Re: [Cocci] Data exchange over network interfaces by SmPL scripts

2019-04-27 Thread Markus Elfring
> connecting
…
>   File "", line 35, in store_statements
> socket.gaierror: [Errno -2] Name or service not known
> Error in Python script, line 56, file …

It seems that the attached adjusted data processing approach can produce
an usable analysis result.

elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/janitor> time /usr/bin/python3 
list_duplicate_statement_pairs_from_if_branches-server4.py
statement1|statement2|"function name"|"source file"|incidence
dprintk ( "%s: readreg error (reg == 0x%02x, ret == %i)\n" , __func__ , reg , 
ret ) ;|return - 1 
;|stv0297_readreg|/home/elfring/Projekte/Linux/next-patched/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv0297.c|3
dprintk ( "%s: readreg error (reg == 0x%02x, ret == %i)\n" , __func__ , reg1 , 
ret ) ;|return - 1 
;|stv0297_readregs|/home/elfring/Projekte/Linux/next-patched/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv0297.c|3

real0m1,044s
user0m0,389s
sys 0m0,055s


Unfortunately, I observed during a few runs on my test system
that the displayed record sets can vary. Thus I guess that this approach
(which works together with Python multi-threading functionality) will need
further software adjustments.
Would you like to add any advices here?

Regards,
Markus
import threading, socket, socketserver, struct, subprocess
inputs = []

def receive_data(s, n):
d = b''

while len(d) < n:
p = s.recv(n - len(d))
if not p:
   return None

d += p

return d

def receive_message(s):
expect = receive_data(s, 4)
if not expect:
   return None

return receive_data(s, struct.unpack(">I", expect)[0])

class threaded_TCP_request_handler(socketserver.BaseRequestHandler):
def handle(self):
data = receive_message(self.request)
if data:
   inputs.append(data.decode())

class threaded_TCP_server(socketserver.ThreadingMixIn, socketserver.TCPServer):
pass

if __name__ == "__main__":
server = threaded_TCP_server(("localhost", 1234), threaded_TCP_request_handler)
with server:
ip, port = server.server_address
server_thread = threading.Thread(target = server.serve_forever)
server_thread.daemon = True
server_thread.start()
cp = subprocess.run(["/usr/local/bin/spatch",
 "--timeout",
 "9",
 "--python",
 "/usr/bin/python3",
 "-D",
 "server_id=" + str(ip),
 "-D",
 "server_port=" + str(port),
 "/home/elfring/Projekte/Coccinelle/janitor/list_duplicate_statement_pairs_from_if_branches-client3.cocci",
 "/home/elfring/Projekte/Linux/next-patched/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv0297.c"],
capture_output = True, text = True)
server.shutdown()
import sys

if cp.returncode:
   sys.stderr.write("%s\n===\nexit code: %d" % (cp.stderr, cp.returncode))
else:
   if len(inputs) > 0:
  def report():
 mapping = {}

 def insert(x):
"""Add data to an internal table."""
key = x["name"], x["file"], x["line"], x["column"]
if key in mapping:
   sys.stderr.write("""A duplicate key was passed.
function: %s
file: %s
line: %s
column: %d
""" % key)
   raise RuntimeError
else:
   mapping[key] = x["s1"], x["s2"]

 def data_import():
import json
for k in inputs:
   for v in json.loads(k):
  insert(v)

 data_import()
 from collections import Counter
 counts = Counter()

 for k, v in mapping.items():
counts[(v[0], v[1], k[0], k[1])] += 1

 delimiter = "|"
 duplicates = {}

 for k, v in counts.items():
if v > 1:
   duplicates[k] = v

 if len(duplicates.keys()) > 0:
sys.stdout.write(delimiter.join(["statement1",
 "statement2",
 '"function name"',
 '"source file"',
 "incidence"])
 + "\r\n")

for k, v in duplicates.items():
   sys.stdout.write(delimiter.join([k[0], k[1], k[2], k[3], str(v)])
+ "\r\n")
 else:
sys.stderr.write("Duplicate statements were not determined"
 " from the following records.\n"
 

Re: [Cocci] Data exchange over network interfaces by SmPL scripts

2019-04-27 Thread Markus Elfring
>   File "", line 35, in store_statements
> socket.gaierror: [Errno -2] Name or service not known
> Error in Python script, line 56, file …

It seems that the attached adjusted data processing approach can produce
an usable analysis result.

elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/janitor> time /usr/bin/python3 
list_duplicate_statement_pairs_from_if_branches-server4.py
statement1|statement2|"function name"|"source file"|incidence
dprintk ( "%s: readreg error (reg == 0x%02x, ret == %i)\n" , __func__ , reg , 
ret ) ;|return - 1 
;|stv0297_readreg|/home/elfring/Projekte/Linux/next-patched/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv0297.c|3
dprintk ( "%s: readreg error (reg == 0x%02x, ret == %i)\n" , __func__ , reg1 , 
ret ) ;|return - 1 
;|stv0297_readregs|/home/elfring/Projekte/Linux/next-patched/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv0297.c|3

real0m1,044s
user0m0,389s
sys 0m0,055s


Unfortunately, I observed during a few runs on my test system
that the displayed record sets can vary. Thus I guess that this approach
(which works together with Python multi-threading functionality) will need
further software adjustments.
Would you like to add any advices here?

Regards,
Markus
___
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci