Re: New axkit?
On Apr 26, 2005, at 11:57 AM, Matt Sergeant wrote: OK guys, I think we should put out a new axkit release. There are lots of reports that CVS is stable, and even if there are things we should fix we can do them in 1.6.4 (or whatever the next number we choose is) afterwards. Any objections or comments? I'll wait until the weekend for votes. +1 I was hoping to get the XML catalog patch working (or at least verify whether it works already) prior to the next AxKit release, but I certainly don't want this to hold up a release, especially since I don't foresee having any time before the weekend is over to work on it. -- Michael Nachbaur [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://nachbaur.com/pgpkey.asc
Re: Migrating to SVN
Matt Sergeant wrote: Proposal: After we release 1.6.3, we migrate to subversion. Apparently it's a very simple process, and I've used svn on a couple of projects now and I'm happy with its stability and performance. Votes please! +1 /me also needs to recall how to ssh there. -- Robin Berjon Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/
Re: New axkit?
On Apr 26, 2005, at 8:57 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote: OK guys, I think we should put out a new axkit release. There are lots of reports that CVS is stable, and even if there are things we should fix we can do them in 1.6.4 (or whatever the next number we choose is) afterwards. Any objections or comments? I'll wait until the weekend for votes. +1 to new release there are a few very useful bug fixes in current CVS version - a new 1.6.4 it would be more than welcome Yours Alberto - Alberto Reggiori, @Semantics S.R.L. www.asemantics.com
Re: Migrating to SVN
On 27 Apr 2005, at 02:06, Tom Schindl wrote: Although I can not vote I would second this. I would also suggest to register for the issue/bug tracking one of the apache possibilities JIRA looks really cool although written in java. I haven't looked at scarab until now but could take a look. Bugzilla would be the least one. I think at the moment bugs are tracked rt.cpan.org. Yes, the ASF has asked us to make this move at some point also.
Re: New axkit?
On 26 Apr 2005, at 21:33, Michael Nachbaur wrote: On Apr 26, 2005, at 11:57 AM, Matt Sergeant wrote: OK guys, I think we should put out a new axkit release. There are lots of reports that CVS is stable, and even if there are things we should fix we can do them in 1.6.4 (or whatever the next number we choose is) afterwards. Any objections or comments? I'll wait until the weekend for votes. +1 Also note we need to apply the new Apache 2.x license to everything before release. I was hoping to get the XML catalog patch working (or at least verify whether it works already) prior to the next AxKit release, but I certainly don't want this to hold up a release, especially since I don't foresee having any time before the weekend is over to work on it. There are always going to be things we hope to get into the release when someone says lets release!. My suggestion is don't sweat it. There will always be another release. Matt.
Re: Migrating to SVN
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Matt Sergeant wrote: Yes, the ASF has asked us to make this move at some point also. For the record - note that we -asked-; nothing more; nothing less. If this community feels it is more productive on CVS that is fine too. However we ultimately will more and more tie in SVN with things like Certificates, CLA's, release tracking and other automated papertrail elements. Which allows us, as the foundation, to better protect the IP and iwth that the Community in this increasingly 'lega triggerhappyl' world. And ultimately every exception becomes a liability in that prcedural view. However this is a proces of years - and at this point there is no great urgency. Esp. as there are enough voluteers within the CVS using pmc's to keep it alive. Dw.
Re: New axkit?
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Matt Sergeant wrote: Also note we need to apply the new Apache 2.x license to everything before release. As this is your first 2.x release - feel free to ping me if oyu need help, explanations or other assistance. http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html Dw
Re: Migrating to SVN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Sergeant schrieb: | On 27 Apr 2005, at 02:06, Tom Schindl wrote: | | Although I can not vote I would second this. I would also suggest to | register for the issue/bug tracking one of the apache possibilities JIRA | looks really cool although written in java. I haven't looked at scarab | until now but could take a look. Bugzilla would be the least one. I | think at the moment bugs are tracked rt.cpan.org. | | | Yes, the ASF has asked us to make this move at some point also. | | Now there would be a perfect point to move AxKit into such a Bug/Feature tracking system. Bugs could be scheduled, ... . Tom -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCb6HskVPeOFLgZFIRArB6AKCcZ9ZoL5QuoMdiEKNKEQuDJqopBACbBcW+ y0/2FUoYKyT5XUOQ5Njnupw= =lx5n -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Migrating to SVN
On 27 Apr 2005, at 10:30, Tom Schindl wrote: Now there would be a perfect point to move AxKit into such a Bug/Feature tracking system. Bugs could be scheduled, ... . I've talked to Dirk about the possibility of us using Trac, which seems to integrate lots of project management features very nicely. We'd probably have to get that setup ourselves, but it looks pretty easy to do. Matt. __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __
