RE: Cocoon 1.8.2 and FOP 0.20.4

2002-10-16 Thread George Pieri


Do you know if new Cocoon 2.0 supports the new FOP ?

Even though I think cocoon and APIs such as FOP are great
the general trend that I seem to finding is that the software
tends not to be backward compatable which sometimes make it 
difficult in a corporate environment.

Thanks for your assistance!

-Original Message-
From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cocoon 1.8.2 and FOP 0.20.4


George Pieri wrote:
 Should I be able to change
 
 1) the fop_0_15_0.jar to the new fop.jar

FOP's API evolved quite significantly between 0.15 and 0.20.4,
with major changes between 0.20.1 and 0.20.2.
I don't expect the new jar to work with an old Cocoon wrapper.

J.Pietschmann


-
Please check that your question  has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
Please check that your question  has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Cocoon 1.8.2 and FOP 0.20.4

2002-10-15 Thread George Pieri



Has anyone gotten FOP 0.20.4 to work with
Cocoon 1.8.2


Should I be able to change

1) the fop_0_15_0.jar to the new fop.jar

2) modify the cocoon properties file

   formatter.type.text/xslfo  = org.apache.cocoon.formatter.FO2PDFFormatter

and then use the new fo ???

Thanks in advance!

-
Please check that your question  has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]




CDATA output / Server Upgrage

2002-05-31 Thread George Pieri


In alot of our xsl stylesheets we wrap xml and
javascrip within !CDATA[    ]] tags
so that it is not parsed.

This has worked well for us with the output being
delivered successfully. 

Using the new version of our web server, Weblogic 7.0, 
this appears no longer to work and our CDATA sections
get interperted and changed to lt;  x gt; tags !?!


What could be affecting this. Any ideas ?


e.g.
---
xsl code

 maintag/maintag
 ![CDATA[maintag/maintag]]

-
output

maintag/maintag
lt;maintaggt;lt;/maintaggt;

--
output in previous version of web server

maintag/maintag
maintag/maintag


-
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Output Data as XML output

2002-04-15 Thread George Pieri




I have XML that I would like to generate XML from using
my XSL stylesheet. I've tried using the cocoon format
command

?cocoon-format type=text/xhtml?  and ?cocoon-format type=text/xml?

with NO luck it appears that my output is still coming back
in HTML format

!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd;

and my processing instruction does NOT appear in the output.
The xsl:output command does not appear to work as well.

Do I have any options available for Cocoon 1.8.2 ?

Do I have the cocoon-format command in the wrong syntax ?


Thanks in advance


-
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Can Coocoon not parse elements

2002-01-11 Thread George Pieri



Is there a way besides wrapping each column with CDATA to tell cocoon
or the xml parser NOT to parse the ELEMENTS defined in the XML ?


All our data comes from the database and some of the columns at times may
have the special characters (e.g.   ) so in order to resolve this issue
we
wrap the data within the !CDATA[ ]] tag. This however makes the XML string
MUCH larger than it needs to be because wrapping every column multipled by
the
number of rows produces alot of extra text.

My thought was to build a DTD for the data coming back from the database
telling the parser NOT to parse the content by defining the ELEMENT as a
CDATA
type or some type that will allow these characters.
Unfortunately CDATA cannot be used for ELEMENTs.


Question
---
!DOCTYPE DATA  [
!ELEMENT DATA  ANY --- Produces error because of 
]
DATA
GRENADA CW
/DATA



!DOCTYPE DATA  [
!ELEMENT DATA   
]
DATA
GRENADA CW
/DATA






-
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]