[CODE4LIB] searching planet code4lib
BTW - I deduce that the search box on the code4lib website doesn't search planetcode4lib - that would be nice. Cindy
[CODE4LIB] Worldshare WSDL/APIs
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 19:37:56 -0400 Subject: Worldshare ILL APIs Hi - I'm at an institution that subscribes only to OCLC WMS ILL and Cataloging, no Discovery or ILLIAD, and I'm trying to work out the cheapest and easiest way to get openurl bib data into our ILL review file. Came upon this article[1] that describes using WSDL to create requests in the old Worldcat Resource Sharing: I can't find any APIs listed on te Worldcat Developers Network that describe adding an ILL request. Is the WSDL method still available? Any suggestions (besides subscribing to WMS Discovery)? Cindy Harper [1] Josep - Manuel Rodríguez - Gairín Marta Somoza - Fernández , (2014),"Web services to link interlibrary software with OCLC WorldSh are", Library Hi Tech, Vol. 32 Iss 3 pp. 483 - 494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LHT - 12 - 2013 - 0158
Re: [CODE4LIB] archivespace vs contentdm
I would rather let AS speak for itself. http://www.archivesspace.org/overview I don't think that I made a clear distinction, and like many modern tools, AS can do a lot beyond its core function. It can be used to present digital collections, but that is not its strength. It can also integrate with repository software — I have seen it working with DSpace — to provide a more integrated, archive oriented solution. I am far from being an AS expert. How does your institution use Archivesspace? Cary On Tuesday, September 15, 2015, Kaile Zhu wrote: > Interesting to hear that AS is more a management tool rather than a > digital asset management tool. Can you elaborate? > > -Original Message- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU ] > On Behalf Of Cary Gordon > Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 4:27 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] archivespace vs contentdm > > If your goal is digital asset management, you might want to consider a > more complete and modern solution like Islandora or Hydra. ContentDM is a > bit long in the tooth, expensive, and does not manage and store original > assets. > > Archivesspace has some overlap with asset management tools, but really it > is intended to serve the archivist community. It is more of a management > tool. > > We work with Islandora, a mashup of Drupal and the Fedora repository > system. It is an end-to-end operation that offers everything from ingest to > display. We offer hosting , training, customization and support. The > software, of course, is free and open-source. > > We also work with Archivesspace. > > Thanks, > > Cary Gordon, MLS > The Cherry Hill Company > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__chillco.com&d=BQIDAg&c=URKFmO0h1-PpCttSQ3v_bEhalPi_sNmh-_LG0Bso5YA&r=UmjVf-1YCnSJ8ymaevl-35Anh5CG-YF09ZrBGH_xV3U&m=Y36UKe3GI_JwX8S6vnj8k-2G4vwC7JCdGwWdN85QJxg&s=YqMwqwP4Xy1MVI6H4Ce4PedhCcHyQ51M48E7RkAGCFs&e= > > > On Sep 15, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Kaile Zhu > wrote: > > > > My library archives collection has both archivesspace and contentdm > installed or subscribed. AS is used for storing data. CDM is used also > for storing data, and for displaying content, like digital images, as well. > > > > Does it make sense to have both? Can we use one platform to achieve the > goal - storing data and publishing the content to the Web? If yes, which > one to choose? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Kelly Zhu > > 361.597.4082 > -- Cary Gordon The Cherry Hill Company http://chillco.com
[CODE4LIB] *Extended Deadline* Survey on embedded metadata in digital objects
Dear Colleagues, You are invited to participate in a survey designed to collect information on the practice of embedding metadata into digital objects. The purpose of the survey is to explore the cost and benefit of embedding additional (i.e. LAM-generated) metadata into digital objects, to the end of evaluating current practice and defining best practices. The survey consists of a mix of closed and open ended questions. Participation should take between 15‐ 20 minutes. *Please follow this link to complete the survey:* http://goo.gl/forms/okWuTIyTcN Rachel Jaffe, Metadata Librarian, UC Santa Cruz and Edward Corrado, Associate Dean, Library Technology Planning and Policy, University of Alabama are conducting this survey. *Participation is voluntary; participants will have the right to discontinue the survey at any point without penalty.* Information obtained from the online survey will be collected in a manner that human subjects cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subject. Data will be made available to the profession; along with analysis of current practice and possibilities for future research. The University of California, Santa Cruz Institutional Review Board has determined that this survey qualifies as exempt from full IRB oversight. No human subjects harm is expected to occur during the online survey. *Extended deadline for completing the survey is September 30, 2015. * Contact Rachel Jaffe at 831‐502‐7291 or jaf...@ucsc.edu, or Edward Corrado at 205‐348‐0266 or emcorr...@ua.edu with questions or concerns about this study. If you have questions about your rights as a participant in this research, please contact the University of California, Santa Cruz Office of Research Compliance Administration, at 831‐459‐1473 or o...@ucsc.edu. Regards, Rachel Jaffe Metadata Librarian Metadata Services, University Library University of California, Santa Cruz 1156 High Street Santa Cruz, CA 95064 (831) 502‐7291 jaf...@ucsc.edu Edward M. Corrado Associate Dean Library Technology Planning and Policy, University Libraries University of Alabama Box 870266 Tuscaloosa, AL 35487‐0266 (205) 348‐0266 emcorr...@ua.edu
Re: [CODE4LIB] archivespace vs contentdm
Interesting to hear that AS is more a management tool rather than a digital asset management tool. Can you elaborate? -Original Message- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Cary Gordon Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 4:27 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] archivespace vs contentdm If your goal is digital asset management, you might want to consider a more complete and modern solution like Islandora or Hydra. ContentDM is a bit long in the tooth, expensive, and does not manage and store original assets. Archivesspace has some overlap with asset management tools, but really it is intended to serve the archivist community. It is more of a management tool. We work with Islandora, a mashup of Drupal and the Fedora repository system. It is an end-to-end operation that offers everything from ingest to display. We offer hosting , training, customization and support. The software, of course, is free and open-source. We also work with Archivesspace. Thanks, Cary Gordon, MLS The Cherry Hill Company https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__chillco.com&d=BQIDAg&c=URKFmO0h1-PpCttSQ3v_bEhalPi_sNmh-_LG0Bso5YA&r=UmjVf-1YCnSJ8ymaevl-35Anh5CG-YF09ZrBGH_xV3U&m=Y36UKe3GI_JwX8S6vnj8k-2G4vwC7JCdGwWdN85QJxg&s=YqMwqwP4Xy1MVI6H4Ce4PedhCcHyQ51M48E7RkAGCFs&e= > On Sep 15, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Kaile Zhu wrote: > > My library archives collection has both archivesspace and contentdm installed > or subscribed. AS is used for storing data. CDM is used also for storing > data, and for displaying content, like digital images, as well. > > Does it make sense to have both? Can we use one platform to achieve the goal > - storing data and publishing the content to the Web? If yes, which one to > choose? > > Thanks. > > Kelly Zhu > 361.597.4082
Re: [CODE4LIB] archivespace vs contentdm
If your goal is digital asset management, you might want to consider a more complete and modern solution like Islandora or Hydra. ContentDM is a bit long in the tooth, expensive, and does not manage and store original assets. Archivesspace has some overlap with asset management tools, but really it is intended to serve the archivist community. It is more of a management tool. We work with Islandora, a mashup of Drupal and the Fedora repository system. It is an end-to-end operation that offers everything from ingest to display. We offer hosting , training, customization and support. The software, of course, is free and open-source. We also work with Archivesspace. Thanks, Cary Gordon, MLS The Cherry Hill Company http://chillco.com > On Sep 15, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Kaile Zhu wrote: > > My library archives collection has both archivesspace and contentdm installed > or subscribed. AS is used for storing data. CDM is used also for storing > data, and for displaying content, like digital images, as well. > > Does it make sense to have both? Can we use one platform to achieve the goal > - storing data and publishing the content to the Web? If yes, which one to > choose? > > Thanks. > > Kelly Zhu > 361.597.4082
[CODE4LIB] archivespace vs contentdm
My library archives collection has both archivesspace and contentdm installed or subscribed. AS is used for storing data. CDM is used also for storing data, and for displaying content, like digital images, as well. Does it make sense to have both? Can we use one platform to achieve the goal - storing data and publishing the content to the Web? If yes, which one to choose? Thanks. Kelly Zhu 361.597.4082
