Re: Sandboxing die.die.die
Gatekeeper uses the Quarantine mechanisms. Installer does not set the Quarantine flag, so the installed app does not trigger Gatekeeper. Basically if you have explicitly installed an app, you are expressing that you trust it. Or, expressed along the lines of the intent-driven model... I've installed this, I intend to execute it. On 23 Aug 2012, at 01:06, danchik wrote: > If the package is signed by Apple Developer's Installer certificate, gate > keeper does not complain (just askes to ok the installation) and then never > sais anything about the app that was installed (though it is NOT signed by > Apples Developer's Software certificate). ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: Sandboxing die.die.die
They can *expect* that you will do the right thing. But they can't be expected to *know* that you really are. On 22 Aug 2012, at 16:52, Alex Zavatone wrote: > > On Aug 22, 2012, at 11:40 AM, Kyle Sluder wrote: > >> On Aug 22, 2012, at 8:29 AM, Jayson Adams wrote: >> >>> >>> Ah, that explains why all of Apple's apps are sandboxed Right. >> >> The big ones are: Mail, Safari, Preview. >> >> There have been legitimate problems with the rollout of sandboxing. It >> doesn't support certain interactions that are fundamental to some apps, and >> yet it was forced upon them by the MAS. Sandboxing errors are opaque, and >> code signing is cryptic. >> >> But arguing against the basic premise of sandboxing is a fruitless endeavor. >> The user cannot and should not be forced to trust you to do the right thing. >> >> --Kyle Sluder > > Actually Kyle, when you're not catering to the mass market, but targeted > clients, the user requires you to do the right thing. > > ___ > > Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) > > Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. > Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com > > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/dez%40mac.com > > This email sent to d...@mac.com ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: Constructive Criticism
On 6 Oct 2009, at 22:48, Alastair Houghton place.net> wrote: Oh, and since I'm in the dot-syntax-is-evil camp, s/self.year/[self year]/g in Bill's code :-D :-D Just an aside, but does either syntax got optimised by the compiler (GCC or LLVM). Obviously it can't in all cases, but this seems an obvious case where it could be replaced by an assignment. ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: Changes in KVO behavior on SL?
On 2 Sep 2009, at 13:47, Kevin Brock wrote: Likewise, there's never been any guarantee that invoking - observeValueForKeyPath:ofObject:change:context: will provoke the receiver to call -valueForKeyPath: on the object whose property has changed. If the observer wants, it can rely totally on the information in the change dictionary. If you were using will/ didChange..., then KVO can be expected to invoke valueForKey: on the object whose property is changing, but that's not what (you say) you're doing. Thanks. That was helpful. On 10.5 the receiver *does* apparently always call valueForKeyPath, at least with the receivers we're talking to. Maybe they weren't checking the dictionary on 10.5, or were calling the fn if the data on the new values wasn't found in the dictionary, but are being stricter on 10.6. Ken didn't contradict the behaviour you have observed. But you are [were] relying on a mechanism that is undocumented and quite possibly accidental on the part of Apple's engineers, and so could have changed at any time, or might have been erratic/fragile even on 10.5. In other words, it is merely fortunate that your app ever worked on 10.5, and not by design ;-) The documented pattern that Ken described should work on both 10.5 and 10.6, and will always work... until deprecated anyway! ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: ViewControllers and window nibs
On 6 May 2009, at 21:01, jonat...@mugginsoft.com wrote: See the following for hints on binding across nibs. http://homepage.mac.com/mmalc/CocoaExamples/controllers.html I have a *vaguely* similar question: In IB, is it possible to connect an object in one NIB to an outlet in another NIB? Dragging a connection in IB across NIBs doesn't seem to work, so I suspect it is not possible?? PS: I know other solutions, e.g. code or bindings, but I am just wondering why I can't do it in IB... Dez ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: Which language to get started with cocoa development?
For an experienced C/C++ programmer, Obj-C is not difficult to learn at all. The main difference from C++ is the method-calling syntax. The rest of what you need to learn for Obj-C development is the Cocoa framework itself, but since that's what you want to learn anyway, you will need to dive into that whichever language you choose. I am not experienced in RubyCocoa, but I believe Leopard includes that with the OS. So you should be able to distribute RubyCocoa apps to Leopard users without bundling the framework. On 31 Dec 2008, at 08:22, Achim Domma wrote: Hi, I develop software for a living and want to get started with cocoa development just for fun. I'm good at python, C, C++ and C# and have some Ruby knowledge. Now I'm asking myself, which language I should use to get started with cocoa development: - ObjC looks interesing, but would be a new language to learn. I like to learn new languages, but I also prefer to do one step after another. So learning Cocoa and Obj-C toghether could be frustrating. - I like dynamic scripting languages like python and ruby, but I would like to ship my apps to other users. And they should not care about the language I have used. Can pyObjC or RubyCoca be bundled with my app, so that the enduser will not recognize that python/ruby is shipped with my app? - As far as I understand, GUIs are usually build with the interface builder of XCode. That tools is tuned to be used with ObjC. How good is the integration with scripting languages? - How up to date are bindings to "non ObjC" languages usually? If I will like cocoa development, I want to have a look at core data and core animations. Are these also available for ruby and python? - What about Mono/Cocoa#? Looks like Mono is not an good option, if I want to distribute my app as small download via the web. Or am I wrong? I would be very happy to hear some opinions of experienced cocoa developers about these topics. Any feedback would be very appreciated. cheers, Achim ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/dez%40mac.com This email sent to d...@mac.com ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: Wake up Reason
From my system.log: Dec 1 08:20:49 kernel[0]: USB caused wake event (EHCI) I assume different wake events are also logged. On 10 Dec 2008, at 11:11, sheen mac wrote: Is it possible to know the reason the MacBook wake from sleep? ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Opening Ports in Leopard
There shouldn't be anything to open. The Leopard application firewall should automatically allow packets that are responding to your query. On 17 Nov 2008, at 12:40, Gerriet M. Denkmann wrote: I am trying to move a Cocoa app from Tiger to Leopard. This program wants to send and receive on port 123 (Network Time Protocoll) but it never gets no answers on Leopard. On TIger there was a firewall, where I could open port 123 in System Preferences. How can I do this in Leopard? ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Why won't Gmail cooperate with authentication delegate methods? (Gmail RSS feeds do.)
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Sumner Trammell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: One can whip up a WebKit/Cocoa app, aim it at a Gmail URL like this: https://www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLoginAuth?continue=http://mail.google.com/gmail&service=mail&Email=YOUR_LOGIN&Passwd=YOUR_PASSWORD&null=Sign+in and get automatically logged into her Gmail account. Pretty cool. Even cooler, in my opinion, is implementing this delegate method: - (void)webView:(WebView *)aSender resource:(id)anIdentifier didReceiveAuthenticationChallenge:(NSURLAuthenticationChallenge *)aChallenge fromDataSource:(WebDataSource *)aDataSource So now, when you aim your app at the Gmail RSS feed URL: https://mail.google.com/mail/feed/atom you are authenticated automatically as well. The second case has me wishing there were a special URL for the first case that used standard authentication. (And thus would work with authentication delegate methods.) I tried the obvious, https://mail.google.com/mail, and that doesn't work. I'm still presented with the Gmail login form screen. Does anyone know if a special URL exists for Gmail that uses standard SSLv3 authentication like the Gmail RSS feed URL does? Isn't this because the atom feed uses HTTP authentication, whereas the /mail URL uses a web form? I suspect that Google deliberately do not have a version of their webmail that uses HTTP auth. I think this is because HTTP auth has to re-send your login credentials with each HTTP request, and Google wanted to avoid that. ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cocoa can be used to execute arbitrary (privileged) code !
On 20 Jun 2008, at 05:10, Jerry LeVan wrote: On Jun 19, 2008, at 11:39 PM, Jens Alfke wrote: It might not be a bad idea to proactively disarm this vulnerability on your own machine(s), as I just did: sudo chmod -s System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/ ARDAgent.app/ARDAgent That turns off the setuid bit. I'm sure that'll break Remote Desktop functionality, but that's still preferable to having your machine pwned. (And it can be fixed by using Disk Utility to repair permissions.) —Jens I removed my user name from the "allow access from only these users" and the hack quit working... I added myself back in and turned on all of the options and the hack still does not work... I checked the ARDAgent executable and the suid bit is still set. Very Strange. That 'fix' didn't work for me. Perhaps your ARDAgent process hasn't quit? ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WebView does not expose bindings in IB 3
Yes, but I was showing off to non-Mac-o-philes, so they hadn't seen anything like it before. It was a great way to show off some of the frills of Mac development, even if it is rather contrived [i.e. you'd still need to write code for your web browser eventually!]. But it certainly was a good way to get some people to sit up and finally take notice of the Mac - developer or not. And I'm sure you know, that once they are hooked, they keep coming back to ask more questions, and then it's just a matter of time before the take the plunge themselves. On 7 May 2008, at 17:23, John Stiles wrote: This was actually in a WWDC WebKit demo when WebKit was first announced—they set up a web browser on stage with no code, IIRC. Derek Chesterfield wrote: I used to love that I could show off to my mates that I could create a web browser in no time at all, and with zero lines of code! ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WebView does not expose bindings in IB 3
I don't think it's a bug. I think Apple just decided they didn't want to expose WebView with all the useful bindings. I used to love that I could show off to my mates that I could create a web browser in no time at all, and with zero lines of code! On 6 May 2008, at 23:19, Adam Radestock wrote: I used to bind the "Animates" binding on the progress indicator to the "isLoading" binding using the Inspector in Interface Builder, but now the WebView doesn't show up as a valid binding target... Is this a bug in IB, or am I missing something? ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
