> ParenType and FunctionType are types present in the C AST that > are not present in the SmPL AST.
Can the understanding of mentioned details be improved by reconsidering the usage of abbreviations? > In the pursuit of aligning both the C and SmPL ASTs, I find this approach also helpful. > add these types to the SmPL ASTs. * Does such an extension mean a copy of functionality? * Can any components be shared between affected software areas? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
