Re: Cocoon performance tuning

[Steven Noels]

Miles Elam wrote:


Lenya L. Khachaturov wrote:


Are there any hints on making Cocoon perform better? I've been using
Cocoon for a couple of weeks and I can't call it "blazing fast" :-) As I
understood, it's performance greatly depends on the Java compiler and the
XSLT processor used. Which compiler and processor would you recommend? As
far as I know, Cocoon 2.0.3 uses Pizza and Xalan. Is Jikes and Saxon (or,
maybe, XSLTC) a better choice? I also use Resin 2.1.6 and Sun JDK 
1.4.0_01
- any recommendations here?

http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/performancetips.html

Big point is setting log thresholds to ERROR (instead of INFO or DEBUG). 
This should give an immediate and dramatic performance gain.

How about setting these to ERROR by default?


--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at  http://radio.weblogs.com/0103539/
stevenn at outerthought.orgstevenn at apache.org


-
Please check that your question  has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. 

To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Cocoon performance tuning

[Miles Elam]

Lenya L. Khachaturov wrote:


Are there any hints on making Cocoon perform better? I've been using
Cocoon for a couple of weeks and I can't call it "blazing fast" :-) As I
understood, it's performance greatly depends on the Java compiler and the
XSLT processor used. Which compiler and processor would you recommend? As
far as I know, Cocoon 2.0.3 uses Pizza and Xalan. Is Jikes and Saxon (or,
maybe, XSLTC) a better choice? I also use Resin 2.1.6 and Sun JDK 1.4.0_01
- any recommendations here?


http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/performancetips.html

Big point is setting log thresholds to ERROR (instead of INFO or DEBUG). 
This should give an immediate and dramatic performance gain.

- Miles



-
Please check that your question  has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. 

To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Cocoon performance tuning

[Ivelin Ivanov]

Did you read this:
http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/performancetips.html


- Original Message - 
From: "Lenya L. Khachaturov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 7:20 AM
Subject: Cocoon performance tuning


> Hello,
> 
> Are there any hints on making Cocoon perform better? I've been using



-
Please check that your question  has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html>

To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Cocoon performance tuning

[Harry J. Foxwell]

> - any recommendations here?
>

depends on the machine & size/complexity of your
application.  the IBM 1.3 JVM has quite good
performance on the Windows platforms, the
Sun 1.4 JVM quite good on Solaris 8/9 & on
Linux platforms.


-
Please check that your question  has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. 

To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Cocoon performance tuning

[Lenya L. Khachaturov]

Hello,

Are there any hints on making Cocoon perform better? I've been using
Cocoon for a couple of weeks and I can't call it "blazing fast" :-) As I
understood, it's performance greatly depends on the Java compiler and the
XSLT processor used. Which compiler and processor would you recommend? As
far as I know, Cocoon 2.0.3 uses Pizza and Xalan. Is Jikes and Saxon (or,
maybe, XSLTC) a better choice? I also use Resin 2.1.6 and Sun JDK 1.4.0_01
- any recommendations here?

-- 
Lenya Khachaturov
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
Please check that your question  has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. 

To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>