Re: Interesting use of map:mount

2003-03-29 Thread Ryan Hoegg
OK, so it sounds like a sound idea.  What container are you running in? 
If I decided to run in JBoss/Tomcat behind Apache with mod_jk* do you 
think the host matchers would still work?  I do all my virtual hosting 
in apache httpd.conf now.

--
Ryan Hoegg
ISIS Networks
http://www.isisnetworks.net
Geoff Howard wrote:

Not sure what part you were concerned about, but I have been using 
empty uri-prefix for my setup with no problems.  I am doing some 
virtual host-type things with cocoon, so I have host matchers/selectors
in my main sitemap with patterns like *.mydomain.com that mount their 
particular application with an empty uri-prefix.

Geoff

 

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Hoegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 11:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Interesting use of map:mount
Hey all,

I wanted to run my novel usage of map:mount by you all in case I am 
breaking some seemingly unwritten rule.

I have my main sitemap all set up declaring components and such, and 
then in my pipelines I have this:

 map:pipeline
   map:match pattern=**
 map:mount check-reload=yes src=isis-sitemap.xmap 
uri-prefix=/
   /map:match
 /map:pipeline

Note the uri-prefix.  The idea is that I have a sitemap for my 
application that defines the actual application sitemap.  I tried it and 
it works.  Is there some reason I shouldn't be doing this?  All the 
map:mount docs I can find talk about using this for delegating URI space 
to other sitemaps.

--
Ryan Hoegg
ISIS Networks
http://www.isisnetworks.net


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Interesting use of map:mount

2003-03-29 Thread Geoff Howard
Yes, I think.  I'm using mod_jk currently in Tomcat.  I am 
set up to alias all of the hosts together (I think).  If you
start having trouble let me know and I'll look more carefully 
at what I did.

Geoff

 -Original Message-
 From: Ryan Hoegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 11:12 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Interesting use of map:mount
 
 
 OK, so it sounds like a sound idea.  What container are you running in? 
  If I decided to run in JBoss/Tomcat behind Apache with mod_jk* do you 
 think the host matchers would still work?  I do all my virtual hosting 
 in apache httpd.conf now.
 
 --
 Ryan Hoegg
 ISIS Networks
 http://www.isisnetworks.net
 
 Geoff Howard wrote:
 
 Not sure what part you were concerned about, but I have been using 
 empty uri-prefix for my setup with no problems.  I am doing some 
 virtual host-type things with cocoon, so I have host matchers/selectors
 in my main sitemap with patterns like *.mydomain.com that mount their 
 particular application with an empty uri-prefix.
 
 Geoff
 
   
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ryan Hoegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 11:43 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Interesting use of map:mount
 
 
 Hey all,
 
 I wanted to run my novel usage of map:mount by you all in case I am 
 breaking some seemingly unwritten rule.
 
 I have my main sitemap all set up declaring components and such, and 
 then in my pipelines I have this:
 
   map:pipeline
 map:match pattern=**
   map:mount check-reload=yes src=isis-sitemap.xmap 
 uri-prefix=/
 /map:match
   /map:pipeline
 
 Note the uri-prefix.  The idea is that I have a sitemap for my 
 application that defines the actual application sitemap.  I 
 tried it and 
 it works.  Is there some reason I shouldn't be doing this?  All the 
 map:mount docs I can find talk about using this for delegating 
 URI space 
 to other sitemaps.
 
 --
 Ryan Hoegg
 ISIS Networks
 http://www.isisnetworks.net
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]