy to contribute to
> it's testing and development if I get some time.
> http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake/2016-May/063493.html

> Harry

> Harry Mallon

> CODEX | Software Engineer

> 60 Poland Street | London | England | W1F 7NT

> E ha...@codexdigital.com | T +44 203 7000 989

> Website | Facebook | Twitter

> --

> Powered by www.kitware.com

> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

> Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
> information on each offering, please visit:

> CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
> CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
> CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
-- 

Powered by www.kitware.com

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers