On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 19:36 +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > +++ b/parsing_c/pretty_print_c.ml
> > @@ -804,11 +804,12 @@ and pp_string_format (e,ii) =
> > (FunctionType (return=void, params=int i) *)
> >(*WRONG I THINK, use left & right function *)
> >(* bug: pp_type_with_ident_rest None t; print_ident
> > ident *)
> > + pp_type_left t;
> >pr_elem i;
> >iiqu +> List.iter pr_elem; (* le const est forcement
> > apres le '*' *)
> >if iiqu <> [] || get_comments_after i <> []
> >then pr_space();
> > - pp_type_with_ident_rest ident t attrs Ast_c.noattr;
> > + print_ident ident
> >
> >(* ugly special case ... todo? maybe sufficient in practice
> > *)
> >| (ParenType ttop, [i1;i2]) ->
>
> Are the source code comments still appropriate for this patch hunk?
>
I know the "le const est forcement" comment is still appropriate.
The bug comment above probably still is.
Not so sure about the WRONG I THINK comment. I'm using pp_type_left
here, but not pp_type_right. Of course, that is if the comment is in
that context.
Cheers,
Jaskaran.
> Regards,
> Markus
___
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci