Re: [Cocci] Replacing usages of “auto” with SmPL?
> You're not actually showing a need. I disagree. - Our needs are just different. > Ie you don't have a real piece of software in which this transformation is > actually needed. Under which circumstances will the clarification of related components become more attractive? Regards, Markus ___ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
Re: [Cocci] Replacing usages of “auto” with SmPL?
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, Markus Elfring wrote: > >> @replacement@ > >> @@ > >> -auto > >> +my_type > > > > There is nothing to support this. > > Thanks for such feedback. > > > > So far I don't have the impression that anyone has had a need for it either. > > How often will I be the first one who shows a need for further software > extensions? You're not actually showing a need. Ie you don't have a real piece of software in which this transformation is actually needed. julia > > > Would anybody like to help any more for corresponding development challenges? > > Regards, > Markus > ___ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
Re: [Cocci] Replacing usages of “auto” with SmPL?
>> @replacement@ >> @@ >> -auto >> +my_type > > There is nothing to support this. Thanks for such feedback. > So far I don't have the impression that anyone has had a need for it either. How often will I be the first one who shows a need for further software extensions? Would anybody like to help any more for corresponding development challenges? Regards, Markus ___ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
Re: [Cocci] Replacing usages of “auto” with SmPL?
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, Markus Elfring wrote: > > I think it expects a type as well. I don't know if that is a reasonable > > assumption in C or in C++. > > Can a source code transformation approach like the following make sense? > > @replacement@ > @@ > -auto > +my_type There is nothing to support this. So far I don't have the impression that anyone has had a need for it either. julia > > > elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/Probe> spatch --parse-cocci > replace_auto1.cocci > init_defs_builtins: /usr/local/bin/../lib/coccinelle/standard.h > minus: parse error: > File "replace_auto1.cocci", line 5, column 0, charpos = 32 > around = '', > whole content = > > > Will the software support for adjustments around the explicit specification of > automatic storage duration become better anyhow? > https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/storage_duration > > Regards, > Markus > ___ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
Re: [Cocci] Replacing usages of “auto” with SmPL?
> I think it expects a type as well. I don't know if that is a reasonable > assumption in C or in C++. Can a source code transformation approach like the following make sense? @replacement@ @@ -auto +my_type elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/Probe> spatch --parse-cocci replace_auto1.cocci init_defs_builtins: /usr/local/bin/../lib/coccinelle/standard.h minus: parse error: File "replace_auto1.cocci", line 5, column 0, charpos = 32 around = '', whole content = Will the software support for adjustments around the explicit specification of automatic storage duration become better anyhow? https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/storage_duration Regards, Markus ___ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
